Get Thee to a Nunnery - But Don't Forget the Condoms

Hamlet's immortal refrain to his former lover Ophelia, Get thee to a nunnery, has been interpreted by some that Shakespeare referred to a brothel. While the majority of scholars reject the idea, it is admissible as a candidate given that convents during the Middle Ages were generally houses of  ill repute.

Historical revisionist Anatoly Fomenko has documented many contemporary descriptions about convents throughout Europe during the Middle Ages as nothing more than flimsily disguised brothels, and many times not even with that much discretion. The Virgin Mary was probably more accurately named the Vagina Mary.

Before you vibrate too much, we understand that Fomenko is considered by many as nothing more than a crank at best, by some as incompetent, though his citations are valid and proper, and they mesh well with the writings of Dr Ernest Martin who observed the ribald, if not obscene, natures of the cathedrals of Europe. Their bawdy graphics were an open secret - if not scandal - throughout Europe, depicting as they did various human genitalia and sexual acts.

If that is not enough, we should note that Wikipedia even maintains a list of sexually active popes, as we note in our reference section. Finally, many of our readers will recall the many pedophilia scandals which have rocked the allegedly chaste institution.

Returning to the evidence, Fomenko cites Alexander Paradisis, The Life and Activity of Balthazar Cossa (Pope John XXIII), quoting Fomenko's quote,

...the decadency in the church and its morals attained grandiose proportions. .. The nuns' clothing didn't help austerity either, since it served to emphasize their natural beauty and gracefulness... Nearly all Italian monasteries [according to Rodocanachi] allowed male visitors... As for Venetian monasterIes - Casanova is not the only source of information in what regards those; St. Didier writes that "nothing attracted as much interest in Venice as the monasteries." Noblemen have been frequent Visitors there, too. Since all of the nuns were beautiful and clean-limbed, none of them went without a lover...

Referring to Charles Louis Polnitz, Fomenko writes,

...and that their bosoms were only covered when they sang in church choir. The garments worn by the Roman nuns also weren't exactly characterized by demureness; as for the Florentine nuns, the prior of a friary who had visited Florence writes that they resembled mythical nymphs rather than "brides of Christ" 

And to beat a dead horse, we will mention one final quote of the hanky panky of the Roman Catholic Church, again quoting Fomenko,

The eminent humanist Giovanni Pontano tells us that in Valencia the Spaniards had free access to the convents, and that it was hard to differentiate between these holy tabernacles and houses of ill repute. Settenbrie, who studied the last collection of Masuccio's works, writes that the book The Conjugality Monks and Nuns had been withdrawn from circulation, and entered the list of the books forbidden by the Catholic Church, while its author was anathematized" ([ 645], pages 162-164).

Fomenko proceeds to cite speculations that these large scale orgies, or as he calls them, Bacchanalian Dionysian cult celebrations, may have been the origins or the facilitators of the bubonic plagues - even venereal disease - which swept Europe, forcing the church to clamp down on the activity through the Inquisition.

Whether one accepts that interpretation or not is neither here nor there. The fact is that statuary, contemporary reports, and art works found in Medieval Bibles support the notion of a very libertine church, and may explain the great popularity of Catholicism during these darkest of ages.

When the church took away the booze and the women, the clergy turned to little boys and god only knows what from the deep torrent of filth, lies, and obscenities which emanate from the Holy See.

Reference

Wikipedia contributors. "List of sexually active popes." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 15 May. 2021. Web. 29 May. 2021.

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

First Impressions: The Fall of the Roman Empire

Scholars and amateurs have pondered – often weak and weary - over the fate of SPQR – the Roman empire. One such scholar has added his deceptively simple thesis that the Western empire fell due to a collapse of military power.

It's a little more complicated than that but Arther Ferrill makes a reasonable case that two key changes in military and strategic posture made by Constantine put the Western empire in a militarily vulnerable position which continued to deteriorate as the west plunged toward 476.

Specifically, the allegedly Christian emperor abandoned the preclusive perimeter defensive strategy used so successfully for centuries, in favor of defense-in-depth which relied upon central reserves dispatched to trouble spots as needed. Previously, troops were stationed along the frontiers to meet threats in real-time with required temporary re-allocations made from other locations until the vulnerable location stabilized.

Ferrill contends that this change in strategy was motivated by political concerns rather than military ones. In other words, Constantine wanted a strong military close at hand as a deterrent to any pretenders to the throne – something with which he was all too familiar as a pretender himself.

The change in posture coincided with an increase in military failures starting with Persia under Julian in 361 and not long after at Adrianople in 378 which was a watershed year which ushered in a long decline associated with the influx of Barbarians into the army whose lower tactical standards corrupted those of the Romans.

In Ferrill's view, traditional Roman tactics of close battlefield formations only succeeded due to the strict discipline of the Roman troops. When training declined, this tactic became a liability rather than an advantage, rendering the Roman soldier little different than the barbarian – a characteristic which became egregious during the 5^th century.

There is considerably more to Ferrill's theory, but I would like to move to broader considerations which the professor touches upon but does not dwell. While acknowledging the myriad explanations offered down the centuries – 210 of them at one count, he waives them away with cursory discussion. I am not disturbed by this dismissal, but it opens the question of root causes.

For example, he mentions depopulation as immaterial but I think he is mistaken as he is with population replacement.

Ferrill frequently cites shortfalls in filling the ranks of the legions, especially in the last 50 years of the West, a problem exacerbated by loss of territories. While not necessarily a depopulation problem per se, it is related. The solution was to incorporate Germans in such numbers that near the end the Western Roman army was nothing but barbarians – and their laxer standards of training and discipline.

Yet demographics is even more culpable in the decline of Rome. We have mentioned in past Chronicles the writings of Dr Ernest Martin on the sea change in the racial demographics of Rome starting in the 2d century after waves of slaves from the oriental regions began to replace the old Etruscan stock.

It was these Etruscans who conquered the empire, but when they diminished so did the intellectual caliber and psychology of the population and its leaders.

For example, where in the late empire were Ovid, Juvenal, Seneca, Tacitus, et. al? Instead Romans got Eusebius and Augustin. The neo-Roman intellect was simply incapable of maintaining its inheritance.

This inferior intellect is seen in the quality of leaders. Where was the Augustus, Trajan, or Marcus Aurelius for the late empire? Instead Rome got Constantine, Theodosius, and an assortment of dirt bags. Although Diocletian brought stability to the empire, it was at the cost of multiple co-rulers who ended up fighting each other until one prevailed. After Theodosius, the split in the empire was permanent except for one brief interlude.

Ferrill documents the many battles between Eastern and Western rulers from Constantine down to the end, emperors who could ill afford the drain of men and resources as the onslaught of barbarians turned into an avalanche which totally ruined the Western Empire. In no way could these unlettered primitives maintain the Roman culture, and their petty venal interests were no match for an empire demanding principle and statesmanship.

As an aside, one helpful observation Ferrill makes is that any cause for a Roman fall must also consider that the Eastern Empire, Byzantium, continued for 1000 years more. So what was it about lead pipes, for example, which did not affect the East in the same fashion as the West?

In conclusion, I respect Ferris’ implication of military weakness as the proximate cause of the collapse of the Western Empire, but the demographic and racial disintegrations get closer to the root of the Western collapse. Considering the East-West dialectic, my explanation is that the Eastern empire was a smaller and more manageable geography requiring less intellect and imagination to rule, and that the East had deeper financial reserves and resources to withstand incompetence.

Reference
Arther Ferrill, The Fall of the Roman Empire, Thames and Hudson, New York, c. 1986,  192pp

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Caravan to Dallas

The many moving parts in the murder of President Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza may have looked like a Rube Goldberg contraption, but it was quite effective. One of those movements was that of the two car caravan which arrived in Dallas carrying scoped rifles to be used in the murder the following day.

Although we have Chronicled this story before, like all good stories, it bears repeating, with some additional detail added.

Most JFK assassination researchers are aware of Marita Lorenz' testimony in the court case instigated by E Howard Hunt's lawsuit against the newspaper The Spotlight. Hunt claimed that an article by Victor Marchetti, a former high ranking CIA official, which the newspaper published, libelously placed him in Dallas on November 22, 1963, the implication being that he was involved in the assassination.

Rather than respond to the article, as offered by the editors, Hunt chose to sue. While he won his initial trial, he lost the appeal when Mark Lane took the case. The details revealed in court testimony were explosive, and were most undoubtedly the reasons why Hunt and his CIA supplied lawyers chose to terminate legal proceedings.

The bombshell of the case is that it legally proved that CIA was involved in the murder of President Kennedy in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963.

The testimony revealed that a former mistress of Fidel Castro accompanied a party leaving for Dallas from a CIA safehouse in Miami. The persons in the caravan were Lorenz, her handler Frank Sturgis, 

Guillermo Novo, and Ignacio Novo. The cargo was telescoped rifles. Other conspirators may have accompanied them.

Lorenz testified that she was supposed to act as decoy, but was unclear in what capacity. Growing nervous about the operation, she left Dallas 11/22, but not without first meeting with Jack Ruby (born Rubenstein) and E Howard Hunt. Hunt was the paymaster who handed Sturgis a bag of money.

Michael Collins Piper raises the possibility that Hunt may not have known the reason for the payment, that he was being framed or made frameable, but it is clear that he was in Dallas on November 21, and there are no reasons beyond Hunt's convoluted and contradictory lies to believe that he was not in Dallas on November 22. However, that point is largely immaterial.

What is more interesting to us is that Frank Sturgis and the Novo brothers met with Jack Ruby that evening. This incendiary revelation proves that Ruby had advanced knowledge of the assassination or at the very least was working with two of the president's snipers. There are revisionists working for Mossad who claim that Ruby was "childlike" and would never be trusted with any assassination plans. This court testimony by Lorenz totally debunks those putrid lies exonerating Ruby.

Furthermore, as Piper documents, Sturgis and Ruby both worked for Jewish intelligence through Jew Meyer Lansky who was the international crime lord of American, Jewish, and other criminal organizations. Lansky worked hand-in-hand with Mossad. Ruby was a trusted Lansky partner, the former of whom admired Jew Mickey Cohen who also was Lansky's lieutenant in Los Angeles.

As we have Chronicled elsewhere - and so does Piper - the Novo brothers also murdered Chilean diplomat Orlando Letelier in 1976, working out of the office of Senator James Buckley.

Another earthquake emanating from the court room was Lorenz' testimony that her handler, Frank Sturgis, admitted to murdering the president. Although it is hearsay information, in no way is it less astounding, and begs why Sturgis was not arrested and questioned.

"We killed the president that day . . . Everything was

covered in advance. No arrests, no real newspaper investigation. It was all

covered, very professional."

Returning to the allegations of Lorenz providing hearsay evidence, Piper relates that Cuban intelligence General Fabian Escalante confirmed her testimony, stating that Sturgis was in charge of communications, particularly on the movements of the motorcade through Dallas.

Thanks to E Howard Hunt and his CIA lawyers, we can confidently conclude that the agency was a major participant in the murder of the president of the United States. However, it leaves open one rather fascinating question, Why did CIA allow the case to go to trial, risking disclosure of damning information? And why did it ask Lorenz who was in the caravan?

Reference

Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th Edition, 2d printing, 2005, source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com), accessed 5/25/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Race and Eye Color

The ubiquitous and pervasive claim that humans belong to one race is held with the utmost religious fervor of an orthodox Jew or Islamic jihadist. While religion may assert the veracity of this belief, science does not. One interesting example of the substantive differences between the races is eye color.

Contrary to your religious shaman, people are not the same car except for the paint color. Even if that were the only difference, it would be substantial and profound with respect to skin pigmentation. We will narrow our examination of this fascinating aspect of human differences by considering iris color.

According to Eric Ford, the skins of White and colored people are structured differently. Whites respond protectively to sunlight with vasodilation, whereas pigmented people respond with melanin reactions. Both racial groups are susceptible to sun damage, but in different ways.

While many pseudo-scientists contend that eye color is a matter of melanin, such is not the case as Ford remarks,

Blue eyes are a result of light scattering from the fibrous structure in the iris that is called the stroma, which has a back layer that is pigmented, called the epithelium.

To restate the matter, White blue eyed people have no melanin in their stromas, in contradistinction to blacks who have it in varying degrees which explains their brown to black eye colors. Both groups of people have the same epithelium color of brown/black. The reason for the blue eye color is that white eyes scatter light, thus giving the blue or grey effect, whereas eyes with melanin absorbs light, causing iris color to assume black or brown hues.

Furthermore, the pseudo-scientists claim that blue eyes are a chance genetic mutation of the evolutionary process. Aside from the fact that this pathetic theory is a fantasy, it fails to explain why whites with blue eyes do not have any vestigial melanocytes in their genes. Since they do not, even if one adheres to the fantasy, it alone proves distinct and different ontological provenance. 

The melanin found in people of pigment is called eumelanin. The adaptive response of pigmented people who move to cooler climates is to produce less melanin - not to change eye structure.

In one of his articles, Ford concludes,

This phenomenon, which is known as Structural Coloration, is only found in the white race and rarely with those who are mixed with them. There are also varieties of this trait, such as grey eyes, which occurs with excess collagen in the iris as well as green eyes which comes from yellow (blond) melanin and structural color.

We know that this information is not religiously compatible with most people, but we appeal to science over religion. People of different races cannot help how they were born - eye color is a fact of birth, and science explains the difference which has nothing to do with evolution or coming out of Africa.

Reference
Eric Ford, Genetic Differences Between The Light and Dark Races, renegadetribune.com, November 8, 2019, source(Genetic Differences Between The Light and Dark Races (renegadetribune.com), accessed 5/23/2021)

Eric Ford, Science Lies About Eye Color, renegadetribune.com, December 9, 2019, source(Science Lies About Eye Color (renegadetribune.com), accessed 5/23/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Did Rothschild Banksters Finance Hitler?

It is sometimes alleged that Hitler's rise to power owed to the financing of the invincible Rothschild banking families. Fortunately the evidence does not support this fantasy.

Your Chronicler has in times past fallen for this false claim, but the evidence is very clear that Hitler's support, financial and political, came from the groundswell of German patriots.

The most obvious refutation of the Rothschild myth is Hitler's arrest of Baron Louis Rothschild in 1939. While Hitler released the criminal for the equivalent of 21 million USD, it was part of his policy of maintaining amicable relationships with the governments under Rothschild control such as the United Kingdom.

Concurrently the German government permitted release of a film documenting Rothschild treachery since the time of the Napoleonic wars. Clearly this was not a film which the Rothschilds would endorse, especially from someone whom they allegedly financed.

Finally, Hitler's closure of the Rothschild banks in France, Germany, and Austria is the absolute proof that this evil banking family did not finance Hitler, and is perhaps the most important reason that Jews hate Hitler so viciously to this day. And you thought that hate was not a family value.

Regarding the claim that London and New York banksters financed Hitler, again the evidence is lacking. Noble, author of Hitler Was NOT Controlled Opposition (Part 1), cites Henry Ashby Turner who documents clearly that big business contributed little to nothing to Hitler and his party. His financing came from small businesses fearing communist takeovers as in Russia, and from receipts from the sales of Mein Kampf. Additional corroboration for the refutation of Rothschild or big business financing of Hitler comes from James Pool .

If all of that is not enough, we have Rothschild agent Hjalmar Schacht admitting at the Nuremberg trials that most of Hitler's support came from the rank and file - not large corporate interests.

Our anonymous author also refutes the notion that the Bushes or Harrimans funded Hitler, a theme we had supported in the past. Citing Antony Sutton, Anonymous points out that Sutton, often referenced for the allegations, actually made contradictory statements regarding Harriman and Standard Oil, meaning that the latter did not fund Hitler.

Given his determination to stamp out the treachery and enslavement of his people by the Rothschild banksters, the world needs another Hitler. (The Holocaust was a total lie).

Reference
Noble, Hitler Was NOT Controlled Opposition (Part 1), renegadetribune.com, December 29, 2019, source(Hitler Was NOT Controlled Opposition (Part 1) (renegadetribune.com), accessed 5/22/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

IQ, Education, and Plasticity

I came across the comments section of an article on IQ differences between Blacks and Whites wherein the opinion was given that IQ depends upon education. This notion is rather common but entirely mistaken. IQ is a measure of psychology independent of education, and it changes very little past a certain age.

IQ is a hotly debated and controversial topic because its proponents and antagonists represent a clash between religion and science - truly unwinnable debates. One side will vanquish the other because there is no basis for mediation. As of now, the religious fundamentalists are winning, stating that IQ is a false construct, mutable, irrelevant, or all of the above.

To return to the relationship between education and IQ based upon science, they are completely separate realities. IQ measures psychology, whereas education measures behavior. The two may be correlated, but they are not causal.

The easiest way to make this point clear is to observe that IQ is measured in children, well before they have completed their education, and more than a decade before they have completed their most important educations if they are college bound. 

Dr Charles Murray, in discussing pre-school interventions as a means of improving education or intelligence for children pointed out that the IQs recorded at ages 3-5 are the IQs recorded at age 18. He stated that IQ is generally static past age 6. This means that IQ is not plastic or amenable to educational interventions. It is a significantly biological artifact which education generally does not modify.

Those with higher IQs tend to have higher educational attainment, though one can easily find exceptions with both modestly endowed people having significantly more education than predicted by their IQs. Likewise, very high IQ examples may be found where education is below their predicted levels based upon IQ.

The bottom line is that education generally will not raise your IQ. It might make you more employable or more interesting, but your IQ under normal circumstances is settled by the age of 6, although I am quite aware of the fact that many psychometricians have given 12-16 years of age as the point of demarcation where IQ fails to advance. Even so, for many people, their most important education years are ahead of them, and their IQs will hover where it was in their adolescences.

Reference
Charles Murray, Charles Murray -- The Bell Curve Revisited, youtube.com, source((610) Charles Murray -- The Bell Curve Revisited - YouTube, accessed 5/24/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

One Minute Chronicle: LEVEL Flat Earth Movie

One of the most brain dead hoaxes of the past 400 years is the spherical earth theory whose modern origins begin with such "scientists" as Copernicus, Galileo, and Newton. Fortunately some people are waking up, including the producers of a new online film debunking the crockery.

Hibbeler Productions produced Level (2021) which patches together a number of vignettes which its stars present on various aspects of the Flat Earth controversy, tied together with narrations by Eric Dubay who has produced prolifically in championing Flat Earth on his Atlantean Conspiracy website.

The documentary discusses the moon landing hoax, the satellite frauds, NASA's endless lies, proofs of a flat earth, including eye witness reports from pilots confirming a flat plane, and government documents which concede the truth of the flat earth.

The tone is visceral, at times take no prisoners, with MTV-like influences, but ultimately educational. One of the highlights is the ending where they rip science personality Neil Degrasse Tyson a new hole for his preposterous flip flops, supported with filmed excerpts where he claims that the earth is as round as a cue-ball, but then later claims that it is shaped like a pear.

It is hard to know what is scarier - the gullibility of the goyim who believe these mindless lies, or the treachery and psychopathy of those who promote them.

The film may appeal more to younger audiences, but there is enough information in it for anyone to become more confident in defending the flat earth and exposing the lies of the global earth. We heartily support Hibbeler Productions in its efforts to educate people about the world on which we live.

Reference

Eric Dubay, Level (Flat Earth Film), atlanteanconspiracy, May 20, 2021, source(The Atlantean Conspiracy: LEVEL (Flat Earth Film), accessed 5/21/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

One Minute Chronicle: Why November 22, 1963?

Why did Permindex-Mossad-CIA choose November 22, 1963 to murder President Kennedy? Why not some other date? We offer a possible explanation.

At one point, I was attracted to the idea that November 22 was chosen because the psychopaths who planned the murder had a fascination with occultic numbers. So 11/22 contains the number of days multiplied twice by the number of the month. From there, the year 1963 somehow contained some hocus pocus number which combined with 11/22 produced the holy cosmic Jedi of the Universe number of Satan which would give the perpetrators all of the powers of this universe and all parallel universes to succeed at their murder, easily trumping 666 as most evil number in history. Fortunately I abandoned this idea.

The date 11/22 was chosen because it is the birthday of French president Charles de Gaulle who was born on that date in 1890. De Gaulle had been the target of more than one assassination attempt planned by the French OAS (Organisation Armée Secrète), which was a rival organization of the French intelligence agency SDECE (Service de Documentation Extérieure et de Contre-Espionnage), and Permindex whose Jewish leadership hated de Gaulle for granting independence to Algeria in 1962.

De Gaulle urged Switzerland and Italy to expel Permindex from their countries because of that organization's assassination operations with which the 2 countries complied. OAS had a close relationship with Mossad, working together to murder Algerian leaders, and disrupting the liberation process.

OAS, as Michael Collins Piper documents in his seminal Final Judgment, was also brought into the assassination of Kennedy, Israel hating the American president for his refusal to support Jewish development of nuclear weapons. Mossad asset James Angleton provided CIA support of the assassination in Dallas.

According to Piper, OAS supplied one or two of the assassins in Dealey Plaza.

There were also other assassination attempts on Kennedy in Tampa and Chicago, and quite possibly elsewhere. These locations were not serious sites for the murder. They were created not only to confuse people, but to make it very clear that Permindex-Mossad-CIA had options, and that it was not taking them. The only site which the combine would select was Dallas because Kennedy would be there on De Gaulle's birthday. The murderers wanted to make it very clear that they were angry with the French president, and the American president.

The idea for the date was probably that of Mossad asset James Angleton. Choosing 11/22 was a veiled threat to de Gaulle that he was next and that he would never have another birthday without remembering the death of his American friend. Another attempt was made on De Gaulle's life subsequent to the death of Kennedy.

This date proves - to me at least - that OAS was involved in the murder of Kennedy, vindicating Piper's research.

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

A Little Known Fact About Jack Ruby

Although Jack Ruby did not murder Lee HARVEY Oswald as most people believe, he was knee deep in the assassination of President John Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza, contrary to what his hagiographers maintain. He was so heavily involved that someone knew of his role well before the rest of the world found out about him on November 24, 1963.

Dear readers may recall previous Chronicles where we outlined the case that Jack Ruby did not kill Oswald on national television as most Americans believe. We have credited Ralph Cinque with this discovery but believe that his source, the Wizard, is a Mossad agent feeding him the information in order to revamp Ruby's image the same way Jews are trying to reimagine the brutal murderer Leo Frank. Cinque has taken to rehabilitate the assassination conspirator, calling him "childlike" and a lover a President Kennedy. What rubbish.

But just to get him into our record, we quote Cinque,

Jack Ruby was a devout Jew, a patriotic American, who was not aggressive- physically, verbally, or otherwise, and he had a soft, rather childlike way about him, that he was NOT cunning; he was not discreet; and he wasn't even smart. I think she [Dorothy Kilgallen] must have realized all that and realized that no one would have trusted this man with a role in the JFK assassination. No one would have wanted to rely on him for anything, and certainly not to keep his mouth shut, that he was a scatterbrain and a numbskull.  

Another character whom we have Chronicled in these Chronicles is a side player who appeared in Oliver Stone's JFK, and in an in-depth biography by her son, which is reviewed by James DiEugenio. In his review of Rose Cherami: Gathering Fallen Petals, DiEugenio notes that when she was taken to the hospital on November 21, she named some important ground operations conspirators; quoting DiEugenio,

When he dropped her off at the hospital, she said the same thing to the two doctors who first checked her in and then talked to her. These were Dr. Victor Weiss and intern Wayne Owen. (Marcades, p. 327; DiEugenio interview with Edwin McGehee, July of 2019 in Jackson, Louisiana) Even more startling is that Cherami mentioned the name of Jack Ruby before the assassination. She told Weiss that she had worked for Ruby. (Ibid, Marcades; DiEugenio, p. 78)

Not only did she work for Ruby, she knew that he was involved in drug running, which in this case involved a shipment of heroin on which she was working with him. Michael Collins Piper fills in more of the picture by confirming Ruby's involvement with drug and gun running - all for his boss, Jew mobster Meyer Lansky. And of course Lansky was highly instrumental in the murder of Kennedy.

Louisiana State trooper Francis Fruge confirmed through Dallas Police Department Captain Will Fritz that Cherami's story about the heroin shipment checked out.

When Fruge flew her to Dallas on November 26, foolishly thinking that FBI had any interest in following any leads, Cherami laughed when newspapers reported that Ruby and Oswald did not know each other, quoting DiEugenio,

She giggled when she read it. She said that was utter baloney; they knew each other for a long time. (Marcades, p. 256)

Of course the interesting question is, was she saying that LEE Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby knew each other, or that Lee HARVEY Oswald and Ruby knew each other; or both?

One other very interesting fact issuing from DiEugenio's book review was the discovery of the names of two other conspirators, Sergio Arcacha Smith and Emilio Santana, men who threw Cherami from the car on their way to Dallas. Smith in particular had a very nasty reputation as someone no one messed with - ever.

Finally, Piper writes that Jewish Mafia mobster Mickey Cohen was his idol - not American idol, mind you, but his Jew idol. Cohen's Wikipedia article says this about the gangster,

Cohen's violent methods came to the attention of state and federal authorities investigating Jack Dragna's operations.

Yes, the man who drove in an armored Cadillac was Jack Ruby's role model. 

So here we have Cinque's sweet dear "childlike" Ruby who is involved with JFK assassins, who knew about the assassination before it occurred because he was involved in planning it, and who was involved with some of its most vicious Cubans - yet we are supposed to believe that Ruby knew nothing of the assassination in advance and that he helped the murderers because he was doing it for the children and Jackie. Ruby was bad news; he was a murderer, and it is too bad he didn't die when the papers reported that he died. On the other hand, reporter and socialite Dorothy Kilgallen died because of her association and knowledge about Ruby. "Childlike"? "Innocent"? Please.

Reference
James DiEugenio, The Woman Who Predicted JFK's Assassination, kennedysandking.com, May 10, 2021, source(Kennedys And King - The Woman who Predicted JFK’s Assassination, accessed 5/21/2021)

Ralph Cinque, untitled (as is everything he publishes), oswaldinthedoorway.com, February 23, 2020, source( Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque, accessed 5/21/2021)

Wikipedia contributors. "Mickey Cohen." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 13 May. 2021. Web. 22 May. 2021.

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Exculpation of Manuel Noriega

President Bush's invasion of Panama in December 1989 to topple the government of Manuel Noriega is often touted as a triumph of good over evil, but closer inspection of the facts suggests that the Evil Bush settled a score with the less than good Noriega.

Anything with George Bush's finger prints on it must be considered suspect as criminal. If George Bush's lips were moving, he was lying; if his hands were waiving, he was murdering. Such was the case when he invaded Panama, leaving in his wake anywhere from 246 to 2000 dead bodies, depending upon who did the counting.

Only in a deranged psychotic mind could one find a pretext for invading a country, which posed no threat to the United States, based upon rumors and innuendo. If the United States was so concerned about human rights and narcotics, why didn't it invade Saudi Arabia or the terrorist state of Israel, or even the fount of cocaine itself, Columbia? Heck, Bush could have even prosecuted Bill Clinton for his Mena drug running operations. No, drugs were simply a convenience card to start a war with a defenseless country which accomplished several things for one of the murderers of President Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza.

After watching the daily proceedings of the 9 month Noriega trial in Miami, investigative reporter Peter Eisner uncovered a number of unsettling facts which indicated that the invasion of Panama was predicated on a tissue of lies concocted by the Bush Crime Syndicate whose purposes are not entirely clear, but about which we will speculate in our closing.

One of the most notable anomalies in the affair was the contrived set of charges brought against Noriega on drug trafficking. Eisner discovered that 26 of the witnesses against the Panamanian leader were convicted felons who were paid to bring false witness, either through reductions in sentences, retention of drug profits, or improved quarters in prison. Not one of these witnesses had ever met Noriega, so their testimonies were simply third hand, rehearsed recitals of imaginary crimes. Yet the US District Judge William Hoeveler found nothing suspect about these paid for witness.

Through it all Noriega maintained his innocence.

In defending the outcome of the case, Hoeveler, in an interview with Eisner, implied that even if Noriega was not guilty of his 8 convictions, there were rumors in the news that he had ordered the murder of Dr Hugo Spadafora, one of Noriega's political enemies. So here we have a federal judge using a newspaper rumor to justify a potential miscarriage of justice. No wonder the Warren Commission could make its baseless claims in its criminal Report with nothing but a little hearsay and wishful thinking.

While 8 Panamanian soldiers were charged in the murder of Spadafora, the jury failed to convict even one of them. Yet a short time later, as Eisner reports, that same evidence was used to convict Noriega in absentia. Again, the Panamanian government was channeling the ghost of Earl Warren and his cover-up commission.

Following up on the allegations of murder and corruption, Eisner made contact with a Panamanian diplomat of repute, whom he called Armando, who explained how he had engineered the downfall of Noriega by circulating unsubstantiated allegations of drug trafficking and murder against the head of state. He shared with Eisner the ease with which he manipulated Congress and the press. However, it is your Chronicler's view that he worked for CIA which did the bidding for Bush.

As Armando put it to Eisner,

"I don't have any independent evidence about Noriega," he said. "I don't think he was dealing drugs. I don't know that he killed Spadafora. I doubt very much the National Security Agency was monitoring him or even had the capacity to do it. It didn't matter at the time. It was all a machination, a manipulation of the system."

Armando contended that the conspiracy against Noriega was strictly about Panamanian internal politics, and while this aspect cannot be entirely discarded, we believe that it obfuscates larger matters. To think that the tail was wagging the dog is utterly retarded, and further supports our contention that Armando was a CIA asset working for Bush.

Nevertheless, Armando mounted a vicious whisper campaign against his government with the help of the Panamanian consul, Jose Blandon, whom Noriega had recently fired in 1987. This rumor attack resulted in indictment of the Panamanian leader in Miami in 1988.

We probably should stop to consider the implication - namely that a foreign, allegedly sovereign nation is subject to US law. The only logical explanation is that Panama is a US possession, something which the US government fails to admit.

Eisner discovered that 2 of the major witnesses against Noriega, Floyd Carlton Caceres, and Jose Blandon, both instrumental in the indictments, lied under oath. At that point, the US government turned to its paid convicted felons for testimony. Nothing which Caceres or Blandon stated under oath held up under subsequent investigation, and in fact created considerable difficulties for the prosecution as just noted.

Even more ironic and infuriating is that the US government was doing business with the very drug cartels with which a grand jury indicted Noriega for doing business. Hoeveler had no concern for the hypocrisy. One cannot help but recall the lyrics from The Night the Lights Went Out in Georgia:

        Well, don't trust your soul to no backwoods Southern lawyer

        Cause the judge in the town's got bloodstains on his hands

In summation, Eisner concluded, 

Since my first visit with Judge Hoeveler, I've spoken to at least four dozen other sources, both in Panama and the United States. They include former DEA officials, CIA agents, U.S. military officers, an official at the Defense Intelligence Agency, even a member of Mossad who monitored the Israeli spy agency's operations in Panama. "We do not believe Noriega did any of this drug-dealing," the Israeli source said.

Given the fraudulent and criminal nature of the case against Noriega, what was its real motivation? We have already noted Panamanian politics which was certainly an issue, but our view is that it was a tool used by the Bush administration to justify the president's removal of Noriega which seemed to be to protect the former from information known by the latter.

One could argue that the invasion was a dress rehearsal for the upcoming invasion of Kuwait, and a way for Bush to impress upon the Central Americans that the US was still the imperator. Some even say that Noriega was currying Soviet support against US intrigue, and thus Bush needed to reassert the Monroe Doctrine to prevent another Cuba. I don't buy any of it - plausible as these arguments may sound. The USSR was in its death throes and had no stomach for a new conflict thousands of miles away.

Other theories hold that Noriega was providing intelligence to other nations or intelligence agencies in contravention to agreements made between CIA and Noriega's government. To assert that spooks have a code of ethics is laughable on its face.

Is it possible that Noriega knew about Mossad and Michael Harari's activities in Panama preceding the Kennedy murder, of which Bush was very much a part? Whatever the General knew, it threatened Bush down to his skull and bones. The theory that Bush invaded Panama to counteract the wimp reputation he was burnishing is malarkey. Bush was a consummate killer - he didn't need to rescue his reputation.

Reference

Peter Eisner, Uncertain Justice, Miami New Times, March 23, 1998, source(Uncertain Justice (miaminewtimes.com), accessed 5/17/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Origins of the Six Day War

President Franklin Roosevelt once famously said that nothing in politics ever happens by chance, and so it is in the case of the Arab-Israeli Six Day War of June 1967. It was an engineered war cooked up by the same psychopaths who brought us the Viet Nam war and all wars since at least the time of the French Revolution.

Yes, Jews were the instigators behind the short war supported with the very able assistance of CIA. The perfect alignment of the stars occurred with the ascendancy of the Jewish Lyndon Johnson to the presidency and the long establishment of Richard Helms and James Angleton in CIA. With these powerful actors in place, war was inevitable.

The war instigating business started in 1966 according to information Michael Collins Piper provided in his seminal book, Final Judgment. Quoting 

According to Andrew and Leslie Cockburn: "One long-serving official at

the CIA's ancient rival, the code-breaking National Security Agency,

states flatly that `Jim Angleton and the Israelis spent a year cooking up the

`67 war. It was a CIA operation, designed to get Nasser [of Egypt].'

Piper provided this excerpt after documenting Angleton's very close connections with the Jewish mafia led by Meyer Lansky and  the former's well known work for Mossad. While Piper refused to state it, the fact is that Angleton was a Mossad asset in CIA, whose treason and corruption of US foreign policy has done more damage to America than any foreign enemy could hope to achieve.

So according to an extremely well placed Johnson era NSA officer, James Angleton and Israel were the primary architects of the Six Day War. To be very clear about the conclusion, it was based upon this NSA officer's access to very sensitive coded cables and communications between the Johnson government, CIA, Mossad, and Israel. The officer knew whereof he spoke.

But Angleton was not without his patron Lyndon Johnson, who himself was vigorously supported by the Rostow brothers whom we identified in a previous Chronicle on the USS Liberty as cheerleaders for this war and the one in Viet Nam.

Readers may recall how Johnson ordered the sinking of the Liberty as a pretext to bomb Egypt with hydrogen bomb weapons. One can only imagine the mayhem if that Jewish psychopath had won another term as president. Fortunately his bungling with the Viet Nam war led him to abdicate after his first term expired.

The Arabs did not have the military strength to take on the American backed Israelis, but with Angleton's and Mossad's machinations, they were goaded into attacking Israel which sought to steal even more land than it had taken in 1948. It is a crying shame that the Arabs failed to politically destroy Israel and remove it from the map.

In order to arm the Jews, Mossad asset James Angleton worked hand-in-glove with Jewish crime lord Meyer Lansky who pushed on his organized crime empire to smuggle and run guns to Israel. The men upon whom Lansky relied were Sam Giancana, Santos Trafficante, Carlos Marcello, and Hyman Larner, all of whom were Lansky subordinates. Larner pulled the strings in Panama where Jew Michael Harari handled the money laundering and gun running.

The reason Johnson needed Lansky's assistance was because his Viet Nam war was blasting full blaze, and funding the Jewish war was not easily laid on the backs of American tax payers. In exchange for Marcello's help, Johnson, according to Piper, called off the Justice Department's investigations and prosecutions against organized crime.

For this failure to stop the psychopaths, which was a foregone conclusion with American collusion in the war, the world paid in great blood, and is still paying today with the fake War of Terror launched by Angleton protégé Dick Cheney and the cabal of blood thirsty Neo-Cons who have infested administration after administration since the Reagan years.

Reference

Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th Edition, 2d printing, 2005, source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com), accessed 5/16/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Was Oswald in the Doorway?

Much fuss has been made over the contention that alleged presidential assassin Lee HARVEY Oswald was standing on the front steps of the Texas School Book Depository at the time of  the ambush of President Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza. New evidence discovered in 2019 suggests that case is still viable, though it is not without its difficulties.

The theory that Oswald is standing in the doorway of the TSBD is based largely on the writings of Ralph Cinque who painstakingly reviews the famed Altgens 6 photograph, observing that it has been heavily altered. He contends that a series of impositions have been made to obscure Oswald in favor of Billy Lovelady on the stairway landing. The reason for the photographic fraud is that otherwise, Oswald had an alibi for his whereabouts at 12:30p, the time of the president's murder by Mossad and CIA.

There is no doubt that HARVEY was the designated patsy - as he himself famously announced - but the introduction of claims of photographic fraud to rescue his innocence is not required. Whether or not Altgens captured Oswald or Billy Lovelady is not essential for Oswald's innocence.

We will present the most likely sequence of events which accounts for Oswald's movements during the noon hour, thus showing that he was no where near the 6th floor of the TSBD. We also show that his presence on the TSBD stairway is yet viable.

Oswald's whereabouts in the TSBD at the time of the assassination have always been a point of contention, in part because no solid contemporary evidence has survived documenting them. It is inconceivable that he was not asked precisely his location by his interrogators who conspicuously did not leave any written record of his location - for rather obvious reasons. After all, the Dallas Police Department needed a scapegoat for its commission of the heinous crime of murder and cover-up, a task compromised by recorded data exonerating Oswald.

In an interesting turn of fate, Malcolm Blunt found the notes which FBI co-conspirator James Hosty made during one of the many interrogations of Oswald. From an interview conducted by DPD homicide chief and co-conspirator Will Fritz on November 22 at 3:15p, Hosty made the following note as quoted by Jeremy Bojczuk,

O stated he was present for work at TBD on the morning of 11/22 and at noon went to lunch. He went to 2nd floor to get Coca Cola to eat with lunch and returned to 1st floor to eat lunch. Then went outside to watch P. [Presidential] Parade

Accepting the very contemporary and early notes as authentic and reliable, we can observe that the debate over Oswald's location during lunch time is practically resolved, and does no injury to the idea that Altgens 6 captured Oswald insofar as it is plausible.

To amplify the note based upon other known evidence, Oswald, at around noon, went to the second floor lunchroom to get a get a Coke, perhaps using the northeast corner stair case, after which he returned to the first floor lunchroom, also called the domino room, to eat lunch. Upon finishing, he walked to the front of the building where he watched the parade. 

The clear implication is that Oswald finished lunch before the assassination. Therefore, it is possible that Oswald was on the western side of the stairway - ie on the left as one faces the building - though it is not entirely guaranteed. For as Bojczuk notes, of the several witnesses who testified about the people in the front of the TSBD, no one mentioned Oswald. As it turns out, this anomaly proves very little.

One could imagine a scenario where many of the parade watchers did not look back to take a roll call of people present. Also, one could imagine the possibility that not all office workers at TSBD who were interviewed knew the relatively new worker Oswald. Other permutations of these ideas are readily conceivable by an agile mind.

Bojczuk makes a strong case, however, that Oswald was on the first floor during the time leading up to the CIA-Mossad ambush of Kennedy. So even without the photograph, there is no reason to believe that Oswald was anywhere else, including the alleged assassination lair on the 6th floor.

According to Fritz' notes, which some maintain are derivative of Hosty's and FBI co-conspirator James Bookhout's notes, Oswald stated that he was "out front" with Bill Shelley who was his CIA handler. Thus we have additional confirmation that Oswald could have been caught by Altgens' camera.

This sequence of movements and positioning by Oswald provides the simplest and most reasonable schematic of his whereabouts. The many stories about an encounter with DPD officer and perjurer Marion Baker and encounters at the front of the building or in the 2d floor lunchroom or anywhere else are now seen as frauds of the perpetrators - and entirely moot to boot.

The reason for the Baker frauds was to remove Oswald from the front of the building where he was snapped by Altgens. 

The case for Altgens photo fraud is heightened by the long lapse between the time his photos were taken and the time that they were broadcast nationally, first by CBS news anchor and co-conspirator Walter Cronkite on November 22 at 6:34p EST.

Larry Rivera documents that an exceptionally strong rivalry between United Press International and the Associated Press prompted each of them to deploy couriers to follow the motorcade to pickup finished rolls of film so that they could be rushed back to their respective offices for processing and distribution with as much celerity as possible. In one case he shows about an hour lapse between the time a photo was taken, and the time it was broadcast nationally.

However, in the case of Altgens 6 and 7, the time lapse is much larger - nearly 3 1/2 hours. Why such a long lag with such intense competition? A very reasonable explanation is that undesirable elements needed photowashing - such as Oswald in the doorway. Other explanations are possible, but no persuasive ones have been presented.

Writing with Rivera, veteran journalist and photography expert Roy Schaeffer confirmed that the image he received from AP at the Dayton Daily News was grossly doctored. Thus the lapse in publication for the most newsworthy event of the century is best explained by alteration due to Oswald's unwanted presence in the famed photograph.

Both the photographic and testimonial evidence converge to place Oswald on the first floor of the Texas School Book Depository at the time the president was murdered by Mossad-CIA. It is beyond a reasonable doubt that Lee HARVEY Oswald was not guilty of the charges made against him in murdering the president of the United States.

Reference

Larry Rivera, Roy Schaeffer, JFK: The James "Ike" Altgen's photo timeline, opengovtv.com, April 2, 2015, source(JFK: The James “Ike” Altgen’s photo timeline (opengovtv.com), accessed 5/15/2021)

Jeremy Bojczuk, What Was Lee Harvey Oswald's Alibi, 22november1963.org.uk, nd, source(Lee Harvey Oswald's Alibi : JFK Assassination (22november1963.org.uk), accessed 5/15/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Great Escape of Jack Ruby

Jack Ruby, the alleged killer of the alleged presidential assassin Lee HARVEY Oswald, allegedly died in prison in 1967 awaiting a retrial for the alleged murder. The best evidence shows that his alleged death was a bit of legerdemain to whisk him away to Israel for reward for a job well done.

Jack Ruby, nee Rubenstein, is typically depicted as a small time hoodlum who ran with the wrong crowd but was on generally good terms with the Dallas Police Department. His murder of Oswald was to spare the president's widow of the trauma of going through an emotional trial.

Now that we have the lies and allegations on the table, we can expose them for what they and reconstruct the truth.

The first point of contention is Ruby's murder of Oswald. I know that it was on television and allegedly in real time, and my god, Walter Cronkite said it was true. How could it be a deception? One clue is that the production was done by Jewish Hollywood directors and producers. Having watched the pre-murder tape I can assure our dear readers that it was a staged production.

Ralph Cinque has done extensive work documenting the sound stage features of the specially fitted Dallas Police Department garage. Not only was the shooting a made for TV crisis drama, but the shooter was not even Ruby.

Ruby arrived at the police station to prepare for the deception. He did not walk past DPD officer Roy Vaughn as official stories claim. We do not know when he arrived, or where he entered, but possibly an hour or so before the staged television spectacle.

Before you protest or roll your eyes, please show me anywhere in the surviving footage or the famous Jackson photo a clear view of Ruby's face. It does not exist. Therefore there is no positive identification of Ruby and thus no case.

But the fake Ruby was not the end of the fakery. Oswald was not shot. Oswald made his acting debut at the Dallas Police Department. Unfortunately he was later murdered in the police station. While we will explore this matter in another Chronicle, we haven't the time to digress in this one.

However, we will congratulate the costume director for the selection of DPD murderer James Leavelle's Easter suit - as Cinque puts it. The symbolism of the good guy next to the evil Oswald made the dramatic suggestion that Oswald got what he deserved and that DPD was innocent of his murder - even though Oswald murdered neither Kennedy nor Tippit. Did Leavelle forget that it was unfashionable - egregiously so - to wear white past Labor Day? How gauche. It was all part of the movie direction.

To Cinque's discredit, he creates a myth of Ruby's innocence - a man ambushed in the police station and drugged into near imbecility. While he may well have been drugged to keep him from becoming too truthy, he was a fully willing participant in the fraud. Ruby was an important Meyer Lansky associate - even if somewhat indirect - meaning that he already had a get out of jail card - though not entirely free.

According to Michael Collins Piper's quote of Peter Dale Scott, Ruby was a man enmeshed in the political intrigues of the international Deep State which emphatically included Meyer Lansky. Only blithering ignorance informs the decision that Ruby was an innocent victim caught up in the maelstrom of the Jewish murder of President Kennedy. Additional evidence ties Ruby to CIA in the case of the staged Walker shooting - an incident requiring a separate Chronicle.

For the next 4 years, Ruby had to play the part of felon while the Warren Commission went through its fake investigation and cover-up of its members' crimes, especially that of former CIA Director Allen Dulles.

After Ruby's first trial resulted in mistrial, the gun runner played the cancer card to great effect. He "died" and was wheeled out to an airport where he was sent to Israel. But where is the evidence?

Fortunately Michael Collins Piper provides it in his seminal Final Judgment. Piper relates the story of Idaho resident Grace Pratt who worked as a cook in San Francisco at a restaurant/bar named Tiny's whose bar was operated by Jack Ruby.

As part of her normal work day, she ate dinner with Ruby after the dinner rush was over. Due to her silence about a mob murder at the restaurant, she earned Ruby's trust who often shared many secrets with her in the course of their many dinners.

After his funeral coverage, she saw a man boarding a plane in New York City bound for Israel. He turned around to look straight at the camera. Pratt instantly recognized him as Ruby. She later learned that he fled to Brazil.

The escape is not at all far fetched. Piper provides evidence that the government cooperated heavily with the Ruby defense, meaning that he was under US government protection - the trial being for the little people to be amused with "justice being served." Our firm belief is that the government assistance was arranged with James Angleton's support and the Rostow brothers, with a cast of thousands in support. After all, Ruby was a Mossad-CIA asset of great importance. Under no circumstance could any Kennedy related trial ever occur - especially one resulting in conviction.

Finally, Piper reports that Ruby lawyer Alan Adelson recorded his account of the funeral which was closed casket. For me, that nails it shut - Ruby did not die. We call for an exhumation of the casket in order to prove the validity of this thesis.

Given Ruby's importance to Israel, and its perpetration of the murder of the president through its web of CIA, Mossad, and Lansky resources, it is inconceivable that the Jewish state would roll him under the bus. The only remaining question is, when and where did Ruby die?

Reference

Ralph Cinque, [many and numerous, often rambling, postings on the Oswald shooting], Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th Edition, 2d printing, 2005, source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com), accessed 5/7/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Will the Real Deep Throat Please Stand Up?

In a Chronicle of some age, we rejected - with considerable scorn - the story that former FBI executive Mark Felt was the notorious Deep Throat of Watergate fame. Even our nominee failed the truth test as we discovered after reading Michael Collins Piper's investigation into the matter which is explosive in substance and implication.

Mark Felt, doddering, crippled, and half-demented, was wheeled out before the nation in one of the most ghastly acts of disrespect of a senior citizen we have witnessed. Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein had the audacity and psychopathic temerity to reveal him as the secret source of their revelations about the Nixon administration as they pummeled it in their political assassination of the 37th president. Have these "people" no decency? Have they no shame?

Our candidate for Deep Throat was certainly better placed and more plausible, but it was wide of the mark as well. We thought that Alexander Haig, Nixon's autocratic, treacherous, and traitorous chief of staff, was well placed, and had enough access to the tapes that he could provide the damaging information which tore asunder his boss' government. Of course, none of this error precludes Haig's involvement in the destruction of the government and Nixon, or his involvement in Operation Deep Throat.

However, Piper introduced new material illuminating Deep Throat in his groundbreaking book, Final Judgment. Drawing on investigation by Debra Davis, author of a biography of Washington Post owner Katherine Graham, Piper provides the most persuasive analysis of Deep Throat we have read.

When Katherine the Great: Katherine Graham and her Washington Post Empire was first published in 1979, Graham flew into a rage, demanding that Harcourt Brace destroy the book. Graham had no libel case - merely a demand that the book be destroyed - because that is what you do when the truth is revealed - especially when it involves treason and sedition against the United States as was her case.

Davis reported that National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger installed his comrade James Angleton of CIA in the White House with Richard Ober, where Kissinger set up a spy network to do surveillance on Nixon. The spy operation Angleton ran was for the Israeli counter-intelligence desk at the White House - not at CIA, meaning that Kissinger and Angleton were conducting Israeli affairs of state out of the Nixon White House!

In other words, Kissinger and Angleton were committing treason by attempting to overturn the 1972 presidential election through espionage for their country Israel, an act in which Mossad was no doubt involved.

Ensconced at the White House, and with full access to the National Security Adviser, Angleton and Ober began monitoring the tapes and conversations in the Oval Office. Whether Ober was Deep Throat proper, or Charlie McCarthy to Angleton's Edgar Bergen, is a rather fine distinction with no difference - the man behind the curtain was Angleton who was deliberately sabotaging the American government for his nation - ie ISRAEL.

Nixon was the target of yet another political assassination by International Jewry and Mossad, the details of which we shall save for another Chronicle. Our main point for now is that James Angleton, working for Mossad, was Deep Throat.

[Postscipt 5/10/2021: It is our belief, though unproven, that Angleton spotted a damaging reference on one of the tapes, ordering Haig to remove it, thus creating the famous 18 minute gap. The popular theory is that Nixon secretary Rosemary Woods made the erasure, but that is surely another fantasy of the Washington Post. To think that Nixon had time to listen to the tapes for incriminating material is lunacy. The damage was to CIA and Mossad - not Nixon.]

Reference

Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th Edition, 2d printing, 2005, source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com), accessed 5/7/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Rethinking Nixon in Dallas

Quite some time ago, we speculated on Nixon's presence in Dallas as complicity in the murder of  President Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza. New evidence and analysis has forced us to discard the theory we presented in favor of a new one placing Nixon in more favorable light.

In our past Chronicle, we suggested that Nixon, a protégé of David and Nelson Rockefeller, was in Dallas on a mission specifically related to the operation of the assassination - perhaps as a bagman or signal that the operation was green - approved.

While there may be some truth to the latter - and it would be without Nixon's cognizance - new analysis prompts us to believe that his handlers placed him in Dallas to show him the power of the Deep State, and to provide a basis for blackmailing or destroying him should he grow too big for his future presidential britches.

As Watergate flames enveloped the Nixon White House, the Rockefellers banged the drums of the Imperial Presidency, showing that Nixon had overstepped his authorization from the Deep State, and thus needed to be cut down to size.

However, the Oval Office tapes, often used to incriminate the president, actually vindicate him on this matter. As we all know, his aide H R Haldeman later wrote about his cryptic conversations with Nixon regarding Bay of Pigs, and assignments his boss gave him regarding DCI Richard Helms.

When Haldeman told Helms that the White House did not want to open the scab of Bay of Pigs, Helms went totally ballistic because he realized that Nixon was attempting to blackmail him over the Kennedy murder in which CIA was a leading partner in crime. In that outburst, Helms let the cat out of the bag.

Nixon is heard musing about the extent of the agency's involvement, hinting that CIA had more to do with the Big Event in Dallas than the public knew. The president seemed genuinely perplexed about the crime, harboring suspicions about the fantasy Warren Commission Report. And certainly Nixon, a veteran of Operation 40 and other CIA black jobs, was not so naïve to suppose that the spook agency was clueless. Our interpretation of Nixon's words suggest that he was getting warm, but yet had not connected the dots.

Since that Chronicle, we have also learned quite a bit more about the assassination, and its lead instigator and planner. Again the tapes come to Nixon's defense insofar as he was not a participant in the crime, and he certainly had no foreknowledge.

The murder of President Kennedy was ordered and led by International Jewry. This thesis Michael Collins Piper makes clear in his book Final Judgment. The tapes also show that Nixon was either ambivalent or antipathetic toward the Jews. Yes he had the exceptionally ambitious, sycophantic, yet totally sinister Henry Kissinger on his staff, along with an army of other Jews in his administration. But he made explicit comments about the "god-damned Jews" and other deservedly unfavorable remarks.

Consequently, we conclude that Nixon could have been used by the Jews, and framed in such a way so as to cast doubt on his innocence in Dallas, but they would never have welcomed him into their bosom as a co-conspirator.

It is now inconceivable to us that Nixon had foreknowledge of the assassination. Although he had good sense to leave Dallas before the shooting, he was brought to Dallas, as were so many other luminaries, to witness the shock and awe of the Jewish Deep State, and to provide a means, via circumstantial evidence, of suggesting his complicity in the crime on November 22. Nixon unwittingly saved himself from that smear by beating CIA to the punch when he challenged Helms with the evidence.

Reference

Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th Edition, 2d printing, 2005, source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com), accessed 5/7/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Tuatha de Danann and the Tribe of Dan

In certain circles, it is believed that the Irish Tuatha (pronounced "to ay") de Danann people and the ancient Israeli tribe of Dan are the same people. Despite superficial resemblances to the name, there is no credible evidence to support the claim.

Although there are variants of the story, the general idea is that a remnant of ancient Israeli emigrants left Israel at the time of the Assyrian or Babylonian invasions, to make a long voyage from Palestine to Ireland, with stops along the way in Carthage and Iberia.

The most important elements of the retinue were two female offspring of the line of David, sometimes led by the prophet Jeremiah to preserve the royal succession, thus fulfilling scriptural prophecy that the Davidic throne would always be occupied. Given the hard times in both the northern and southern kingdoms of Biblical fame, it was time for an escape to safer climates.

The arrival of the royal entourage in Ireland gave rise to the Tuatha de Danann which after time was moved to Scotland and then to England, finally uniting under the Union Jack.

It is an entertaining and fascinating story, but the evidence for it is slim, if for no other reason that an alternate and more plausible explanation of these mythical people exists. Its chief proponents are found in British Israelism and Christian Identity circles.

Anthropologist Robert Sepehr gave airplay to this idea when he included a lecture in his video by someone who glibly asserted that the Tuatha de Danann were from the Israeli tribe of Dan based upon the similarity of names. I suppose one could then contend that Dannon yogurt is based upon a recipe handed down through the millennia from the Tuatha de.

Irish language expert Tomás Ó hAodha explains that Tuatha de Danann are people of the goddess Danu, while the editors of Wikipedia follow a similar though different line of thought by contending that they are deities of the goddess Danu. According to some scholars, Danu may not even represent a person, but may be a geographical or terrestrial reference. In any event, there seems to be no opening in the definition to allow for the insertion of Israeli peoples.

In fact, the myths, legends, and stories of these people are of traditional beliefs regarding the gods and goddesses shared and told by peoples worldwide with distinct coloration and localizations which make them uniquely Irish. These "pagan" stories predate Christianity and have no affinities with either Christian or Hebrew traditions.

hAodha further notes that these people were the final of 5 waves of invaders who invested the land - but again within a prehistoric and most likely mythical sense.

The link between the Tuatha de Danann and the tribe of Dan is a fanciful interpolation which only a drunk leprechaun could concoct.

Reference

Robert Sepehr, Ancient History of Ireland, Tuatha Dé Danann, Scythians, and Phoenicians - ROBERT SEPEHR, Youtube, March 9, 2019, 23:55 min, source((592) Ancient History of Ireland, Tuatha Dé Danann, Scythians, and Phoenicians - ROBERT SEPEHR - YouTube, accessed 5/8/2021)

Wikipedia contributors. "Tuatha Dé Danann." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 19 Apr. 2021. Web. 8 May. 2021.

Tomás Ó hAodha, Celtic Mythology - An Introduction to the Tuatha Dé Danann, Youtube, April 25, 2017, 18:55 min, source((592) Celtic Mythology - An Introduction to the Tuatha Dé Danann - YouTube, accessed 5/8/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

JFK and the Federal Reserve

Conspiracy researchers have often pointed to President Kennedy's antagonisms toward the privately owned Federal Reserve as a cause of his murder on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza. While there is a kernel of truth to that observation, it is usually muddled with reference to his famous Executive Order 11110 and silver certificates which are notoriously misunderstood. We have learned that there is much more to the story.

We covered the Executive Order in a previous Chronicle based upon G Edward Griffin's analysis on this widely misunderstood decree. To sum up briefly, the major intent of the order was to delegate the authority for the issuance of silver certificates and silver sales to the Secretary of the Treasury. Prior to this, the president was often imposed upon to provide a pro forma signature for their issuance or silver transactions. These notes were issued by the Treasury rather than the privately owned Federal Reserve.

The main point was that there were no silver certificates actually issued on authority of the president, and thus it was not a salvo fired on the Fed. 

Subsequently, partisans would show examples of Treasury issued notes as proof that Kennedy was indeed interested in wresting control of the money away from the Federal Reserve.

However, such notes were issued well into Johnson's elected term for, as Michael Collins Piper explains, federal law demanded that a certain level of United States Notes be maintained in circulation. Federal law from 1878 required that the Treasury circulate 322,539,016 USD at all times. 

So the United States Notes were simply compliance with a somewhat archaic law. Unfortunately the law was honored in the breach because, although they were printed, they were kept in the Treasury vault to collect dust.

However, there is more to the story than thusly told. Piper relates that DeWest Hooker stated that the Kennedys planned to move against the Federal Reserve in his second term. In a meeting which the Hollywood agent had with John's father Joseph, the latter called the Federal Reserve

'"the Rothschild-dominated Federal Reserve."'

Clearly Joe had no fond regard for the privately owned Federal Reserve, instead wanting to return the money to the people, issued without interest.

If the International Jews were aware of this intent, they probably would have walked into the Oval Office and shot him on the spot. Had Kennedy succeeded in achieving the destruction, or perhaps Treasury control, of the Federal Reserve, we would have hailed him as a god.

Reference

Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th Edition, 2d printing, 2005, source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com), accessed 5/7/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Did the Mob Elect Kennedy?

One of the many truisms of the 1960 presidential election is that the mob elected John Kennedy as president. Unfortunately for its advocates, there is little, if any, truth in this belief.

Our interest in the topic was piqued by Michael Collins Piper's assertion in Final Judgment to the same effect - that the Kennedys made a deal with the mob, such as in Illinois, to get the senator elected president. The assertion is that the mob and the Kennedys made a deal wherein Kennedy would go soft on organized crime in exchange for the delivery of the votes needed for winning the critical state of Illinois. These claims are at best unfactual, and at worst lies.

Piper's source was Sam Giancana himself. Why the former decided that the latter was a paragon of truth is curious to say the least, but I would want someone more substantial and credible than a mobster supporting my claims about organized crime delivering votes for Kennedy.

If you add Gus Russo or Seymour Hersch to the list of sources, you get more substance. However, as John Binder discovered in his research, they are no more credible on the topic than Giancana. For example, Hersch relied on disbarred alcoholic lawyer Robert McDonnell for his version of the mob stole the election story, who by comparison almost makes Giancana look respectable.

Binder looks at the numbers using statistical methods to find support for the hypothesis that the mob delivered the votes for Kennedy. He starts by noting that there were really only 5 wards of 50 where the mob had any palpable control over voting, and they were not populous enough at the margin to provide any national candidate any tangible benefit in statewide voting.

When applying tests of statistical significance on voting patterns across all of Chicago, Binder also finds that the theory that the mob generated votes for Kennedy simply lacks evidence and credibility. His more reasonable conclusion is that mayor Richard Daley's legendary voting machine provided the votes for the presidential aspirant, and explains why the mayor, rather than Giancana, was invited to the White House after the election.

Binder also considers local voting issues as a factor which generated votes for or against Kennedy. His evidences are that all across the nation there was an upswing in Democrat voting, Chicago being no exception to the rule.

Stepping away from ballots and statistics, there is also the laugh test to consider. Is it really reasonable that Kennedy would risk associations with organized crime in a highly competitive race as was 1960's? There is no way that Kennedy would risk the political toxicity which exposure of such a quid pro quo would risk.

Even more damning to the mob thesis is the fact the both Robert and John created a bit of a reputation as being tough on organized crime in the McClellan senate hearings on this very matter in the 1950s. Would the mob trust Kennedy in any alleged deal after all of the energies each brother expended against organized crime? Binder in fact finds that two mob wards under-voted for Kennedy for the very reason that the Kennedys were seen as a threat to organized crime.

If anyone had associations with organized crime, it might have been Nixon whom Jimmy Hoffa endorsed for the very reason cited above, namely that the Kennedys were on the record for their hostility to the mob whereas Nixon was not. And yet this national leader's endorsement was not sufficient to deliver any state for Nixon.

The idea that the mob delivered Illinois to Kennedy is preposterous on statistical and semantic grounds. It is a myth which will probably not die, but for those who seriously study the matter, rather than rely on gadfly histories, they will find no credible evidence for the mob providing any local or national support for Kennedy in 1960.

Reference

Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th edition, second printing ebook, 2005, illustrated, 771pp source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com) accessed 4/30/2021)

John J Binder, Did the Chicago Outfit Elect John F Kennedy President?, The Mob Museum (website), October 22, 2020, source( Did the Chicago Outfit elect John F. Kennedy president? | The Mob Museum, accessed 5/2/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Identifying the JFK Assassination Senior Partner

When asked if CIA or Mossad was the initiator in the murder of President Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza, Michael Collins Piper equivocated a bit by claiming a degree of agnosticism but affirming that the heavy hand of Mossad was inescapable and plainly obvious. We would like to correct the record by stating that International Jewry, acting through Mossad, was the instigator in the murder, deftly orchestrating a village to remove the American president.

The only idiots in the village are the coincidence theorists who couldn't connect two dots lying on top of each other.

To answer the question, one has to step back from the minutia of the assassination to consider larger forces than the many trigger men encircling Dealey Plaza, or obsessing with the identity of Umbrella Man. This Piper does admirably in his book, Final Judgment. However, in stepping away from the trees, we finally see the forest of Israeli intelligence operating internationally through many spheres and layers.

But before getting into that aspect, we would do well to step back to 1917 when Lord Balfour, one of the instigators of World War 1, issued his famous declaration to Lord Walter Rothschild on November 2, 1917 stealing Palestinian lands from the crumbling Ottoman empire in order to give them to another empire - that of the Rothschilds.

It is thus unambiguous in the historical record that the land, contrary to mindless verbiage about "Jewish people", was given to the Rothschilds for their enrichment, providing them a political entity through which they could launch their ravagings of the earth through means of statecraft. Israel is first and foremost a Rothschild colony serving the purposes of Citizens of the World, the true meaning of International Jewry.

The wealth of the Rothschilds is legendary, making the fabled wealth of Solomon looking like that of a used car dealer. To rub the point in the faces of the goyim, their Hollywood collaborators even produced a movie in 1934 proclaiming, while laughing at the viewers, their blinding riches and power.

One financial analyst estimated a few years ago that the wealth of the Rothschilds numbered around 900 trillion dollars, far surpassing that of the Jewish Rockefellers at 300 trillion. With the passage of time, raids on the US Treasury, growth and inflation, we would easily estimate their current wealth over 1 quadrillion dollars, a number incomprehensible for most goyim.

This exceptional wealth should easily answer the question posed to Piper, who was the senior partner in the murder of the president? Yet there is even more to the matter than the sheer wealth of these Gargantua and Pantagruel.

The murder of the president was planned before he entered office. Joseph Kennedy earned the implacable raging anger of the Rothschilds when he interfered with their plans to initiate World War 2 by praising Hitler, and taking a pacifist stance toward the trumped up situations in Europe which Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin were staging for their pretext for aggression.

When one of Roosevelt's sons collaborated in the murder of Joe Kennedy, Jr, one of 4 Kennedy assassinations was in the completed column. The Jews were not content, for the Old Testament commands them to "wipe out every last man, woman, and child of the heathen whom I will give into your hands."

Evidence of this broad ranging movement to wipe out the Kennedys comes from a very interesting vignette from the life of Lee HARVEY Oswald - the Oswald who was the patsy designated to take the fall, and who was the son of Hungarian Jews living in New York City who spent all of their waking hours on communist activities.

John Armstrong documents the event in 1953 when HARVEY and his fake mother stayed in Stanley, North Dakota during July and August of that year. Mrs Alma Cole had a son who played with HARVEY, and knew another boy who was even closer to him. She wrote assassin Lyndon Johnson in 1963 recalling her interactions with Oswald, foolishly thinking that the government was trying to solve the murder of Kennedy.

She noted that Oswald was reading Communist literature, and recalled his boast that he had "a calling to kill a president." When the Secret Service read the letter, it interviewed the son, William Henry Timmer, who confirmed the information.

It is thus very clear that a plan to murder a president was in the works, and it wasn't just any president to our way of thinking. The president to be killed was John Fitzgerald Kennedy who needed to pay for the sins of the father.

With Jewish rage impelling an urgent destruction of the Kennedys which preceded John's inauguration, it becomes clear that the Bay of Pigs was simply a stratagem to enlist the help of CIA in the murder. John Foster Dulles and Richard Bissell were both fired for the planned failure, but it gave them the motive to participate in the revenge murder even after their alleged departures from the agency in 1961.

The straw which broke the camel's back was the highly contentious conflict between Jewish president David Ben-Gurion and President Kennedy over Jewish development and possession of nuclear weapons, something which the president resolutely opposed, and for good reason. Ben-Gurion's angry resignation in 1963 was the gauntlet authorizing execution of the president.

Kennedy was quite aware that Jewish terrorism in the Middle East was destabilizing to say the least, with Mossad, Irgun, Haganah, and Shin Beit being uncontrollable murder squads which would be even more destructive with nuclear technologies.

From here, Piper pulls together the data showing the Jewish manipulations and collaborations of PERMINDEX, CIA, French OAS, French SDECE, Meyer Lansky's mob, Mossad, anti-Castro Cubans, and many assorted and sundry villagers in the coalition to murder a president.

It is inconceivable that the murder of the president and its cover-up could succeed without the vast international resources of the Jews in government, intelligence, media, and industry. One quadrillion dollars buys a lot of murder and cover-up.

Michael Collins Piper's answer to the question of seniority in the assassination may have been somewhat unsatisfactory from my point of view, but our answer would be entirely impossible without his seminal contributions in solving the Kennedy murder case.

Reference

Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th edition, second printing ebook, 2005, illustrated, 771pp source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com) accessed 4/30/2021)

John Williams, Harvey in North Dakota, Hary and Lee (website), nd, source(Harvey in North Dakota (harveyandlee.net), accessed 5/1/2021

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.