Chronicle Update: Barbara Olson Murdered in 2009

When we previously reported the Barbara Olson hoax related to the missile attack on the Pentagon in September 2011, we were unable to state with any certainty her final disposition. We can now report that she is indeed dead, but not in any way related to the explanations we put forth.

 

The Pentagon was attacked on September 11, 2001, in part to cover up vast financial fraud by elite US politicians, not the least of whom were the Bush-Clinton cabal of neo-cons - ie Nazis. The Pentagon, as we reported, was assaulted by a missile type projectile to draw attention away from the 2.2 trillion dollar theft by these traitors, and to incinerate records related thereto.

 

At the time, much press coverage was devoted to the fate of Barbara Olson, the wife of US Solicitor General Ted Olson, who was on the phantom plane which crashed  into the Pentagon. The persistence of the coverage should have alerted us to the famous Shakespearean line, namely that when the lady doeth protest too much, she is probably guilty. In this case, Olson was guilty of being in Sweden.

 

Barbara Olson was ordered to Sweden to live in obscurity since she knew too much about the stolen money. She abided by the terms of her exile until 2009, when according to Jim Willie, she was caught at the Swiss French border carrying bonds. Many will recall the story covered extensively by Zero Hedge about 2 bond smugglers caught at the Italian Swiss border carrying billions in bearer bonds although we are not necessarily drawing a link.

 

In any event, Mossad took Olson into custody  to Israel  for violating her terms of incarceration where she was shot in the head. Now you know the rest of the story.

Reference
Jim Willie, The Plane Truth, November 4, 2013, accessed on Youtube November 8, 2013

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Where in the World is Barbara Olson?

Barbara Olson (December 27, 1955 - ? ) was the television commentator who earned a few seconds of fame for her book about Hillary Clinton’s evil liberal ways, but who also earned enduring fame for her alleged death on American Airline’s alleged Flight 77 when the alleged plane allegedly hit the Pentagon. We think that there are too many allegations to assume that Mrs. Olson went to her death in flames.

 

Perhaps Carmen San Diego could tell us Mrs. Olson’s where abouts, but absent a sudden channeling from her, we doubt that Ms. Diego will be of much help. However, deconstructing the 9/11 lies of the government will help us find a suitable path of discovery.

 

We have published strong – nay unassailable – evidence that a plane did not hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 as the newsfakers in the state controlled media told us. But this raises the most intriguing question about the life of Ted Olson’s wife. Since there was no airplane which hit the Pentagon, the natural question is what happened to the famous personage?

 

There are several avenues to consider, but they fall basically into two camps. The first is that Olson was killed, while the second is that Olson lived beyond 9/11 and is perhaps still alive. At this time we do not have sufficient evidence to prefer either hypothesis.

 

It is possible that the real flight 77 took off as described, but was then hijacked to a location unknown – perhaps Canada. It is also possible that Olson was kidnapped on the ground and murdered at location unknown. But her murder raises additional questions about motive. Who in the Bush Crime Syndicate wanted her dead and for what cause?

 

Was her death a warning to Ted to tow the line on some matter? Was she murdered because she angered the Clintons with her scathing exposure of Hillary’s radical politics, which couple are card carrying members of the Bush Crime Syndicate or the Rockefeller Axis of Evil – we are not yet sure which?

 

The other major possibility concerning Barbara Olson is that she is still alive incognito. We read one report that she had major face surgery – a highly developed skill of the CIA – and was living in Germany. We can see this outcome a reward of the BCS for her services rendered in the BCS’s totalitarian aspirations. But why go to so much bother? Did she really want to get away from Ted that much?

 

After considering the matter, we are inclined to believe that Barbara Olson is dead although we don't know where she was buried or why she was murdered. Perhaps the most likely reason is that her death brought the tragedy to the White House, and thus attention away from it as the epicenter of the attack on America.

 

These many questions linger with us because we know for a  fact that no plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11 – only a remote controlled projectile of sorts. We ask any spooks with the cunning of an Edward Lansdale to come forth in helping us locate Mrs. Olson – dead or alive.  

 

Copyright 2010-12 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Did Hijacked Passengers Really Call Anyone on 9/11?

The 9/11 Commission Report and various news agencies at the time of the 9/11 attacks asserted that various passengers called family during the hijacking. Unfortunately, the evidence and technology for such conversations are entirely lacking, meaning that once again the government has lied to its people.

We consider the evidence in James Marrs’ fantastic book on the 9/11 attacks for our discussion, in addition to evidence submitted by former Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura on his television show Conspiracy Theory.

One of the most famous stories to emerge in the early aftermath of the twin towers attacks was that of CNN correspondent Barbara Olson calling her husband Ted Olson who was the Solicitor General for the Bush administration. News reporters claimed without a shred of evidence that Barbara called her husband from the lavatory aboard American Airlines (AA) flight 77 to inform him that her plane had been hijacked by terrorists wielding box cutters, pocket knives, and possibly bombs.

What the fabricators of this lie forgot to consider was that cellular phone technology was incapable of operating at the speed and altitude at which jetliners fly. When the public discovered that such a call was impossible from a cell phone, the 9/11 Commission invented a new lie – this time she called from an Airfone installed on the AA plane.

Unfortunately for the liars on the 9/11 Commission, American Airlines confirmed that the 757s they operated did not carry Airfones. But even if they had such phones, they would not have them installed in the bathroom.

Ted Olson changed his story more times than a centipede would need to change sox. One possible and disturbing implication of this story is that Olson was complicit in the murder of his own wife. Why else would a man contort so much to defend the official story in the face of its impossibility? On the other hand, it is possible that Barbara was not on the flight as some stories suggest. Under this scenario, Olson was whisked to Germany for plastic surgery where she has lived under an assumed name.

Yet another interpretation of events is that Ted indeed received a phone call but that it was a voice synthesizer which generated the messages, a theory which both Ventura and Marrs present as highly plausible and likely. We, for our parts, are not certain that such technology was used in the Olsons' case simply because Ted’s story has changed so often. With a real synthetic call, he would have had a basis for stabilizing his story.

As touching a story as the cell calls are - and they were presented to create pathos for the perpretrators designs, they have no substantiation in fact. In other words, there are no transactional records from the phone carriers documenting the calls, a fact which the FBI used to conclude that there were no calls. Evidently the perpetrator of the story left some loose strings in the wake of his lie.

United Flight 93 is another telephone episode where the stories resemble Swiss cheese. The famous story of Mark Bingham calling his mother, Alice Hoglan, is one such example. In this instance, the stilted and illogical aspects of the call in fact suggest a synthetic voice prevaricated by the CIA or one of its accomplices. The fact that Bingham addressed himself as Mark Bingham to his own mother, even when she knew who was calling before she took the receiver from her sister, is an oddity without adequate explanation.

The government has claimed having tapes of these calls, which is another absurdity unless we understand the government to routinely tape all calls in the United States. But it is even more absurd when one considers that the calls were never made in the first place. The government claimed its ever paranoid lie of state security in refusing to release them, declaring also that they were evidence in the trial of alleged hijacker Zacarias Moussaoui. However, the government did not release the tape during trial – only partial and redacted transcripts, again suggesting that the evidence of the calls is malarkey.

Other calls from Todd Beamer, Tom Burnett, and others suffer similar anomalies. The most disturbing instance is that of Deena Burnett’s husband whose call showed from his cellular phone on her caller id. Since we know that these calls were not feasible in flight, it suggests that the perpetrators had taken the passengers hostage elsewhere while a fake flight 92 made its way allegedly toward the White House, where they were subsequently killed – not from the crash, but in cold blood. We will cover this subject more fully in another posting.

Finally, anyone who has claimed to possess tapes of in flight conversations, such as the FBI and American Airlines, refuses to release the tapes. The FBI also threatens dire consequences to anyone who dares speak of the contents of these fabricated drivels of fake evidence.

The hoax of the phone conversations is as great as the hoax that Barry Soetoro is an American citizen. It is past time that Americans demand accountability for the crimes of the Bush Crime Syndicate.

Reference
The Terror Conspiracy Revisited, Jim Marrs


Copyright 2010-12 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.