Postscript: Who Murdered William Colby?

New information has belatedly crossed our desk which prompts us to update our thesis about the unexpected death in 1996 of former CIA Director William Colby. Although we accused CIA of murdering one of its own, we did not give proper credit to Mossad.

Chronicle readers may recall that Colby conveniently died the day before he was scheduled to give testimony to Congress with some observers fearing that he might say something a little too truthy. It is not that Colby was an American hero or a good goy, but that he wasn't sufficiently reliable to put in front of Congress - he might accidentally spill the beans on something - My Lai, Viet Nam, Kennedy Assassination, Tailhook - God only know what might drift inadvertently from his wagging tongue.

At one point we thought that his death was faked so that he would not be brought before Congress to testify, as was done in the case of Loretta Fuddy. But we came across some information from Michael Collins Piper which causes us to believe that Colby was indeed murdered by Mossad.

Unfortunately for your Chronicler, Colby wasn't overcome with a sense of patriotism or remorse over his squalid past where confession would do the soul good. His troubles started in 1974 when he shoved out of the CIA the Mossad mole and Kennedy assassin James Angleton. Angleton had operated the Israel desk at the agency for most of his tenure, but the new DCI wanted to place American interests above those of Israel, which is something Angleton would not tolerate.

Why the Director of Central Intelligence wanted to change American foreign policy is above our pay grade, as we thought that it was the domain of the State Department, but Colby and Angleton clearly show that such is not the case. According to Piper, Colby wanted to take a more equitable position toward all of the antagonists in the Middle East, perhaps because oil was such a sensitive and volatile topic in the wake of the recent oil embargo.

The Johnson administration was probably the high summer of American Jewish relations before the chillier season of the 1970s. But Reagan would pursue revanchist policies to return Israel as a sacred cow Americans were forced to worship. In fact so obsequious was Johnson to the Jews that he ordered them to sink the USS Liberty, a task, fortunately, at which they barely failed. Johnson wanted to bomb Egypt into the stone ages for Eretz Israel.

Colby's idea was to moderate US stance toward the Middle East nations by showing less fealty to the sacred cow, and more sensitivity to Arab interests and concerns, a view with considerable support in the State Department. After all, Israel wasn't producing 10 million barrels of oil per day as was Saudi Arabia.

Fortunately for Colby, his job was terminated by President Ford who installed a Mr George Bush of the CIA as its new director. We say that this termination of Colby was fortunate because it prevented him from making any "controversial" moves which might anger the Jews who, as we saw with Kennedy, murdered people not subservient to its interests.

It was against this backdrop that Colby began forming high level relationships with proponents of Arab interests, including Arab government officials, for the purpose of advising them how to deal with Jewish advantages in the US government. Such consulting arrangements were well advanced by the time of his boating "accident."

Piper also noted that sweeping reforms of the organization of US intelligence were making their ways through Congress which would consolidate many intelligence decisions in the hands of the DCI, a prerogative which the military heads were not willing to relinquish. Would Colby have supported this overhaul? If not, it could do serious injury to the legislation.

But why was this legislation so covetously sought by the Jews? The reason was that a Jew, foreign born John Deutch, was the DCI. His salivations over the new powers coming his way could barely be concealed, and given Colby's actions against Jew mole Angleton, the Jews certainly would not want Colby making any remarks before Congress which would deflate the momentum behind the power grab.

When Colby's body was found floating by the dock outside of his home, it bore similarities to two other assassinations - that of CIA man John Paisley in 1978, and Mossad agent Robert Maxwell several years later. All three men had earned the ire of Israel, and all 3 were killed in a similar "wet" fashion. For serious students of covert operations, we needn't elaborate further on wet operations.

Given Colby's antipathy toward Israel, and his support of Arab interests, it is without doubt the case that Mossad murdered Colby, with CIA providing backup support.

Reference

Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th edition, second printing ebook, 2005, illustrated, 771pp source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com) accessed 4/30/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Harry Potter as CIA Psyops

While Harry Potter has earned some notoriety in some quarters, it has never been because it was the product of Anglo-American intelligence. But that is precisely the thesis advanced by one commentator analyzing the mega-epic which has generated some 500 million book sales.

Miles Mathis' genealogical research has tied its author, J K Rowling to many of Britain's highest ranking nobility and even to Queen Elizabeth II. And since the nobility are at the epicenter of state intelligence operations, it is a near certainty that Rowling is a front for this mass produced fiction one of whose important roles was to generate business for the paper industry in which one of Rowling's peers holds considerable interest. But that is really just a footnote as we shall see.

In Mathis' estimation, Harry Potter is second rate derivative literature churned by a committee of writing hacks in the bowels of Langley or UK's MI6. He doubts that its reputed author has even the skills to produce that level of gibberish.

One of the leading themes in Harry Potter is that parents are muggles - useless antiquated relics at whom one should sneer. It is the Platonic ideal, realized in Jewish Communism, which takes children from the parents to be raised by the state.

The other major theme of Harry Potter is that life is an illusion - a complete magic act. While Mathis does not precisely state the case thusly, we would contend that the oligarchy creates a miasma of fakery, fantasy, and falsehoods to bamboozle the "hoi polloi." Through its pervasive and total control of entertainment (Jewish), communications (Jewish), and government (Jewish), the elites are able to create whatever virtual reality (magic) it wishes. The people have swallowed the kool aid, in part through well paying jobs, to believe the hokum shoveled down their throats and shoved up their posteriors. Because it comes from respected authorities, and they have spent their lives in academia as obsequious, grade sucking sycophants, it is all the more believable because it comes from these intellectual elites as fake news.

Thus, as we have pointed out long before, the Single Bullet Theory, Moon Landing, the Holocaust, the Titanic sinking, among so many more, are so readily believed by the masses, but are contrivances and falsehoods. Sometimes the facts are correct, but the explanation is totally a lie, as in the case of the Titanic.

Jews are masters of illusion which is why they own Hollywood lock, stock, and barrel. They are also masters of control which is why they have created the invisible government of the CIA and MI6 to control society - not just some of it but all of it. And thus it is the Magic Academy of Harry Potter which is a symbol for the intelligence agencies and magic is the lies and illusions created by these agencies often to instill fear and confusion in order to better divide, conquer, and control. The elite are rubbing their control of you in your face and you don't even realize it.

It is tempting to hold in contempt people who believe these foolish lies, but I was such an one myself. History and life are lies created by the elites - especially the Jewish ones.

Reference
Miles Mathis, The Great Harry Potter Hoax, May 15, 2016, mileswmathis.com, accessed 1/7/2018


Copyright 2018 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Clinton, Brennan Irreparably Damage US Security

The recent loss of Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential election was as much a loss for Saudi Arabia as it was for the candidate herself. Had Clinton won, the devastation to America would have been complete.

Wayne Madsen published a couple of articles on Dr James Fetzer’s blog outlining how deeply Saudi intelligence has penetrated the US government under “Obama” and how closely beholden the Clintons are to the Saudis.

“Obama” elevated John Brennan, a Wahhabist Muslim, to Director of the CIA after the traitor General Petraeus resigned in disgrace over a scandal involving his transmission of US secrets to 3d parties via his mistress. While we cannot confirm that Petraeus was entrapped, it remains a possibility, but certainly unproven.

Brennan converted to Islam while station chief in Riyadh, and has since become a Saudi mole controlling the CIA. “Obama’s” education was heavily funded by royal Saudis, so his appointment of Brennan to CIA Director was nothing more than payback, and may have explained his mysterious trip to Saudi Arabia a couple of years ago where he was supposedly rebuffed by Saudi officials, though we suspect that it was an official cover for more treason.

Brennan’s hand was clearly seen during the election when every major news organization was panting for a Clinton victory with Newsweek even publishing a “Dewey Defeats Truman” commemorative issue before the election ended in a bid to bolster her election chances. All major media stories are cleared through the CIA, and many anchors, such as Anderson Cooper, are CIA agents or operatives.

It was Brennan’s angry response after the electoral loss which showed his true colors when CIA and George Soros shipped “professional” demonstrators across the country to key localities to demonstrate, vandalize, brutalize, and murder Trump supporters.

CIA also sent one of its fake anarchists to fire gunshots in a Georgetown pub which was believed to be a meeting point for sex slaves purchased by Bill Clinton and a certain Epstein operating out of Florida where Jeb Bush was once governor.

The interesting point is that the Jewish owned media were supporting Clinton just as eagerly as the Saudis, showing that the friction between Muslims and Jews is street level animosity which does not carry into the highest reaches of government where Saudi intelligence and Mossad have a very close working relationship.

Brennan’s most important service to the Saudi government was concocting the hair brained crock that Russian intelligence, including President Vladimir Putin himself, had sought to rig US elections, as though they were ever honest in the first place. The reality is that Saudi intelligence, through its vast oil wealth, was agitating for Clinton through the Jewish owned media which gave the Democrat candidate billions of dollars in free publicity.

Although the story has faded somewhat, “Hanoi John” McCain and Lindsay Graham are agitating for investigation into the hacking, showing exactly for which party these senators work.

One of the linchpins between Clinton and Saudis is the Bush Crimes Syndicate, whose head George Bush, Sr has very close connections with Saudi royals through Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, also known as Bandar Bush due to his extraordinary closeness to the Bushes. We reported that the prince had been murdered based upon pre-mature and bad intelligence we received some years ago. By all appearances the Saudi prince is still alive.

The Bush-Clinton connection goes back to their Arkansas days when then-Governor Clinton helped Bush bring cocaine into the United States through Mena, Arkansas. Thus the Bushes, Clintons, and Saudis form a very close tryst of traitors against the United States.

There is yet another connection between the Clintons and Saudi Arabia and its intelligence agencies through the person of Saudi intelligence asset Huma Abedin who joined the Clinton White House in 1996 and is believed to be Hillary’s lesbian lover, though if so, it is only to obtain intelligence and compromise Clinton more than she already is.

Abedin’s mother, Saleha Abedin, a Wahhabi Muslim, is dean of Dar al-Hekma college for women in Jeddah where she advocates stoning, circumcision of girls, public floggings, and other Medieval practices, all quite ironic given the Democrats’ patina of liberality which is simply a mask for this type of religious and social behavior they wish to impose on the United States.

The elder Abedin also edited Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, a Saudi funded publication which extolled the 9/11 attacks on the United States. Huma was the author of one of those articles which is no surprise given the Jewish, Saudi, Bush, and Clinton involvements in the attacks. Her marriage to Zionist Anthony Weiner was quite supportive of our contention that Judaism and Islam are the same side of the same Bolshevist coin.

Abedin is well known for her involvement in Saudi intelligence circles through front agencies such as International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child (IICWC) and Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a group which even the United Arab Emirates declared a terrorist organization much to the consternation of John Brennan of the CIA. CAIR has several offices and numerous cells within the United States and poses a grave risk to national security.

One of Brennan’s legacies is the promotion of many Saudi intelligence moles within the CIA including Andrew Warren, Michael D’Andrea, and Yaya Fanusie.

Concerning the destruction of “Obamas” passports proving that he is a foreign national, Madsen wrote:

Brennan had previously served as Obama's counter-terrorism adviser on the National Security Council. He was also in charge of the cleansing of the Obama/Dunham family passport files at the State Department in 2008 while CEO of The Analysis Corporation, a CIA contractor. 

Brennan also covered up the damning evidence proving Saudi involvement in the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing, just as Huma Abedin was joining the Clinton administration. The Saudi mole also was point man for preventing the release of the 28-page document of 9/11 Commission which inculpated Saudi intelligence in the 9/11 attacks. We should note that Saudi and Israeli intelligences, in close co-operation with the Bush Crime Syndicate, planned and executed the 9/11 attacks.

Madsen reported Defense Intelligence Agency documents from 2012 which clearly expose Brennan’s support for ISIL, a well-known front of the CIA, Saudi intelligence, and Mossad.

The coalescence of Saudi mole John Brennan, Hillary Clinton, Saudi mole Huma Abedin, and the Bush Crime Syndicate has gravely destroyed US intelligence. We are certain that Brennan is working diligently to assassinate Donald Trump just as his predecessor Alan Dulles murdered John Kennedy.

The real import of the Abedin-Brennan terrorist cell is that each conspired with Clinton to convey US state and intelligence secrets to Saudis and Israelis with whom Clinton has a close relationship through Lynn Forrester-Rothschild, the wife of Jew Evelyn de Rothschild.

The email server scandal which plagued Clinton's presidential ambitions was far more than about a few emails on Clintons servers, of which she had scores at her New York home. It was a virtual repository of the very highest secrets of the US government as we reported in a previous Chronicle. The theft of these documents was part of a sophisticated, high powered operation by both Mossad and Saudi intelligence to destroy US intelligence networks.

No one in US history, with the exception of Franklin Roosevelt or George Bush, has committed treason on such a grand scale as have Abedin, Brennan, and Clinton.

Reference
Wayne Madsen, Wayne Madsen: Saudi Intelligence tried toss the Election to Hillary, jamesfetzer.blogspot.com, December 19-20, 2016, accessed 12/22/2016

Copyright 2016 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Chronicle Update: The Truth About the Iranian Hostage Crisis

Contrary to our previously published essay on the Iranian Revolution of 1979, it was not the result of "blowback" against the CIA's Shah, but rather another CIA coup to replace a wayward son who got too big for his britches.

This new information surprised even us, as we had long considered the Islamic revolution a virulent rejection of Westernism and the domineering cruel Americans. It seemed to us that Islam was the perfect vehicle for expressing native objections to US control of Iran.

 

While the revolution no doubt contained true believers in such a philosophy, the revolutionaries led by the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini itself used religion as an instrument for its more basal lusts for power rather than principled basis for governing, something which ingratiated itself to the CIA.

 

We have discovered that the Shah had angered the Americans, more specifically the Ziocons, Rockefellers, and Bush Crime Syndicate by his growing independence of these groups' wishes, his assertion of strength as a regional power, and his closer relations with the USSR.

 

However, even those sins were trumped by the greatest evil one can commit against Western oil barons, which is the temerity to not renew oil concessions extracted from the 1953 revolution which brought the Shah to power. The concessions were set to expire in 1979 and the Shah was not inclined to renew them.

 

It seems that somewhere along the way, the Shah decided that governance in the interest of the Iranian people, rather than in the obeisance to Washington and the Rothschilds, was the legacy he wished to leave his country.

 

One other factor riling the ire of the Rothschild dynasty, which owns and rules Israel, was that the Shah sought support from foreign powers for the development of its nuclear energy, a quest which has fueled the sanctions of today by the US at Israel's orders.

 

David Rockefeller had appointed Jimmy Carter president whom the former ordered to accept the Shah into the United States however briefly. This provided the catalyst for the Iranian students to storm the American embassy to take hostages which it held for over 400 days, resulting in the demise of the Carter presidency. Thus what David gave, he took away, and deliberately so.

 

When Carter visited Iran in December 1977, he assured the world that "Iran, because of the great leadership of the Shah, is an island of stability in one of the more troubled areas of the world." One week following his departure riots erupted in Iran, presaging the Shah's downfall the following year.

 

As George Bush later explained, this was coded language for the CIA to begin to dismantle the Shah's government.

 

During this time, American generals and CIA, including one General Huyser, were compromising the Shah's military which they bribed or coerced into abandoning or denying the Shah's orders. With 40,000 "advisors" in Iran, it is easy to see how the CIA was the country's real kingmaker. For all practical purposes, the Iranian military was a vassal of the CIA.

 

The Ayatollah was America's handpicked successor to the Shah. While this statement may shock Americans raised on propaganda, lies, and deceit, it is the truth. Khomeini and many of his lieutenants were either on the CIA payroll or were in bed with them. Granted that in some cases it was merely a marriage of convenience, but the bottom line is that each party used the other, and the Ayatollah, among other things was a megalomaniac who used religion as a control structure, a situation very amenable to CIA modus operandi.

 

It is also true that among the revolutionaries there were true believers, but this does not undermine the tilt which Khomeini had toward the CIA.

 

Thus the CIA removed an increasingly non-compliant vassal who dared to take back his country's oil, and in the mean time installed a brutal repressive religious freak who made life miserable for Iranians using the CIA's Shock Doctrine.

 

The Khomeini regime's compliance with the Ziocons explains why no hostage suffered great harm, although the idea that many of them were probably CIA also explains their safeties. The CIA sponsorship of Khomeini also explains the October Surprise which George Bush engineered in 1980 to further destroy Carter whom he and Rockefeller played like a cheap fiddle - both coming and going.

 

We urge those interested in exploring the subject more carefully to read our Reference as it is quite enlightening.

Reference
Iran and the Revolution: An Exposure of the American Plans, islamicweb.com, nd, accessed 10/17/2014

Copyright 2014 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

A Little Sumpin' About Operation 40

Operation 40 is a group about which very few Americans know, but its formation represented a watershed in American history, and led directly to the US coup of 1963.

 

Until the time of Castro, Cuba was the great offshore play palace of the wealthy, especially for those with organized crime connections. When the corrupt and brutal Batista regime unraveled in the 1950s, the CIA knew that it must not let a good crisis go to waste. It sought the services of a young firebrand, Fidel Castro, who played upon the people's suffering under Spanish and corrupt native rule.

Castro himself would rival Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao T'se Tung as butcher without peer, operating under the aegis of the CIA.

 

The CIA installed Castro as a foil in a larger game of strategic conquest, served by a bagman named George Bush. The agency was not about to lose control of the island, and its offshore torture chambers in Guantanamo. Indeed, if Castro really wanted to antagonize the United States, he would have allied with the Soviets to expel the American presence even with as many complications as that move would have entailed.

 

During the late 1950s, Nazis Allan Dulles and Prescott Bush, George Bush's father, conspired with a man J C King to write a letter complaining about the loss of property and generally deteriorating conditions on the island as a way to goad the United States to protect US business exploitations of the Cubans.

 

His letter of December 11, 1959 reached Dulles who took it to the National Security Agency (NSA) for action. Vice President Nixon, DCI Allan Dulles, Admiral Burke, Livingston Merchant of the State Department, and Gordon Gray were among the key action officers who heard the case and proposed that the government use "alternative means" for dealing with the Cuban problem. As Eisenhower's personal representative at the NSA, Nixon wasted no time in authorizing a group to bring about "regime change" and to "protect" American interests.

 

The group was known as Operation 40, but could never be requested of Congress, much less the American people, as it was authorized to engage in criminal activities, mostly murder, to sabotage the revolutionaries in Cuba. However, the CIA was not really sabotaging Castro because he was on the CIA's payroll. The group also had very little to do with Cuba, at least after Bay of Pigs, as it was needed to assassinate Americans who interfered with CIA activities.

 

Nixon, who was raised to national elected office by Prescott Bush, asked George Bush and Allan Dulles to head the group, with Bush taking the lead in fund raising, and Jack Crichton, a Texas oil man, as close associate.

 

Bush and Crichton in turn worked the members of the Texas based 8F Group to raise funds since Congress was not even aware of the new assassination program. Lyndon Johnson was one of the very well known members of this establishment but secretive group.

 

Among Bush's recruits was David Ferrie, Lee Oswald, David Morales, Frank Sturgis, and Barry Seal, all of whom played prominently in the assassination of Kennedy and/or other CIA crimes such as the Mena Drug cartel which financed CIA activities from the 1960s to the present.

 

Dulles appointed Tracey Barnes to initiate the Operation 40 Group in January 1960 with a launch meeting which included E Howard Hunt, Frank Bender, Jack Esterline, and David Atlee Phillips, all of whom would contribute mightily to the murder of Jack Kennedy.

 

The first order of business was to foment a counter-revolution in Cuba, but that was a half baked affair which failed miserably, and was never intended to succeed, because Castro was on the CIA payroll.

 

The group's next assignment was Bay of Pigs, for which George Bush of the CIA, along with Felix Rodriguez, professional murderer and scum bag, commuted between Houston and Miami weekly, no doubt ferried by David Ferrie or Barry Seal, to recruit Cuban ex-patriates for Brigade 2506, which would eventually be slaughtered by Castro. But no matter, it was all for show anyway.

 

For what it's worth Ferrie worked for Eladio del Valle.

 

To augment their numbers, crime boss Frank Roselli, and a young Porter Goss were recruited, the latter of whom would assist Bush in the 9/11 attacks.

 

The failure of Bay of Pigs provided the impetus to turn Operation 40 into a counter intelligence group because the paranoia of the CIA waxed hot in the risible belief that domestic traitors sabotaged its success. And who was the number 1 traitor? President Kennedy, of course.

 

After the Bay of Pigs flop, a planned one at that, Operation 40 came under the auspices of the CIA's as Domestic Affairs Division, a domestic terrorist group with an ostensible mission of taking out Castro, but with a real mission of murdering the president of the United States.

 

By November 22, 1963, Operation 40 was a battle hardened cohesive unit ready to take on its biggest challenge by staging a coup against the United States of America. George Bush was in Dealey Plaza with Jack Crichton, contributing his part to the assassination plot by taking his Operation 40 team to the Dal-Tex building where the assassins delivered either of the shots to the president's back or head - possibly both.

 

Thus Nixon's enduring legacy was the destruction of the United States by refusing to defy Allan Dulles' demands for a shadow government. But Nixon was in bed with Dulles and Prescott Bush in their grand scheme to take over America by destroying its Constitutional character, and governing with shadow entities with no accountabilities to anyone but themselves.

 

Nixon knew of Prescott's and Dulles' collaboration with the Nazis during World War 2, a fact which he uncovered through highly sensitive documents he obtained shortly after the war while working in the Navy. The pact between Nixon and Dulles was to promote the Nazi agenda  through secrecy and illicit power.

 

The unleashing of Operation 40 opened the flood gates of Murder, Inc, which operates to this day as a component of the totalitarian state, wreaking murder and mayhem at will.

Copyright 2014 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Truth About Flight MH370

The CIA controlled news media have mounted another mystery theater over the fate of Malaysian flight MH 370 which disappeared from its planned flight between Kuala Lumpur and Beijing on March 8, 2014. The truth of the matter is that US intelligence knows exactly what happened to it because they are the ones who hijacked it.

 

The protracted drama over the flight reminds us of the long drawn out soap opera that the CIA put on when it was winding down the Howard Hughes hoax in 1976. The CIA had murdered Hughes as early as 1959 in order to punish him for political and business misdeeds which interfered with the Rockefeller oil interests, but they finally realized that the charade had to be killed off because it was becoming too much of a nuisance.

 

The spooks are playing the same storyline with MH 370 which they hijacked, perhaps as part of some cloak and dagger operation against China. The most noteworthy passengers were the 20 FreeScale employees and equity holders whose smalle chip technology would have reverted to the surviving patent holders which included the Rothschild cabal. So there was definitely motive for the other 4 patent holders to be dead. But that is only a cover story.

 

Whatever the actual reason for hijacking, it was well within the means of US intelligence to remotely hijack the plane using a technology which the Boeing 777 has had since the installation of these systems in the wake of the CIA's and Mossad's projectile launches at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

 

Veterans Today interviewed on April 4, 2014 Matthias Chang, a barrister who served as Political Secretary to the Fourth Prime Minister of Malaysia and retains strong senior level connections, who arrived at the same conclusion. He cited the remote control technologies, which only a few countries have, as the foundation for his belief that a foreign government absconded with the plane.

 

In the same article, Veterans Today also reported that US satellite and tracking systems could easily locate the plane within very short time, demonstrating that the search for the plane is a giant entertainment production. The editors have also reported that the Rolls Royce engine powering the aircraft is monitored from its offices in England every second that the engine is running . There is absolutely no way that a plane like this could disappear without a trace, meaning that the CIA controlled news outlets are lying their posteriors off with every story they run about the flight.

 

Pulling back the FreeScale cover story, the real reason for the hijacking is possibly explained by the replica of the Boeing 777 found in an Israeli aircraft hanger. The alleged Iranian passengers who didn't board the plane were probably Mossad agents who would have been blamed in a false flag operation justifying an attack on Iranian nuclear attacks. Israel is the largest exporter of terrorism in the Middle East and has had a long history of performing these kinds of terrorist attacks, the most famous being the destruction of the World Trade Center.

It is also evident that the plane did not blow up near Diego Garcia or another fantasy location provided by the White House, Malaysian officials, or the CIA controlled press.

 

We salute Veterans Today and their reporters for covering the story and bringing us the truth which the public simply cannot obtain from the CIA controlled newsfakers.

 

Reference

Kevin Barrett, Flight 370 Was Remote-Hijacked, Veterans Today, April 4, 2014, accessed 4/4/2014

 

Copyright 2014 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Was Watergate Really About Sex?

As time rolls on, new evidence about the Watergate case seeps from the bowels of archives and witnesses revealing previously unreported information. One of these revelations is that Watergate was really about a call girl operation run by the Democratic National Committee. Although it is part of the puzzle, we don’t think it tells the whole story.

 

Although Phil Stanford has recently written a book, White House Call Girl, laying out the details of the prostitution ring serving Washington's high and mighty, the story has been around since as early as 1976, and gained stature with G Gordon Liddy’s legal encounter with Maxie Wells, one of the prominent figures in the ring. However, Standford’s book is dedicated to the details of the subject, and is more accessible to casual students of Watergate than some other treatments of the topic.

 

The call girl ring is certainly a verifiable aspect to Watergate about which Stanford reveals important details, some of which we admit are necessary inferences for which we would like meatier substantiation. He identifies 3 important characters who were the motivation for the break-in, namely John Dean, White House Special Counsel to Richard Nixon, Carl Shoffler, the arresting officer of the Watergate burglars, and Heidi Rikan, the madame running the escort service.

 

Rikan ( c. 1940 – 1990 ), also known as Cathy Deiter, was a German immigrant who became involved with the underworld as a stripper. Mob boss Joe Nesline thought that her talents would be better used as a whore to spy on his pimps’ big name clients in football and politics. She had developed an exclusive clientele in the Johnson and Nixon administrations when she came to the attention of John Dean.

 

John Dean’s girl friend and future wife Mo Biner and Rikan were roommates at the Columbia Plaza Apartments before Biner moved in with Dean. Dean and Rikan knew each other well as attested by Rikan’s black book which contained Dean’s direct White House number. Stanford believes that the ambitious Dean wanted the information Rikan had on politicians in order to blackmail them for personal political advantage. Consequently he ordered the Watergate break where Rikan’s business originated at the DNC headquarters.

 

The target of the break in was Ida “Maxie”  Wells’ desk, the secretary to Spencer Oliver, Jr. Wells was the front woman for Rikan’s prostitution service for which Wells arranged hook-ups for out of town visitors. The operation is confirmed by attorney Phillip Bailey whose credibility was so high that he was sent to St Elizabeth’s Hospital for psychiatric tests where after some considerable time he was certified sane. When he was released from the hospital he was forced to plead guilty to a felony and sent to federal prison. The purpose for railroading Bailey into the hospital and prison was to discredit him. Clearly he touched a nerve.

 

The Washington Post’s version – ie the CIA’s – of Watergate is that the burglars broke into DNC chairman Larry O’Brien’s office to tap his telephone to gather political information. They burglarized the Watergate on May 28 and June 17, with the former deemed to be a failure requiring the second break in. No bugs were ever found in the offices but the CIA story claims that Alfred Baldwin was eavesdropping across the street in the Howard Johnson motel. The most likely story is that he was listening to conversations at the Columbia apartments down the street since O’Brien had been out of town for about a month prior to the last break in.

 

At some point, perhaps as early as June 1, Carl Shoffler of the Washington DC police department, and concurrently a military intelligence agent, got a tip about the second break in. On the night of the burglary, he volunteered to work without pay, waiting in an unmarked car for a call to come in reporting the burglary. This version of events is supported by testimony of the Senate Watergate committee from a certain Army LTC whose name we don’t recall.

 

This version of the story contradicts the CIA story which alleges that an alert diligent police officer just happened to stumble upon the burglars as he was making his rounds. This story is a complete lie.

 

Two interesting points stand out about the arrest. The 5 burglars were wearing surgical gloves and had mounted photography equipment on Wells’ desk, and one of them, Eugenio Martinez had a key which Shoffler took, but which the FBI later determined fit Wells’ desk. So the evidence points strongly to the burglars breaking into Wells’ desk to photograph her black book with its rich data.

 

As Stanford puts it, the arrest looks like one intelligence operation stepping on the toes of another. But we don’t see it quite that way. The absolute most important fact of the entire Watergate saga is that the 5 burglars were not ordinary street hoods. They were hardened top level CIA agents and operatives who were involved with Bay of Pigs and the murder of John Kennedy, something which Nixon immediately recognized when he found  out about the break in. Without understanding who they were, it is utterly impossible to understand Watergate. Even if proper cognition is made of this salient fact, it is no guarantee that one will understand the purpose of the break-in, but clearly the CIA was behind it and was the reason Nixon wanted Haldeman to contact Richard Helms, CIA DCI, to thwart the investigation. After all, it was their operation.

 

Unfortunately for Nixon, the CIA was the sponsor of the break-in and they were not about to call off the investigation, especially when Nixon threatened them with the unraveling of the “whole Bay of Pigs thing.”

 

Our view is that Dean instigated the cover-up into which he drew Nixon who thought he could twist the whole affair to his political advantage. Unfortunately he was going up against the entire intelligence establishment which included the press – a fact which he never understood.

 

He also did not realize that Dean started the cover-up, knowing full well that it would end badly, thus accomplishing the agency’s goal of removing a president.

 

While we agree that Stanford has uncovered a significant dimension to the Watergate story, we don’t think that it was the true ultimate aim of the CIA operation. Certainly Dean threatened to expose an explosive sex scandal, but the Democrats fought mightily by turning it into a story about abuses of the imperial presidency in order to keep the salacious aspects under wraps, and for which the FBI obliged by suppressing the evidence of the key which Shoffler obtained during the arrests.

 

We could be mistaken about the grand purpose of Watergate, so will hedge our bets with continued research into the 20^th century’s great American political scandal. But for now, it was not all about sex.

Reference

Jim Hougan, Hougan, Liddy, the Post and Watergate, jimhougan.com, June 22, 2011, accessed 3/26/2014

Phil Stanford, interview on Oppenheimer Report, no date, accessed 3/26/2014, YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MedT1FkaR0

Copyright 2014 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Shocking Story of KAL 007

Korean Airline flight 007 was aptly named, and perhaps intentionally so, as it is the source of a story worthy of a James Bond story. Contrary to the public lies about its demise, the passengers survived the flight and attack on it by the USSR.

 

Many are still alive who recall the disturbing news of September 1, 1983 that the Soviets shot down a civilian Boeing 747 aircraft which had drifted into its airspace. President Reagan made a live broadcast speech 5 days later denouncing the barbarity of the Soviets, a regime he had previously labeled the Evil Empire.

 

On board were 269 passengers who left Anchorage, Alaska as the final leg of a trip from John F Kennedy Airport in New York City en route to South Korea, carrying US officials to commemorate the 30 year anniversary of the United States–South Korea Mutual Defense Treaty. On board was Congressman Larry McDonald who was joined in Alaska by Senators Jesse Helms, Steve Symms, and Representative Carroll Hubbard.

 

Richard Nixon was also on hand but warned at the last minute not to board the flight, a subject to which we shall return.

 

The official story is that the plane, commanded by a highly seasoned pilot who flew the president of South Korea, and served by a highly seasoned crew which had flown this flight for years, veered into Soviet air space, refused to heed warnings to leave, and was subsequently shot down by a pilot of a Soviet SU-15 aircraft.

 

The actual sequence of events differs substantially from the US government lies. Much of the information presented here comes from The International Committee for the Rescue of KAL 007 Survivors who drew upon a rich bank of resources including Avraham Shifrin, Izvestia news reports, the CIA Report, the ICAO Report (UN), and investigations by Senator Jesse Helms.

 

Shifrin is perhaps the most significant since his information forms the basis of the CIA Report, and since he was a former Soviet Army major who was finally sent to the Gulag, and later immigrated to Israel. His contacts were deep and knowledgeable.

 

The pilot, Gennadie Osipovich, radioed to his commander that his missile hit the Boeing 747 aircraft. However it was quickly discovered not to be the case, prompting General Kornukov to order a MIG-23 fighter to finish the civilian aircraft.

 

The heat seeking missile Osipovich fired exploded about 50 meters from its target – too far to fatally injure it, but close enough to cripple it. Even so, the pilots continued to fly the plane successfully for another 10-12 minutes before it crash landed near Moreno Island, not far from the Sakhalin Islands where the Soviets manned a huge and secretive military installation.

 

Soviet sea vessels arrived to take the passengers into custody who were dispersed to various locations after interrogation. The children were sent to orphanages and the adults to slave labor camps. Perhaps the most prominent passenger was Georgia Representative Larry McDonald who was shipped to Moscow for torture and questioning. His last known sighting was in 1995 in Karaganda in Kazakhstan. Reports suggest that he was administered mind altering drugs which prevented him knowing his own identity.

 

Why was the plane downed and who was behind it? These are the central questions which help us understand the crime. The superficial reasons claim that the KAL-007 was a spy plane snooping on the Soviet military bases on Sakhalin Island. Indeed a US reconnaissance plane, possibly the RC-135, was sighted in the area, and may have been the basis of plausible deniability on the part of the Soviets. However, Osipovich clearly identified the plane as a civilian Boeing 747.

 

To understand the real story of the KAL-007, one has to delve into the mind of the world’s ruling Nazis and into conspiracy theory. The first lead is the flight’s most important passenger Larry McDonald who was the newly appointed Chairman of the John Birch Society and an outspoken critic of the New World Order before it became fashionable.

 

McDonald appeared on an episode of CNN’s Crossfire which was hosted by former Nixon speech writer Patrick Buchannan and CIA operative Tom Braden. During his appearance on the show, McDonald spoke about the goals of the Rockefeller dominated New World Order which sought to create one world government by demolishing US sovereignty.

 

Buchannan played the skeptic while the CIA’s Braden played the critic. However, they were putty in McDonald’s very capable hands. We believe that his articulate and truthful exposure of the Rockefellers earned the ire of David Rockefeller who ordered him “eliminated.” Ironically, Rockefeller admitted in his biography that he was indeed pursuing world government and destruction of US sovereignty.

 

So furious was Rockefeller and his far flung organizations with McDonald that we believe he issued orders culminating in the tragedy of KAL-007. The plane was flown by extremely capable crew, which means that the piloting errors could only be explained by sabotaged equipment or possibly complicity on the part of the airline and its pilots.

 

The warning to disgraced President Nixon not to board the flight also indicated advanced knowledge of the sabotage, and thus a conspiracy by US and Korean intelligence agencies to down the plane. Finally, Jesse Helms was ordered to cease his investigations in 1991, or perhaps he voluntarily ended them knowing full well that he was part of the conspiracy – the need for a public whitewashing finally behind him.

 

The Soviets were under the regency of the Rockefellers with Henry Kissinger being one of their trusted lieutenants. As such we believe that the Soviets acted on their behalf to down the plane and to take McDonald into custody where he could be tortured for having exposed the Nazi goons for their nefarious plans.

 

It is important to understand that Nazi ideology came from American and British plutocrats who used Hitler in a plan to further their gains. The same holds true of the Soviet Union where Marshal Varrenikov, chief of the Soviet Army, and KGB head, Vladimir Kryuchkov managed the cover-up of the assault on the KAL-007. We believe that directly or indirectly they were doing the bidding of the NWO leaders.

 

In any event, there is no credible evidence that the KAL-007 crashed and burned at sea, but abundant evidence that it “safely” landed with all passengers alive. We believe that the attack was a vendetta against Congressman McDonald for speaking the truth and exposing wickedness in high places.

Reference

 

The International Committee for the Rescue of KAL 007 , "Frequently Asked Questions Concerning the Downing of KAL Flight 007 and Attendant Matters", www.rescue007.org, on September 20, 2013

 

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The JFK Murder Is A Continuing Operation

One of the enduring artifacts of the Warren Commission Report is the anomaly of an anti-social Lone Nut and the adamant refusal to release government files on the Lone Nut. The anomaly is resolved when one realizes that the plot to murder the President is a continuing operation covered by the government's rules on secrecy.

 

The Warren Commission and its many paid hacks continue to this very day, 50 years after the murder, to stonewall and defy the laws of the land on the release of government records related to the assassination of John Kennedy and to Lee Oswald. Many paid CIA operatives, including those who operate WCR friendly websites - some of which are funded by the CIA, militantly deny the public's right to see the contents of Lee Oswald's files or any other classified assassination files.

 

But why is the government still concealing files of a lone nut 50 years after he allegedly murdered the president? Why are Ruth Paine's income tax returns from the early 1960s still under top secret classification? The answer is obvious - Oswald was not a Lone Nut. As we have reported elsewhere, he was a highly capable and valuable intelligence agent who worked for many intelligence organizations. But that is old news.

 

What most people fail to recognize is that this secrecy of the government is partly based in law, particularly those which exempt the CIA and other stealth organizations from Freedom Of Information Act disclosures for ongoing operations.

 

The CIA does not have to release any document which relates to active operations. Thus it is quite evident that the operation to murder the President was a CIA operation which continues under the aegis of the cover-up operation. Hence the CIA is under no obligation, at least in its criminal mind, to release the information it possesses on its former agent Lee Oswald. And why did the CIA recruit a Lone Nut in the first place?

 

The CIA is not alone in defying the US Congress which it holds in the utmost contempt. The Office of Naval Intelligence and Federal Bureau of Investigation are just a few among so-called US government agencies withholding information, such as personnel files, in defiance of Congress and US law.

 

The other consideration is that the CIA does not report to Congress or the US president. It reports to its plutocratic bosses in Wall Street and academia. Under no circumstance does it see itself as a creature of government. Its only purpose is to serve plutocratic moneyed interests associated with America's 1%. Indeed, Yale is a prime recruiting ground, a place where imperial hauteur is cultivated before and after matriculation.

 

So contrary to the bland claims by the stealth organizations that 98% of all assassination records have been released, the truth is that some remain concealed, and many more have been destroyed. All of this is protect a Lone Nut.

 

If former Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Blinder believes that it is the last duty of a central banker to tell the public the truth about its currency - i.e. lying is good policy - does anyone with an IQ above a potato honestly think that a spook agency would think otherwise?

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Commemorating the Third Reich

Such is the power of propaganda that Americans believe that the United States won World War 2 and in so doing defeated Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany. On the contrary, the Third Reich is alive and well.

 

To understand World War 2, one must understand the politics of finance. War and finance go together like a horse and carriage; Bush was told by Satan, you can’t have one without the other. One of our correspondents reported a documentary describing a visit George Bush, Jr. had with the Brazilian President when the former held office. He advised the Brazilian to start a war since it is good for the economy. This was the lesson which the plutocrats wished to foist upon America about the Great Depression and World War 2.

 

They turned coincidence into causality as a means of positively associating war with prosperity. The banksters had prolonged the depression in order to time the war for this lesson. It is a reductionist application of the broken window theory, quackery which was demolished in the 19^th century but revived for the 20^th century fool.

 

But war cannot be waged without finances. Thus all significant American wars have been financed by cheap money in order to sacrifice lives in useless causes. The Federal Reserve Act was passed in order to finance American involvement in World War 1, to say nothing of the enormous transfer of wealth it presaged from the poor to the rich.

 

After conquering Germany in World War 1, the West, led by the Americans, imposed crippling terms on the vanquished in order to pave the way for an hysterical tyrant. Anyone would do, but it so happens that the banksters stumbled upon Adolf Hitler, a low rent corporal from World War 1, failed artist, and future mass murderer.

 

For anyone to think that such a person could rise to the top of the political heap without a guiding hand is a bit naive. Hitler was financed by western banksters who saw opportunity in his ascent, particularly Henry Ford who hated Jews more than he hated anything. So enamored was Hitler with Ford that he patterned Mein Kampf after Ford’s writings and proudly displayed a picture of Ford in his office for years until it embarrassed his benefactor.

 

Antony Sutton has documented the links between Wall Street and German financial powers who funneled money into Hitler’s cause. Hitler was completely impossible without Wall Street and German money – the kind that grows in monopolies and merchants of death.

 

We reported some of his findings when we wrote about the Chairman of Standard Oil of New Jersey who openly supplied oil to the Nazis throughout the entire war and was found guilty by Congress. We assure you that it is the height naivety to suppose that Farish was acting on his lonesome. Standard was and remains a Rockefeller phenomenon. We are not fooled by the idea that it was simply the love of money which motivated Farish to supply his favorite dictator with much needed oil.

 

When the war ended, the plutocrats were as much in control as ever. While they failed in their attempt to exterminate Jews, they took the lessons of the war to devise more effective strategies for dealing with democracies such as the United States. Toward that end, they officially established the Central Intelligence Agency, and imported thousands of Nazis through Operation Paperclip, criminals who assumed important positions in American government.

 

The plutocrats murdered a president because Nelson Rockefeller always wanted to become president without an election, as Winthrop Rockefeller’s ex-wife testified in court. Since November 22, 1963, the Citizens of the World have had a firm grip on the US presidency.

 

The plan to establish the Nazi state rocketed into orbit on September 11, 2001 when the Military Industrial Complex leaders, a group which includes the Rockefellers and Bush Crime Syndicate, staged an attack on American soil in an adaptation of Operation Northwoods, first presented to Kennedy by General Lyman Lemnitzer in 1962.

 

The gimmick worked and America has been at war fighting the CIA’s bogeymen ever since. Manifestations of the Nazi state have been observed in the grossly named Patriot Act, the destruction of the Occupy movement, and most recently the march again Monsanto, a core member of the Nazi movement. The march against this purveyor of disease was occasioned by people realizing that genetically modified foods (GMOs) have been an evil experiment on humans without their consent and with highly deleterious consequences.

 

The state controlled media blacked out this story even when major demonstrations all over the world called upon Monsanto – the proud maker of Agent Orange – to stop the propagation of these deadly foods. Facebook forcibly removed references and links to information about the march in full contempt of freedom of speech and to show their authority as a Nazi overlord.

 

The most flagrant signs of the flourishing Nazi state come from the current administration which has used the IRS to attack Americans, uses ATT, Facebook, Google, Verizon, Boeing, and other corporate behemoths to spy on every aspect of Americans’ lives, funneling the information into computers whose capabilities defy most people’s abilities to comprehend.

 

Americans live in a Nazi state - the Third Reich of their forefathers - and think that their ability to buy lottery tickets and watch Dancing With the Stars is a sign of freedom. Freedom ended on their television watch.

 

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

William Greer Murdered President Kennedy

[Editor's Note 10/13/2021 - We are way late in denouncing this Chronicle. Although we still believe that Greer purposely stopped his vehicle to give the snipers ideal shooting conditions, we do not believe that he fired his pistol. We were taken away with nonsense at the time.]

United States Secret Service Agent William Greer ( 1909 – 1985 ) murdered President John Fitzgerald Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas, Texas’ Dealey Plaza while working under orders from the Rockefeller cabal which engineered America’s first coup d’état.

 

The evidence has been hiding in plain sight though heavily encumbered by faked evidence occluding the testimony of the physical evidence. One of our correspondents, Michael Gordon, an inveterate researcher into the Kennedy case, has uncovered a book published in 2010, Murder From Within, which lays out the case against Greer.

 

The book was originally published by Fred Newcomb and Perry Adams, who were also its authors, when they found that the state controlled media would not handle their explosive book. You can tell a million lies without notice, but don’t ever get caught telling the truth.

 

The story relies upon 8 years of research by the men beginning in 1966 when Edward J Epstein’s article questioning the fraudulent Warren Commission Report provoked Newcomb, a professional photographic expert, to dig deeply into the case.

 

Their results are astonishing with Dealey Plaza being one, but not the only, focal point of the action. The drama began with a stray shot fired from one of the many shooters and assassins ringing the Plaza, a signal to open fire. The second shot came from behind the fence on the grassy knoll which hit Kennedy in the throat. Jackie Kennedy looked to her husband to ask what was wrong as the President clutched his throat.

 

At about the same time, John Connally (1917-1993), sitting by the limousine’s right window behind Secret Service agent Roy Kellerman, turned to his right to watch the president, most likely because he wanted to witness the President’s death. At the moment Connally was facing the President, Jackie abruptly stared at Connally for an extended period. The reason for this strange attention to the Texas Governor was because he was reacting – and quite verbally we imagine – to a point blank gun shot fired straight at his back. Two other stray shots from the Dal-Tex building hit the limousine windshield and windshield frame.

 

When Greer, the President's Secret Service driver, realized that the President was not dead, he used his pistol to murder Kennedy point blank from the front at which point Jackie paniced and attempted to escape the murder mobile only to be rebuffed by Clint Hill shoving her back into the limousine. At least two more stray rifle shots were fired. Greer suddenly acceleratesd to Parkland Memorial Hospital where they press the doctors quickly for a death certificate in order to swear-in Johnson as president.

 

Meanwhile, the bubble top of the limousine is installed so that Secret Service agents can immediately wash down the interior of the vehicle to scrub it for any evidence.

 

At Parkland Secret Service agents secured every phone in order to prevent anyone from calling out to report news. The Secret Service also commandeered the body in order to whisk it back to Washington for a fake autopsy and removal of any forensic evidence showing a frontal head wound.

 

While at the hospital, the Secret Service also spread the rumor that an agent has been shot so that it could assert federal jurisdiction over the entire Dallas area in order to claim the slain president's body. Under Texas law, any murder on Texas soil is strictly the jurisdiction of the state. Secret Service agents threatened reluctant doctors with murder to relinquish the body, thus concluding the coup.

 

Much of this narrative contradicts in key places points we have made previously. Although we have long advocated a frontal shot, we had assumed that it took place by a trained sniper near the Stemmons underpass. Even with high powered scopes, this maneuver is difficult against a moving target, one reason why Greer stopped the president's vehicle. However, when the other assassins failed in their attempts, Greer had to stop the vehicle to murder the president.

 

When we reported earlier the overwhelming evidence supporting an altered Zapruder film, we thought the reason was to obscure the frontal assault. While the CIA was only partially successful in that task, the main reason for the alteration was to remove evidence of a stopped vehicle, and to omit any evidence of Greer’s treason by regicide. The Zapruder film sustained serious corruptions, something which the original developers have testified to Douglas Horne.

 

While the Secret Service was an organic part of the coup, they were still under operational direction from the CIA, which in turn is the operational arm of the Rockefeller Nazi syndicate which rules the country through its fabulous wealth.

 

We were skeptical of Greer’s guilt at first – not because he was not a murderer – but because of the audacity and lack of evidence for such a case. But the surviving evidence shows his body movements to be in concert with the head shot to Kennedy and explains how both Connally and Kennedy were shot at so quickly.

 

When Connally was in the hospital, he ordered his state security to guard his room and the building and to allow absolutely no Secret Service agents near. When he yelled in the limousine that “they are going to kill both of us,” he knew the plot since he was extremely instrumental in luring Kennedy to Dallas and to the kill zone. Thus we ponder why the revolutionaries wished to murder a co-conspirator.

 

This explanation of John Kennedy’s death is breath taking, but it fits the most facts. If anyone is still looking at Oswald as the assassin, we invite him to apply for a timeshare in our deluxe bridge stretching from here to Shangri-La.

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Purpose of the Boston Marathon Bombing

It should be evident to those who are not zombies or sheep that the recent Boston Marathon bombings were a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) covert operation to establish martial law and vilify the Miranda Rule.

 

The Rockefeller Nazis and their Bush Crime Syndicate have worked feverishly since the September 11, 2001 bombing of the World Trade Center to establish a total Nazi state patterned after the one they established in Germany in the 1930s.

 

In the recent Boston episode a 19 year old is said to have concocted an elaborate bombing scheme and required at least 10,000 armed troops to capture. As always, the FBI solved the case in quick order, and voila, you have the crime all solved within a few days. They learned from the Kennedy murder to protract it in order to give the folks at home to play along with the newsfakers.

 

The greatest theme of the operation was to make a major issue of the Miranda Rule which requires that all suspects be read their rights to have representation and to not make any self incriminating statements. Of course the various Nazi acts have exempted Miranda rights in the event of a terrorist act. So the CIA concocted just such an event to demonize the sacred right.

 

This leads to the larger issue of presumed innocence. The newsfakers presented the CIA’s position about the hoax to the extent that all of America believes that the 19 year old kid is guilty of this monstrous crime requiring 10,000 highly trained and brutally armed Gestapo agents to enforce martial law – for public safety of course.

 

The people of Boston took it lying down, as you do when you have an M1 tank ready to blast you and your home away. Martial law is the reason why the Obama government orders far more tanks than the military says that it needs. What the military failed to recognize is that it is an occupying force.

 

The sad outcome of this sordid affair is that Americans accept the idea that any time powerful people are after someone, then they are automatically guilty. We have lost presumption of innocence. Even the newsfakers stated that the lawyer for the victim would simply attempt to avoid the death penalty.

 

The Boston operation has all of the DNA of Ruby Ridge, Waco, Oklahoma City bombings, 9/11, and a host of other covert CIA domestic operations. If Americans value freedom and Constitutional government, they must give up the Democrat and Republican parties, both of which are controlled by the same people spreading strong delusion of lies and oppression.

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Who Was George Joannides?

Even researchers fluent in the cast of characters connected to the John F Kennedy assassination may not know the name of George Joannides ( 1922 – 1990 ) or his significance in the crime, but American patriot and attorney Jim Lesar knows very well who he is, as does the Central Intelligence Agency.

 

Considerable time elapsed between the assassination and the discovery of Joannides, whose last significant act of criminality occurred when he worked as liaison between the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) and the CIA circa 1977-79. Prior to that, Joannides was a CIA agent who headed the agency’s psychological warfare branch of JM/WAVE through which capacity he helped organize the militant Cuban expatriate group DRE which participated in or supported the CIA’s murder of President John Kennedy. Joannides also had contact with Lee Oswald, the alleged lone nut, in 1963.

 

Joannides was supposedly retired from the CIA, engaged in private law practice, during the 1970s when the agency asked him to return to serve as its liaison with HSCA. The Memorandum of Understanding between the HSCA and the CIA required that the CIA disclose Joannides' relationship with the agency, but more importantly any information about those involved in the DRE, information which the CIA deliberatly withheld.

 

In his capacity as liaison, Joannides operated covertly to undermine the work of the HSCA’s oversight activities of executive branch agencies and departments, a crime which Mr Lesar notes is a direct assault on democracy and a felony offense.  But having murdered a president, it is a trifle bit ridiculous to suppose that the CIA would be concerned about rules of oversight.

 

Jefferson Morley discovered the covert operations of Joannides and his employer years later, prompting him to file a lawsuit in 2002 in federal court to enforce Freedom of Information Act release of CIA documents related to Joannides. The CIA successfully lobbied its puppet judges to rule on narrow technical matters of the case, rather than on the material fact and substance of it.

 

For example, the DC  Court of Appeals remanded the case back to district court on the grounds that the CIA's claim for Exemption 2 classification of documents was not applicable to the Joannides collection. Exemption 2 protects documents related to internal personnel and practices rules. Yet the court refused to rule on Exemption 1 which covers classified documents. Since these early documents are 50 years old, they are subject to release regardless of their prior classification. Lesar has argued that this claim by the CIA is a  disputed issue of material fact, requiring discovery or trial. The judge refused to consider the plaintiff’s claim, ignoring it as though it did not exist. The CIA is withholding nearly 300 documents on such grounds.

 

The Joannides file collection is interesting not only because of Joannides’ involvement with the Kennedy assassination, but more specifically because of his contact with Lee Oswald in 1963. Ironically enough, the CIA has placed similar documents in the JFK Records Act collection in the National Archives but is seeking to protect these half century old items.

 

Not only does the Department of Homeland Security claim that assertion of privacy is admission of guilt or criminal activity, but it is unclear why an association with a lone nut would endanger the CIA. Clearly the agency’s protestations are inculpatory and should be released on grounds of national security.

 

Reference

Jim Lesar, BlackOp Radio, May 3, 2012

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Origins of the Iranian Hostage Crisis

Most Americans of a certain age recall the incessant coverage of the Iranian hostage whose 444 days of drama ultimately doomed the hapless Carter presidency. Unfortunately Americans were not told the truth of the matter which would shape the region for the next 2 generations but whose omission we attempt to rectify herein.

The immediate cause for the Iranian students taking 52 American hostages was the admission of the Shah of Iran to the United States for medical treatment. The two men who agitated for this exception to Carter’s policy against the Shah were Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller, whose emissary John McCloy lobbied Carter relentlessly for admission of the Shah.

Why would the Iranian students react with such hostility to an ostensible act of dying mercy? The reason is that the Shah showed absolutely no mercy to anyone during his wretched murderous reign modeled after those of Adolph Hitler and Joseph Stalin. The Shah’s vicious SAVAK secret police ruthlessly rooted out adversaries, especially those seeking a nationalist tilt in Iranian foreign policies.

That kind of a stance directly contradicted the Western oil barons who coveted Iran’s vast oil supplies. In fact the CIA installed the Shah to power in 1953 by staging a coup against the democratically elected Mohammad Mosaddegh who nationalized British Petroleum (BP Oil) oil assets in Iran. Up to that point, Iran had been largely a British foot stool from whom to extract prodigious amount of petroleum.

Unfortunately, the British were in a tight squeeze and in the process of unwinding their once vast empire. So they turned to the United States to recover the oil assets. The CIA under John Dulles was only too happy to oblige and promptly murdered Mosaddegh.

Once he was out of the way, the CIA installed Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as the new Shah, a man who acquiesced quite willingly to Western demands and to Western ways of violence through the establishment of the CIA trained SAVAK. This Gestapo organization kept a tight lid on matters until the late 1970s when the Shah's health began to fail.

Now who would have such a keen interest in Iranian oil? British Petroleum certainly did but so did the United States and more specifically David Rockefeller. But in 1979 the interest was not so much oil as the presidency. The CIA was desperate to remove Carter from office, with the Secret Service cooperating again in political assassination just as it did in 1963 at Dealey Plaza, Parkland Hospital, and Bethesda Naval Hospital.

Rockefeller, McCloy, and Kissinger – all of whom are proto-Nazis – were setting Carter up for a big failure. Carter, against his better judgment, allowed the Shah to enter the United States when he should have had him dropped from a helicopter. Rockefeller also knew that admission of the Shah into the country would have deleterious results which is the prime reason why he badgered Carter into a policy reversal.

Carter took the bait whic sunk his administration into a hopeless tar pit of impossible electoral consequences. It is conceivable that the students were acting under direction from the CIA but we have not been able to confirm that theory. In any event, the nightly news reporting was drummed up – as in the Watergate days by the CIA – to topple the president.

In the meantime, George Bush Sr’s political ally Saddam Hussein was convinced to invade Iran, thus starting the bloody Iran-Iraq war which saw young children sent to war as soldiers. Thus creating a need for weapons, Bush went to Paris and Switzerland to negotiate an arms exchange for the hostages. Of course the timing of it – 5 minutes after Reagan’s swearing in to office – was a pointed gesture to Carter of who was in control. That made the third president of whom Bush had disposed since he murdered Kennedy. He would momentarily attempt his 4^th political assassination.

We do not believe that Reagan had any knowledge or participation in the arms for hostages deal – it being all the handiwork of Bush; but we are open to facts which show otherwise. We do know that Bush was hyperactively busy – not going to dead heads of state funerals – but expanding the arms program into the Iran Contra scandal whose political fallout nearly sunk the Reagan presidency courtesy of his devious vice president.

We know that this is a lot of information to digest, but the events in the Middle East are largely the orchestrations of the CIA and have been so since the end of World War 2. The Bush Crime Syndicate and Rockefeller Axis of Evil are intent upon establishing their pavilion of war in the lands of oil. Much more interesting events will transpire next in Iraq and Syria.

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

When Did Howard Hughes Die?

Many are still alive who recall the Kim Kardashian like circus surrounding the sad last days of Howard Hughes. Although you may pass a history testing by giving the date of his death as April 5, 1976, the truthometer will buzz loudly with displeasure.

Yes there is much gratification is regurgitating the lies and fancies of the state controlled press, but it is much more satisfying to feast on the truth. In this case we believe that Howard Hughes died no later than 1971 and no earlier than 1957.

Enigmatic elusive Howard Hughes continues to fascinate historians, journalists, and gossips decades after his purported death. His alleged final gasps spawned a television movie, late night TV jokes, and a very sordid fascination with the peccadilloes of the successful billionaire.

What you don’t hear about in That 70s Show is the many death watches which were fodder for Saturday Night Live. Guessing when the next right winged dictator was ready to give up the ghost became something of a parlor game. When is the old coot going to kick the can, already? Franco, Kai-shek, Tito, and others were for years on their last breaths – breaths which we believe the CIA played a very heavy hand in taking away.

But Hughes’ vast wealth and exaggerated hypochondria made him more fascinating than the rest. How could a man who had risen to stellar heights fall to such hellish lows? Couldn’t his money cure him of his illness?

We believe that there is much more to the story than meets the eye. Our working thesis is that the CIA murdered Hughes for political and personal reasons – and aren’t the two so often the same? Hughes had become associated with Republican politics in a way which threatened big government, and he had technologies which could be employed in devious ways – especially if in the hands of a Spook.

 

Perhaps the best explanation for his demise lay in his companies' oil technologies which Hughes probably used to tighten the scews on the Eastern plutocrats.

The Canadian newspaper Midnight argued that Hughes was buried off of the Greek island of Skorpios in 1971. It suggested that John Kennedy had secretly survived his assassination and was held by Aristotle Onassis. Mae Brussell, who in contrast to the Midnight, was a respected and fact conscious assassination researcher, argued that Hughes died on April 16, 1971 and was buried in the same location.

There are some reasons we present below to support Hughes’ murder in 1971 but we can’t rule out 1957. The reports state that Hughes was kidnapped and severely incapacitated, possibly in a botched CIA job. A component of my current theory is that the CIA feared the growing alliance and influence Richard Nixon would wield if he were to tap fully into Hughes’ money. In conunction with Hughes' squeeze on Eastern plutocrats, his death was all but assured.

Since our original publication of this report, we have learned so much more about the Bush Crime Syndicate that we could easily see its principals wishing to cut Nixon off at the knees. Hence, they concocted a plan to incapacitate Hughes.

Whatever the reasons for Hughes’ murder, the last 20 years of his penumbrations were a long running CIA gag – one in which the spooks were rolling on the floor laughing their hind ends off as they created this garish caricature of a hypochondriac who was never seen. It was like an I Love Lucy episode where Lucy tries to avoid getting caught impersonating two people.

Hughes was never seen in public after 1957. A body double was hired to give fleeting glimpses of the man to maintain the illusion that he was still alive. The reason for this charade was to continue to tap his bank accounts. After all, if he were officially declared dead, the banks would close his accounts. Hughes died intestate – or his will was destroyed by the CIA, precluding any orderly liquidation of assets.

Noah Dietrich, Hughes close right hand man, retired in 1957, on very abrupt notice and under the most peculiar circumstances. It is our guess that he was fired by some CIA thug and Dietrich kept very quiet for good reason.

Hughes’ marriage to glamour actress Jean Peters – also in 1957 - was the most soaring performance of the latter’s career. Their non-marriage could always generate headlines – especially in conduits like CIA outlet Parade Magazine. During the entire period of the fake marriage, neither saw the other and communicated nearly always by phone. Peters kept all of the details about this “marriage” like the state secret which it was – meaning that it was a masquerade.

The CIA finally started winding down the hoax in 1971, just about the time which they sprung Watergate on us. Peters and Hughes “divorced” in that year with the former Mrs Hughes receiving 70,000 USD per year alimony – which was enough to be modestly comfortable at the time, but peanuts compared to Hughes’ vast fortune. But actors' salaries would not rocket into the stratosphere for a few years yet.

Though the divorce was finalized in June, it comports well with the theories for an April death.

The complete reclusiveness of Hughes was predicated upon his acute germ phobia. Again, I believe that this was a cover to provide plausible explanation of his hermetic behavior. Body doubles were used to provide his presence when absolutely necessary but these became increasingly rare and confusing wherein there was the healthy van dyke bearded Hughes juxtaposed with the frail gross looking Hughes with 6 inch finger nails.

The same clowns – CIA - who brought us Watergate also had a fun time destroying Howard Hughes. My theory is that they incapacitated him to wrest control of his money and projects. When they discovered that he was intestate they realized that they had a huge problem. Thus they kept him alive for years in order to uncover more details about his holdings and to safeguard their unfolding plans. This is a subject deserving more scrutiny.

At some point his health failed or they no longer needed him. My suspicion is that this occurred in April 1971. Then the CIA had the most hilarious uproarious time creating the comical hypochondriac whom they finally let die officially in April 1976.

This same showmanship over an incompetent or dead person was used years later with Osama bin Laden, leaving us another finger print of the CIA’s vicious activities.

 Copyright 2008-12 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.