Sunday, October 12, 2014

How the Jews Murdered Charles I

Most history students would probably protest that Charles I, king of England (1625-49)  etc., was murdered, but they probably do not know the details of how the Jews used Cromwell to trump up charges against the sovereign, and how Dutch Jews were the power behind Cromwell.
We know that in many Reformed circles, a certain amount of reverence is accorded to Oliver Cromwell, the usurper to the English throne, if for no other reason than he led the Puritans to political victory in the kingdom. They do this despite the fact that Cromwell was a Rosicrucian Mason who was well versed in the Jewish Kabala. Any notion that Cromwell was a Christian is misplaced.
A fascinating article by Stephen Goodson traces the role of Jews in English history, including that of the following synopsis, almost all of it nefarious and corrosive to their host nation. So destructive were the Jews to English comity and prosperity that Edward I finally banished them from the kingdom in 1290, a fate they faced throughout Europe at various times and places.
During the 17th century they attempted a comeback through the agency of Oliver Cromwell, a man who used brutal force to conquer England, and whose military successes owed not to his military genius, but to his superb intelligence network which always knew the movements of Charles’ armies. This intelligence was supplied by English traitors and Jewish infiltrators.
One of the more prominent traitors was John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough and ancestor of Winston Churchill, who abandoned service to the king, in favor of a 6,000 pound annual stipend from the Jew Solomon Medina of Holland.
Prior to open hostilities, the Jew Fernandez Carvajal organized 10,000 operatives to exploit the country’s continuing religious divisions, particularly with the Sabbatean controversy which concerned itself with the question of observance of the Sabbath.
The Jews had alighted in the Netherlands during the 16th and 17th centuries, from where they financed Cromwell on the condition that he allow them back into England upon destroying the English monarch. Goodson quotes excerpts from correspondence between Cromwell and the Jew Ebenezer Pratt who promised generous funding in exchange for the aforementioned quid pro quo. The good Mason Cromwell explained that he would need time and circumstances to pull off the murder, and that he would need a way to distance himself from the actual deed – plausible deniability as the CIA likes to state it.
The letters between the two conspirators is fascinating because it shows without question that two parties were conspiring to destroy a third, evidence of which is enough to demolish the imbecilities of those who deny conspiracies, such as the Jew Cass Sunstein.
No Englishman would draw up charges against the king, so Cromwell brought in the Dutch Jew Isaac Dorislaus to do so, after which a show trial with its predetermined outcome eventuated in the King’s murder on trumped up charges in 1649.
By 1656 Cromwell made good on his promise to Pratt, but could only do so by smuggling in Jews to England as practically all of the merchant and professional classes, to say nothing of his own government, were staunchly opposed to such actions.
Following the resettlement of Jews in England, the German William of Orange led another and final invasion of England, also financed by Jews, which permanently established the Hanoverians on the British throne.
Parliament, on Williams’ watch, approved the Bank of England, using the exact same tactics which the Jewish banksters would use over 200 years later when they established the Federal Reserve.  Out of 512 members of Parliament, 42 formed a “quorum” to pass the enabling legislation. Since that time England has been in permanent debt, paying a continuous tribute to the City of London banksters, significantly robbing and defrauding the country of its economic health, and perpetually plunging it into colonial wars.
A history buff may wish to read the entire article as it covers more historical ground concerning Jewish influences on England, as well as that of the Bank of England.

Stephen Goodson, The Hidden Origins of the Bank of England, The Barnes Review,  September/October 2012
Copyright 2014 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.


peri1224 said...

Thank you for trying to take history a little closer to reality than is presented in most history books. You mention the "German William of Orange". Was he not Dutch? Or did he have strong German connections that would justify calling him German?
Thanks, Peter

Tony Bonn said...

I think it is closer to the latter of your options. I seem to recall my college professor in English history (the Glorious Revolution) stating that he was from the Netherlands but that was only an immediate connection. my source gave him a German attribution probably based either on birth or native country. Given what I have subsequently learned about European ethnicities and the very Germanic bases of the English royalty - Especially the houses of hanover/windsor, I am inclined to accept the Teutonic label over the Dutch which I am sure was political rather than ethnic. in any event it is an interesting question.