The Benghazi Hoax

While the Benghazi massacre appears to be an act of terrorism, the truth is far more complicated than what Americans have been told – the October Surprise came a month early.

Four Americans, including the US ambassador to Libya , Christopher Stevens, were murdered in Benghazi Libya on September 11, 2012 at the American Embassy. Explanations were fast and furious. The White House initially claimed that the attack spontaneously erupted in protest of a defamatory anti Islam film which went viral on You Tube. The neoconservatives immediately claimed that the attack was the result of terrorists, more specifically al Qaeda. Is either answer correct?

The short answer is, yes. We believe that the attacks were indeed executed by al Qaeda as a planned assault on the embassy, but the full elaboration of the explanation is far more sinister. We believe, after studying the various tactics of the Wall Street controlled CIA, that the assault was directed to accomplish a few specific political and strategy goals.

The first hint came with Mitt Romney’s indelicate exposure to an ostensibly private group that he hoped for a surprise event which would rescue his Bob Dole campaign from oblivion. Shortly after making those remarks, the 9/11 anniversary attacks erupted on a surprised US embassy. Mitt got his wish, or should we say that the clairvoyant's words proved true?

The White House, we believe, was caught off guard and tried to spring the preposterous story about a You Tube video as the inspiration of the spontaneous attacks. However, one does not bring mortars, grenade launchers, and rifles to a spontaneous protest. The presence of these weapons indicates a very powerful planning force animating the attacks.

The assault bore the signs of signature US intelligence prep work in the many cables which  were submitted over several months to various entities including the White House. This paper trail creates abundant opportunities for finger pointing and blame sharing so typical of CIA orchestrations. Congress and independent counsels can investigate ad infinitum and have rich semaphores for sending the findings in any number of directions depending upon the cooperation of the victims, patsies, and moles. In this case the storyline is a bungled presidency by its current occupant.

Immediately after the attacks, the rabid neocons at Fox News – and that includes all of them – started playing the terrorist card. Joseph Goebbels wannabe Sean Hannity lead the charge with his hysterical allegations that the assault was a terrorist attack which required immediate action if not heaping of blame on the president. He complemented his invectives with support from the usual suspects including John Bolton, Karl Rove, Charles Krauthammer, and vice Satan himself, Dick Cheney.

We can point out, with a long paper trail of our own, that we are no fan of the president . Thus we caution those who see this analysis as his defense. We merely assert that he was the victim of the crisis to enable Mitt Romney’s elevation to the presidency by the Bush Crime Syndicate.

The attack accomplished at least two goals. The first is that it eroded Soetoro’s standing with many Americans who want to see America strong and decisive. Soetoro’s preoccupation with campaign matters – such as television appearances – did not develop that vision of America. The president can now be painted as a foreign policy derelict by those hawks clammoring for more war and arms spending.

The second purpose of the attacks was to keep alive the fear mongering created by 9/11  engineered in part to further eviscerate American freedoms. Both the Rockefeller Axis of Evil and the Bush Crime Syndicate have long standing goals to subjugate America to its political ambitions, both of which lead to world domination.

One pivotal actor who has been missing in action in the initial days and weeks after the attacks was Hillary Clinton, whom we believe supplied the pretext for the weak Soetoro persona when her State Department advertised widely throughout the Middle East apologies for past American sins. Indeed the apologies were long overdue in some sense, but without apologizing on behalf of the CIA, they were crocodile tears. But the apologies play well with the red meat crowd who will now point to the Neville Chamberlain airs of Mr Obama/Soetoro.

While we should have made the point earlier, we must stress that al Qaeda always has been and is to this day a mercenary force of the CIA. When you see or hear anything about al Qaeda, you should understand that al Qaeda means database in Arabic – and is a veritable Rolodex of criminal thugs who do the Agency’s dirty work. So Mr Hannity was correct to label al Qaeda as the guilty party, but in so doing, he was exposing his favorite spook supply, the CIA.

The Libya incident is the perfect context for vastly increased military spending to be used on more wars of foreign aggression and to remove Obama, whose loyalties are to the Rockefeller Axis of Evil, from office so that the war president may takeover the duties of sending more Americans to their deaths in the nether reaches of the globe, especially in the oil rich Middle East.

Finally we must ask why the four men killed, including two Navy Seals, were targeted. It is possible that the Seals were accidental losses, but it is most likely that their murders would be viewed as symbolic of American pride and therefore a stronger rallying cry to stir Americans to action. The ambassador, we suspect, was a thorn in the side or threat to elements of the Bush Crime Syndicate.

A third reason for the staged attacks on Libya was to provide American military with a remote theater base from which to plan and supply attacks on Syria and Iran. Damascus will be demolished into a parking lot by America munitions which will include light weight nuclear devices such as those used in 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Centers by the BCS lead coalition against America.

Watch for CIA mouthpiece Fox News to grow more rabid in calling for action, heads to roll, and further embarrassment of the Obama administration. For its part, watch for the Administration to spew forth more preposterous lies about the events leading to the attack. Our prediction is that Soetoro is cooked - entrapped by the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, and he can thank his Wall Street buddies, to whom he shoveled trillions of dollars, for the betrayal.

Copyright 2010-12 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Is Barry Soetoro's Birth Certificate Fake?

Since our previous posting on the foreign citizenship of Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama, the White House has published yet another birth certificate which it presents as the actual long form birth certificate which would be recognized as legal evidence of Soetoro’s birth place. Unfortunately, as with the other short form posted by the president’s stool pigeons, this one, too, is a fake.

The issue of Obama’s birth certificate reached a crescendo in April 2011 when billionaire gadfly and general Republican flake Donald Trump pressed the matter publicly. Of course, no one should assume that Trump was acting because of concerns of constitutionality or truth. Rather, Trump was a token Republican who would feign concern and then withdraw his complaints as soon as Obama presented a birth certificate. Trump would have backed down even if the certificate were drawn in crayons. The drama was staged theater to keep the Rockefeller-MIC-Yale-CIA nominated president in office.

However, the fakers in Langley – or wherever it was forged – failed in several key respects as Bishop Ron McRae points out in a posting on Obama Crimes website which we quote:

• Note the Hour block NO. 5b on Line 2 at the far right and you will see that the typed P.M. is the identical one from the Nordyke document, with the M below the line in the exact same place as the Nordyke document.
• The date of 8-7-61 in block No. 18b is the exact, identical written date copied from the Nordyke document, even though on the Nordyke document the signature of the parent is slanted backwards.
• Also note that on the Nordyke document, the parent signed the document on the supposedly same day that Ann Durham signed Obama’s, but the dates of the Attendant’s signature and the Local Registrar’s signature are the very next day; whereas on the Nordyke document, the signatures were affixed and dated four days later.
• In block 7g on both documents appears the identical hand written No. 2 in the very same place. 
• In Block No. 3 appears identical hand written “x’s” in the same place on both documents.
• Also, the released photo of the Nordyke document shows the coiled slightly in the upper left hand corner, though laid onto what appears to be carpet or cloth. The Obama document has the identical coiled upper left hand corner, but the herringbone legal cross stitched pattern to the paper carries over into the background of the photo, though the upper left hand corner is blackened out. If you hold both up together, the curvatures in the lines are exactly the same. If you look closely at the herringbone legal print of the background on both the left and right side margins, the printed document is superimposed onto the legal background and not original.
• On the left side margin, there is a vertical margin line running up the entire side, with additional horizontal lines exposed to the left of the margin in the coiled down fold of the document. In those unidentified blocks are identical hand written marks that match identically to the Nordyke document.

The more troubling aspect of the document is the use of kerning, a letter spacing technology which was not available in 1961. One ex law enforcement official, Carl Gallups, produced a YouTube video showing that kerning was used in the production of the latest Soetoro document, meaning that it could not have been contemporaneous with his birth.

In any event, Philip Berg, the attorney handling several lawsuits against the president over his fraudulent claims to US citizenship, has noted that the form which the White House presented to the public is not the long form birth certificate, the only version with legal standing. Even the long form would not resolve Obama’s constitutional qualifications to be president since we know that he relinquished any possibility of repatriation through his relinquishment of USA citizenship under Indonesian law.

Finally, Obama is simply not a natural born USA citizen due to the citizenship of his father. Legal cases in the 19th C. established this principle as the definition of natural birth.

To date, the only document which the White House and the fake president have released is an image of a Certificate of Live Birth – a document not even adequate to provide eligibility for Little League.

We have seen vindicated the dictum of George W. Bush, “The Constitution is nothing but a goddamned piece of paper.”

Copyright 2010-12 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Is Barry Soetoro A U.S. Citizen?

Considerable controversy surrounds the citizenship of the candidate elected to the presidency in 2008. A small minority claims that the man known as Barack Hussein Obama is actually not an American citizen and therefore lacks Constitutional eligibility to serve as president. After investigating the matter, we have concluded that as the majority are not always right the current White House occupant, Barry Soetoro, is indeed an Indonesian citizen born in Kenya. Americans have been lied to yet again by their government and leaders.

Mr. Obama has spent at least 900,000 USD defending against various lawsuits challenging his elegibility to be president but refuses to use the most basic nuclear option possible - presentation of a vault copy of his birth certificate. Yet the conclusion is as simple as it is obvious: there is no vault copy because Soetoro nee Obama was born in Kenya. So how did we get to this point?

One man leading the charge for truth is a Democrat operative named Philip Berg who is a practicing attorney in Pennsylvania. He is litigating at least three lawsuits filed on behalf of several plaintiffs who challenge the veracity of Obama's claims about his presidential qualifications. One Judge Surrick and a Court of Appeals have determined that Berg has no standing in the matter and thus does not have a right to know if Obama is qualified to be president. Ignorance makes an informed electorate.

Although the material on Berg's website is voluminous it is slightly convoluted and is worth recapitulating here for clarity. This then is the relevant history of Barry Soetoro. Stanley Ann Dunham (November 29, 1942 – November 7, 1995) met Barack Obama, Sr. (April 4, 1936 (?) − November 24, 1982) while she was a student at the University of Hawaii in 1960. He was in the USA studying under a special program providing scholarships to third world students so that they could help their countries develop upon returning to their native lands. She conceived in November of that year, married Barack in February 1961 and delivered Barack, Jr. on or around August 4, 1961.

The Obamas setup house in Hawaii but they decided to travel to Kenya to meet Barack's parents. Whether or not they planned to have the baby in Kenya is unclear but that is indeed what happened. Shortly thereafter, someone called a Hawaiian hospital to register the birth - perhaps Ann's mother - for which a Certification of Live Birth would be issued. A COLB is a simple document acknowledging that someone with residence in Hawaii had given birth to a child. It is distinct and wholly different from a Certificate of Birth which is issued to the parents upon birth of their child on Hawaiian soil.

An important point about Ann is that she was 18 at the time of birth and thus ineligible according to US law to transmit citizenship to her son who was born in Kenya. We have taped testimony from Sarah, Barack's grandmother, that he was indeed born in Kenya.

After this point Ann and Barack separated - him for school and her to Washington to care for her new son who was most likely named Barack Hussein Obama II. However we have no objective evidence for the claim so simply mark at as a high probability. In short time, Ann moved back to Hawaii where she filed for divorce which was granted in January 1964. Barack, Sr. would visit his son one final time in 1971.

At some point in 1965 Ann met then married Lolo Soetoro who was an Indonesian citizen. They returned to Indonesia in either 1965 or 1966 where they established permanent residence. Soetoro either legally adopted or claimed Barack, now known as Barry, as his own, which enables him to enroll in the public Indonesian schools. Extensive research by Berg with Indonesian legal consultants demonstrate that Barry was legally named Soetoro and that he was an Indonesian citizen - a requirement for enrollment in school.

In 1971 Barry was sent alone to Hawaii to live with his grandparents, his grandmother a vice president of a local bank, who enrolled him in an expensive private school. When Barry entered the United States - probably on his mother's passport, he did not visit immigration. There is no record whatsoever that Ann applied for Barry's USA citizenship when he returned with her in 1961. As such Barry entered the USA illegally and has lived here ever since illegally. There is also no record of Soetoro ever changing his name to Obama.

One other interesting detail about Soetoro's citizenship relates to his travel to Pakistan in 1982. At the time, Pakistan was proscribed for travel to US citizens. It is thus most likely that Soetoro's travel there was based upon his Indonesian citizenship. As a further aside, Indonesian law required that minors upon reaching their majority  between the ages of 18-21 were required to affirm in writing  abdication of their citizenships should they desire that election. There are no records of Soetoro ever filing this affidavit with the result that he retained his Indonesian citizenship.

It is also worth noting that at the time of Barry's residence in Indonesia the law prevented dual citizenship and that as such even if he acquired US citizenship prior to arriving in Indonesia c. 1965 that he lost it due to the workings of international law, not the least of which was the Hague Convention of 1930 to which the USA was a signatory.

The case is air tight that the man known as Barack Obama is still legally Barry Soetoro and is an Indonesian citizen and therefore unqualified to be president of the United States.

Congress and in particular Nancy Pelosi have acted shamefully and treasonously by lying to the American people when they certified his eligibility to be president. It was Pelosi who certified Obama's eligibility during the Democrat Party Convention.

A man does not become president of the United States without the help of a lot people and even if they were few, there were still enough Democrats (and Republicans) who knew that Obama was not a qualified presidential candidate. Thus the question is why did so many participate in this hoax upon the American people? We shall explore that in a future article.

References:
Obama Crimes