Sunday, November 19, 2017

Bonaparte and Hitler: Two Peas In a Pod

Observers have long noted similarities between France's Napoleon Bonaparte and Germany's Adolf Hitler, but they often miss the important commonalities and thus distort European history into a caricature of truth. The most salient feature of the two autocrats is that they were Jewish.

Napoleon and Hitler both conquered or dominated large swaths of Europe, and both men met their matches attacking the Russian bear. They ruled their respective countries for 12-15 years, after which they both managed to escape to safer locations when their ruling careers came to a halt.

As noted already, both men were Jews. Miles Mathis has noted in 2 separate studies the genealogy of both dictators, each of which has Jewish blood in both the matrilineal and patrilineal lines. This ethnicity explains how each of these Jews had such meteoric and improbable rises to power.

In other words, the financial Jewish elite who already controlled so much of Europe were easily able to manipulate manufactured events to give the reigns of power to their chosen puppet. In no way would these Jewish elites allow non-Jews the kind of power taken by Bonaparte and Hitler.

As we reported elsewhere, Louis XVI was fake-guillotined and returned to the throne as Louis XVIII. The power vacuum of the Jewish engineered French Revolution created the ideal scenario for a pompous actor such as Bonaparte to seize power. So the Jews created fake crises which their crisis actor par excellence resolved with his march on Paris.

In Germany over one hundred years later, the same shtick was played, this time with Adolf Hitler who brought prosperity to a prostrate nation as the man of the hour.

Both men were financed by the usual suspects - the Rothschilds, though in the case of Hitler, new financial blood was brought to the party with the Schiffs, Warburgs, Baruchs, Bushes and others. Each man was assigned the task of militarily conquering Europe for the Jews, and on the surface each failed. But the real story is that Hitler succeeded because his job was to destroy Gentiles.

Mathis notes that too many inconsistencies in the stories of Bonaparte's military campaigns suggest that his battles were more paper affairs than real military battles. Usually the manpower claimed for each side, such as Austria and France, increased when it was expected to decrease, and victory was achieved in the face of overwhelming odds in the case of Napoleon. Hacks are quick to note Bonaparte's genius for war, but more than likely it was the genius of historians lying about the battles rather than the midget commander's strategic and tactical puissance.

If Mathis is correct about the deceit of the numerous Napoleonic battles, then European history is ripe for a major rewrite. But even if Napoleon was a gifted a commander as reported, the fact that his paymasters were Jews provides an even greater rewrite of the European history down to the present time.

Miles Mathis, Was Napoleon Jewish?, April 16, 2016,, accessed 11/19/2017

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Saturday, October 28, 2017

Is God Really Impossible?

We came across an interesting essay which explained how God was impossible. Unfortunately, most of the opponents of the article did not read the fine print which qualified the argument. We would like to elaborate a bit further on the thesis.

The author of the article in question is an anonymous writer going by the name fatfist. To his credit he adheres to the scientific method and to precise definitions. Most of his adversaries couldn't define a fart if their lives depended on it.

For those wondering, a definition is a stipulation declaring criteria for membership in a set. For example when we ask for the definition of a ball, we don't care about its size, color, weight, etc as those are descriptive aspects of what we assume to be a ball. We are only interested in the minimum criteria for labeling an object a ball. We might then say that a ball is sphere with a bounce coefficient greater than 0. Thus a globe, though spherical, is not a ball because we assume that it does not bounce.

And so fatfist defines key terms in making his argument that God cannot exist. The first term is God who is defined as the person who created something from nothing as monotheist theologians are inclined to do.

His argument is sullied by the mischievous stipulation that the verb "to create" must be creatio ex nihilo, but which in ordinary usage does not carry that meaning. As such, caveat emptor. We exploit the loophole in short order.

He then defines space as a void, and matter as something which has form which can only come from location in space. An object has existence if it has location, and location is defined as the set of distances to other objects. Matter is that which has form.

Since space is a void - ie nothingness - by definition it cannot be created. Since it is impossible to have form without space, then space must necessarily precede form and hence precede matter. Since God is said to have form, he must have matter and be surrounded by space. The implication of these statements is that space and matter are eternal and God must consequently be subsequent to them.

Thus we have a non-eternal God who rather than creating the universe could have assembled planet earth and this would be highly consistent with Genesis which pervasively uses the language of manufacture, construction, and formation to describe the creative acts in its first 2 chapters. They were not creations ex nihilo as the theologians and atheists normally insist.

So God might exist, contrary to fatfist, but then we are talking of 2 different types of Gods - a greater and "lesser" god. The idea of a "lesser" god is actually consistent with the Biblical book of Genesis which introduces elohim which refer to powerful or authoritative beings rather than to gods with magical powers. These elohim could be the assemblers who built the earth and man but then the question becomes, How did they come to exist?

Along with Fatfist's description of matter and the universe is the explanation that all matter is bound together by gravity, magnetic, and other forces such that all matter is in fact unity. This gives rise to the idea of the Universal Mind. Perhaps all of these connections among matter creates in effect a mind much like the human mind which operates as the electro-chemical machinations of brain cells, neurons, axons, synapses, dendrites, and so forth. The idea of the universal mind could be analogous to the brain but operating on a much grander and more complex scale.

In any event, God is not impossible if one considers the "lesser" god of whom we may be children. On the other hand, neither is he guaranteed.

fatfist, God Does NOT Exist - It is IMPOSSIBLE for a God to Exist, HubPages (, June 3, 2014, accessed 10/28/2014

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Thursday, October 26, 2017

Did Lady Diana Fake Her Death?

With all of the fake events such as Sandy Hook, Orlando, Las Vegas, etc, one must ask if anything in the world is real, including the death of one-time Princess Diana. Although we do not have sufficient proof to make an adamant conclusion, we think that enough evidence exists to suggest that Diana indeed faked her own death.

There are many reasonable conspiracy theories which suggest that Diana was murdered. There are enough confessions, mysterious incidents, and ambiguous news to give rise to the idea that the one-time princess was murdered. We think that Occam's razor rescues us from that conclusion, although we are not opposed to it in principle should sufficient evidence emerge to substantiate it.

A simpler conclusion is that Diana faked her death to escape torrid media spotlights and to lead a more normal life. We suspect that Queen Elizabeth or her former husband Charles gave Diana the opportunity to leave at the peak of her fame in exchange for not sullying the royal line with Muslim lines, although it had long been overrun by Jews, and perhaps that is the main point.

We are drawing from memory some of the key events of the crash, so we might be mistaken in some details and will stand corrected if indeed we are. But for starters, Diana predicted her own death which some see as an ill omen or that an assassination attempt was being plotted. But a simpler read of the notes she shared with her bodyguard is that she knew she was soon to fake her death. Writing the note created a lot of noise and distraction from the real facts - ie a cover story to confuse.

Complementing this idea is Diana's disclosure on the day of her "death", according to Lillian Zhang, to Richard Kray of the Daily Mail that she was planning to retire from public life.

A couple of key anomalies at the accident scene also reinforce the idea that Diana faked her death. One is that initial witnesses reported that the vehicle in which she and Dodi were riding suffered limited damage - certainly not enough to be fatal. Another witness observed Diana alive and coherent as she was placed in the ambulance.

Yet there was nearly 1.5 hours delay in arriving at the hospital which was only 10 minutes away. So 2 explanations present themselves. One is that Diana was murdered. The other is that her body was swapped for a fake while she and Dodi were taken to a royal jet to be flown to God-knows-where.

Given the penchant for the elite to fake deaths as Miles Mathis has shown again and again, we are inclined to believe that Diana faked her death and is most likely still alive. All of the stories about MI-6 involvement in her murder are noise. They most likely were involved in helping to fake it or in creating confusing conspiracy theories for never would MI-6 act to murder her without full royal consent which includes not just Phillip, but the very powerful Spencers and other prominent parties.

Our case is not ironclad. It would be nice to see a photo of her today as we have seen of John Lennon. But the idea that the royals would kill one of their own is an even greater stretch.

Lillian Zhang, Princess Diana's death faked?, May 28, 2012,, accessed 10/26/2017

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Monday, October 23, 2017

Louis Pasteur: The Troglodyte of Biology

Louis Pasteur has been lionized as a legend in biological history, but the truth of the matter is that he was a fraud, and was to medicine what the Middle Ages was to Western Civilization.

Not only did Pasteur steal ideas from others, but he faked data, and put biology and medicine on a trajectory not much different from blood-letting. Ethel Douglas Hume and R. B. Pearson exposed Pasteur's frauds in the early and mid 20th century, but Gerald Geison delivered the coup de grace in 1995 when Pasteur's papers were at long last released to the public. Geison found that Pasteur systematically falsified his data and stole ideas from his contemporaries including the truly great Antoine Bechamp.

So what was Pasteur's legacy? The process of heating foods, known as pasteurization, and the Germ Theory of pathology are his 2 most well known contributions. Unfortunately they are both quackery which serve big pharmaceuticals and food processing.

Pasteurization is most associated with milk processing during which milk is heated to well above 100 degrees Fahrenheit to kill germs. Unfortunately this process kills mostly good enzymes and bacteria which eviscerates so many of the benefits of milk. Unpasteurized milk is perfectly safe to drink, a fact to which this author can personally attest.

The more important idea which Pasteur fostered was the Germ Theory in which the Frenchman declared, contrary to all experimental evidence available in the 19th C., that monomorphic germs cause infectious disease.

Another French man, Antoine Bechamp, discovered that viruses, germs, microbes, et. al. are pleomorphic and change shapes, when sufficient waste and toxic matter are discovered in the body, to purge the body of these harmful matters. In other words, germs, etc. are the consequence of disease - not its cause - and are part of the toxic waste cleanup crew of the body. Bechamp's model is known as the cellular disease theory.

The implications are staggering. Modern medicine is built upon the faulty, troglodytic ideas of Pasteur which have resulted in toxic, lethal, and counterproductive vaccines which attack the body's ability to heal itself - to say nothing of causing autism, cancers, and other malignancies.

The great advances in health enjoyed over the past 2 centuries are largely creditable to vastly improved diets. Common childhood diseases such as chicken pox, measles, etc., are not communicable but caused by toxic build-up in the body.

American medicine is controlled by greedy psychopathic money interests, namely the Rockfellers, who control the so-called prestigious medical journals such as those endorsed by the American Medical Association. These plutocrats create toxic living conditions which in turn "require" the prescription of toxic drugs which in turn require more drugs and surgeries which make most Americans not only credit and wage slaves, but also medical slaves. You are nothing but a piggy bank for the Rockefellers and Rothschilds to shake and you are conditioned to accept it because of the witch doctoring founded upon Pasteur's quack theories which he recanted at the end of his life.

It is long past time to discard Pasteur and follow the science and wisdom of Bechamp.

-, Louis Pasteur Plagiarist, Imposter & the Truth About Vaccines, Aetherforce,, nd, accessed 10/23/2017

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, October 22, 2017

What's With All the Russian?

One curiosity in the Oswald case which has recently caught our attention is the large amount of Russian language spoken among Oswald and his closest associates. We do not yet know what to make of it, but we will draw the picture to encourage additional thought.

First let us deal with Lee HARVEY Oswald, the man accused of murdering President Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza. We accept the idea that there were more than one Oswald, quite possibly up to 4 significant Oswalds. There is the one just mentioned; the one who impersonated HARVEY in the Texas Theater and elsewhere also known as LEE using John Armstrong's convention; one who allegedly spoke with Patricia McMillan at the hotel where Oswald stayed in Moscow, and one whom we believe returned to the US with Marina in 1962.

(As we have argued elsewhere, we do not believe that HARVEY went to the USSR.)

The significant issue at the moment is not how many Oswalds we can count, but the fact that HARVEY could speak fluent native Russian. James Norwood provides strong evidence including contemporary documentary support that HARVEY's command of Russian was superb, and that he read difficult Russian works in a language already known for its difficulty.

We quickly note that LEE couldn't speak of lick of Russian to save his broken tooth which is why there are conflicting reports about "Oswald's" ability to speak Russian.

While in the US, HARVEY did not hide his Russian speaking abilities before fake-defecting to the USSR, but while in the Soviet Union he feigned complete ignorance, and made only token advances in learning the language during his 2 1/2 year stay.

When Oswald returned to the US, he brought with him his new wife Marina who quite obviously spoke Russian. She pretended not to understand English, but this was clearly a ruse. Researchers such as Armstrong have shown how she was able to negotiate complex contracts written in English.

One of Oswald's early handlers was George De Mohrenschildt, also a good friend of George Bush, who spoke Russian natively, and would most frequently converse with Oswald in Russian.

Finally, we have the vile Ruth Hyde Paine who was extremely proficient in Russian, long before she made the fake claim that she wanted Marina to live with her so that she could improve her Russian. So in Dallas, when Marina was living with Paine, and on occasions when HARVEY spent time there, Paine was hosting a house full of fluent Russian speaking spooks.

We are not suggesting that the ubiquity of Russian was a sign of Soviet intelligence work. But we are asking why this language was prevalent among these intelligence agents and operatives. Was it to speak in a language which neighbors could probably not understand when discussing CIA work? Was Ruth Hyde Paine Oswald's handler? Did everyone know that everyone else in this cozy confab spoke excellent Russian and worked for the CIA?

We have surmised previously that Paine was assigned to Oswald to keep an eye on Marina so that she could observe any of her Russian conversations, and likewise for HARVEY.

Nevertheless, we feel as though we are still dancing around the issue, and that the Russian language characteristic indicates something more than we currently know.

James Norwood, Oswald's Proficiency in the Russian Language, Harvey and Lee (, nd, accessed 10/22/2017

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Thursday, October 19, 2017

Was Hitler Jewish?

Claims of Adolph Hitler's Jewish roots have circulated for years, but recent genealogical tracings strongly suggest that the reports are true. If so, what does this mean for our understanding of World War 2?

The most recent evidence we encountered comes from Miles Mathis whose extensive paper on the topic seems to seal as fact the suspicion that Hitler was Jewish in both his maternal and paternal lines. It also explains why Hitler's genealogy goes dark in several and unreasonable places - as if the Jewish controlled press is attempting to hide this fact.

But it is not just Hitler who was Jewish. Mathis shows that most of the senior Nazi leadership was Jewish, including Martin Bormann, Adolph Eichmann, Rudolph Hess, Heinrich Himmler and so many more.

The implications are staggering because it shows that World War 2 was a Jewish food fight, so to speak, where Gentiles were slaughtered like cattle. In other words, Roosevelt, Stalin, Churchill, and Mussolini were all Jewish and they were, especially Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill, the instigators of World War 2.

For those who might accept the idea that Hitler was Jewish but then suggest that he was a self-loathing Jew, we would quickly point out that there is no such thing. Of all peoples, Jews are very tribalistic and narcissistic, meaning that they are extremely chauvinistic and supportive of all things Jewish. There isn't even the remotest chance that a Jewish Hitler would be against Jews.

If you haven't figured it out by now, the Holocaust was a gigantic hoax, one which the Jews had been perpetrating since the 1850s. There isn't a shred of evidence that Hitler sponsored any extermination of Jews. Of what the whining Jews neglect to inform you is that far more Gentiles died in Germany than did Jews, and that the deaths were the direct result of Allied bombing which made it impossible for the Germans to maintain healthy living conditions in the work camps.

No Jew was killed with Xyklon B - a delousing agent used as such, or in gas chambers which were strictly crematoria. These ludicrous lies should cause Gentiles everywhere to rise in revolt against Jews.

Hitler was also an early champion of resettling Jews in Palestine although there was no open enthusiastic support of that idea at the time. Consequently other relocation plans were pursued including to Madagascar of all places.

But didn't Hitler defy the Rothschilds and lift the yoke of the Allies who had ruined the nation with its crushing war reparations? Yes, and he also moved against the Jews by imposing restrictions on their employments. These actions were very popular with Germans who recognized that the Jews among them were traitors who had sold them out in World War 1 and would do the same in World War 2. These popular acts paved the way for Hitler's assumption of extraordinary power.

Thus, assuming that Hitler was indeed Jewish, we must conclude that he was controlled opposition to move Jews out of Germany into the United States and other western nations, as well as setting up the inevitability of a Jewish state for the Rothschilds. His legacy would guarantee to neutralize any animosity toward Jews while they enslaved the rest of humanity which they see as so many beasts of burden.

Indeed Mathis uncovers abundant evidence that Hitler was an intelligence operative working for Jewish industrialists who wished to re-arm Germany for one more massive butchering. Hitler was above all else an actor doing the bidding of his patrons.

Hitler's act as an antagonist would then explain his fake death about which we have see-sawed. We originally accepted the revisionist stories that Hitler faked his death and escaped to Argentina. Then we rejected those accounts assuming that Hitler was a non-Jew who championed the German people against Western and Jewish oppressions and thus would have gone down with the ship so to speak. As it turns out, the Fuhrer most likely survived his death.

CIA (main stream) news sources admit that DNA tests show that Hitler had Jewish blood, but they stop short of stating that he was Jewish as only a liar could circumlocute. This seems to us a limited hangout operation. If other independent sources can confirm the genealogical evidence presented by Mathis, then we have a major rewrite of history on our hands.

Miles Mathis, Hitler's Genealogy, January 16, 2017,

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Friday, October 13, 2017

Meet Miles Mathis, Polymath

We stumbled upon a remarkable man whose attraction to us was not necessarily his varied and sundry interests, but his ability to think originally about historical events and squeeze truth out of establishment (CIA) sources.

We are speaking of Miles Mathis, a true Renaissance man whose interests stretch from art to physics, mathematics, science, history, poetry, and most likely much more, interests which some may see as mutually exclusive - unless of course one is speaking of a bonafide polymath.

It is all the more remarkable that we would endorse Mathis' writings because it is not our habit to champion Jews whom we regard as a source of many of the great ills in the Western world. Mathis describes himself either as Jew or half Jew, the latter of which might be akin to being half pregnant. However Mathis is very objective in assigning responsibility where it is due and holds no prejudicial animus towards Jews.

One example where Mathis has shown originality is in the computation of pi which anyone with grade school mathematics education would tell you is 3.14 ad infinitum world without end. However in the case of our mathematician, we learn that it is 4 when dealing with a circle in motion. He provides the proof which should turn the world of mathematics upside down, but for some reason is being suppressed - we can't imagine why (wink wink).

Where we are most captivated with Mathis, however, is in the sphere of history where he has exposed more faked history than Carter has pills. Even as hardened Conspiracy Scientists we were shocked at the number of faked deaths reported as authentic. While we could not enumerate all of them, to name just a few, consider that all of these people's deaths were faked: Abraham Lincoln, Marilyn Monroe, Elvis Presley, Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and so many more.

Mathis' methodology is to examine the standard texts of these events - which in a sick way often means consulting Wikipedia - to examine them for consistency. Stories with a considerable number of inconsistencies, or requests for suspension of disbelief, become candidates for complete dismissal.

An example is the assassination of President Lincoln in Ford's theater. While we have written previously that we do not believe that John Wilkes Booth murdered the president, we were not bright enough to suppose that Lincoln had not been murdered at all. It is this unique ability to begin at ground zero and to question everything about a story which make Mathis a coruscating intellect.

Continuing with the example of Lincoln, Mathis asks why an actor would risk his reputation and life for killing a president, and then stop on stage after a 15 foot jump to make a short speech, and then be able to escape without one single person in the audience or cast attempting to rush him, as there must have been many armed military men in the house that evening.

The other critical observation Mathis made is that Lincoln was not taken to a hospital, the likes of which existed in abundance in Washington, DC. This point alone serves to undermine the thesis that Lincoln was shot. It also explains to us why General Grant, Robert Lincoln, and a couple of other potential guests refused the invitation to accompany the President to the play. Perhaps these episodes were faked as well. The fakery of assassination is also the reason Mary did not go to the funeral. Why should she? - it was for some other man or none at all.

Mathis even suggests that Booth was dead at the time of the fake assassination and would have therefore been a perfect patsy.

The other major technique Mathis uses in deconstructing fake history is genealogy which has proven time and again to identify the same powerful families behind both fake and real murders. More intriguing is that so many - perhaps a majority - link back to the British Peerage which at times seems to be primarily Jewish.

While Mathis prizes truth over lies, even when it implicates Jews, he always writes in an irenic fashion - ie, he does not demonize Jews, recognizing that both Jewish and Gentile financial elites are behind the many frauds and desecrations of history. From this stance, Mathis makes the ostensibly reasonable proposal to appeal to the reason of perhaps the 50 most powerful men in the world rather than to fight them - the latter proposition being dead on arrival. While we like the idea, we are not optimistic since these men tend to be psychopathic, a confession of which one bankster made in an article published by Zero Hedge many moons ago. The bankster in question said that "we cannot help ourselves" in connection with fleecing people and the system.

Regarding art, we are not firstly drawn to portraiture, but nonetheless respect Mathis' work. He has pointed out how the Rockefellers and its CIA have totally destroyed art by ignoring and denigrating representational art in favor of such modernist forms as Abstract Expressionism. We were heart warmed to read Mathis' appreciation of William Merritt Chase and John Singer Sergeant, to which list we like to add Childe Hassam.

If you want to understand Western history over the past 1000 years, you must take Miles Mathis with you on that journey.

Miles W Mathis,

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Saturday, October 7, 2017

The Presley Project

If you think that Elvis Presley was a spontaneous combustion of American popular culture of the 1950s who rose from rags to riches, you have been drinking too much of the CIA Kool-Aid. New information has surfaced showing that Presley was an MK-ULTRA project from birth.

The standard hagiography of Presley is that he was the poor son of a tenant farmer who by good fortune and talent stumbled on a career as a music and film idol at the dawn of the Rock & Roll era, only to die prematurely 1977. The story is a contrived hoax of the CIA.

Researcher Miles Mathis has uncovered a great deal of information which sheds light on the real powers behind the Presley phenomenon, and gives us a truer portrait of the entertainer's personality and career.

Presley was born to a Jewish mother whose family were very well connected to prominent Jews, including the disgraced Supreme Court justice Abe Fortas who was forced to resign from the court due to extensive criminal activities.

Presley had a twin brother Jesse Garon who is said to have been delivered still-born and who was buried in an unmarked grave which makes it very convenient to obscure his real fate. According to Mathis, it is a near certainty that Jesse survived because numerous photographs of Elvis are impossible to be the same man. Thus the most reasonable explanation is that Elvis had a double, and what better doppelganger than one's twin brother?

Thus Jesse allowed "Elvis" to maintain a whirling dervish itinerary of activity in music, military, film, and concert.

Mathis describes the many Jews involved in Presley's meteoric career which got so many breaks as to defy credulity, such as appearing on the Jewish Milton Berle Show just a couple of weeks after his first record released as a complete unknown.

The Jewish David Sarnoff's RCA benefitted handsomely from the record deals made for Presley, as did the Dutch native Tom Parker. In fact Parker made far more from the records than did Presley, not because Presley was a poor businessman, but because Presley was property - property of CIA, and its affiliates RCA, Parker, and the Dutch Phillips family.

In time, Jesse let his appearance and health go, perhaps due to medical problems, and thus caused problems with doubling for his brother. Mathis believes that Jesse married Priscilla. The many accounts of Presley's drug addictions to lose weight contradict earlier stories that Elvis was clean as whistle regarding drugs. The most reasonable account is that both stories are true - Elvis took care of himself while Jesse did not.

While this may have been a factor in deciding to close down the act, Mathis also argues that the expense of maintaining two Elvis' may have been too much for the Agency, although we find that thought unpersuasive. It is more probable that Elvis was no longer generating cultural shock, and thus was no longer valuable as a psychological warfare tool. His death would generate plenty of publicity and new income, so keeping Elvis alive was not essential to future revenues.

Thus in August 1977, the trigger was pulled so to speak. Whether Jesse died or fake died we don't entirely know. Dear readers of our past Chronicle on this subject will recall that we were positive that Elvis faked his death, but at that time we had never considered the possibility that his twin was involved in the Presley Project. As such, we need to re-open the investigation. In any event, at least one "Elvis" survived the reports of his own death.

So what was the purpose of the Presley Project? It was designed, years in advance of its execution, to debase American society through sex, drugs, and Rock & Roll. Such debasement would lead to destruction of the family unit and  decreases in the White population, thus exacting revenge by the Jews on the races they believed crushed Jerusalem in 70 AD. Forgiveness is not part of the Jewish lexicon.

Presley was an authentic talent who still has legions of fans, but he was a puppet in a much larger game to corrupt traditional American values.

Miles Mathis, Elvis Aron Presley: Intelligence Project, December 15, 2015

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, October 1, 2017

White Genocide

After more than a century of relentless warfare against Caucasians, the White Race is in its death throes and has not much more than a century or two of survival remaining. We describe the perpetrators, their methods, and motives for White Genocide.

The vicious assault against Whites began in earnest internationally with World War 1 during which the Jews pitted the White Anglo-Saxons of the United Kingdom and the United States, with its French and Italian allies, against Anglo-Saxon Germans. It was a fratricidal war which decimated Caucasians, especially the French. The Jewish Winston Churchill used the Gallipoli fiasco as a killing field for his naval and marine forces, then said, "Oops my bad" without suffering any consequences for his feigned incompetence.

The Jewish Winston Churchill, the Jewish Franklin Roosevelt, and the Jewish Josef Stalin orchestrated war in Europe a second time against Adolph Hitler who represented an ideological threat to Zionism and its predatory central banking. Again brother killed brother in a replay of World War 1, but this time with much greater destructive force. The Jewish Winston Churchill resorted to carpet and fire bombing to destroy the loathed Caucasians.

Prior to World War 1, Jews instigated the American Civil War to decimate the White ranks. The Rothschilds backed both sides of the war. When Lincoln dared to issue his own money, the Rothschilds closed ranks to murder him. But in the meantime, they were able to prolong the vicious war with their pretentious self-righteous abolitionist propaganda and deep pockets.

The Jews have not targeted just American Whites, but European - especially as they engaged in wholesale systematic destruction of the White race in the Jewish controlled USSR. At least 60 million Caucasians were murdered by the Jews, and these pusillanimous people did not have the courage to fight back.

All American wars have a goal of depleting and demoralizing the White stock while motivating them to fight wars of Jewish aggression as a demented form of patriotism. But permawars are not the only methods which the oligarchs use to debase American and European societies.

Edward Bernays was the father of propaganda - a man closely associated with America's ruling elite such as the Rockefellers, Morgans, Harrimans and others. He stated that the elite should use mind control techniques, such as mass advertising, to manipulate the thinking of Americans. Thus Skull & Bones alumni Henry Luce founded Time magazine under the auspices of J P Morgan to create a mass circulation news weekly to mold American thinking and values in order to realize Aldous Huxley's Brave New World ushering in the zombie society where dumbed down Americans happily work as slaves on the elitist's plantations.

One of the great propaganda coups of the Bernays acolytes is the creation of White guilt. Presumably it was Whites who were responsible of slavery, but this is a lie. Jews were the great financiers and ship owners of the slave trade. Only a very small percentage of Americans owned slaves. I can assure you that none of my large clan of family on either my paternal or maternal side owned slaves. But the Ivy League schools have made hay with the insidious idea of Dead White Males and their effacement from American history owing in part to the aspersion that they were slave owners or not diversity friendly.

To help realize this dystopia for the oligarchs, Tavistock,  CIA, MK-ULTRA and other projects were initiated to precipitate the new revolution featuring drugs, sex, and rock and roll. The CIA distributed massive quantities of LSD via its agents such as Timothy Leary, Gordon Wasson, and Faul McCartney which in turn created a very profitable revenue stream for all kinds of Eastern Establishment drug distribution empires.

Jewish entertainment executives unleashed all manners of depraved entertainment which glorifies pornography, pedophilia, and abortion, all of which is designed to impede family formation and population growth.

The final assault on the White race is miscegenation in which interracial marriages and relationships are presented as normal. Oftentimes this normalization is achieved by CIA life time actors who play out these perverted relationships with the understanding that slow witted whites will imitate such base behaviors. It is this last attack which is finally extinguishing the Caucasians.

Other extermination tools of the elite include Chemical Trails which crisscross the skies of all major US cities; Genetically Modified Organism foods which brew into formaldehyde in the body; vaccines which cause cancer and autism to create useful idiots; and massive plastics usage which destroys fertility and gender development, and promotes obesity.

As we stated, we do not claim to know why the Jews and their White fellow travelers are hell bent on destroying Whites. It is not because of the Holocaust because it never happened - it is another Jewish lie. Perhaps it is jealousy. After all, most Jews are an amalgamation of many races; so perhaps they resent the purity of the true Caucasians.

Having said that, we would be irresponsible should we fail to offer an informed explanation for elitist hatred of the Caucasians. The answer goes back to the Essenes, a fiercely messianic cult whose writings were preserved in the Qumran caves of Jordan. The Essenes believed that a warrior messiah - much like David - would arrive to deliver them from Roman rule. Their writings, as do the Old Testament writings, call for the complete extermination of Gentile races and enslavement of those few who are permitted to live, especially the hated Romans who subjugated Jews and forced them to worship Caesar as god. This imperial cult eventually became known as Christianity - render unto Caesar.

The Jews have finally emerged from their humiliation to control the world with vengeance taught by the Old Testament and Qumran writings very much on their minds. This we believe is the motive animating their quest to eradicate the White races.

Perhaps the most burning desire of the Jews is to destroy any vestige of God. Only Caucasians can produce blue eyed blondes - people which persons of all races confirm as the most beautiful people on the planet. The eyes of Caucasians are blazing blues, flashing greens, and other magnificent colors. Perhaps racial envy is at the root of the genocidal holocaust..

Copyright 2017 The American Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Friday, September 22, 2017

Was Jesus the Mother of All Conspiracies?

Is Jesus the mother of all conspiracies? According to a documentary published a few years ago, Caesar's Messiah, the founder of the Christian religion was the psychological warfare tool of the Roman emperors to control the empire in the aftermath of the Jewish revolt which was finally crushed in 73 AD - only to be crushed again in 135.

While other theories of Roman uses of the Christian religion focus on the fourth century Constantine, Caesar's Messiah takes the story back to the Flavian emperors who ruled from 69-96 AD. In order to avoid future costly wars, the Flavians turned to psychological methods to pacify its captive populations, and to quench the spread of Jewish messianic aspirations calling for the overthrow of the Roman occupation of Palestine.

The protagonists in this plot were the Flavian caesars themselves, most notably Vespasian and his son Titus, the Jewish historian Josephus who was adopted into the Flavian family, and the Jewish Alexanders of Alexandria, one of whose scions was Philo. While Josephus and the Alexanders were Jewish, their sympathies were clearly Roman, the latter of whom had married into the Flavian family.

Josephus led a rebellion against Rome in the mid 60s, but when faced with defeat changed his allegiances to Rome, after which he became the highly feted court historian. But there is some argument that Josephus himself was a fictional character.

One of the main commentators in the documentary, Joseph Atwill, compared the writings of Josephus with those of the gospels. He found 40 points of similarity between actions of Titus, whom he argues is the Son of Man spoken of by Jesus in the Gospels, and those of Jesus. One example offered is that both Jesus and Titus go to Jerusalem sending messengers ahead of their arrivals. Another example is that Titus found the Jews fighting among themselves, with the parallel Gospel event being Jesus' saying that a house divided against itself cannot stand.

An even more interesting parallel is that Titus ordered all of the fruit trees leading to Jerusalem from the Roman camps cut down which corresponds to Jesus cursing the fig tree. While some may dismiss the parallels as somewhat vague or inconclusive, the cumulative weight of 40 of them running in sequence makes it virtually impossible to be coincidence. The conclusion is that the Gospels relied upon Josephus for their constructions. This connection might help resolve unknowns regarding the elusive Q document spoken of by modernist theologians as being a source document for parts of Luke and John.

The prophecies which Jesus gave concerning the destruction of Jerusalem were fulfilled precisely as "predicted" with Titus, the Son of Man, fulfilling the eschaton. In short, Jesus is the alter ego or type of Titus.

The reference to the Son of Man is quite possibly the relationship between Vespasian and Titus whom the Roman Senate decreed were gods, and whose images were placed in all temples throughout the empire, including the Jewish Temple. This relationship anticipates the trinity members the Father and Son. Perhaps the 2d son Domitian represents the Holy Spirit.

At this point we get to the allegations of anti-Semitism in the Gospels. As an aside, we note that the Jews are not the only Semitic people - in fact they are a miniscule percentage of them. So the term is used for more Jewish whining and special pleading. According to Caesar's Messiah, the Romans took the incendiary Jewish writings, including the Old Testament, in order to remove any possible future incitations to rebellion. In their places, the Romans invented the Gospels to teach a pacifist, cheek turning attitude, and compliance with Roman authority. So the Messianic Jews were made to be the sinister heavies in the crucifixion of Jesus, with Pilate washing his hands of the dastardly deed.

Thus good Jews would follow the Son of Man, ie Titus and the Roman emperors exemplified by the beatific and pacifistic teachings of the Gospel Messiah, while the bad Jews would follow the bellicose Pharisees, Sadducees, and Scribes and their messianic Christ - not Jesus - who would deliver them from the Romans.

In this context, Jesus' troubling statement that he came only for the lost tribes of Israel makes perfect sense. The word for lost is actually a Greek word meaning punished or destroyed; it does not mean misplaced. Thus the Roman Jesus came with a new gospel for the recalcitrant Jews who needed to fall in line. While messianic rebels certainly paid it no heed, much larger and docile swaths of the population did.

The Alexanders of Alexandria bankrolled much of the literary production which formed the Gospel writings, while Josephus and other unnamed authors produced either the source material or perhaps the Gospels themselves. With these documents, Christians and good Jews would learn submissiveness to the authorities.

On its surface the case seems persuasive with Christianity being exposed as a pagan Roman religion foisted upon its peoples in order to suppress rebellious tendencies. If this is the case, then the Gospels would have been written sometime between 80-150, with 70-90 being the most likely span since this was a Flavian project.

It would be interesting to find out what the subsequent emperors did with this legacy. Returning to Constantine, Atwill suggests with strong evidence that the emperor chose Christianity as the state religion because it was the family cult. In other words, Constantine was probably a descendant of the Flavians - he was known as Flavius Constantine - and was honoring his family by selecting their religion as the new Roman established religion.

Caesar's Messiah - The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Friday, September 15, 2017

The Historicity of Moses

The debate over the historicity of Moses burns on, largely because two different groups employing two different epistemologies believe that they can persuade their opponent of the truth of their position. It is a hopeless cause where both sides would do well to agree to disagree.

After visiting several forums purporting to answer questions about the Biblical Moses, I can assure you that hostility reigns on both sides with the skeptics holding a good edge over the believers in invective.

There are actually 3 groups engaged in tug of war over Moses' historicity. The traditional group accepts the divine inspiration of the Pentateuch and thus accepts the story of Moses as a fact of history, based largely on the manner in which his deeds are told. The second group are the skeptics who believe that the Bible is either pure fiction or a mishmash of vague memories of a minor figure embellished over time. A third group doesn't really care either way because it believes that the didactic value of the Bible, in this case Moses and the Exodus, trumps any concern for historical or factual substance.

The skeptic demands historical evidence for the existence of historical figures. For example, one can point to letters written and signed by George Washington attesting to his historicity. Likewise contemporary accounts affirm the deeds of the Founding Father. In fact we can even visit his home today.

The case with Moses is quite the opposite. After nearly a century of excavation all over the Levant and Egypt, there is not a single shred of archaeological or documentary evidence substantiating the existence of Moses or the Exodus. Thus through an empirical epistemology, one has no basis for believing in the existence of Moses or the Exodus.

This point is lost on the believer who insists that the book of Exodus is of divine inspiration, and thus may be trusted as an historical document. However, if pressed to demonstrate that the Pentateuch is of divine origin, the believer is at rope's end to substantiate the claim.

Some believers err by stating that certain archaeological evidence corroborates certain events in the Bible, but this conflates causality with colinearity. Simply because an artifact is found at a certain Tel which conforms with a Biblical narrative does not substantiate that an event occurred or that a person existed. It could be intriguing and the basis for additional excavation, but it is simply a coincidence.

For example, Charles Dickens wrote the Tale of Two Cities which occurs in Paris and London. Paris and London indeed exist, but just because they exist does not mean that Dickens' story is historical. We can only say that it is historical fiction.

Finally, we would be remiss if we did not note that it is entirely possible that historical evidence for Moses and the Exodus could materialize. After all, the most famous rejoinder to skepticism is the discovery of the city of Troy after centuries of scholarly denial. Yet belief in the existence of Moses and the Exodus is an exercise of faith.

Now why are we discussing this point on a blog devoted to American history? The reason is that the debate closely parallels the case of Lee Oswald who was framed by the criminal Warren Commission led by murderers Allan Dulles, John J McCloy, and Gerald Ford. There isn't a shred of evidence substantiating the allegation that Oswald murdered the president let alone fired a shot at him. In fact we have his alibi, of which neither it nor the allegations were tried in a court of law. As such, those who cling to the Warren Commission Report and its findings are the Bible believers who affirm the existence of Moses based upon Holy Writ.

Thus not only will the debate over Moses continue through the ages, but so will that of the innocence of Lee Oswald whose reputation was destroyed by the very murderers who murdered the president of the United States. The great irony is that in both cases Jews were behind the story of Moses and that of the Warren Commission - in one case a blood thirsty priesthood; in another case a cabal of Jews hiding behind the mask of Permindex.

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

Did Japan Really Bomb Pearl Harbor?

Some skeptics have questioned the standard history that Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. Instead they attribute the attacks to American traitors acting on orders from Franklin Roosevelt. We believe that there are enough unanswered questions about the events of December 7, 1941 to warrant further examination of this idea.

Indeed at least 5 official inquiries by both Congress and executive branch departments investigated the attack on Pearl Harbor because of its enormity and inexplicable anomalies.

The claimants, at least in our case, argue that real attacks occurred, but that they were executed under American command using Japanese Americans and German planes painted in Japanese colors. Given that many documents from World War 2 remain highly classified, one would be remiss in not considering the possibility of a fifth column attacking the United States as an act of treason to further the aims of the Jewish New World Order.

So many strange anomalies accompanied and surrounded the attacks on Pearl Harbor that only an imbecile could trump them up to coincidence. For example, only certain parts of the military base were attacked when reports circulated widely of Japanese spies on the island plotting in grid form the location of every plane, ship, and militarily significant target around the military base.

As examples, the military intelligence buildings were untouched, as were the repair depots, large fuel tanks, and torpedo magazines. These are just a hand full of the important and ripe targets which were studiously avoided by attackers who were said to have highly detailed layouts of the military base.

American shipping was diverted away from the alleged path of the Japanese armada headed toward Hawaii. Long range patrols from the Aleutian islands were also grounded. This latter act is often interpreted as the means for providing security for the Japanese fleet, but another interpretation is that Roosevelt and Chief of Staff George Marshall did not want any witnesses who could claim that there were no Japanese ships in convoy toward Pearl Harbor.

Yet it is also possible that the grounding of air reconnaissance was to provide cloaking for the American carrier groups which carried out the attacks.

Admiral Kimmel and General Short were assured that Pearl Harbor faced no threat from the Japanese navy. In fact Admiral Stark in Washington ordered Kimmel to return all ships to port in Hawaii when the latter took the time honored precaution of sending its fleets to sea when diplomatic relations with a foreign power were in jeopardy. The only warning Kimmel received was that of sabotage, the approved precaution against which was to huddle planes together, thus making them an easy target for bombing attacks. Surely Marshall and his lieutenants knew this and chose artfully sabotage as the key threat.

So what about the 3 American aircraft carriers, Enterprise, Lexington, and Saratoga? It is reported that they were miraculously at sea to be saved by an act of deus ex machina. Since no one knows exactly where they were, it is best supposed that they were carrying a total of 50 planes - a fact not questioned, perhaps German Fokke Wulfes or American AT-6s, painted as Japanese Zero bombers and other planes which then attacked Pearl Harbor. A naval task force of  aircraft carriers is always accompanied by other ships such as battleships, destroyers, and submarines. Thus the best of the American fleet was used to attack the United States while the aging iron was left for destruction. How convenient.

How is it that the American carriers, along with their escorts, did not come to the aid of their countrymen or pursue the Japanese? The Enterprise was allegedly only 215 miles west of Pearl Harbor - and yet it could not help? The Japanese navy was said to be 275 miles west of Pearl Harbor.

The counter arguments to this theory are not trivial. There are many intercepts of Japanese transmissions which would seem to prove that Japanese attack formations indeed headed toward Hawaii. But could these transmissions be fabricated? On the other hand, no one saw any of the Japanese ships. How could this be for the size force needed to attack a large military installation such as Pearl Harbor?

Other contemporary reports state that there were no Japanese airplanes seen in flight although one said that he saw a crashed Zero - possibly a Japanese painted AT-6?

Another argument against a Japanese fleet in Hawaiian waters is the logistical difficulties of such an operation at least 3700 miles away from home base. That was one of the arguments which Roosevelt's staff used to claim that Hawaii faced no credible threat from the Japanese.

False flags are part of the warp and weft of American history. They have been used time and again to drag the United States into Jewish wars. Pearl Harbor has the odor of such a false flag attack, but requires additional evidence to clinch the case.

blocula, Americans Bombed Pearl Harbor With Airplanes Designed To Look Japanese,, April 8, 2012, accessed 9/6/2017

James Perloff, Pearl Harbor: Hawaii Was Surprised; FDR Was Not, New American, December 7, 2016, accessed 9/6/2017

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Monday, September 4, 2017

Did The Cubans Kill Kennedy?

CIA hacks propagate many theories about the power behind the murder of President John F Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza, the latest of which we address is the Cuban theory. Although it has a grain of truth, like all CIA murmurings, it is ultimately a fraud to fix primary culpability on the anti-Castro Cubans who were indeed a vital part of the matrix.

Recently an anonymous poster posited that Cubans betrayed in the Bay of Pigs fiasco formed the nucleus of the conspiracy to kill Kennedy. The interesting aspect of the theory is that it was a concession that there was a conspiracy at all. But like the mob theory of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, it falls far short of the mark and only serves to obfuscate the real murderers.

The important point about the Cuban involvement in the murder of Kennedy is that they were only one of numerous elements who had an axe to grind with the President. They simply lacked the means, on their own, to murder a president of the United States.

McGeorge Bundy, Richard Bissell of the CIA, and Secretary of State Dean Rusk colluded to ground the air support of the CIA operation after Kennedy had reluctantly authorized it earlier in the day on Sunday of the week of the Bay of Pigs invasion.

Thus the foolish Cubans were led to believe that Kennedy grounded the planes when it was actually traitors in his administration who did so. Without air support, Operation Zapata, ie Bay of Pigs, had no chance of success. This subterfuge was intentional for recruiting anti-Castro Cubans for the murder of the president. It also created yet one more rabbit hole down which researchers would fall, never to return, in attempting to trace the real blame for the murder of Kennedy.

As we have stated many times before, not even the CIA was the ultimate power which killed Kennedy. It answered to the Jewish Permindex which had targeted Kennedy for assassination before he entered office.

Murders of presidents typically take a village, which in this case included a bevy of heavy and lightweight assassins of which the Cubans are only one piece of the puzzle.

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, July 4, 2017

Was Barbara Bush the Babushka Lady?

George and Barbara Bush may be the Bonnie and Clyde of the modern clandestine era. It has crossed our mind that Barbara Bush may be the mysterious Babushka lady in Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963 when the Jewish Permindex corporation saw its murder plans of President Kennedy unfold.

According to our interpretation of Russ Baker's research, Barbara Bush is definitely a company woman who has helped George with alibis and plausible deniability, one such occasion being her contrived letter implying that she and George were in Tyler, TX giving a speech when the President was murdered. The letter was a fraud and a hoax like most things Bush.

George Bush was in the Dal-Tex building where he led a team of Operation 40 assassins in the ambush on the President. Barbara's true whereabouts are unknown - which leads us to the famed Babushka lady.

No one has ever found her, and there are no clear pictures of this mysterious woman. Clearly she was in disguise doing work for the assassins. No more reliable agent could be found than Barbara who has worked hand in hand with her husband's covert operations over the years.

The Babushka Lady was seen in Dealey Plaza near the motorcade at the time of the President's assassination. George Bush is known for naming his ships after his wife; perhaps the Babushka lady is another such paranomasia.

Babushka is a well known Russian word for a type of scarf or head covering, but Babs is sometimes short for Barbara as in the case of Babs Streisand. Bush would be the family name of one of the president's murderers. Stretch it out a little and you have Babushka Lady.

It's a wild stretch we know, but we like to explore all paths in our quest for truth.

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Corporate Cow and the Government's War Against Good Food

Everyone knows that raw milk is bad for you, and that in order to be healthy, it must be pasteurized. These are the typical lies which flow from the sewers of the Food and Drug Administration and Center for Disease Control.

Raw milk has received a bad rap because of historical problems brought on by the industrial and urbanization revolutions of the late 19th and early 20th centuries when the filth and disease of urban centers caused many health problems for its inhabitants. Most Americans are familiar with Upton Sinclair's chronicles of these conditions in such classics as the The Jungle.

In a bad case of conflating ontology with unsanitary influences, the government determined that the only way to make milk safe for public consumption was to demand that it be pasteurized during which process it is heated to a certain temperature - typically above 151 F - in order kill bacteria.

The problem with pasteurization is that it kills good bacteria and probiotics which in turn kill the bad bacteria. Pasteurization also significantly reduces - contrary to deceptive claims by some authors - the nutritional value of milk which is considered one of the most complete foods in its raw state.

There is no doubt that the dirty practices - whether through ignorance or greed - of the past century cultivated unhealthy food production, but there is certainly nothing inherently dangerous about consuming raw, unpasteurized milk provided it is produced under clean sanitary conditions. Fostering healthy production and distribution methods is the course of action which the government should have taken.

On the contrary, honest researcher have discovered that pasteurized milk has been associated with far more illnesses and diseases than raw milk, a fact which the corporate owned CDC refuses to acknowledge. The CDC makes up "facts" about raw milk in order to infuse the public with a "healthy" sense of fear.

When Sally Fallon and Thomas Bartlett attempted to find the raw data which the CDC used to claim that raw milk was responsible for 45 cases of food-borne illnesses, they discovered that it could not be found. Neither could the CDC find it because the data was made up - a total fabrication.

Most allegations that raw milk was the culprit for food-borne illnesses turned out to be false because the alleged bacteria could not be found in the food alleged to be the cause of the illness.

Today's corporate cow is infested with so many drug, hormones, and diseases to produce the most possible milk for the least possible cost that it is no longer a safe bet. Consumers will be saddled for years overcoming the detriments of modern pasteurized milk as it takes its tolls on their healths.

The benefits of raw milk are numerous; the dangers of pasteurized milk are manifold. Americans need to demand that the government allow the production and distribution of raw milk in all 50 states. Why do we have a government which encourages the distribution of condoms so that high school kids can have sex, but prevents the production and sale of raw milk which is health giving?

Josh Axe, Raw Milk Myths: Are We Prisoners of Pasteurization? Part 1 of 3,, nd, accessed 7/4/2017

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, April 9, 2017

The Dinosaur Hoax

Proving yet again that education provides no immunity from stupidity, academia has successfully pawned off one of the great "scientific" hoaxes of the past 2 centuries with its theory of dinosaurs - a wholly mythical creature without foundation in fact.

The dinosaur industry started in the mid 19th C. at about the same time that Charles Darwin's crackpot theory of evolution began to take the world by storm. Richard Owen, Superintendent of the British Museum Natural History Department postulated the existence of dinosaurs in 1842 which after 12 short years resulted in the discovery dinosaur bones near the upper Missouri River when Ferdinand Hayden found a few unidentified teeth which had to be those of dinosaurs.

As Erasmus (1466-1536) once quipped, speaking of the massive quantities of relics of the true cross, there were enough of them to build Noah's ark. And so it is with the alleged dinosaur teeth and bones - it only takes a couple of odd teeth, a chip of an elephant tusk, and a few chicken bones to contrive a dinosaur display for a prestigious museum.

As Eric Dubay noted in our reference article, the public is entirely unaware that dinosaur displays are fabrications of random bones and teeth supplemented by large quantities of fabricated pieces made of plaster, epoxies, and plastics. No one has ever discovered a dinosaur in situ. The majority of the ones placed in museums are complete hoaxes. For example Edward Drinker Cope and Othniel Marsh, 2 leading 19th C. paleontologists, "discovered" 136 dinosaurs of which over 75% have been rejected as invalid.

Nearly all dinosaur "discoveries" have been made by paleontologists and related "scientists" who have a vested interested in promoting the dinosaur hoax. Billions of dollars are at stake and in play when one considers the academic and entertainment industries which have profited handsomely by the belief, the movie Jurassic Park being a prime example.

The majority of discoveries have come from concentrated areas which defies the laws of probabilities, so much so that a fabrication plant in China supplies fake bones and displays to this nation's premier museums. So-called real bones can sell for millions of dollars, so augmenting them with fake bones from China made by Zigong Dino Ocean Art Company, which supplies nearly 3/4 of the fake bones shown by American and European museums, makes economic sense.

Professors and museum curators hire artists to help create the mythological creatures which have no precedence in the annals of science prior to the 19th C. Unfortunately the artists do not have a good sense of physics, biomechanics, or biology as the centers of gravity and other structural characteristics of the fantasy animals make them physical impossibilities. Only in a child's fiction book or Disney Studios can dinosaurs come to life.

The alleged real bones said to be those of dinosaurs are held under lock and key with absolutely no access by the public, the main reason being that exposure of cat and chicken bones as dinosaurs could cause considerable embarrassment to the hoaxsters. Thus the keepers of the hoax have completely sabotaged the Scientific Method which requires that scientific discoveries be independently reproduced before acceptance.

So-called prestigious journals such as Nature and National Geographic have been outed so many times for the fraudulent "discoveries" that hysterical laughter should ensue from the mention of either of these names. Dubay writes:
In the 1990s many fossils with feathers were supposedly discovered in China (suspiciously close to the Zigong Dino Ocean Art Company), but when examined Dr. Timothy Rowe found the so-called “Confuciusornis” was an elaborate hoax.  He also found the “Archeoraptor” supposedly discovered in the 90s was composed of bones from 5 different animals!  When Dr. Rowe presented his findings to National Geographic the head scientist reportedly remarked “well all of these have been fiddled with!  National Geographic then proceeded with their news conferences and media stories about the Archeoraptor fossils being genuine and having found the missing link in evolution.  
Many fall back to the redoubt of radiometric dating to buttress their claims about the antiquity of dinosaur bones, yet this method has come under great suspicion as scientists realized that it is susceptible to faulty readings for so many reasons. One of the bigger problems is that radiometric methods are applied to the rocks near the bones rather than to the bones themselves.

But why all of the fraud? The main reason is the need to fill in the gaps in the theory of evolution which has more holes in it than a colander made of Swiss cheese. The Jewish and Free Mason press need a method to undermine Christianity and the Bible, so quack paleontologists and editors of National Geographic are impressed into service with their shimmering atheistic voodoo science.

Some Biblicists point to the term leviathan and similar vocabulary in Job to sustain the idea that dinosaurs existed, but the language is too loose to make any such conclusion.

Given the relative novelty of dinosaur theories and evolution, it is very doubtful that an authentic dinosaur will ever be found - dinosaurs were a need invented by the fakers of another theory about human origins. The ones to date have certainly been the product of fertile imaginations where academia and the entertainment industries have combined to defraud the public on a grand scale.

Eric Dubay, Dinosaur Hoax - Dinosaurs Never Existed!,, September 9, 2015, accessed 4/9/2017

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, April 2, 2017

Karen Silkwood and the USS Liberty

Connecting Karen Silkwood to the sinking of the USS Liberty may seem like a stretch, notwithstanding the chronological difficulties, but new information has come to our attention implicating Israel and Mossad in the murder of Silkwood, and the sinking of the US communications ship.

An article in the January/February 2017 Barnes Review surfaces new evidence connecting the famous whistleblower to Jewish espionage against America's nuclear assets.

Silkwood gained fame as the undercover employee of the criminal Kerr-McGee plutonium processing plant near Crescent, Oklahoma which produced highly defective fuel rods destined for the Hanford plutonium processing facility in Washington state. Silkwood documented many other safety violations which she uncovered while working as a quality control specialist.

Kerr-McGee and intelligence agents, whom we believe were from Mossad and CIA, retaliated against Silkwood by contaminating her apartment with plutonium at 150 times its "safe" levels. When that murder attempt failed, Kerr-McGee sent Mossad agents working with law enforcement agencies to run her off the road in a staged accident.

Enroute to a meeting with a New York Times reporter in Oklahoma City on April 13, 1974, Silkwood was run off the road by a driver of a black painted Chevrolet. The setup was problematic in the first place because the Jewish owned New York Times was most likely involved in luring Silkwood to Oklahoma City. Why didn't its reporter meet her locally? ( We know all of the plausible deniability reasons.)

Government officials attempted to blame the accident on faint traces of alcohol or tranquilizers, but those quantities do not impair driving. The fact that Silkwood was braced against the driving wheel indicates that she was attempting to protect herself as best as she could from her attacker and an imminent crash. The documents Silkwood carried with her to her appointment were stolen by her attacker(s).

The safety violations were only the tip of the iceberg. Silkwood also discovered that at least 40 pounds of plutonium were missing from the Kerr-McGee plant. An FBI source revealed in 1975 that the number was at least 140 pounds which a CIA source confirmed was destined for 2 "friendly" countries. That information was doublespeak for Israel and South Africa - though some contend India was involved.

This story dovetails perfectly with our previous Chronicle relating how numerous nuclear warheads were smuggled out of this country through Pantex in Galveston, Texas, headed for Africa, then South Africa, then to Israel and New York City where Jews used them to attempt to blow up the World Trade Center, the first attempt being in 1993.

Israel created in 1957 the Bureau of Scientific Relations, aka LAKAM, as a front organization to steal plutonium through its intelligence front NUMEC near Pittsburgh by obtaining nuclear processing contracts with the US government. Mossad agent Raphael Eitan who headed the operation was also the handler of American traitor Jonathan Pollard.

Jewish espionage against America's nuclear capabilities goes back to at least the Rosenbergs, but it continued full swing even after the well deserved execution of the husband and wife traitors. In the 1960s, the Jewish Lyndon Johnson gave full sanction to Jewish espionage and treason contrary to specific US nuclear non-proliferation laws governing otherwise. The Vietnam president personally intervened to keep Israel's nuclear program a secret. Kennedy, on the other hand, attempted to derail it, citing concerns about the terrorist state's proclivity for violence. This intervention against Israel cost Kennedy his life.

In another Chronicle on the attack of the USS Liberty which Johnson ordered, we noted that one motive for sinking the Liberty was to destroy evidence that the communications ship had gathered that Jews were wantonly slaughtering unarmed Egyptians in the Sinai Desert. In a follow-up, we noted that Johnson was attempting to create a casus belli for dropping a hydrogen bomb on Cairo. While both motives for sinking the Liberty are true, there is yet another one equally powerful.

According to a retired CIA official, a French freighter carrying stolen uranium was headed toward Israel, whose contents would have surely been identified by the Liberty. Thus it was necessary for the Jews to sink the ship, and which was most likely the reason for Johnson's vehement demand to "send it to the bottom of the sea, now!". For had the cargo been identified, Sixth Fleet interdiction would have surely followed, leading to numerous international diplomatic troubles and setbacks to the Jewish nuclear program.

The Karen Silkwood case was just the tip of the iceberg of treason against the United States by its citizens and the Rothschild colony of Israel. When a lawyer for the Silkwood parents attempted to obtain documents on their daughter's case from the government, one official warned him that both of his clients would be dead if he did not desist from his demands, adding that not a damned thing would be done about their deaths. Only Jews have that kind of power.


Philip Rife, Karen Silkwood: The Woman Who Knew Too Much, The Barnes Review, January/February 2017, Volume XXIII, Number 1, pp 24-27

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Thursday, March 23, 2017

The Oswald Defection

In our most important article to date on the defection of Lee Harvey Oswald to the Soviet Union in 1959, we provide a more cogent explanation of the event which has been offered on this controversial subject. We believe that the Oswald defection is another hoax on the American people.

You may read it on our new website at this link

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Saturday, March 18, 2017

Black History Month Fraud

Every February Black History Month rolls around to spread more lies about black achievements, but this year the editors at the Barnes Review took the time to dispel the many myths magnifying black accomplishments, which in too many cases are gross misrepresentations of the facts.

It is very telling that Black History Month is needed at all, whose very existence must surely be an embarrassment to any thinking person. It is indeed the ultimate pity screw if you will pardon the coarse gesture - but that is the legacy of affirmative action. No one celebrates White History Month - and why should he?

The article mentioned dismantles the persistent myth that blacks were the core of ancient Egyptian civilization. For centuries no one questioned the largely European composition of Egypt - especially during its founding and greatest splendor. Whites from Europe and descendants from Enoch and Shem were among it earliest settlers.

During the 1970s, Whites determined that the Blacks needed a boost to their fragile self esteems, so they invented Black History Month, along with a string of myths and falsehoods to boost their egos, not the least of which is the lie that Egypt and its empire were created by blacks. The overwhelming forensic evidence, such as mummies and art, should have made such a myth laughable in the extreme.

Over time, miscegenation by Egyptians with their conquered peoples produced a mixed multitude to the point where it assumed its present racial composition about the 8th C. BC when the black Nubians finally conquered part of  the country. Thus the ascendance of Blacks, as the Barnes Review noted, coincided with the collapse of the Egyptian dynasties and empire - its best days were long behind it. From that time forward, with a couple of exceptions, Egypt was a vassal state of the great powers - Assyria, Chaldea, Persia, Alexander, the Ptolemies, Rome and others. Today it is an overrun third world basket case.

The article then enumerates a number of inventions alleged to be of black origin - kind of like Al Gore claiming to invent the internet. The author shows that blacks did not invent the light bulb filament, the pace maker, laser cataract surgery, the traffic signal, the blood bank, the air brake, air conditioner, and a few other items we left out to keep from boring our dear reader.

While one cannot deny black achievement in sports and entertainment, equally one cannot ascribe to them what is not rightfully theirs. It is a fraud on the true inventors, and just too bad if black people have their feelings hurt by not having invented so many things attributed to them. We are waiting for their White handlers to attribute the invention of the internet to them.

-, Black History Month Myths, The Barnes Review (website), nd, accessed 3/18/2017

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, March 12, 2017

The Vile Ruth Hyde Paine and Her Vile Lies

The vile Ruth Hyde Paine pretended to be a friend of the Oswalds, but the truth of the matter is that she was assigned by the CIA to help manipulate Lee HARVEY Oswald and frame him for the CIA's murder of President John F Kennedy in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963.

Paine committed at least 3 signal acts to help frame Oswald for the murder. She got him a job at the CIA's Texas School Book Depository which, rather than being a school book supplier, was one of the CIA's nerve centers in managing the ambush on the president. The purpose for placing HARVEY in the TSBD was to provide the story about him being the lone 6th floor assassin.

The second act of participation in the murder of Oswald was that of Paine ordering the rifle with which Oswald allegedly shot the president. We have spent considerable space deriding the idiocy of using such a weapon for an assassination, but suffice it to say that when a large group of Italian military professionals was informed that the Mannlicher-Carcano was the murder weapon, the entire auditorium broke out in laughter.

Paine was the supplier of the rifle. Whether or not she ordered it from Kleins in Chicago, or was provided it locally, she was the one who wrapped the Carcano in a blanket in her garage. John Armstrong has proven that the alleged money order used to purchase the weapon was a fraud, so we know that Oswald did not acquire the rifle.

We do know that Paine, a CIA operative, did the dirty deed. She annotated her calendar on October 23 as saying Oswald ordered the rifle. Why would Paine record such a detail? Marina claimed she knew nothing about it. If Oswald were this dangerous lone nut, shouldn't she have alerted authorities that a mad man just ordered a rifle - all the more so with the false allegations that Oswald tried to assassinate General Walker. It was all a hoax, with Paine planting evidence on her occasional house guest.

Another act of treachery by the so-called Quaker Ruth Paine was forging a farewell note attributed to HARVEY. Having read it, we realized that only someone with an intellect of a pre-adolescent would accept it at face value. The note was supposedly written in Russian, translated into English, and then translated back into Russian. Such a bizarre stunt could have come only from the psychopathic imagination of the CIA of which Ruth Paine was a part.

Some of the nonsense in the letter was that Oswald had paid the last month's water and gas bill and house payment even though he was allegedly living in a rooming house and his wife was living with Paine. Paine knew Russian very well and was the author of the note which miraculously showed up some time after the assassination of the president.

We know conclusively from photographic evidence that HARVEY did not shoot the president because he was in the doorway of the TSBD precisely at the moment CIA ambushed the president. Therefore there was no need for him to concoct such a brain-dead note.

Finally, when HARVEY tried to reach Paine to get legal assistance on Saturday, she refused. What kind of friend was Paine? She was not a friend at all, but a vicious piranha seeking innocent blood.

It is unfortunate that the vile Ruth Paine is still alive, but soon enough the world will be rid of her. In the meantime we must all endure her insufferable lies and continuation of the murder operation of President Kennedy and Lee HARVEY Oswald.

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Saturday, March 11, 2017

Did Marina Oswald Speak English?

The news media and Warren Commission fostered the unquestioned presumption that Marina Oswald did not speak English at the time of her interrogations immediately following the murder of John Kennedy by the CIA in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963. The evidence points to her mastery of English, a fact she hid to play the helpless damsel in distress.

John Armstrong has made a convincing case that Marina Oswald, the wife of Lee HARVEY Oswald, spoke English very well. He draws upon photographs annotated in her hand, and her handling of contract negotiations in English. We would like to present a few more pieces of evidence that she spoke and wrote English well.

The government-news media story was that Marina barely knew any English, in part because the brute Lee HARVEY Oswald wanted to keep his wife barefoot, dumb, and pregnant.

In the early days of the fake investigation conducted by the FBI of Kennedy's murder, a translator was always brought to the interviews of Marina. By February the investigation notes explicitly state the interviews were conducted in English, begging us to conclude that within 2 months of the murder, Marina suddenly developed enough competency in English to forgo the translators. The reality is that she knew English long before suddenly speaking in English tongues in February.

One of the evidences for Marina's proficiency is a letter by Robert Oswald, HARVEY's alleged brother, in which he described a number of interactions between Marina and other people who did not speak Russian. For example he documents an affair between her and John Martin, the assistant manger of the Inn of Six Flags, which would not have been possible without the 2 people being able to speak English. Armstrong in fact reports Martin as stating that Marina spoke English very well.

At the end of the affair in February, Robert walked into his house, where Marina was staying, at the tail end of a telephone conversation between her, John, and his wife in which Marina, under Robert's direction, ended the affair. According to Robert, the affair occurred from November 1963 to February 1964. It is inconceivable that the telephone conversation could occur without all parties being able to speak English, a fact Martin has already confirmed.

Another interview session of Marina by the FBI covered the allegations that HARVEY was in Mexico City, something which Marina said she knew about from watching television, another indicator that her English was quite good.

A final bit of evidence we offer is her association with Robert Webster, a Rand Corporation plastics specialist who fake-defected to the Soviet Union 2 weeks before Oswald, and who re-entered the US 2 weeks before Oswald. Webster stated that he knew Marina although the latter denied it. Unfortunately she made a Freudian slip of sorts when she told a Russian friend that her husband was in the USSR for a trade show, precisely the circumstances under which Webster was in the USSR. It is well known that HARVEY was not on a trade show mission, and therefore that Marina knew Webster.

Since Webster did not speak Russian, and evidence exists that Marina met with Webster in the USSR in Leningrad and in Moscow, it was necessary for Marina to have good English skills to communicate with Webster in what A J Weberman called an espionage ring operated by the CIA.

Many other small details of the story fabricated by the US insurgents who took over the government in 1963 give convincing proofs that Marina Oswald knew and spoke English, and quite well at that.

The significance of this revelation - though by no means new - is that Marina and the government were deceiving us when they pretended that she knew no English. It also confirms the probability that Marina was a spy, but for whose side was she working? We will address that subject soon enough.

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.