The Synagogue of Satan

Anyone who thinks that the Jews are a helpless, persecuted, misunderstood minority should disabuse himself of that lie by reading Andrew Hitchcock’s The French Connection, The History of House of Rothschild. This powerful, incestuous, and genocidal family is the fount of nearly all evils the world has suffered since Moses Amschel Bauer reestablished the Synagogue of Satan in 1743.

 

Moses placed a red hexagram, the sign which would become falsely known as the Star of David, over his counting house in that same year. This hexagram, whose symbolic and occultic interpretation is 666, the very number against which John the Apostle warns the world, would become the emblem on the Israeli flag unfurled in 1948, thus cementing the connection between the Rothschilds, Israel, and Satanism.

 

We know that a wide swath of so-called American Christians would become apoplectic over the allegation, as they are diehard supporters of the nation ruled by whom the Rolling Stones honored as his Satanic Majesty. Thus most Christians, cognizant or not, are underlings of Satan in their ardor for the modern state of Israel.

 

Hitchcock’s history is rather lengthy, and pocked with some factual and interpretive errors. For example, he supports the myth of the Holocaust, an event which Zionists invented out of whole cloth as we have reported elsewhere. Even so, the timeline is worthy of careful study and consideration because its major thesis, that the Rothschild Empire is the master of the world, is the best and most coherent interpretation of events since the 18^th century.

 

We will summarize the timeline by focusing on pivotal events. The family’s rise to banking pre-eminence came through connections cultivated with royalty and powerful politicians. The Rothschilds realized that there was no real money in retail banking, so they focused on government loans which would be collateralized by the taxing authority of the state.

 

Before proceeding too far, it is essential to understand the Jewish origins of the Rothschilds and their hatreds for gentiles. The family is extremely inbred, with family rules stipulating that members must marry first and fifth cousins, though certainly exceptions abound. The Judaism which the Rothschilds follow is based not just upon Torah, but also upon the Talmud, a dark Satanically inspired compilation of Jewish teachings stretching back centuries.

 

Hitchcock notes as we have that modern Jews are actually gentiles from Khazaria who have no connection whatsoever to the historical people who descended from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The vast majority of so-called Jews, known as Ashkenazi, descend from an amalgam of peoples, none of whom includes historical Semitic peoples - thus the irony of all the pity and claims to real estate in the Middle East.

 

Inspired by revenge and hate, the Rothschilds have proceeded to organize the governments and peoples of the world under their rule, using a vast coterie of fawning hangers-on to help them administer this vast undertaking known as the New World Order, the very thought of which is found on the back of the United States Federal Reserve Note in Novus Ordo Seclorum.

 

Their first major attempt at ushering in their planetary ambitions was the establishment of the Illuminati under the agency of the Jewish Adam Weishaupt in 1776. Their plan was to infiltrate Free Masonry, which they began doing in Europe and the United States that very year. The idea was to spread Talmudic teachings and create layers of secrecy to accomplish their goals under deception. As Albert Pike, the highest and most revered Mason in American history put it, Masonry requires that higher levels of Masons lie to lower levels in order to accomplish otherwise unacceptable goals; for indeed masonry is the worship of Satan, the father of lies.

 

The development of vast banking capabilities placed the Rothschilds at the center of all major world powers including the United Kingdom, France, Austria, Italy, Germany, the United States and others. Yet one government refused to bow to its demands – that government being the Tsarists rulers of Russia. For that impudence the Rothschilds vowed revenge which they obtained in 1917.

 

However, the blood feud between the two powers began in 1815 when the Tsar Alexander I foiled the Rothschild attempt to establish world government at the Congress of Vienna. The Congress convened after the Napoleonic wars ended, at which time the Rothschilds found themselves in possession of great wealth from financing all sides of the war.

 

This duality became the trademark of the family, one seen on display in the US Civil War, World War 1, World War 2, and nearly all major conflicts – whereby the Rothschilds financed both sides of a conflict to reap the rewards of death.

 

During the time of the Napoleonic wars, the Rothschilds also established their courrier network which would become the forefather of the modern intelligence and espionage services. Rothschild couriers were given free passage through various choke points during conflicts because they were specially commissioned by European governments to dispatch sensitive communications to both allied and enemy states. The Rothschilds would always intercept these messages in order to take advantage of trading opportunities which they almost always engineered to their advantage.

 

The Rothschilds also struggled with the United States which in fits and spurts repudiated central banking until it was shoved down the Congress’ throat in 1913 through the energetic deceptions of Rothschild agents such as Bernard Baruch, Jacob Schiff, John Rockefeller, and J P Morgan. The highly corrupt and filthy Woodrow Wilson was easily blackmailed over his numerous affairs and disgusting personal conduct. Wilson reintroduced segregation to Washington after previous presidents, starting in the early 20^th century, worked to dismantle it.

 

Hitchcock also documents how the Rothschilds precipitated financial and bellicose events when they were thwarted. These engineered catastrophes included the War of 1812, the American Depression of the 1830s,  the US Civil War, both World Wars, and the American depression of the 1930s, to name but a few. With control of the money supply, they could easily constrict when the time arrived to bring a nation to its knees.

 

Another important innovation of the Rothschilds was the creation of various political ideologies to bring about national divisions in order to make conquering a country easier. The prime example is the Russian Revolution of 1917 under the aegis of communism, first promulgated by the Jew Karl Marx. The many isms such as Fascism, Communism, Nazism, Capitalism, are all used for divide and conquer strategies.

 

On the religious front, the Jews have infiltrated many Christian denominations, including the Presbyterians who conducted their Reimagining God conference at a General Assembly in the early 1990s. The Dulles brothers had begun the work of infiltration, but the coup de grace came when the denominational leadership sought to introduce worship of Gaia into the religious body.

 

In the more extreme case, the Jew Anton LaVey established the Church of Satan in 1966, quite a natural project given the statement of the Jew Harold Rosenthal, an aide to the Jew Jacob Javits, who said, “Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer.” We countenance no objection which states that Lucifer and Satan are 2 different persons.

 

Another important aspect of the Rothschild founded Zionism is genocide. As one prominent Jew, Harold Greenbaum, publicly stated, “One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland.” Many Jews, including Ariel Sharon among a vast host of others, have stated that killing Jews is an important tactic in obtaining sympathy and advancing political goals through the sympathy or pity card. Thus Jews murder Jews for political points. The ultimate enactment of this strategy was the fake Holocaust.

 

Hitchcock documents numerous instances of treason by Jews against the United States, with rarely any political or judicial consequences. Richard Perle is among the most egregious spies in America, but he is hardly alone. Jewish infiltration and colonization of America received a huge boost from James Jesus Angleton who was a Mossad mole in the CIA.

 

We have only skimmed the surface of the business and political dealings of the Rothschild Empire, so we urge interested readers to Hitchcock’s timeline, with the understanding that not all of the details are correct. But the main narrative – that world history of the past 3 centuries can be explained by the Satanic machinations of the Rothschilds – is absolutely correct. We have met the enemy, and we must fight him.

 

Reference

Andrew Hitchcock, The French Connection, The History of the House of Rothschild, www.iamthewitness.com, nd, accessed 5/10/2014

Copyright 2014 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Rethinking Lenin

Painting of Vladimir Lenin, Isaac Brodskey

Vladimir Lenin  (1870 - 1924) cast a long shadow over 20^th century political theory and praxis, but in the United States he has been painted as an extremist Communist. We think that this portrait is an exercise in historical Dadaism designed to cover up more duplicitous political goals.

 

Although The American Chronicle is focused tightly on American history, we will reach across our borders when foreign topics are required to better understand our own history by providing necessary context. Lenin is one such subject requiring closer examination because most of popular and right winged politics hinges upon making him the bane of 20^th century existence and the cause of the Red Scare hysteria of the post war years.

 

Lenin ruled briefly the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics from 1918 to 1924, although the practical period of his reign ended in 1922 when a series of strokes incapacitated him. He was a Bolshevik who established a number of very progressive laws including legalization of abortion, civil rights for women, universal health care and education, land reform – all of which makes him nearly indistinguishable from an American Democrat. But this underscores a point in American politics – the only difference between a Republican and Democrat is about 10 – 20 years. There is no substantive difference between the two parties.

 

Recent research has revealed that Lenin was assassinated by Josef Stalin (1879 - 1953), the dictator who succeeded him, an act concealed by the dilapidated state of the ruler’s health. This murder by Stalin marks a strong division in Soviet history wherein the former ruler was co-opted by the usurper in order to establish his bonafides to succeed to the throne.

 

Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote a profound essay many years ago explaining the distinctions between Russia and the Soviet Union – a conflation of which many Americans were wont to indulge due in large part to propaganda induced ignorance. The author noted that the two entities were almost antithetical to each other, the former being a theistic nation of pious people – if only outwardly in some cases - while the latter was an atheistic wasteland.

 

Solzhenitsyn made his most cogent case comparing the cultures of the two nations by calling on Dostoyevsky as the archetype of the Russian soul and pointing to a barren, desiccated consistory of Soviet command artists as the emblem of Soviet communism.

The same divide exists in Soviet history at the time of Lenin’s death in which he represented the aspirations of the revolutionaries whose goals were generally peaceable while Stalin ruled with an iron fist, machine guns, and gulags.

The 1930s were a time of devastation over much of the world but none more so than in Stalin’s USSR during which time he engaged in countless bloody purges to rid the country of Bolshevik or Leninists influences. His enforced collectivizations resulted in deaths by the millions, most of which were by starvation.

Lenin had insisted on peaceful negotiations with all parties, including the Mensheviks, White Russians, and others hostile to his reforms. This protocol represented the first phase of the October Revolution which was punctuated by the ensuing civil wars between the Red Russians and White Russians, with the latter being a revanchist atavism to the Tsarist imperium.

Although an atheist, Lenin tolerated the Orthodox Church and was a strong opponent of anti-semitism - putting him at considerable odds with the Tsars.

All of this changed with the rise of Stalin whom Lenin had sought to remove from power at the 13^th Party Congress in 1924. But as previously noted, failing health and Stalin’s assassination short circuited his plans.

Apres Lenin, le deluge. We have already noted Stalin’s massive party purges and murders, especially in the Ukraine. Many of the deprivations and disasters – particularly famines and starvations – of the post war years were not in any way attributable to Lenin’s agriculture policy. Rather they were the deliberate consequences of Western banksters depriving the Russians of food in order to discredit the Revolution.

In fact, so hostile were Western powers to the October Revolution that British general W Thompson rounded up Bolsheviks in Aberzaijan to murder them in cold blood without trial.

The Western press glorified the Stalin revolution with glowing reports of its progressive and prosperous society all through the 1930s – especially the New York Times and Walter Duranty. Why would the capitalist paper of record conceal the brutalities of Stalin? The most probable reason - in our mind - is that it was influenced and controlled by the banksters who so abhorred the October Revolution. They – such as the Rockefellers and DuPonts – were extra busy during the 1920s and 1930s establishing totalitarian regimes in Europe and the United States. They did not want anyone to understand the brutality of Stalin’s regime.

While we do not find Lenin terribly attractive either as a person or ruler, we are in great accord with him in his recognition that reforms were desperately needed in Russia, and that the isolated, aloof, arrogant aristocracy had outlived its usefulness. On the other hand, Lenin was, according Bertrand Russell, quite modest though rather doctrinaire in his beliefs - a man devoid of pretensions or entitlement.

All of this contrasts with the popular portraiture of Lenin as a Stalinist, ruthless dictator. We encourage Americans to revisit their perceptions of Lenin in light of these disclosures as he was probably the best outcome in all possible Russian worlds at the close of World War I.

References

Lenin's Stroke: Doctor Has a Theory, New York Times, May 7, 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/health/research/lenins-death-remains-a-mystery-for-doctors.html?_r=0

Lenin: The Original Dictator? Per-Ake Westerlund,  Socialism Today, February 2004, http://www.socialistalternative.org/literature/lenin/

Vladimir Lenin. (2013, February 22). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 02:04, February 27, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vladimir_Lenin&oldid=539562767

Alexander Solzhenitsyn essay of unknown origin

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.