Saturday, November 17, 2018

The 55th Hoaxiversary of the Kennedy Assassination

[Author's Note: This Chronicle proves that we are not above being conned by specious but seductive reasoning. The theory that Kennedy was not shot is provably imbecilic as subsequent Chronicles will demonstrate. Miles Mathis is either an excellent con artist or as gullible as we were in considering the theory that Kennedy was not murdered.

Author's Note: Since publishing this Chronicle, I have come to doubt the validity of its thesis though the questions it raises are quite profound - namely what happened to Kennedy's body?

The 55th anniversary of the assassination of John Kennedy gives an opportune time to reflect on the progress made since 2013 in unraveling the munificent mysteries of this epic event in American history. Many of our previous conclusions must be discarded or modified.

In our earlier attempt to bring clarity to the Big Event, we concluded that Kennedy was shot from the front by a cabal of conspirators, and that Lee Oswald was entirely innocent of either murdering Kennedy or Tippit. Finally we concluded that the Warren Commission was a complete farce. All of the foregoing is true except the one about Kennedy being shot.

So much has been learned in the past 5 years. Through the work of Ralph Cinque, we know that Oswald was indeed in the doorway of the Texas School Book Depository at 12:30p just as he told Dallas police Captain Will Fritz, thus making it impossible for him to be the assassin. The myriad Oswald inconsistencies are easily resolved by the recognition that multiple Oswalds were played over the years going back to the births of LEE and HARVEY Oswald as John Armstrong has documented. In short, Oswald was an intelligence project.

Other astonishing work by Ralph Cinque has proven that Jack Ruby did not shoot Lee HARVEY Oswald in the Dallas Police Department basement. In fact, the incident was a made for TV movie to terrorize the American people, and to eliminate the possibility of either case going to trial where it would collapse in a pile of smoke and rubble. Cinque has shown many marks of film production artifacts in the DPD basement - such as film set microphones, movie director filming angles, and stage marks - proving that the so-called casual transfer of Oswald between detention centers was pure theater - including his murder. The character of Jack Ruby was played by FBI agent James Bookhout.

At the other end of the drama, Miles Mathis has made a cogent case that Kennedy was not shot. While Mathis goes out on a limb to suggest that Kennedy assumed the throne of an underground kingdom, the more plausible story is that his health necessitated his evacuation from public life - but that is only part of the story.

The case against Kennedy's murder is that there is no body. Even Bobby complained at the casket viewing that "he didn't even look like Jack." This clue speaks volumes. The autopsy was a charade of  Keystone Cops playing a shell game of caskets where different caskets were literally being chased around Bethesda before the autopsy. Is that the way an autopsy of a president is conducted? Kennedy's brain is missing because it was never available in the first place. The X-rays are inconsistent because they are forged and faked because there was no Kennedy body. The photographic evidence is a mess because it was a movie production gone bad - or one which didn't need serious production quality because the news media would perpetually peddle a pile of lies to explain away the idiocies of the whole plot.

The Zapruder film has been shown time and time again to be a fraud, with Jim Fetzer's analysis of it being a good starting point for novices.

One of the central proofs of the fraud is the Single Bullet Theory which posited that the brilliant sharpshooter psychopath Oswald could fire 3 shots from an Italian weapon at which even the Italians laugh hysterically when presented as an assassin's weapon. The imbecility of suggesting that a bullet could zigzag through Kennedy's body and then hit Connally is damning evidence that the oligarchs were yanking our chain.

Since Oswald and Kennedy were not shot, it is very doubtful that Tippit was killed despite all of the conflicting and confusing testimony from the crisis actors playing witness to the event. We know for a fact from Armstrong's research that Dallas Captain William R Westbrook was at the crime scene with Sgt Kenneth Croy and that he walked down the driveway to where Tippit's body lay to confirm that he was "dead." Is even a CIA creep like Westbrook going to risk being spotted by dozens of witnesses as an accomplice to a murder?

More importantly, the crime scene is so clean. A point blank shooting is going to leave blood spatter, but we see none on the car or on LEE Oswald, the version who is known to have been Tippit's assailant. We also know that Tippit was involved in intelligence work because he was staying in the neighborhood - rather than his own home - where he was shot and was close friends with CIA asset Carl Mathers of CIA's Collins Radio.

Finally, there is the vaunted and much maligned Warren Commission which was a total joke. Critical witnesses such as Laura Kittrell were studiously ignored. Banal and inane documentation was included in the Warren Commission Report such as dental records of distant relatives of irrelevant witnesses. It was a creation of the Executive Branch which had absolutely zero competence to solve a murder - much less try one.

The major players in the assassination production were the masters of entertainment, legends of Hollywood, the Wizards of all Oz, and owners of all media - powerful Jews. Both Jack and Jackie were Jews, contrary to all of the misrepresentation about their Irish roots, a fact which Mathis establishes with considerably finality.

As we noted, one reason for the drama was Jack's health. But couldn't he have just resigned from office, or hung on for another year before relinquishing the reigns to Johnson? Oh no mon frere. Never let a good crisis go to waste. In the first place a good deal of controversial legislation needed passing such as the Civil Rights Act. And as we all know there is nothing like the pity card to get one's way.

More importantly, the American people needed constant fear to surrender civil liberties and to pay ever more taxes for Jewish wars of imperial aggression. The oligarchs needed a way to get the drugs flowing from the Golden Triangle - et voila - Vietnam.

So yes, the American people have been played like the gullible sheep which they are. If it's on TV - and especially if told by Walter Cronkite - it must be true. The facts state otherwise - you have been hoaxed.

Copyright 2018 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, November 4, 2018

Update on Larry Craford

New information about Larry Craford has emerged providing new insights into his role in the alleged assassination of John F Kennedy, as well as compelling a revision to our previous belief about his role in the murder of Dallas Police Department Officer JD Tippit.

Larry Rivera has unearthed new details about the Texas Employment Commission (TEC) incident revealing that Larry Craford (aka Crafard) was the man impersonating Lee HARVEY Oswald.

For those new to the case, a young man said to be Oswald applied to the TEC for employment prior to "finding" a job at the Texas School Book Depository in October 1963. He was interviewed by Laura Kittrell who left a lengthy manuscript detailing her interviews of Oswald.

She described a man who was prone to outbursts, bragged of speaking Russian and being in Russia, and displayed other idiosyncratic behaviors which suggested that he was a "Lone Nut." When Kittrell later saw pictures of Craford from the Warren Commission, she recognized the man as her noisy Oswald.

But that wasn't the only Oswald Kittrell interviewed. The other version was indeed Lee HARVEY Oswald who was much more polished and composed. Kittrell noticed this difference, realizing that she was being played, but not sure of its meaning.

Thus it is very clear that CIA was running multiple Oswalds, as John Armstrong has abundantly demonstrated, to create a profile of a man who was unhinged and liable to do anything, including murdering a president.

Kittrell noticed that her boisterous and careless Oswald was not the news media Oswald, and was thus studiously avoided by the Warren Commission. Her records at TEC had been confiscated by FBI while she at the Trade Mart expecting to hear the president speak.

Not only had Kittrell seen Crafard, but she also saw the real HARVEY Oswald. She knew that 2 people were playing the same Oswald character.

Previously, we had opined - with conviction - that Larry Craford had murdered Tippit, but we may raise caution after these revelations. On the other hand, it cannot be ruled out all together. We are also not convinced that Tippit was murdered.

In other words, it appears that Crafard's assignment was to make Oswald look like a nut case. But we also know that he was involved with organized crime because he mentioned to Kittrell his ties to Nixon aide and real estate investor Murray Chotiner. We also reported previously Crafard's career as a gun for hire. Thus we have a credible basis for assuming that Craford applied his trade in the execution of JD Tippit.

Further research by Armstrong shows that LEE Harvey Oswald murdered Tippit, but there may be more to the story. Some witnesses reported seeing 2 men leave the alleged Tippit murder scene, each going in opposite directions.

If the Tippit murder was faked, as we suspect, then we have to question whether or not any of the witnesses were authentic. They may have been crisis actors as the government uses them so frequently in faked "tragedies."

But accepting that 2 men were at the scene of the "murder", it is entirely possible that one of them was Crafard while the other was LEE. But because the accounts of 2 assailants is somewhat murky, we leave as conjecture our hypothesis that Crafard was the murderer - if in fact there were a murder.

Reasons for doubting that a murder was committed include the cleanliness of the crime scene, and the cleanliness of LEE Oswald - there was no blood spatter or flying body fragments expected in a close range gun attack.

On the other hand, if Crafard was the gunman, then that might explain why the white-shirted LEE Oswald was untainted with physical evidence of the crime.

At this point, we can firmly believe and know that Larry Crafard was the man impersonating Lee HARVEY Oswald at the Texas Employment Commission.

Larry Rivera, Laura Kittrell, Larry Crafard, and Lee Oswald, The New JFK Show Blog, September 27, 2018, accessed 11/4/2018

John Armstrong, The Murder of J. D. Tippit, Harvey and Lee (website), September 9, 2018,, accessed 11/4/2018

Copyright 2018 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, July 8, 2018

The JFK Assassination Hoax

[Editor's Note 7/29/2020 - We have since recanted of the ridiculous idea that the assassination of John Kennedy was a hoax. We concluded that the author of the theory is a limited hangout artist whose main job is to lead people astray regarding this crime. As an antidote to this drivel we wrote, please see our more sober article here]

As ridiculous and preposterous as it sounds, a credible legally viable case can be made that President John F Kennedy was not assassinated in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963 as reported by the news media.

Several considerations inform the conclusion, the chief of which is the lack of a body. Other details include Kennedy's Jewishness and his very establishmentarian credentials, the explanations of which will have to wait.

To bring a case of murder to court, one must have evidence that the victim is dead. Without a body to confirm death, the case is doomed from the start, and may not even be admissible in court. In the case of Kennedy we have no body - plain and simple. He was certainly reported dead, but its factualness defies proof.

One may protest vehemently that Kennedy died because Walter Cronkite said it was true and that Lyndon Johnson became president. But these facts are not proof of death. The only fact which can prove death is the corpse of the deceased. Therein lies the rub.

One of the leading issues is the confusion in the forensic evidence. The autopsy images show at least 3 different men, at least one of which was alive at the time of the photography according to Miles Mathis. Since the autopsy artifacts are the highest form of evidence for the claim that Kennedy was dead, and they are riddled with inconsistencies and body doubles, we must assume that Kennedy was still alive at the time of his autopsy.

During the very limited viewing of the body, Bobby or Jacqueline was reported to have said that the corpse didn't even look like Jack. This seemingly odd remark could be attributed to the alleged head damage, but it turns out to be a marker in unraveling the events of 11/22.

Another fact undermining the allegations of Kennedy's death are his body doubles. We know that Kennedy had body doubles from the legendary series The Men Who Killed Kennedy. Miles Mathis reports that a taped conversation of one of Kennedy's would-be assassins asks how many body doubles Kennedy has - not if he even had one.

The implication for our case is that one or more of those doubles could have been used for the autopsy, or could have in fact been a real assassination victim, though we doubt that anyone was killed for Kennedy's fake assassination. This fact, coupled with all of the holes in the evidence, creates more than enough reasonable doubt about Kennedy's demise.

The main point is that no one can positively identify John Kennedy in the autopsy photos or prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was Kennedy, rather than one of his doubles, who was assassinated. Even worse, no one can prove that Kennedy was assassinated.

This gaping hole in the case is the reason why Johnson and his advisors fought valiantly to keep the case out of court where legally unimpeachable evidence would have been required to establish the fact of death - regardless if by assassination or other causes.

Bobby Kennedy sent Walter Sheridan to torpedo the investigation and prosecution of Clay Shaw because he did not want to deal with this issue of a lack of forensic evidence, or to expose the hoax and fraud perpetrated upon the American people.

It is so much easier to try a case in the court of public opinion or in an executive branch kangaroo court such as the Warren Commission than it is to do so in a duly constituted court working under the standards of the judiciary.

Many will object that the notorious Zapruder film "proves" that Kennedy was assassinated. However such a believer would have to prove that the occupant of the limousine was a body double, and then prove that the film was not altered. Many researchers have identified book loads of inconsistencies in the film such that it is almost laughable that it would be admitted to court as evidence. In a court of public opinion presided over by Dan Rather and Geraldo Rivera, it is another matter entirely.

Another telltale sign that the assassination was a made for TV production is the presence of Ed Lansdale in Dealey Plaza. Lansdale was an advertising man who was pulled into CIA via the military. His specialty was public relations propaganda and psychological warfare. He was not an assassin. One of his "accomplishments" was the overthrow of the Philippines government in 1954 when a fake uprising of a hand full of revolutionaries which he filmed was broadcast as a major mutiny and coup, leading to the installation of the US puppet government.

Dealey Plaza followed the same model in which a fake event was transmorphed into the real thing. Lansdale's job was a revival of his other stunt work - he choreographed the activities in Dealey Plaza, including the crisis actors who occupied the open fields in front of the pergola and between the north and south structures. It is almost certain that none of the witnesses was authentic - in part because there was no real assassination, but also because fake witnesses were required to corroborate the story.

Another sign that the assassination was faked is the Jewish control of the assassination. Everything from Permindex to Abraham Zapruder was under the control of Jews. Because Kennedy and Jacqueline were Jewish, we can be certain that the Jews would not harm either of  them. Now it might be surprising that the Kennedys were Jewish, but based upon the research of Miles Mathis and the links he found between Jewish families in the British Peerage, it is an unavoidable conclusion.

A final clue we will consider is the fakery of the Oswald shooting. Ralph Cinque has documented in painful detail the fake shooting of Oswald by a fake Jack Ruby. No one ever sees the face of the shooter who is in reality FBI Agent James Bookout. Cinque has documented the microphones, position markers for the actors, wide angle views, the special lighting and all of the TV production apparatus used to film this epic event. It was a total charade.

So if the Oswald "murder" was a fake, it makes sense that the whole thing was a fake - a massive assault on the sensibilities of Americans and the world.

But what is the motive? Here we part company with Mathis who maintains that Kennedy was moved underground to establish an American monarchy. While it may ultimately turn out to be correct, its evidence is weak, and can be replaced by a simpler explanation.

Kennedy was quite encumbered with health issues as Robert Dalleck has documented. It is very likely that Kennedy's health required that he relinquish his office - at least its public aspect. The fake assassination gave the oligarchs a perfect opportunity to expand government power and illegalities - such as keeping the case out of state court - and to create fear to justify further government expansion and termination of freedoms and rights.

The assassination was also used to overcome objections to very controversial acts such as the Civil Rights Act, and the expansion of the war in Viet Nam.

The Kennedy assassination, then, marked establishment of the police state, from which the country has never recovered.

Miles Mathis, The Hidden King(s),, c. 2008
Ralph Cinque, [numerous writings], Oswald in the Doorway,

Copyright 2018 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, January 7, 2018

Harry Potter as CIA Psyops

While Harry Potter has earned some notoriety in some quarters, it has never been because it was the product of Anglo-American intelligence. But that is precisely the thesis advanced by one commentator analyzing the mega-epic which has generated some 500 million book sales.

Miles Mathis' genealogical research has tied its author, J K Rowling to many of Britain's highest ranking nobility and even to Queen Elizabeth II. And since the nobility are at the epicenter of state intelligence operations, it is a near certainty that Rowling is a front for this mass produced fiction one of whose important roles was to generate business for the paper industry in which one of Rowling's peers holds considerable interest. But that is really just a footnote as we shall see.

In Mathis' estimation, Harry Potter is second rate derivative literature churned by a committee of writing hacks in the bowels of Langley or UK's MI6. He doubts that its reputed author has even the skills to produce that level of gibberish.

One of the leading themes in Harry Potter is that parents are muggles - useless antiquated relics at whom one should sneer. It is the Platonic ideal, realized in Jewish Communism, which takes children from the parents to be raised by the state.

The other major theme of Harry Potter is that life is an illusion - a complete magic act. While Mathis does not precisely state the case thusly, we would contend that the oligarchy creates a miasma of fakery, fantasy, and falsehoods to bamboozle the "hoi polloi." Through its pervasive and total control of entertainment (Jewish), communications (Jewish), and government (Jewish), the elites are able to create whatever virtual reality (magic) it wishes. The people have swallowed the kool aid, in part through well paying jobs, to believe the hokum shoveled down their throats and shoved up their posteriors. Because it comes from respected authorities, and they have spent their lives in academia as obsequious, grade sucking sycophants, it is all the more believable because it comes from these intellectual elites as fake news.

Thus, as we have pointed out long before, the Single Bullet Theory, Moon Landing, the Holocaust, the Titanic sinking, among so many more, are so readily believed by the masses, but are contrivances and falsehoods. Sometimes the facts are correct, but the explanation is totally a lie, as in the case of the Titanic.

Jews are masters of illusion which is why they own Hollywood lock, stock, and barrel. They are also masters of control which is why they have created the invisible government of the CIA and MI6 to control society - not just some of it but all of it. And thus it is the Magic Academy of Harry Potter which is a symbol for the intelligence agencies and magic is the lies and illusions created by these agencies often to instill fear and confusion in order to better divide, conquer, and control. The elite are rubbing their control of you in your face and you don't even realize it.

It is tempting to hold in contempt people who believe these foolish lies, but I was such an one myself. History and life are lies created by the elites - especially the Jewish ones.

Miles Mathis, The Great Harry Potter Hoax, May 15, 2016,, accessed 1/7/2018

Copyright 2018 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.