Showing posts with label Adolf Hitler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Adolf Hitler. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 25, 2021

Did Rothschild Banksters Finance Hitler?

It is sometimes alleged that Hitler's rise to power owed to the financing of the invincible Rothschild banking families. Fortunately the evidence does not support this fantasy.

Your Chronicler has in times past fallen for this false claim, but the evidence is very clear that Hitler's support, financial and political, came from the groundswell of German patriots.

The most obvious refutation of the Rothschild myth is Hitler's arrest of Baron Louis Rothschild in 1939. While Hitler released the criminal for the equivalent of 21 million USD, it was part of his policy of maintaining amicable relationships with the governments under Rothschild control such as the United Kingdom.

Concurrently the German government permitted release of a film documenting Rothschild treachery since the time of the Napoleonic wars. Clearly this was not a film which the Rothschilds would endorse, especially from someone whom they allegedly financed.

Finally, Hitler's closure of the Rothschild banks in France, Germany, and Austria is the absolute proof that this evil banking family did not finance Hitler, and is perhaps the most important reason that Jews hate Hitler so viciously to this day. And you thought that hate was not a family value.

Regarding the claim that London and New York banksters financed Hitler, again the evidence is lacking. Noble, author of Hitler Was NOT Controlled Opposition (Part 1), cites Henry Ashby Turner who documents clearly that big business contributed little to nothing to Hitler and his party. His financing came from small businesses fearing communist takeovers as in Russia, and from receipts from the sales of Mein Kampf. Additional corroboration for the refutation of Rothschild or big business financing of Hitler comes from James Pool .

If all of that is not enough, we have Rothschild agent Hjalmar Schacht admitting at the Nuremberg trials that most of Hitler's support came from the rank and file - not large corporate interests.

Our anonymous author also refutes the notion that the Bushes or Harrimans funded Hitler, a theme we had supported in the past. Citing Antony Sutton, Anonymous points out that Sutton, often referenced for the allegations, actually made contradictory statements regarding Harriman and Standard Oil, meaning that the latter did not fund Hitler.

Given his determination to stamp out the treachery and enslavement of his people by the Rothschild banksters, the world needs another Hitler. (The Holocaust was a total lie).

Reference
Noble, Hitler Was NOT Controlled Opposition (Part 1), renegadetribune.com, December 29, 2019, source(Hitler Was NOT Controlled Opposition (Part 1) (renegadetribune.com), accessed 5/22/2021)


Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, November 19, 2017

Bonaparte and Hitler: Two Peas In a Pod

Observers have long noted similarities between France's Napoleon Bonaparte and Germany's Adolf Hitler, but they often miss the important commonalities and thus distort European history into a caricature of truth. The most salient feature of the two autocrats is that they were Jewish.

Napoleon and Hitler both conquered or dominated large swaths of Europe, and both men met their matches attacking the Russian bear. They ruled their respective countries for 12-15 years, after which they both managed to escape to safer locations when their ruling careers came to a halt.

As noted already, both men were Jews. Miles Mathis has noted in 2 separate studies the genealogy of both dictators, each of which has Jewish blood in both the matrilineal and patrilineal lines. This ethnicity explains how each of these Jews had such meteoric and improbable rises to power.

In other words, the financial Jewish elite who already controlled so much of Europe were easily able to manipulate manufactured events to give the reigns of power to their chosen puppet. In no way would these Jewish elites allow non-Jews the kind of power taken by Bonaparte and Hitler.

As we reported elsewhere, Louis XVI was fake-guillotined and returned to the throne as Louis XVIII. The power vacuum of the Jewish engineered French Revolution created the ideal scenario for a pompous actor such as Bonaparte to seize power. So the Jews created fake crises which their crisis actor par excellence resolved with his march on Paris.

In Germany over one hundred years later, the same shtick was played, this time with Adolf Hitler who brought prosperity to a prostrate nation as the man of the hour.

Both men were financed by the usual suspects - the Rothschilds, though in the case of Hitler, new financial blood was brought to the party with the Schiffs, Warburgs, Baruchs, Bushes and others. Each man was assigned the task of militarily conquering Europe for the Jews, and on the surface each failed. But the real story is that Hitler succeeded because his job was to destroy Gentiles.

Mathis notes that too many inconsistencies in the stories of Bonaparte's military campaigns suggest that his battles were more paper affairs than real military battles. Usually the manpower claimed for each side, such as Austria and France, increased when it was expected to decrease, and victory was achieved in the face of overwhelming odds in the case of Napoleon. Hacks are quick to note Bonaparte's genius for war, but more than likely it was the genius of historians lying about the battles rather than the midget commander's strategic and tactical puissance.

If Mathis is correct about the deceit of the numerous Napoleonic battles, then European history is ripe for a major rewrite. But even if Napoleon was a gifted a commander as reported, the fact that his paymasters were Jews provides an even greater rewrite of the European history down to the present time.

Reference
Miles Mathis, Was Napoleon Jewish?, April 16, 2016, mileswdavis.com, accessed 11/19/2017

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Friday, May 13, 2016

Was Hitler a British Agent? Part 2

Was Hitler a British agent used to unleash on humanity the calamity known as World War 2? While we appreciate conspiracy analysts' recognition of the United Kingdom’s central role in starting the war, we cannot accept the claim that Hitler was one of that evil empire’s agents.
 
There are basically 2 forms of this theory, one of which we have dealt with previously. It states that Hitler was a mind controlled subject programmed at Tavistock to become the raving lunatic his detractors have portrayed him to be. This theory is full of holes and ultimately so much nonsense.
 
The second form of the British agent theory is that Hitler was a conscious and willing agent who sought to immolate the German people in an unwinnable war which furthered the aims of Britain’s imperial madmen.
 
The theory is rooted in certain relationships the Fuhrer cultivated with British agents such as William de Ropp, an obscure but very influential player in British foreign policy, who, according to the theory, acted as his handler. Proponents of this thesis argue that Hitler and his trusted aide Alfred Rosenberg shared far too much sensitive information with de Ropp to make Hitler anything less than an agent of the United Kingdom.
 
This analysis is faulty on a number of counts, but motivated from a number of misleading coincidences, the first of which is that Hitler was an admitted Anglophile who saw value in preserving the British Empire, especially if its leaders acquiesced to German interests on the Continent. Our point is that admiration for an institution does not make one an agent of the institution.
 
Furthermore, Hitler sought assiduously to avoid war with Britain through cultivation of influential Britons, such as those among the Cliveden Set, who thought that plunging the nation into another war was mad. Because de Ropp had access to these people, including the Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain who championed appeasement, it is no wonder that the Fuhrer sought to cultivate this relationship as a means of avoiding war. Wishing to avoid war with the United Kingdom does not make one an agent of the UK.
 
Chamberlain led a minority faction in Great Britain which sought to avoid war, but the Jewish Winston Churchill and his blood thirsty Zionist supporters were hell-bent on war. In fact Churchill stated that one of the goals of World War 2 was to wipe out the German people. This of course is the stated goal of Zionist Jewry which has worked tirelessly to wipe out all Christian peoples.
 
Churchill refused on numerous occasions to even consider Hitler’s numerous attempts for a negotiated settlement to the war – during both the Phony War as well as to hostilities which raged after the hot war started. It is exceedingly difficult – if not impossible – to think that someone treated so contemptuously could possibly be a British agent. Perhaps Hitler was a dupe who was played like a fiddle, but he certainly was no British agent. If he was, he was tossed away like so much trash.
 
The error of the British Agent theorists is that they have confused Hitler's anglophiliism with British agency. The acts of the British government demonstrate convincingly that it wanted to wipe out the Fuhrer and the German people. This is not how one treats a loyal agent.
 
The aristocracy of the United Kingdom are Satan worshipping scum who should be wiped off the face of the earth for all of the crimes they have committed against people groups and individuals. They, along with Franklin Roosevelt and Josef Stalin, all of whom were controlled by Jewish banksters, were the aggressors of World War 2. It was a grave error on Hitler’s part to think that he could trust a cabal of Satanists.
Reference
Henry Makow, Hitler's British Handler, henrymakow.com, May 1, 2016, accessed 5/13/2016
Copyright 2016 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, February 14, 2016

The Enduring Vilification of Adolf Hitler

Everyone loves to hate Adolf Hitler, but the bases for doing so are based upon myths and lies. We deal with the causes for the eternal hatred of the Fuhrer which all boil down to his opposition to the Rothschild banking cabal. Along the way we deal with the common myths surrounding Hitler's policies and death.

http://www.americanchronicle.info/home/the-enduring-vilification-of-adolf-hitler.aspx?ArticleID=57&tabid=514


Copyright 2015 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, February 8, 2015

One Minute Chronicle: Hitler on Auschwitz

The Judeo-Nazi Matrix has made its reputation by propagating the outrageous lie that Adolf Hitler promulgated the Final Solution to exterminate the Jews. New evidence has come to light demolishing that cherished myth of Jews, the Christian Right, and other assorted fools who believe Jewish lies.
 
At a presentation to the Institute of Historical Review, perhaps in 2005, historian David Irving presented the astounding revelations of surviving transcripts from a January 19, 1945 meeting of Hitler and his general staff, in whose presence was Heinz Guderian. The German general informed Hitler that Auschwitz had been taken by the Red Army, to which Hitler replied, "Yes," then moved on to more pressing matters.
 
Is Yes all that the alleged promulgator of the Final Solution could muster on news that the plan's alleged crown jewel had been taken over by the Soviets? A measly, pitiful, plaintive, Yes? Yes means that Auschwitz wasn't even a pimple on a gnat's ass in the eyes of Hitler.
 
Of course there has never been any documentation substantiating the existence of a Final Solution, or that if one existed that it involved the murder of Jews. No, even Israelis in the early 1960s admitted the absence of such evidence.
 
With the latest revelation from Irving, it becomes abundantly and absolutely clear that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, and that the Jews put together an extraordinary lie in fabricating out of whole cloth the hoax of the holocaust.
 
For those who are unaware, Irving is an historian's historian. Whereas most professional historians are access journalists engaged in an incestuous series of trysts republishing each others' works, Irving has spent decades poring over original documents to construct a more faithful version of history, devoid of the propagandistic lies of the Ziocon lobby. For that we salute you, Mr Irving, even though in today's Germany you would have been sentenced to prison for uttering the truth.
 
Reference
David Irving, The Faking of Adolf Hitler for History, filmed at the Institute for Historical Review, nd, published by Per Jensen on YouTube, accessed 2/8/2015
 
Copyright 2015 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Monday, April 7, 2014

Jewish Nihilism and World War 2

Americans typically have a cartoon understanding of Adolf Hitler and World War 2, but for those looking for an adult explanation of the war and Hitler’s mindset going into it, they would need to begin with an exploration of Communism and its relationship to Jews.
 
Jews are the inventers of Communism whose purpose was to provide a replacement religion for the Christianity which they had striven so mightily to destroy with the Enlightenment, the first body blow against the Ancien Regime. To its Jewish inventers, Communism is also the political ideology with which to completely control a nation, offering the masses a lie of proletariat rule when in fact autocratic totalitarian rule is controlled by a cabal of Jews.
 
If this sounds like fantastical anti-Semitism, one would do well to read Jonas Alexis’ disturbing but incisive analysis of the ideological events leading up to the second world war. It is against this backdrop of the development of the intertwined revolutionary dogmas of Communism, Marxism, and Bolshevism which informs Hitler and his Nazis.
 
Part of Hitler’s genius was to create a counter-revolutionary ideology in the National Socialist Workers Party to blunt and to turn back the inroads made by Communism and its allied strains of anti-establishment and tradition hating ideology. Indeed the Jewish trinity of Communism, Marxism, and Bolshevism – plus the Enlightenment for completeness - were fundamentally anti-establishment protocols for bringing about revolution and the destruction of Christian and traditional societies.
 
Thus if we observe the work product of Jewish Talmudism from its prototype ideology, the Enlightenment, we see the French Revolution of the 1790s, the Continental revolutions of 1848, the Bolshevik revolution of 1917, and the Weimar putsch of 1923 as the direct offspring of these subversive and destructive Jewish ideologies. They are attractive to the poor because they promise relief to their miseries, but as with all things Zionistic, they are deceitful lies.
 
Jonas documents Bernard Levy’s comments on Marx, with whom he was a prominent correspondent, as follows:
in this new organization of humanity, the sons of Israel now scattered over the whole surface of the globe…shall everywhere become the ruling element without opposition…
The government of the nations forming the Universal or World-Republic shall all thus pass, without any effort, into Jewish hands thanks to the victory of the proletariat…Thus shall the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, that, when the Messianic epoch shall have arrived, the Jews will control the wealth of all the nations of the earth.
All except 1 leader of the Bolshevik ruling party were Jews, which included Lenin himself. In fact it was Lenin who ordered the murder of the Romanovs, facts which many historians and apologists had denied for decades until the evidence overwhelmed the lies.
 
It is against this background which Hitler formed his nationalistic Nazi party to efface the presence of Communism in Germany. Jonas documents that Hitler was not anti-Semitic in the personal sense. Indeed many historians, even Jewish ones, have noted that many Jews served in Hitler’s armed services or as commandants of prisoner camps, thus refuting the pernicious lie that Hitler was anti-Semitic. As we have documented elsewhere, the charge of anti-Semitism is a false one because the people claiming to be Jews are in fact Khazars – not descendants of Abraham or those of the Roman diaspora.
 
Hitler’s objective, the target of his ire, was the elimination of Communism and its culture of genocide. But since the vast majority of the Communist leadership was Jewish – almost 100% as we saw in Russia – the Zionist has turned colinearity into a form of causality, an argument very appealing to a lazy mind. And for those readers who believe the Holocaust happened, please write us for your timeshare in the Brooklyn Bridge.
 
Thus Hitler’s concern was to prevent what happened to Russia, where a revolution by totalitarian genocidal Jews wiped out 66 million people, from happening to Germany. Interestingly enough, Alexis notes that the Talmudists do not fundamentally oppose Nazism, but only its war on Communism. Thus the Jew Victoria Nuland of the State Department spent 5 billion dollars overthrowing the elected government of Ukraine to replace it with a neo Nazi government, all to further Zionist aims.
 
We urge readers who want to follow up the details of this brief essay to read Alexis’ outstanding article in Veterans Today which delineates the Talmudic Zionist assault on Europe and the United States where this country is a colony of the terrorist state of Israel as Bernard Levy prophesied in the 19th century.
Reference
Jonas E Alexis, Historical Causes of Nazi Germany and Implications in Ukraine (Part III), Veterans Today, April 6, 2014, accessed 4/7/2014, http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/04/06/historical-causes-of-nazi-germany-and-implications-in-ukraine-part-iii/
 
Copyright 2014 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Hitler’s Escape

German news reporters announced the death of Adolf Hitler May 1, 1945 after Soviet troops captured the bunker in which he was believed to have hidden. New evidence produced by multiple investigators over the past 10 years show these announcements to have been false.
 
The official story, especially the fairy tale produced by Hugh Trevor-Roper, claims that Hitler and his closest aides descended into his underground bunker for their last acts as rulers of Germany which was overrun by Allied military forces. Part of Hitler’s and his mistress Eva Braun’s final moments was their suicide in order to avoid capture by the Soviets. Upon closer inspection, there is very little substance to this tale.
 
Although a number of researchers have drawn similar conclusions about Hitler’s survival, there are differences in the story, so the reader is advised to continue researching this matter. But we attempt to amalgamate what we believe to be the most plausible narrative of his escape from Berlin.
 
The state sponsored story about Hitler suffers many defects, and we might add that the revisionist theories are not without their holes. The first problem is that there is no physical evidence of Hitler’s death. The skull fragments which the Soviet’s claimed for decades were those of Hitler were examined in 2009 by American researchers using DNA and anthropological tools. They concluded that the skull was that of a woman under 40 years of age – a finding which eliminated the last of the physical evidence purporting to be Hitler’s remains.
 
As one commentator noted, you couldn’t obtain a life insurance settlement with that kind of evidence. But another curious aspect to the Soviet case is the alleged recovery and burning of the body. Why would Hitler’s staunchest enemy furtively take the body and burn it? The more natural expectation is that the Soviets would put it on display to show the world that they had indeed conquered their arch nemesis.
 
And to complicate matters more, Joseph Stalin asserted on several occasions that Hitler escaped to either Spain or Argentina. At this point, the butcher of Moscow starts to point toward the truth, not something he was often inclined to do.
 
Eye witness evidence from the pilot who flew Hitler to Denmark from Berlin on or about April 30, 1945 begins to tell the remarkable story of the dictator’s escape with his mistress Eva Braun. From there the couple and a very small cadre of followers boarded a submarine which took them to Argentina where they lived sin eclusion until Hitler’s death some years later.
 
Exactly how many years “some years later” is has not been determined with finality.  Some of the more conservative researchers speculate that he died as early as 1954 while others put the time of death between 1962-65. The more sensational story tellers allege that he died in the 1980s.
 
The various years of death derive from circumstantial evidence and speculation. The researcher who argued for death in the mid 1950s based it upon life expectancy for someone with Parkinson’s disease, while those arguing for the 1960s base it upon the end of data trickling out from Argentina and the FBI about his life and whereabouts.
 
There are also differing accounts about how he lived. Some say that he lived in comfort though not grand, while other say that he survived in a humble if not desolate cabin behind very tight security. We tend to believe that the former explanation is more accurate but it is not major point of the story.
 
Part of our belief rests upon our understanding of Hitler’s connections with Martin Bormann and the Eichhorns who were very close friends and supporters of Hitler. Bormann was the financial and organizational brains who made Hitler’s economy hum. He had established hundreds of corporations throughout the world beginning in the 1930s, but especially in the 1940s, as a way of spreading influence, guaranteeing industrial supplies, and providing a means of escape and support should the Nazis lose the war.
 
The Eichhorns were also wealthy and had considerable holdings in Argentina. It is believed that Hitler stayed in their Eden Hotel in La Fulda for some or the entire time he was alive. The Eichhorns were among many German expatriates who had either taken up residence or acquired properties in Argentina, a practice which had started in the 1880s. In some places of Argentina, especially in the south and Patagonia, they had developed a state within a state, very much off limits to Argentine officials.
 
Finally, Juan Peron came to power during the war as a sympathizer and supporter of the Nazi cause. Thus all of the logistical and legal support required to sequester Hitler out of the public eye was in place by the time he arrived.
 
It is said by eye witnesses that Eva Braun was pregnant when she left Germany, thus many have speculated that the Hitlers had at least one child, while others speculate that they had another – making a son and daughter. Again, there is no hard evidence of this, but reasonable circumstantial evidence suggests it.
 
So how do we really know that Hitler survived? Much of the evidence comes from eye witnesses who have spoken in recent years. For example, one of the maids who waited on Hitler at the Eden Hotel has described vividly Hitler’s stay.
 
Many local newspaper accounts report directly or indirectly of Hitler’s attendances at various social functions. The FBI maintained a small team to track his location since the end of the war, and their reports and activities do not stop until about 1968.
 
It is believed that Eva survived considerably longer, with some saying as late as the 1980s. The children also believed to still be alive.
 
We would like to address one theory explaining Hitler’s escape. L C Vincent argues in his essay on the subject that Hitler was spared in a quid pro quo with the Allies over the atomic bomb. In other words, the Germans had already produced the bomb, but contrary to all of the hoopla surrounding the Manhattan Project, the US failed to produce an atomic bomb because it could not design the trigger necessary to detonate the bomb.
 
Although this theory is not as tight as we would like, we think it has merit, and may well explain why the Allies did not make a full court press to hunt down Hitler. Since we believe that it was within their means to do so, it is upon these grounds that Vincent’s theory has plausibility.
 
While all of this may seem disturbing, it is only because Americans are fed a steady diet of lies, fraud, and deceit, so that anything contrary to their civic religion is unsettling. However, we believe that the story of Hitler’s survival fits far better the evidence than does his death.
 
Reference
Revealed: Hitler in Argentina (Trailer), Producer: Noam Shalev, 2013
Hitler’s Escape to Argentina FULL VERSION, 21st Century Wire, Interview with Gerrard Wolf by Patrick Henningsen, First Airing SKY Channel 119 2012.
L C Vincent, Hitler Survived, Mystery Train, October 7, 2011, accessed March 16, 2014

Copyright 2014 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Friday, February 14, 2014

In Defense of Hitler?

Given what we “know” about Adolf Hitler, could anyone in his right mind honestly defend the man accused of murdering millions of Jews and many more millions who stood in his way of global conquest? The answer is yes, and the information presented will surprise most Americans.
 
The Barnes Review published its inaugural 2014 volume with a defense of Adolf Hitler, an ostensibly insurmountable feat. However, the historians at TBR pasted together a collage of interesting facts and vignettes which undermines the conventional wisdom about the 20th century’s most reviled man.
 
One of the leading articles in the edition addresses the subject of civilian bombings of cities during the war. The common view is that Hitler launched the London Blitzes to terrorize Britons, but the truth is much different. While Hitler bombed military targets in Britain, Churchill targeted civilian populations in Germany. Only after months of incessant bombing of Germany’s civilian centers did Hitler retaliate in kind. It is thus evident that Churchill was the butcher who spread death and pestilence throughout Europe.
 
This view is confirmed by Churchill’s refusal to consider any peace offers from the German fuehrer. Taking his love for war a step further, Churchill stated that he would not offer any peace terms to Germany because he knew that Hitler would accept them. How did the butcher of London know this? The answer is given in another revelation in the TBR magazine.
 
In a closely related article, TBR covers the carpet bombing of Germany, with Dresden being the most famous example in which American and British bombers pummeled the city with deathly fire bombs, a city with virtually no military significance. It was the stated policy of Anthony Eden to kill as many civilians as possible. The British, with their vaunted smug aristocracy, are among history’s most blood thirsty murderous hordes. Roosevelt and the Americans were no better.
 
New information about the mission of Rudolf Hess has been revealed in Hess, Hitler, and Churchill written by Peter Padfield which confirms the stories that Hitler sent his deputy to Britain with an offer of peace wherein Germany would withdraw from the occupied countries in exchange for British neutrality in his planned invasion of the USSR.
 
The magazine explains elsewhere that Hitler’s animosity for communism stemmed from its birth as a Jewish-Bankster tool for imposing totalitarianism on its subjects, the USSR being a prime example. Consequently, Hitler was biding his time to attack the Soviet Union in an effort wipe its threat from the planet.
 
When Hess’ plane went down over Scotland in 1941, the British arrested him and placed him in Spandau prison until they murdered him in 1987. Hess was also tried at Nuremburg after the war even though he could not have committed any crimes of any kind while incarcerated.
 
Padfield argues that the British entrapped Hess in a double cross where they feigned an interest in peace in order to lure Hess to Britain where they would betray him.
 
It is well established that Churchill lusted for war, and was hell bent that the United States should join the Zionist instigated war. Thus peace was a non starter for Churchill.
 
On a more personal note, Hitler’s bodyguard, Rochus Misch, the last surviving member of dictator’s inner circle, died September 5, 2013 aged 96. His recollections of Hitler are quite at variance with the common stories of a mad lunatic frothing at the mouth demon possessed rabid anti Semite. On the contrary, Misch reports that Hitler was well composed, considerate, and normal.
 
Finally, TBR published a very brief essay denying that the Rothschilds financed Hitler. While we have maintained that plutocrats indeed financed him, including Wall Street and the Bush Crime Syndicate, the essayist argued that no such evidence about the Rothschilds exists despite what Eustace Mullins or Gary Allen have written.  Cassian d’Ornellas argues that Hitler was the scourge of banksters, and that they turned on him as a threat to their pecuniary interests. This is a subject deserving further investigation. We do not retract any statements we have made about the involvement of Standard Oil and Wall Street funding Hitler, but a revised hermeneutic of the relationship is in order.
 
Most likely, Hitler was propped up to create a thesis and antithesis leading to war, the old favorite of banksters looking to grow rich on the corpses of the poor.
 
Other topics abound in this issue of The Barnes Review. We agree that it is time to re-examine Hitler based upon the evidence – not upon the movies and propaganda of Zionists.
Reference
The Barnes Review, January/February 2014
Copyright 2014 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Commemorating the Third Reich

Such is the power of propaganda that Americans believe that the United States won World War 2 and in so doing defeated Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany. On the contrary, the Third Reich is alive and well.
 
To understand World War 2, one must understand the politics of finance. War and finance go together like a horse and carriage; Bush was told by Satan, you can’t have one without the other. One of our correspondents reported a documentary describing a visit George Bush, Jr. had with the Brazilian President when the former held office. He advised the Brazilian to start a war since it is good for the economy. This was the lesson which the plutocrats wished to foist upon America about the Great Depression and World War 2.
 
They turned coincidence into causality as a means of positively associating war with prosperity. The banksters had prolonged the depression in order to time the war for this lesson. It is a reductionist application of the broken window theory, quackery which was demolished in the 19th century but revived for the 20th century fool.
 
But war cannot be waged without finances. Thus all significant American wars have been financed by cheap money in order to sacrifice lives in useless causes. The Federal Reserve Act was passed in order to finance American involvement in World War 1, to say nothing of the enormous transfer of wealth it presaged from the poor to the rich.
 
After conquering Germany in World War 1, the West, led by the Americans, imposed crippling terms on the vanquished in order to pave the way for an hysterical tyrant. Anyone would do, but it so happens that the banksters stumbled upon Adolf Hitler, a low rent corporal from World War 1, failed artist, and future mass murderer.
 
For anyone to think that such a person could rise to the top of the political heap without a guiding hand is a bit naive. Hitler was financed by western banksters who saw opportunity in his ascent, particularly Henry Ford who hated Jews more than he hated anything. So enamored was Hitler with Ford that he patterned Mein Kampf after Ford’s writings and proudly displayed a picture of Ford in his office for years until it embarrassed his benefactor.
 
Antony Sutton has documented the links between Wall Street and German financial powers who funneled money into Hitler’s cause. Hitler was completely impossible without Wall Street and German money – the kind that grows in monopolies and merchants of death.
 
We reported some of his findings when we wrote about the Chairman of Standard Oil of New Jersey who openly supplied oil to the Nazis throughout the entire war and was found guilty by Congress. We assure you that it is the height naivety to suppose that Farish was acting on his lonesome. Standard was and remains a Rockefeller phenomenon. We are not fooled by the idea that it was simply the love of money which motivated Farish to supply his favorite dictator with much needed oil.
 
When the war ended, the plutocrats were as much in control as ever. While they failed in their attempt to exterminate Jews, they took the lessons of the war to devise more effective strategies for dealing with democracies such as the United States. Toward that end, they officially established the Central Intelligence Agency, and imported thousands of Nazis through Operation Paperclip, criminals who assumed important positions in American government.
 
The plutocrats murdered a president because Nelson Rockefeller always wanted to become president without an election, as Winthrop Rockefeller’s ex-wife testified in court. Since November 22, 1963, the Citizens of the World have had a firm grip on the US presidency.
 
The plan to establish the Nazi state rocketed into orbit on September 11, 2001 when the Military Industrial Complex leaders, a group which includes the Rockefellers and Bush Crime Syndicate, staged an attack on American soil in an adaptation of Operation Northwoods, first presented to Kennedy by General Lyman Lemnitzer in 1962.
 
The gimmick worked and America has been at war fighting the CIA’s bogeymen ever since. Manifestations of the Nazi state have been observed in the grossly named Patriot Act, the destruction of the Occupy movement, and most recently the march again Monsanto, a core member of the Nazi movement. The march against this purveyor of disease was occasioned by people realizing that genetically modified foods (GMOs) have been an evil experiment on humans without their consent and with highly deleterious consequences.
 
The state controlled media blacked out this story even when major demonstrations all over the world called upon Monsanto – the proud maker of Agent Orange – to stop the propagation of these deadly foods. Facebook forcibly removed references and links to information about the march in full contempt of freedom of speech and to show their authority as a Nazi overlord.
 
The most flagrant signs of the flourishing Nazi state come from the current administration which has used the IRS to attack Americans, uses ATT, Facebook, Google, Verizon, Boeing, and other corporate behemoths to spy on every aspect of Americans’ lives, funneling the information into computers whose capabilities defy most people’s abilities to comprehend.
 
Americans live in a Nazi state - the Third Reich of their forefathers - and think that their ability to buy lottery tickets and watch Dancing With the Stars is a sign of freedom. Freedom ended on their television watch.
 
Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.