Showing posts with label David Rockefeller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Rockefeller. Show all posts

Saturday, February 21, 2015

David Rockefeller and the Assassination of John Kennedy

When we discovered an article delineating the many Rockefeller links to the principal architects and builders of the murder of President Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas, Texas’ Dealey Plaza, we felt vindicated in our thesis that David Rockefeller was one of the eminences grises of the crime.
 
Most who visit our chronicles are well aware of the following quote from the traitor David Rockefeller, published in his 2002 autobiography:
 
"Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
It is thus no stretch of the imagination that someone who hates the United States so deeply and profoundly as Rockefeller would participate in the murder of its president. Without any loyalties of substance to the United States, its government and laws would only seem a nuisance to the all powerful Rockefellers.
 
Many have written of the Rockefeller control of both political parties, Phyllis Schafly being one such early opponent who recognized the crass contempt with which the Rockefellers manipulated both parties to govern the nation in their best interests.
 
During the divorce trial of Winthrop Rockefeller, the man who had the largest homosexual porn collection in the world, his ex-wife recounted how the Rockefeller brothers would sit around 1-2 times per year to figure out how Nelson could become president without an election.
 
Such an opportunity arose in 1963 when they participated in the assassination of a sitting president. While the smoking gun of Rockefeller involvement is not at hand, forensically sound evidence is available intimately linking David Rockefeller to the crime of the century.
 
The argument rests upon relationships which Rockefeller had with the known principals of the murder. In particular, Rockefeller had exceptionally close relationships with the following individuals: Lyndon Johnson, Allen Dulles, John J McCloy, and C Douglas Dillon.
 
We have written elsewhere about the close association of Lyndon Johnson and David Rockefeller, a relationship close enough that Rockefeller would have endorsed Johnson for the presidency in 1968, a subject which came up at the not infrequent dinners the 2 parties had.
 
It is well established that Lyndon Johnson murdered John Kennedy, with the largest debate centering on the extent of Johnson’s involvement. His famous duck in his limousine prior to the outbreak of sniper bullets is proof that he had advance knowledge, while the various schemes Johnson orchestrated to bring Kennedy to Dallas is proof of participation in the murder to say nothing of the cover-up.
 
For the planning and cover-up, 2 men closely associated with Rockefeller, the aforementioned Dillon and Dulles, warrant further scrutiny for their relationships to Rockefeller. These relationships are foundational to understanding the command and control exerted by Rockefeller in the murder of Kennedy.
 
Dillon was a close friend and confidante of David, knowing him as far back as their days at Pine Lodge School, and later Harvard. Dillon was the son of the founder of Dillon, Read, the famous and highly profitable bond broker whose international business network was legendary. Closer to Laurance than to David, Dillon was vice chairman of the powerful Council on Foreign Relations and the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art, both important Rockefeller enterprises.
 
As Secretary of Treasury from 1961-65, Dillon was the authority over the Secret Service which played an indispensible role in murdering President Kennedy. Without their feigned negligence and active involvement in the murder and cover-up, the assassination project would have failed utterly.
 
Dillon went so far as to lie about Kennedy’s preference for no Secret Service agents, a lie which he told to the Warren Commission, and was later contradicted by one of his own agents James Rowley.
 
But what’s a few lies among friends? On the Warren Commission were 2 other Rockefeller associates – John J McCloy and Allen Dulles. McCloy was chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank from 1953-60, the bank whose chairman was Rockefeller’s Uncle Winthrop Aldrich when he gave Rockefeller his start in business.
 
McCloy was also chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations from 1954-70. But McCloy’s most important role was as member of the Allen Dulles run Warren Commission, the vile assemblage of traitors who covered-up the murder of the president by the Rockefeller men.
 
Allan Dulles’ connections to Rockefeller are just as strong, first through the elite law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell which advised the Rockefeller oil interests, and later through the CIA. But John Foster Dulles, brother of Allen, was a Rockefeller in-law, ties which were cemented through the intelligence work which both Rockefeller and Dulles were deeply tied.
 
When Dulles set up one of the offices of the Office of Strategic Services, he chose Rockefeller Center from which time David Rockefeller was extensively briefed on covert operations as they were often in support of family business. Many CIA operations ran through the Chase Manhattan Bank including the 1953 Iranian coup which gave American oil companies the bulk of Iran’s oil.
 
It was the CIA, working closely with Mossad, David Ben Gurion, and Rothschild family which murdered Kennedy - the agency over which Dulles ruled, and from which Kennedy fired him for his Bay of Pigs failures.
 
David Rockefeller admitted in his own biography that his family was part of a secret cabal to overthrow the United States government, a fact of which he was proud. Rockefeller’s closest personal and business ties were to men who served on the Warren Commission, two of whose most important members - Dulles and McCloy - were Rockefeller acolytes. Finally, David maintained close relations with Kennedy murderer Lyndon Johnson, and his ace Secret Service secretary Dillon, all of whose policies benefited first and foremost the oil, arms, and money machines of the Rockefeller empire.
 
Do not for a minute think that anti-trust diluted Rockefeller wealth or power, a fact which Gary Allen copiously documented. The wealth reported for David Rockefeller is a carefully constructed lie as it represents just the tip of a massive iceberg.
 
It is plainly evident that private citizen David Rockefeller, with ties so close to US intelligence that he commanded extensive briefings on its covert operations, was not only part of this secret cabal as he admitted, but that he was one of the silent partners in the murder of President Kennedy with a little help from his friends Dillon, Dulles, McCloy, and Johnson.
 
Reference
Morgan Reynolds, The Assassination of JFK, 9/11 and David Rockefeller, No More Games . Net, June 1, 2009, accessed 2/21/2015

Copyright 2015 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Friday, October 17, 2014

Chronicle Update: The Truth About the Iranian Hostage Crisis

Contrary to our previously published essay on the Iranian Revolution of 1979, it was not the result of "blowback" against the CIA's Shah, but rather another CIA coup to replace a wayward son who got too big for his britches.

This new information surprised even us, as we had long considered the Islamic revolution a virulent rejection of Westernism and the domineering cruel Americans. It seemed to us that Islam was the perfect vehicle for expressing native objections to US control of Iran.
 
While the revolution no doubt contained true believers in such a philosophy, the revolutionaries led by the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini itself used religion as an instrument for its more basal lusts for power rather than principled basis for governing, something which ingratiated itself to the CIA.
 
We have discovered that the Shah had angered the Americans, more specifically the Ziocons, Rockefellers, and Bush Crime Syndicate by his growing independence of these groups' wishes, his assertion of strength as a regional power, and his closer relations with the USSR.
 
However, even those sins were trumped by the greatest evil one can commit against Western oil barons, which is the temerity to not renew oil concessions extracted from the 1953 revolution which brought the Shah to power. The concessions were set to expire in 1979 and the Shah was not inclined to renew them.
 
It seems that somewhere along the way, the Shah decided that governance in the interest of the Iranian people, rather than in the obeisance to Washington and the Rothschilds, was the legacy he wished to leave his country.
 
One other factor riling the ire of the Rothschild dynasty, which owns and rules Israel, was that the Shah sought support from foreign powers for the development of its nuclear energy, a quest which has fueled the sanctions of today by the US at Israel's orders.
 
David Rockefeller had appointed Jimmy Carter president whom the former ordered to accept the Shah into the United States however briefly. This provided the catalyst for the Iranian students to storm the American embassy to take hostages which it held for over 400 days, resulting in the demise of the Carter presidency. Thus what David gave, he took away, and deliberately so.
 
When Carter visited Iran in December 1977, he assured the world that "Iran, because of the great leadership of the Shah, is an island of stability in one of the more troubled areas of the world." One week following his departure riots erupted in Iran, presaging the Shah's downfall the following year.
 
As George Bush later explained, this was coded language for the CIA to begin to dismantle the Shah's government.
 
During this time, American generals and CIA, including one General Huyser, were compromising the Shah's military which they bribed or coerced into abandoning or denying the Shah's orders. With 40,000 "advisors" in Iran, it is easy to see how the CIA was the country's real kingmaker. For all practical purposes, the Iranian military was a vassal of the CIA.
 
The Ayatollah was America's handpicked successor to the Shah. While this statement may shock Americans raised on propaganda, lies, and deceit, it is the truth. Khomeini and many of his lieutenants were either on the CIA payroll or were in bed with them. Granted that in some cases it was merely a marriage of convenience, but the bottom line is that each party used the other, and the Ayatollah, among other things was a megalomaniac who used religion as a control structure, a situation very amenable to CIA modus operandi.
 
It is also true that among the revolutionaries there were true believers, but this does not undermine the tilt which Khomeini had toward the CIA.
 
Thus the CIA removed an increasingly non-compliant vassal who dared to take back his country's oil, and in the mean time installed a brutal repressive religious freak who made life miserable for Iranians using the CIA's Shock Doctrine.
 
The Khomeini regime's compliance with the Ziocons explains why no hostage suffered great harm, although the idea that many of them were probably CIA also explains their safeties. The CIA sponsorship of Khomeini also explains the October Surprise which George Bush engineered in 1980 to further destroy Carter whom he and Rockefeller played like a cheap fiddle - both coming and going.
 
We urge those interested in exploring the subject more carefully to read our Reference as it is quite enlightening.

Reference
Iran and the Revolution: An Exposure of the American Plans, islamicweb.com, nd, accessed 10/17/2014

Copyright 2014 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, March 17, 2013

How David Rockefeller Selected Jimmy Carter for President

To most Americans, the idea that a powerful plutocrat could anoint a president seems rather preposterous, but as Gary Allen reported in his book Jimmy Carter / Jimmy Carter, that is precisely how Carter ascended to the presidency.
 
In the wake of Watergate, the Rockefeller cabal needed a suitable Democrat replacement since their polling indicated that a Republican’s chance of election were not much better than a snowball’s survival in hell.
 
Their poll results indicated that a “progressive” southern Democrat sported the best chance of winning the election, no doubt due to the growing electoral significance of the South, but also in recognition of the nation’s increasing rightward tilt – at least rhetorically so.
 
In 1973 David Rockefeller invited Florida governor Reubin Askew and Georgia governor Jimmy Carter to his Tarrytown, New York estate for dinner to discuss the proposition of either one of them running for president.
 
Prior to this point, the Rockefeller controlled media began juicing Carter’s political engines by doing favorable puff pieces for Carter extolling his New South credentials in order to make him more palatable to traditional coastal liberals and moderate Midwesterners.
 
Allen states that Rockefeller chose Carter over Askew because the Georgia governor showed much more ruthless ambition than his southern neighbor. In order to make Carter more pliable, they maneuvered him into deceiving his banker and friend Bert Lance to shovel bank depositor funds into Carter’s peanut business which was subsequently deposited back into the bank to serve as the basis for campaign matching funds.
 
This illegal campaign fraud would later envelop Lance when he outlived his usefulness, resulting in his resignation as OMB Director in Carter's first year. Lance was also implicated in other bank fraud in connection with BCCI in the late 1980s.

Once elected, Carter honored Rockefeller’s wish to fill his cabinet with Council on Foreign Relations and Tri Lateral Commission alumni in pursuit of his Grand Design for merging the USSR and USA into a single political union.
In the end the rightward tilt left threw Carter off his perch with the Iran Hostage Crisis fiasco which happened to be instigated by none other than David Rockefeller.

Reference
An Interview with Gary Allen by John Rees, The Review of the News, February 27, 1980, http://www.whale.to/b/allen1.html

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.