The Moon Landing Hoax Redux

We have spent considerable time exposing the moon landing hoax, but we did so under the supposition that the universe is configured the way establishment astronomers tell us. With the discovery that these astronomers are also liars, we need to update our exposure of the moon landing hoax.

 

The standard view of the universe is that it consists of numerous galaxies composed of numerous solar systems, an example of which is the Milky Way Galaxy. Within our solar system, planets orbit around a sun, some of which have lunar satellites such as earth’s moon. In addition to orbiting, earth rotates at 23.4 degree tilt. The earth rotates at the equator at approximately 1038 mph, and orbits around the sun at approximately 67,000 mph. The sun is said to be 93,000,000 miles from the earth, while the moon is 240,000 miles from the earth.

 

While all of this sounds scientific, it is pure poppy cock. The earth is a flat stationery terrestrium sitting upon pillars and protected by a firmament between which is sandwiched the sun, the moon, and the stars. The sun is about 3100 miles above the earth with a diameter of about 34 miles, and likewise for the moon.

 

The moon is a luminous entity which does not reflect the sun’s light. Its light is distinct from the sun, having different properties. Neither the moon nor the sun is a sphere upon which anyone could land.

 

It is not possible to break into the firmament, nor is it possible break out of it.

 

Given all of the foregoing, our attacks upon the moon landing fraud were misplaced for the most part. In other words, we had appealed to space hazards, lack of suitable technology for space travel, the Van Allen belt, and massive photographic fraud to prove our case that NASA and the United States government lied about landing on the moon. The only critique which has survived is the photographic fraud.

 

There is no outer space, and even if there were, the protective firmament of the earth would prevent anyone from reaching it. The stars are not millions, billions, trillions, quadrillions or any other illions of miles away. At most they are no more than 7-8000 miles away.

 

God said that he would send strong delusion in the last days, a deception hard to break. He is using the Freemasons, among whom Kepler was a leading sun worshipper, to deceive the world to believing Satan’s rancid lies. He is making foolish the learning of the wise.

 

Discard the criminal lies about the universe. True science will lead to the conclusion that there is absolutely no evidence for a galactic universe. As such it is impossible to take a 3 day trip to the moon, land on it, and then return.

 

Copyright 2016 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

A Compendium of Lunar Lies

In the interest of consolidating responses to the many lies of the US government regarding its false claim that it put a man on the moon, we present a running list of lies and truth about the Moon Landing Hoax.

 

Philosophically one cannot even claim that man landed on the moon for the very simple reason that there is no tangible evidence for it. It is an utter perversion of science and logic to place the burden of proof upon the moon landing deniers because flying to the moon is an outlier in all of man’s experiences. It had never happened in 6000 years of human history, so why should one believe that it happened in 1969? Where is the proof?

 

The hoaxers point to video evidence and moon rocks and nothing more, unless you count the hearsay of the US government. There are many alternate explanations to account for what the people saw on July 20, 1969, and none of them requires a man on the moon.

 

One of the moon hoaxers’ favorite arguments is that it was possible to land on the moon, therefore it happened. But this is the rationalization of a liar using a confidence game to hoodwink the weak minded. Even if it were possible to land a man on the moon in the middle of the 20^th century, there is absolutely no requirement that it happened.

 

We will show later that it was utterly impossible to put a man on the moon 1969 or any time afterward. Therefore the moon landings of 1969-72 were absolute frauds.

 

As we look at the alleged evidence proving that man landed on the moon, we realize that it is a gauze of threadbare lies.

1.      Photographic evidence proves that man did not land on the moon

 

Strictly speaking, the photographic evidence proves only that the pictures claimed to be on the moon were taken on earth. Just because the pictures were taken on earth does not prove that man did not land on the moon. However, the US government ties its case so tightly to the photographic evidence that the 2 must stand or fall together.

Logistically the pictures are impossible. One researcher discovered that the astronauts of Apollo 11 had to take 1 picture every 15 seconds while on the moon in order to take the number NASA claims that they took.

The quality of the pictures is superb, but that perfection is further evidence that the images were faked. The Hasselblad camera was mounted on the astronaut’s space suit without a view finder. Thus the astronauts, who were not professional photographers, would have had to take magazine quality pictures every 15 seconds without a viewfinder. We find this assertion an absolute joke.

The temperatures on the moon ranged from -250 degrees to 250 degrees Fahrenheit, thus rendering the camera inoperable and subject to destruction from temperature changes. Kodak has stated that the film was commercial grade film which would have been destroyed by the destructive temperatures on the moon.

And if by deus ex machina the film survived the heat and the cold, the massive radiation from the sun would have surely destroyed it.  The period 1969-72 witnessed some of the most intense solar radiation on record and would have wrecked any film that the astronauts brought with them.

Even if the film survived the heat, cold, and radiation, there is no way the astronauts could change the film with their gloves which they would surely have had to do outside the spacecraft to take one picture every 15 seconds.

Regarding the pictures themselves, a couple of howlers have been discovered. One moon rock picture allegedly taken on the moon has a very distinct carefully inscribed C on it. Did the man on the moon take up rock carving in his spare time? Another picture shows a Coke bottle on the alleged surface of the moon – surely the pause that refreshes the man on the moon.

One of the most pronounced problems with the moon pictures is that their lighting is all wrong. The moon’s primary source of light is the sun. When the sun lights objects casting shadows, it does so in such a way that all shadows are parallel. But we have numerous examples where the shadows intersect, one of which we saw was at a right angle with another, demonstrating that there were numerous light sources on the film set where the landings were faked.

Many pictures show an astronaut being photographed from above, something not possible with the camera mounted on the chest of another astronaut. Then there is the hysterical picture showing Neil Armstrong climbing down the Lunar Module for the first time. Was the man on the moon also taking that picture?

We have pointed out in a previous article that the images show unmistakably the seams from backdrops and set props, which means that the photographs were taken on earth.

But the lunar follies did not stop at earth. They were carried into space in orbit around our planet. In some Apollo instances the astronauts indeed orbited the earth, from which we see the weightlessness of space. But we also see the photographic fraud they played on us.

The biggest admission of fraud comes from NASA films on Apollo 11 which Bart Sibrel revealed to the world in his fantastic, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon. He received films time stamped with the dates July 18-20, 1969 purporting to be of the astronauts 130,000 miles from the earth. However, the film shows blue earth in one of the windows, meaning that the astronauts lied about their location which never exceeds 200 miles above earth – a far cry from the 240,000 miles they claimed for their moon trip.

The perspective they showed of the earth was not possible from their orbital position, so they were caught filming the “earth” by placing transparencies and cutouts on the windows of their space craft to fake the earth from a distance.

Another evidence of moon landing fakery includes the earth’s absence in the lunar based photos, something impossible to explain given the enormous size of the earth relative to the moon. In addition, there are no stars in the photos. While mooners claim that this is because of the focus of the camera, the real issue is why the astronauts did not attempt to take any stellar photos. The reason of course is that they were never on the moon, and faking the stars would have been improbably difficult.

2.       Environment

One of the most significant factors preventing man from going to the moon is the radiation in space. Earth shields us from many sources of radiation through its complex, sophisticated atmosphere. Outer space has no shield and that of the moon is quite flimsy.

The first obstacle to overcome is the Van Allen radiation belt which is essentially 2 belts of intense radiation which would render 1960s space craft inoperable, and would have deleterious impact on humans. The impact is so pronounced that NASA ordered space station crews to bring their spacecraft closer to the moon when they had reached only 400 miles above earth’s surface. This distance was 600 miles away from the start of the first belt.

The reason for concerns about health were raised when the astronauts said that they started seeing flying streaks of light and other visual impairments due to the effects of the radiation. While the Van Allen belt is only 32,000 or so miles at its greatest extent, travel through it would be long enough time to destroy the space craft’s instruments as well as that of the astronauts.

The effects of the Van Allen belts were not discussed during the alleged 1969 moon flight because the science was relatively new – they had only been discovered a couple of decades earlier, and scientists had no idea what the consequences of proximity to them would be. Ignorance is bliss as they say.

The other major source of radiation which the astronauts and their flimsy space crafts and suits could not withstand was the solar flares of the sun, which during 1969-72 were at their most intense on record up to that time. The astronauts would have been fried to crisps if they had been on the moon, to say nothing of the devastation inflicted on their equipment.

Finally, space is filled with micrometeorites whose sizes range from microscopic to golf ball or orange sizes. These flying meteors would pummel both astronaut and space craft alike, yet we saw no activity of the kind in space or on the moon. The Apollo modules would look like Swiss cheese after a journey of 240,000 miles to the moon.

In our next installment we will examine physical anomalies which demonstrate no landings on the moon.

 

Copyright 2014 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Moon Landing Hoax

Most Americans of a certain age would agree without reservation that the United States landed a man on the moon on July 20, 1969. Unfortunately that belief represents a triumph of psychological warfare and strong delusion.

 

Saying that the United States did not land on the moon is akin to calling one’s mother a whore on Mother’s Day. Saying so would be the absolute truth about the moon. But saying so would also cost you your life as Virgil Grissom discovered after he spoke frankly about the state of the space mission in 1967.

 

In an astonishing documentary, Apollo Zero, produced by Jarrah White, overwhelming evidence is presented to demonstrate that the moon landings were giant hoaxes perpetrated not just on the American people, but the entire world.

 

White traces the origins of the space program to World War 2 after which the United States and the Soviet Union divided the spoils of victory by taking many Nazi rocket scientists to their respective countries. The hatefulness of these scientists and their CIA sponsors helps explain why they burned Grissom and his crewmates alive when they dared to expose the fraud of the space program.

 

White interviewed many Apollo alumni in their homes, only to find that rage and physical violence greeted narrator Eric Ryan when he challenged the science and veracity of space travel, especially in the case of Buzz Aldrin who punched Ryan in the face when he confronted the former astronaut about his false claims of a moon landing. Another astronaut’s son suggested that his dad call the CIA to “wax” Ryan and his filming crew as they were physically thrown from the house for confronting the lies they were still peddling nearly 40 years later. Clearly the CIA is the leader behind the moon hoax.

 

So what is the evidence of fraud? One of the most powerful clues is the photographic record which shows scores and scores of lighting, perspective, and artifact anomalies. For example, the planted flag waving in the wind on the moon is something which even a novice could detect. When watched carefully, one can see the rod perpendicular to the pole holding the flag up.

 

Another source, Jay Weidner, speculates with certainty that famed film maker Stanley Kubrick produced the elaborate trick photography he used in his classic film 2001: A Space Odyssey for the televised moon walks. Weidner shows the Scotchlite screen material used in Front Screen Projection and seen in Space Odyssey as also present on NASA’s films.

 

Incidentally, NASA claims to have “accidentally” erased much of its lunar film, knowing full well that modern imaging tools could completely unmask the charade of the moon landing. What person would survive destroying witness of mankind's most impressive accomplishment?

 

Weidner also notes that shadows in NASA pictures from two men allegedly on the moon are at different angles although supposedly lit by the same light source – the sun. Weidner, himself a professional Hollywood film maker, explains that the different shadow angles are easily caused by studio lighting.

 

Returning to White’s evidence, he provides what he calls the smoking gun in which a camera mounted in the Apollo spacecraft, pointed at the earth, is eclipsed by a man and his hairy arm. The image also has a large rectangular light source which is without doubt man made.

 

One final note on the images of the moon is that they are all perfectly focused for men who were supposedly walking around in bulky space suits. How would they have operated the camera controls so expertly? Weidner notes that depth of vision is perfect across all distances, something explainable only by a studio production using Front Screen Projection.

 

Other anomalies abound. One of the most intriguing is the state of technology today versus what it supposedly was during the 1960s. White observes that the highest altitude above the earth which modern space missions have reached is about 400 miles. While the brevity of distance is striking in contrast to the 240,000 miles to the moon, the real issue is the Allen Belt, an electromagnetic force field whose radiation is too powerful for man to withstand for any period of time – to say nothing of the two days required to take the spacecraft through it - which keeps man under the 400 foot ceiling.

 

Although not mentioned by the documentary, we note that that the spacecraft would have to travel 3300 miles per hour to reach the moon within the alleged 3 days of travel. We cannot produce aircraft to operate at that speed today, to say nothing of 1969, nor can man survive at that speed even in the weightlessness of space.

 

White points out that the environment on the moon is simply too severe to insulate against, especially with 1960s technology. The surface of the moon would be at least 250 degrees Fahrenheit, a condition which the space suits could not handle. The NASA answer is that the suits were cooled by an air conditioning unit on each of the space suits sporting portable batteries. It is utterly preposterous unless one supposes that the Energizer Bunny was in the backpack operating a treadmill to produce electricity. Oh yes, and batteries supposedly operated the entire lunar module. For those familiar with battery technology, that lie ranks right up there with streets paved with gold in America.

 

In general, given what we know now about technology and its limits, it is rolling on the floor funny to think that the technology of 1969 could take man 480,000 miles round trip when going 400 miles into space is a great challenge in 2013.  Most Americans are damned lucky to have a car which can go 100,000 miles in Earth's agreeable climate. And to go that distance and live on the moon for 33 hours without a hitch is the most lunatic lie imaginable. Having many years with the software industry, project management, and military training missions, we can say that the likelihood of that outcome is absolutely zero degrees Kelvin.

 

Regarding the moon rocks, some of those were indeed from the moon as found in Antarctica. Nazi Wernher von Braun visited there in 1966 to find suitable specimens for the moon rock hoax.

 

After considering Weidner’s and White’s evidence, it is abundantly clear that the United States did not land on the moon. The Apollo craft crashing into the ocean was orbiting the earth for several days until it was time to make a grand splash.

 

Say it ain’t so, Joe, but say it we must. No one has ever been to the moon.

Reference

Apollo Zero, Jarrah WhiteHow Stanley Kubrick Faked the Apollo Moon Landings, Jay Weidner

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.