Alek J Hidell and the Vindication of Lee Oswald

There are many evidences exonerating Lee Oswald of the murder of President John F Kennedy in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963. One of the more obscure ones involves his alias Alek J Hidell.

Serious students of the assassination will come across this somewhat mysterious name in due course. It has been associated with Oswald's post office box, the Mannlicher Carcano rifle, and a note received by the Dallas Police Department warning of danger to the president.

But there is another note sent from Oswald to DPD which is sometimes confused with the note sent to FBI agent James Hosty, so it worth delineating the 2 notes.

The House Select Committee on Assassinations confirmed that Oswald delivered a message to FBI Agent James Hosty at the FBI field office in Dallas, a fact concealed until about 1975. According to prevarications peddled by WCR shills, the note contained a threat to blow up the office.

The reality is that it was a note from Oswald to Hosty to stop harassing his wife. The Dallas FBI agent had been instructed in March to keep an eye on Oswald who was in New Orleans, in part because he subscribed to the Daily Worker. Unfortunately no one bothered to inform Hosty that Oswald subscribed to it as part of creating his leftist legend and identifying Castro supporters. In fact, that was what Fair Play for Cuba was all about - a lint operation to identify communists and their sympathizers.

Oswald was understandably annoyed that the powers of the state were being used to harass his wife; so he left a note with Hosty insisting that he desist from such actions, and probably indicated that it was part of his covert operations with former FBI agent Guy Banister. Our suspicion is that the note was not signed by Alek J Hidell.

The FBI desperately attempted to suppress this note because it showed awareness of Oswald long before November 22, 1963, such revelations demonstrating that it had failed to prevent a presidential assassination if you accept the cock and bull story that Oswald killed the president.

Either Oswald confronted Hosty in September when he returned to Dallas, or made a special trip to Dallas during the summer. Our strong suspicion is that it was the former. The harassment incident occurred in June 1963.

Jim Marrs told the story of the second note based upon the witnesses of several Dallas Police Department officers who confirmed to him receipt of the warning. The note warning of imminent danger to the president was sent to DPD intelligence which, unable to find any Alek J Hidells, dismissed it as a crank or unreliable information according to Marrs. The more likely explanation is that DPD filed it in the round file since it was deeply involved in the murders of Kennedy, Oswald, and Tippit.

After Oswald's arrest, FBI ransacked DPD downtown headquarters on 11/25/1963 in search of the note, realizing that it was explosive information which had to be quickly destroyed to ensure the success of its plot to frame Lee Oswald for the murder President Kennedy, although technically he was only charged with the murder of Tippit whom he did not kill.

There is no question that Oswald used the alias Hidell, a fact confirmed by Judyth Vary Baker who knew Oswald well. It is also true that others, such as the vile Ruth Paine, used the name to implicate Oswald in certain incriminating acts such as ordering the Mannlicher Carcano rifle from a Chicago gun dealer. Paine, working for the CIA, used the Hidell nom de plume to order the rifle so that it could be pinned on Oswald, as was in fact done in the famous visit to her garage following the assassination.

Lee also sent a warning to FBI prior to Kennedy's planned visit to Chicago, a visit which was canceled due to concerns about security. Oswald again sent a notice to authorities in Dallas. Thus we can see that this CIA agent was very protective of the president's security. Yet paradoxically, this concern for Kennedy would cost him his life once CIA found out about Oswald's interference with their operations.

Yet there is a third note, signed by Alek J Hidell, which originated with Oswald which was received at the  FBI Dallas office telex by William Walter on November 21, 1963 in Dallas, again warning of danger to the President's life. This note also conveniently vanished down the toilet - literally.

Agent James Hosty was compelled by his superior Gordon Shanklin to destroy the copy of the telex. FBI and DPD were heavily involved in the murder of the president, doing all it could to obstruct justice by, but not limited to, destruction of evidence, and murder of witnesses.

Had the note become public, it would have undermined the case against Oswald, and would have exposed his intelligence activities with CIA and FBI. In sending the note to Dallas FBI, Oswald continued the practice he established in Chicago in protecting the president against the CIA's operation to murder him, something which did not fit well with the "lone nut" idiocy concocted by the Warren Commission and its shills down to the present time.

Reference
Jim Marrs, Question and Answer Session, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsItiPfnzLI


Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Lee Oswald: The Fingerprints of Intelligence

One of the more intriguing and mysterious elements of Lee Oswald’s (1939-1963) incarceration at the Dallas Police Department jail is a couple of telephone calls he attempted to make, one in particular to John David Hurt (1909-1981) of Raleigh, North Carolina on November 23, 1963. This call is yet more evidence of Oswald’s involvement with CIA at the very highest levels of operation.

The story of what has become known as the Raleigh Call begins, for our purposes, on the 5^th floor of the Dallas Municipal Building where Alice Swinney (b. 1919) worked as a telephone operator. She had been informed by Dallas Police around 7p that 2 men would visit her if Lee Oswald attempted to make a telephone call.

At around 10:15p a co-worker, Alveeta Treon (1920-1999), arrived to relieve Swinney earlier than her normal 11p. About 10 minutes later 2 unidentified men entered the switchboard room, and setup in the equipment room.

Sometime after 10:30p, a call from Oswald came through the switchboard which both women answered simultaneously. Swinney took charge of the call, but put Oswald on hold while she communicated with the 2 men in the equipment room. They told her not to place the call and to tell Oswald that there was no answer. After returning to Oswald, she informed him that there was no answer.

The details of the requested call from Oswald were preserved by Treon including the annotation that the call was outbound to a John Hurt in Raleigh, NC for which 2 numbers in area code 919 were provided by the caller. Treon saved the card because her daughter, who was with her that night, wanted a souvenir of the historic event.

Word about the call and Treon’s memento surfaced in 1968 and was eventually investigated by the House Select Committee on Assassinations, at which time the 2 operators were interviewed again. Surrell Brady, an attorney working for Robert Blakey, chief counsel for the Committee, investigated the event in greater detail, locating John David Hurt, a non-commissioned officer veteran of World War 2 who had worked in counter intelligence.

He indeed had the number provided by Oswald, but claimed complete ignorance of why he was named by Oswald or why Oswald would have even called. Hurt had fallen on hard times, having lost his job in 1955 and suffered severe psoriasis and arthritis, going on 100% government disability in 1963.

Thus Hurt seems an unlikely candidate as an intelligence operative. However, the significance is not that Oswald tried to contact John Hurt, but that Oswald was attempting to contact a cut-out, a man who in this case was useless. Former CIA agent Victor Marchetti informed Grover Proctor, who has conducted extensive research on the Raleigh Call, that Oswald was attempting to call someone who could put him in touch with people who could help him.

More than likely the man who could help was New York attorney John Abt whom he had attempted to contact earlier that afternoon or evening – sometime during Louise Swinney’s shift and prior to Oswald’s attempted call to Hurt.

Not surprisingly, Oswald could not reach Abt, most likely for the same reason that he could not reach Hurt – Swinney failed to place the call.

Interestingly enough, North Carolina was not terra incognito for Oswald. Proctor uncovered additional evidence showing that Nag’s Head, North Carolina was home of an Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) training site for fake defectors, of whom Oswald was one from 1959-1962 while stationed in the USSR.

Oddly enough, Proctor makes the idiotic, and demonstrably false, claim that there is no evidence of Oswald being involved with the CIA. The facts speak otherwise, beginning with his tour of duty with the US Marines, especially in Japan, then USSR, New Orleans, Dallas, and Mexico City. Oswald worked not only for the CIA, but ONI, FBI, and other US intelligence agencies, possessing the very highest of security clearances. His file at the US State Department eventually caused Otto Otepka to be fired from his job where he had built a sterling reputation until such time as he attempted to follow Department policies in handling Oswald’s highly confidential file.

While many are puzzled by the Raleigh Call, it is not so mysterious. Oswald had been given a bogus cut-out. It is as simple as that. Oswald’s handlers had no intention of giving their agent any help in his framing as the patsy. The operator handling Oswald’s calls was instructed not to place them, and Oswald was given a useless cut-out. He was a doomed man long before November 24, 1963.

Reference
Grover Proctor, Jr, The Raleigh Call AND THE Fingerprints of Intelligence, groverproctor.us, November 23, 2014, accessed 1/28/2017

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The True Story of the Murder of Lee Oswald

Everything you know about the murder of Lee Oswald is a lie. There is not a single important element of the “official” story which is correct. We present the true story of how Lee Oswald was murdered on November 24, 1963 at the Dallas Police Department. It is a chilling and shocking story where Hollywood and Reality blend in a surreal pastiche of fakery and lies.

To read our most important article to date on the murder of Oswald, follow the link to our new website. http://www.americanchronicle.info/Home/TabId/514/ArticleId/71/the-true-story-of-the-murder-of-lee-oswald.aspx

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Carl Mather's Plymouth and the Fake Lee Oswald

After recently reading an excellent article about the vehicle spotted by auto mechanic T F White on November 22, 1963 at the El Chico restaurant in Dallas' Oak Cliff neighborhood, I wanted to make a few remarks on the incident which ties it to the Texas Theater where Lee Oswald was arrested.

The story regarding White is that he spotted around 2p a suspicious looking driver of a 1957 blue Plymouth in the parking lot of the El Chico restaurant across the street from Mack Pate's auto repair shop where White worked. Because he heard sirens related to the assassination of Tippit or arrest of Oswald, his heightened alertness prompted him to cross the street to more closely inspect the vehicle and driver. After getting a good frontal look at the driver, he wrote down the license plate number as PP 4537.

Later that evening, White recognized the man as Oswald when he saw him on television. The 60 year auto mechanic did not know that Oswald had impersonators.

The FBI was alerted to the information whereupon they interviewed White and Pate. The topic of an assassination threat to Kennedy in Houston the day before involving a red Ford Falcon came up during conversation with Pate, which the FBI used to describe the vehicle which White saw. So instead of seeing a blue 1957 Plymouth, the FBI said that White had seen a red 1961 Ford Falcon. This discrepancy in stories has been long used by Warren Commission shills to discredit White. The discredit goes to the FBI and its supporters whose error was intentional.

The FBI discovered that the license plate belonged to a vehicle owned by Carl Amos Mather of the Collins Radio company which was a major CIA contractor. The Mathers were said to be friends of the Tippits, a claim which we have been unable to substantiate. Because Mather was a CIA spook, he invoked "national security", so to speak, to refuse interviews, but the FBI interviewed his wife who provided no useful or reliable information.

Years later Mather would demand immunity to speak to the House Select Committee on Assassinations, which is proof of guilt in the crimes against President Kennedy and JD Tippit. The HSCA lost a valuable opportunity to interrogate one of the accomplices of the murders and to uncover the full extent of Collins Radio in the crimes.

If Tippit and Mather were friends, would both have been involved in the crimes of the CIA? But this leads to a connection to Oswald. As reported elsewhere in our Chronicles, there was indeed an Oswald look alike who was used to frame and implicate Oswald as a murderer and a lone nut.

At approximately 1:50p, the Texas Theater had two men bearing striking likeness to each other. Both men were arrested with one taken out the front, and the other out the back. The man taken out the back was the imposter Oswald who was then taken to the nearby Plymouth which he then drove to the El Chico restaurant where he was spotted by White.

It's not a huge point, but quite interesting that the Oswald imposter was seen so quickly after his departure from the Texas Theater. As we opined previously, this man may have been the one who was part of the murder of Tippit at approximately 1:06p. Insofar as a man resembling Oswald was witnessed at the Tippit murder scene, this imposter was the man.

Reference
Bill Kelley, The Red 1961 Ford Falcon, JFKCountercoup (blogspot), March 12, 2012, accessed 12/31/2016

Copyright 2016 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Ruby Did NOT Shoot Oswald

Contrary to the baroque lies of the Warren Commissioners and the establishment press and US government, Jack Ruby did not murder Lee Oswald.

The details to this fascinating story are found on our new website by following this link: http://www.americanchronicle.info/Home/TabId/514/ArticleId/66/the-patsification-of-jack-ruby.aspx

From Dealey Plaza to the Texas Theater

There is much misinformation about the movements of Lee Oswald after the CIA ambushed President Kennedy in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963, but we offer an antidote to the lies of the Warren Commission. We also discuss the controversial Rambler station wagon, the Beckley rooming house, and the testimony of Roger Craig.

 

This article is one of our more important ones dealing with the details of the crime during this critical time period, an article you can read on our new website at the following address.

http://www.americanchronicle.info/home/from-dealey-plaza-to-the-texas-theater.aspx?ArticleID=26&tabid=514

Copyright 2015 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Who Murdered Mary Sherman?

Mary Sherman (1913 - 1964) is another somewhat obscure footnote in the assassination of President Kennedy who was murdered for knowing too much. The newsfakers of the time of her death attributed her murder to a random act of meanness, but we mean to set the record straight because the truth is stranger than fiction.

 

Sherman was a famed oncologist whom the highly reputable cancer authority Dr Alton Ochsner brought to Tulane University in New Orleans in order to help him study cancer. The studies turned out to be research for developing a bio-weapon to induce virulent cancer.

 

Ochsner had assembled a first rate mod squad of researchers to complete the weapon. The prominent players besides Sherman and Ochsner were Judyth Vary Baker, David Ferrie, and Lee Oswald, all of whom worked in offsite labs to grow the cultures and mice to produce the weapon.

 

Considerable work was done in David Ferrie’s apartment and some in Sherman’s, not to mention lab work at Tulane. Judyth Baker provides detailed accounts of her work on the project, and the collaborations of these 5 individuals, in her ground breaking book Me & Lee.

 

Ochsner’s explanation for the weapon was that it was needed for “national security” – in other words the murder of Fidel Castro. The only problem with the story is that it was a lie. Castro was the boogey man of Latin America whom the CIA installed as its pretext du jour whenever it needed to stir up the Red Menace to turn on the spigots of cash for its wars of imperial aggression. George Bush Sr was the bagman who carried money to Castro in the early days.

 

When 4 of the 5 researchers discovered that they had not been working on a weapon targeted at Castro – a highly inane idea in the first place due to the preparations required on a victim to make it work – they realized they had been used, but not sure how, and not sure how it related to Kennedy’s murder by the CIA.

 

But Ochsner knew the details and relationships, having intimate ties with the CIA through International Trade Mart which CIA employee / asset / operative / and bagman Clay Shaw directed. The ITM was another CIA front, this one targeted at oppressing Latin America – a long time custodial province of the Rockefellers. George Bush Jr does not have a humungous ranch in Paraguay for nothing. And the Wall Street Nazis who installed Adolph Hitler in power also hid their Nazi puppets all throughout South America.

 

Interestingly, Ochsner had ties to Brazil where he conducted business for the CIA.

 

Fearing that Sherman might say something wittingly or not when the Warren Commission went on its road show south, Ochsner murdered her. She was found dead in her apartment on her bed with severe burns and puncture wounds. The New Orleans police, as corrupt as the Dallas Police Department, cooperated in the cover-up of the murder.

 

But how do we know that Ochsner, the world renowned oncologist, murdered the internationally esteemed Dr Sherman? New evidence has emerged showing the extent and nature of the burns suffered by Sherman. Even casual observers would recognize that a bed fire could not have produced the burns she endured. Besides, there were no burns on the mattress.

 

Sherman was murdered by a linear particle accelerator, a very sophisticated piece of machinery requiring very carefully controlled access and supervision. The number of people with the necessary access to it for use as a murder weapon was exceedingly few. And among that handful, only Ochsner had both the authority and motive to murder Sherman.

 

Ochsner murdered others as well. As part of his medical research, he infected people with viruses and other foreign agents without their consents or knowledges. In fact, he sent Oswald and Baker to a mental health hospital in Louisiana to infect prisoners brought from Angola State Prison for his cancer weapon experiments. Death was brutal.

 

Ochsner also used this weapon on Jack Ruby after the mobster confessed things to journalist Dorothy Kilgallen, which things ought not to have ever been confessed. Ruby died a short time thereafter.

 

The finger prints of Ochsner are all over the murder of Dr Sherman as well as others who got in the way of his defense of “national security.” Her knowledge of his nefarious management of the cancer weapon, and more significantly his handling of Oswald, proved too big a risk for the thug to take. So, Ochsner murdered a single, defenseless woman to protect his reputation. What a man.

The macabre deeds of New Orleans are seeping up through the marshy bogs like so many putrid corpses. The fog is lifting and we can finally bring closure to so many unexplained murders, knowing full well that the CIA is no longer able to keep its dirty, murderous secrets.

 

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Role of Ruth Paine in the Murder of President Kennedy

Whatever worthy cause, whatever noble endeavor, whatever good deed Ruth Paine may have done in later years to expiate for her misdeeds in the crime of the century, the woman is evil incarnate, being a principal agent who maligned and framed Lee Oswald as the murderer of President Kennedy.

 

Ruth Paine has a long career as a CIA asset who has long done the agency's business, starting at least with her involvement with the Oswalds in 1962-63. Acting as a spy on spies, she kept tabs on Marina Oswald, who had come to the US as the new wife of CIA agent Lee Oswald.

 

Following her betrayal of both Marina and Lee, she often went overseas under the guise of a social or humanitarian worker who snooped around to keep her contacts in the CIA informed of the businesses of foreign peoples. USAID is a well known CIA front organization which often works alongside “missionary” organizations to conduct intelligence operations.

 

Paine also worked with her ex-husband Michael to frame Lee. In 1963, writing from Washington, DC where she spent the summer, she informed the Oswalds that Marina could stay with her after she returned from New Orleans, and that she would pay for her living and hospital expenses. The quo of the quid was that Marina would teach Ruth Russian, but this too is misleading as Paine knew Russian already and was spying on Marina for CIA.

 

When Paine appeared before the Warren Commission, she presented Lee as a deadbeat who had essentially abandoned his wife. This was not the case, but the truth is far more complicated than most folks know.

 

Lee kept his wife isolated because he did not want her learning English due to her associations with the USSR and KGB. The less Marina knew in the very Cold War world of the early 1960s, the better. The real problem is that Lee was at risk of losing his child, whom he loved dearly, should Marina be deported back to the USSR. Therefore a very low profile with minimal suspicions was the order of the day.

 

As we have explained elsewhere, James Angleton was determined to murder Lee because in his book Lee was compromised goods. Oswald had been a trusted false defector in the USSR, something which Angleton never trusted. Angleton himself was as corrupt as Judas, but we save that story for another day.

 

Paine also came to the rescue for the Warren Commission by falsely claiming that Lee’s Minox camera was hers or Michael’s. The camera was most emphatically Lee’s as he was a superb photographer who worked in a very sensitive photographic assignment during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

 

The problem with the Minox, an advanced camera at the time used in spy operations due to its compact form, was that it did not comport well with the Lone Nut Theory. What was a lone nut doing with a Minox camera? Could it be because he was an intelligence agent?

 

If there were any doubt that Ruth Paine and her husband helped frame an innocent man, we refer our dear reader to the taped telephone conversation between Ruth and Michael where one tells the other on the day of the assassination that they know who murdered the President and it was not Lee. That of course did not prevent Ruth from giving false or misleading testimony about Lee to the Warren Commission whose job was to cover up the crime by framing a patsy.

 

If there were any doubt that Paine was involved in the frame-up, there are a couple of closing considerations. After November 22, 1963, Marina Oswald never again spoke with Ruth Paine, who to that point had been considered a dear friend. The other point is that Ruth bought up at least 4 homes after the murder with funds which came from who knows where. Prior to these purchases Paine had lived very modestly in a ranch house in the Dallas area.

 

Ruth Paine should be a person of interest in the crime of the century. She knows far more than she ever admits, and what she does admit is a lie.

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Lee Harvey Was a Friend of Mine

Lee Oswald, the man framed by J Edgar Hoover, Allan Dulles, James Angleton, and many other federal and Texas state government officials, finally received a respectful funeral after 50 years of relentless calumnies this past Sunday November 24, 2013.

Judyth Vary Baker, Lee’s true love from the summer of 1963, led a small group of about 2 dozen mourners to the grave site of the slain US intelligence agent where they paid respects to the man gunned down by mobster Jack Ruby on national television 2 days after the CIA led coup assassinated President Kennedy in cold blood on November 22, 1963.

 

Although he survived the shooting, Oswald died unexpectedly at Parkland Memorial Hospital after President Johnson insisted vehemently that he speak with the attending physician, Dr Crenshaw, in the middle of surgery. When the doctor returned, the mysterious man in the operating room with Crenshaw  had disappeared and Oswald was dead, even after Crenshaw declared that his patient would likely survive.

 

When Lee was buried, he was accorded an insulting tombstone plaque reading only Oswald; but on this Sunday afternoon, well wishers placed a colorful bed of flowers around the stone  slab in a token attempt to redress the poverty of his grave site.

 

Baker opened the ceremony with a few prefatory remarks, followed by author Robert Grodin who gave a brief summary of the tragic events which falsely implicated Oswald in 2 crimes which were never adjudicated. Singer Homer Henderson sang an a capella version of Lee Harvey Was a Friend of Mine, joined in chorus by those gathered. Chaplain Hy McEnery, Green Beret, gave the eulogy.

 

Although the unusually grey and cold weather abbreviated the proceedings only slightly, a measure of history was finally righted and reclaimed.

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Why the CIA Assigned Ruth Paine to the Oswalds

Ruth (b. 1932) and Michael Paine (b. 1928) were a CIA couple assigned to babysit another CIA agent Lee Oswald and family while they resided in Dallas. We believe that the primary reason for the association was James Angleton’s plan to murder Oswald.

 

When Oswald returned from the USSR in 1962 under eyebrow raising circumstances with a Soviet wife, James Angleton was all beside himself, fearing that Oswald had been compromised or was a double agent. To limit his perceived losses, he spawned an elaborate plan to murder Oswald.

 

Shortly after returning to the US, CIA operative George DeMohrenschildt introduced Oswald to Michael and Ruth Paine at a party given by an employee of the Magnolia Oil Company, Volkmar Schmidt. Ruth Paine, allegedly a Quaker, claimed that she wanted to help the beleaguered young couple establish themselves in Dallas, in return for which Oswald’s wife, Marina, would give Russian language lessons to Ruth, who claimed that she wanted to learn the language.

 

The main problem with her story is that Ruth already knew Russian for she was teaching it at a school in Dallas. Furthermore, we know that she had family connections to the CIA, including associations with Allan Dulles, director of the CIA until 1961 when Kennedy fired him for his bungled Bay of Pigs disaster.

 

The salient point of interest is that Paine knew Russian and would be the ideal babysitter for Oswald as she could monitor Lee’s and Marina’s conversations when staying at her house – something which she insisted that Marina do from the beginning. It is well known that the CIA sent Ruth Paine to many foreign and domestic locations to gather intelligence. So her work with the Oswalds was fully consistent with her job as spy.

 

Paine was also used to plant false evidence on Oswald, including the famous backyard photos of him holding a rifle. We also speculated with good reason elsewhere that Paine was the one who used the fake identity of Alek Hidell to order a rifle from Klein mail order, an identity which was subsequently planted on Oswald after his arrest.

 

In addition to these connections, Dallas Police Officer Roger Craig noted in early 1968, when he finally saw his testimony to the Warren Commission, that the Commission altered his statements concerning Ruth Paine – a clear indication that she was far more important than most anyone knew.

 

Craig had observed Oswald enter a light green Nash Rambler which, he stated to the Warren Commission and  in his memoirs, did not have a license plate matching Texas plate colors. According to Craig “The driver of the station wagon was a husky looking Latin, with dark wavy hair, wearing a tan wind breaker type jacket” who had been arrested immediately after the assassination but just as quickly released because he did not speak English!

 

But the point about the Rambler is extremely important because it appears in 2 more instances of the investigation. Edgar Eugene Bradley, whom Craig said claimed to be a Secret Service agent, stopped him for information about the Rambler into which Oswald entered – in fact he was obsessed with the details about it.

 

The reason for his interest in the Rambler was undoubtedly because Ruth Paine owned such a vehicle of the same color, a fact which police officer Buddy Walthers confirmed when he and “Harry Weatherford, and we met Officer Adamcik that works for the city [Irving] and Officer Rose and another one of their officers…” went to Ruth Paine’s home in Irving, Texas where they saw a similar vehicle. Our speculation is that it was the same one.

 

Paine told the Walthers that she was expecting them, yet the news of Oswald’s arrest had not been made public and Marina did not seem to know that he had been arrested. Thus, Paine let slip very incriminating evidence that she knew Oswald was being framed as the patsy.

 

If the vehicle which the “husky Latin” was driving was indeed Paine’s vehicle, he had completed his errand by the time police arrived at the Paine’s. We believe that his assigned task was to take Oswald to the Texas Theater where he was caged like a trapped rat.

 

The man claiming to be a Secret Service agent – Bradley – was in reality a right winged preacher from North Hollywood and closely associated with Carl McIntire, both of whom we believe were involved in the assassination conspiracy.

 

Later in life when Paine was on assignment in Nicaragua during the 1990s, she very briefly and opaquely opened up to a friend concerning the murder and her part in it:

There was, however, one occasion when the friend tried to bring up the assassination when Ruth began to say how sad she was that her daughter (then about 40) was estranged from her. Ruth said that her daughter told her that she refused to talk to her until “she came to grips with the evil that she had been associated with.” The friend said that Ruth had tears in her eyes when she said this and was certain that this was a veiled reference to the Kennedy assassination.

Of course we have no sympathy for Paine who is indeed an evil woman who framed an innocent man and assisted the assassins in their goals of murdering a president.

 

But in 1963, Paine’s largest value to the CIA was her knowledge of Russian which made her the perfect babysitter for the Oswalds. Her avid interest in an ostensibly non-descript, returning defector, can only mean that she was eye ball deep in the CIA, and assisting Angleton in the murder of Oswald.

 

Reference

Steve Jones, New Evidence Regarding Ruth and Michael Paine, Kennedy Assassination Chronicles, Winter 1998

Bill Kelly, Ruth Paine's Garage, JFKCountercoup, December 9, 2009

Various, Ruth Paine's Station Wagon, Education Forum thread, started April 28, 2006

Roger Craig, When They Kill a President, 1971, republished electronically ratical.org

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Unmasking Alek Hidell

The identity of Alek Hidell has been something of a mystery to JFK assassination researchers, but we believe that we have linked Hidell to more than one person – the unwitting Lee Oswald and the very witting Ruth Paine.

Alek Hidell is the name on an identification card found in Lee Oswald’s wallet at the time of his arrest. One of his wallets was found at the Tippit murder scene with the Hidell identification, and another presented after his arrest in the Texas Theater after the CIA murdered the President and the Dallas Police supervised the murder of officer J D Tippit. We believe that the forged ID was planted on Oswald after his arrest.

Allek Hidell is also the name of the individual who ordered a weapon in March 1963 from Klein mail order located in Chicago . The weapon ordered from Klein was not a Mannlicher-Carcano as was claimed by the deceptive Warren Commission; but the fact that a rifle was ordered from Klein by Hidell was sufficient for framing Oswald.  

The fabricated WCR story stated that Hidell ordered the weapon sent to Oswald's post office box; Hidell's identification was found on Oswald; a Carcano rifle was found on the 6^th floor of the TSBD; Oswald was on the 6th floor; therefore Oswald murdered the president. The logic is childish, but then the Nazi perpetrators knew they were dealing with a simpleton public.

When asked by the Postal Inspector on 11/23/1963 about his post office boxes and Hidell, Oswald exasperatedly stated that he did not know about Hidell, a statement we believe because the Hidell identity was planted on him by Dallas police with CIA supervision. Hidell got around, as this ID showed up in other places as we will discuss momentarily.

We know from Jim Fetzer’s research that Chauncey Holt, chief accountant for mob boss Meyer Lansky, was also a gifted forger who used his talents to create the Hidell identification cards which were delivered to the CIA or Secret Service, along with other forged items, in a red pickup truck parked in Dealey Plaza’s parking lot on 11/22/1963. From there the cards were propagated to Oswald.

Another person found with the Hidell ID was Richard Case Nagel who, fearing being implicated as the patsy, managed to get himself arrested so that he could provide a rock solid alibi of being in jail when the assassination occurred. Nagel worked for the CIA.

The faked backyard photos of Oswald holding the Carcano were found in Ruth Paine’s garage, so we now have two suspects who may have ordered the rifle. Our suspicion is that Paine, or possibly her husband Michael, was the individual who ordered the Carcano and cooperated with the photo forgers to plant evidence in her garage implicating Oswald.

While CIA operative Nagel may have been the Hidell impersonator, we think the more likely explanation is that CIA operative Ruth Paine did the deed. Paine was the Oswald baby sitter who put up Marina in her home for a time and took her to and from New Orleans, playing the kindly neighbor with hidden venom. As a CIA operative, she could easily forge and hide evidence related to post office boxes.

Finally, we noted earlier that the strange package which Linnie Mae Randle mendaciously claimed Lee took to work on 11/22 – a package supposed to be large enough to be a rifle, possibly disassembled, was really the rifle her brother Buell Frazier got from Paine and which he smuggled to the TSBD to frame Oswald.

Thus, we conclude that the ordering of the rifle from Klein and delivery to Alek Hidell was the work of CIA operative Ruth Paine.

PS 10/28/2017: We failed to include the fact that Alek was the name "Oswald" used in the USSR. There is more to unwind with Alek J Hidell pseudonym.

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The JFK Murder Is A Continuing Operation

One of the enduring artifacts of the Warren Commission Report is the anomaly of an anti-social Lone Nut and the adamant refusal to release government files on the Lone Nut. The anomaly is resolved when one realizes that the plot to murder the President is a continuing operation covered by the government's rules on secrecy.

 

The Warren Commission and its many paid hacks continue to this very day, 50 years after the murder, to stonewall and defy the laws of the land on the release of government records related to the assassination of John Kennedy and to Lee Oswald. Many paid CIA operatives, including those who operate WCR friendly websites - some of which are funded by the CIA, militantly deny the public's right to see the contents of Lee Oswald's files or any other classified assassination files.

 

But why is the government still concealing files of a lone nut 50 years after he allegedly murdered the president? Why are Ruth Paine's income tax returns from the early 1960s still under top secret classification? The answer is obvious - Oswald was not a Lone Nut. As we have reported elsewhere, he was a highly capable and valuable intelligence agent who worked for many intelligence organizations. But that is old news.

 

What most people fail to recognize is that this secrecy of the government is partly based in law, particularly those which exempt the CIA and other stealth organizations from Freedom Of Information Act disclosures for ongoing operations.

 

The CIA does not have to release any document which relates to active operations. Thus it is quite evident that the operation to murder the President was a CIA operation which continues under the aegis of the cover-up operation. Hence the CIA is under no obligation, at least in its criminal mind, to release the information it possesses on its former agent Lee Oswald. And why did the CIA recruit a Lone Nut in the first place?

 

The CIA is not alone in defying the US Congress which it holds in the utmost contempt. The Office of Naval Intelligence and Federal Bureau of Investigation are just a few among so-called US government agencies withholding information, such as personnel files, in defiance of Congress and US law.

 

The other consideration is that the CIA does not report to Congress or the US president. It reports to its plutocratic bosses in Wall Street and academia. Under no circumstance does it see itself as a creature of government. Its only purpose is to serve plutocratic moneyed interests associated with America's 1%. Indeed, Yale is a prime recruiting ground, a place where imperial hauteur is cultivated before and after matriculation.

 

So contrary to the bland claims by the stealth organizations that 98% of all assassination records have been released, the truth is that some remain concealed, and many more have been destroyed. All of this is protect a Lone Nut.

 

If former Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Blinder believes that it is the last duty of a central banker to tell the public the truth about its currency - i.e. lying is good policy - does anyone with an IQ above a potato honestly think that a spook agency would think otherwise?

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Who Is Buell Wesley Frazier?

Buell Wesley Frazier is a somewhat obscure figure in the murder of President John F Kennedy in Dealey Plaza in the City of Hate on November 22, 1963, but known as the man who drove Lee Oswald to work that day. The truth is that he was involved in the plot to frame an innocent man.

 

Frazier, while staying in Irving, Texas with his sister Linnie Mae Randle who was a neighbor of CIA operative Ruth Paine, provided the damning “evidence” that Oswald carried a package to work described as the length of curtain rods. This meaningless statement provided the Warren Commission the baseless evidence that Oswald was actually carrying the Mannlicher-Carcano which he smuggled into the Texas School Book depository where Frazier worked side by side with Lee Oswald.

 

The bottom line is that the story is bogus. Oswald smuggled nothing into the TSBD on 11/22/1963. In addition to his association with Paine, Frazier was associated indirectly with the ubiquitous Jack Ruby through his friend John Crawford. So there is ample evidence to consider Frazier an element, even if somewhat minor, in the plot to murder the President. He and his sister were directly involved in the framing of an innocent man.

 

What may not be bogus is that Frazier himself took the Carcano to work that day. After arriving at the parking lot which was about 3 blocks from the TSBD, Frazier stayed behind, according to his dishonest testimony, to charge his car battery. The truth, we believe, is that he needed to bring the "curtain rods" into the building, "curtain rods" being code for Mannlicher-Carcano.

 

It was not just about the curtain rods which Frazier lied. He lied about practically everything related to the events of 11/22.  George O’Toole produced The Assassination Tapes which researcher David Horne called a gem. O'Toole interpreted his interviews through a patented device called the Psychological Stress Evaluator which has an uncanny ability to detect stress in voice recordings. When O’Toole found Frazier in the 1970s – after much difficulty, he presented a series of questions for which Frazier lied constantly.

 

According to Larry Rivera, writing in Veterans Today, the following questions elicited high stress:

"1. Did he (Oswald) take that package up with him into the building?
2. Did he tell you he was going to go home with you that night?
3. There was nobody else in the (polygraph) room with you?
4. Did he (the examiner) tell you that you passed the test?
5. Do you know Paul Bently?
6. You never knew he (Oswald) had this gun then?"

But things get more interesting due to Frazier’s position at the time of the assassination. According to his earliest testimony, he was on the steps of the TSBD at the time of the President’s murder. The Weigman photo confirms that he was on the stair steps as he stated in his very first testimony to the Dallas Police on the evening of 11/22. Subsequent stories he told placed him in various other locations on the stairs of the TSBD.

 

The striking fact about his Warren Commission testimony, regardless of his variations in telling the story, is that he identified Billy Lovelady as being there and always in front of him. This evidence refutes the claim that Doorway man was Lovelady because Frazier was in front of Oswald and Lovelady was in front of Frazier. If the Warren Commission Lie needed another nail in its coffin, it just got one.

 

And if Doorway man is not Lovelady, then it had to be Oswald. The meaning is staggering as it ends for all time any spurious speculation that Oswald was on the 6^th floor.

 

However, Frazier was removed from the Altgens6 photo because his presence there would have complicated the lies necessary to support the Altgens6 fabrication removing Oswald from the photo, thus creating the plausibility that Oswald was elsewhere, such as the 6^th floor.

 

But it was Frazier who took at least one trip to the 6^th floor that day in the course of processing book returns. We believe that he took the rifle carried from the Paines into the TSBD to the 6^th floor on one of his trips to handle book returns. This was the ridiculous curtain rod story which Frazier’s lying sister Linnie Mae told to help frame Oswald.

 

This revelation is dramatic because not only do we now know that Linnie Mae and Buell were conspirators in the assassination through their association with the Paines, but it also exposes them as analogues to Earlene Roberts and Roy Truly, other accomplices who provided plausible witness to a crime. The problem with Roberts, Randle, and Frazier is that they are the only witnesses to the alleged events which they allegedly saw. They were in reality liars and obstructers of justice who should be prosecuted for their crimes.

 

These numerous prevarications and accessories to murder explain the enormous stress which always shows in Frazier’s voice profiles. He is lying about his role to preserve his life. Should he ever be found out, there would be hell to pay – be it in the form of a “suicide,” “accident,” or “heart attack.”

The evidence is mounting to the skies vindicating the innocence of Lee Oswald. The smug self righteous accusers have hung themselves on the own petard.

Reference

Larry Rivera, JFK: Why Buell Wesley Frazier was erased from Altgens6, Veterans Today, March 7, 2013

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Who Is Doorway Man?

New evidence from multiple researchers finally settles the question of the identity of the man known as Doorway man in the famous Altgens6 photograph taken by Ike Altgens of the Associated Press at the time President Kennedy’s motorcade passed in front of the Texas School Book Depository at 12:30 PM on November 22, 1963. If you guessed Lee Oswald you are correct.

 

The photograph has been a point of contention because the individual shown in the photograph bears resemblance to both Lee Oswald and Billy Lovelady, another employee of the TSBD. The reason for the contention is that the Lone Nut Theory requires that Oswald be on the 6^th floor of the TSBD at the time of the shooting. Without that flimsy bit of "evidence," the wheels come flying off the Warren Commission’s go-cart of lies.

 

Jim Fetzer, Ralph Cinque, and Clare Kuehn provided various insights into the resolution of Oswald’s identity, but it was not intuitively obvious to the most casual observer. Part of the problem is that there are at least 4 versions of the Altgen6 photo when only 1 is expected. The other problem is that in addition to a faint resemblance between Lovelady and Oswald, there is also a Lovelady imposter. Isolating the various components of the photographic fraud required the contributions of several investigators, but their conclusions are groundbreaking.

 

The starting point for unraveling the mystery is Oswald’s own statement about where he was at the time of the ambush of President Kennedy. One of the conspirators in the murder, Captain Will Fritz of the Dallas Police Department, took notes of his interview with Oswald which were recently discovered which reveal Oswald’s statement of his whereabouts. Oswald told Fritz that he was “out with Bill Shelley in front,” meaning that there were witnesses to his location and that he could not be on the 6^th floor even though his presence on the 6^th floor would prove absolutely nothing other than he was on the 6^th floor.

 

William Shelley, a CIA agent like Oswald, adamantly denied being with Oswald when he said “At no time during the shooting did I see Lee Harvey Oswald.” As Dr Cinque notes, the 3 name code for Oswald was a giveaway that Shelley was lying about a man with whom he worked. Shelley also withheld critical information from the Warren Commission about his work on the 6^th floor of the TSBD on the morning of 11/22. His genuineness as a truthful witness is lacking, especially considering his involvement with the agency even prior to its legal inception after World War 2.

 

But the nail in the coffin for the lying Shelley is Victoria Adam’s testimony when she said that after she went down the stairs immediately after the gun fire, she saw Oswald and Shelley standing by the elevator and Jack Ruby standing outside.

 

In addition to the eye witness testimony, we have the photographic witness of Ike Altgens, which requires a bit of explanation before proceeding with the findings. The conspirators, especially the FBI, were very anxious about the clothes Lovelady and Oswald were wearing that day because they realized that some evidence had to be altered using people who were not appropriately attired. The reason the evidence had to be altered is because it showed Oswald where he told Fritz that he was standing. To alter evidence, the CIA and FBI required an Oswald imposter, in this case Billy Lovelady.

 

Lovelady told the FBI at the time of the Kennedy murder that he wore a red vertically striped red and white shirt and blue jeans. Indeed, the FBI took a photograph of Lovelady in such attire in March 1964 because that is what Lovelady was wearing. However, this was not even close to the type of shirt which Oswald wore which had a very distinctive cut and fabric pattern.

 

So the FBI photographed a Lovelady imposter in a plaid or checked shirt which more closely resembled Oswald’s shirt than the red and white striped shirt Lovelady wore on the 22d. Then the CIA took elements of Lovelady’s face to superimpose on Oswald’s face, and then physically altered the photograph to make Oswald’s shirt look more like the new Lovelady shirt. They also covered up the man in the Fedora with a toddler, the former of whom was Jack Ruby. Bill Shelley had to be wiped out, which is probably the person with a white splotch over his face, and Lovelady had to be obscured which may be the man with his arms over his head. Numerous rearrangements of Altgen6 were made to create the fraud that Lovelady was the man in the doorway.

 

Dr Cinque began to unravel the fraud as he examined the body and shirt with known images of Oswald, especially of those taken at the police station. As a chiropractor, he noticed that the body position and lay of the shirt of the man in the doorway matched Oswald. The shirt which was given to Lovelady ex-post facto contained too many anomalies, not the least of which were lay, construction, and fabric.

 

More significantly, the person known as Black Tie Man standing next to Oswald is shown in a physically impossible position as he appears both in front of and behind Oswald at the same time. The problem is that his image, pasted in, obscures much of Oswald’s left arm and shoulder – yet he is supposed to be behind Oswald.

 

One finding which we offer is that Oswald’s missing arm and shoulder are found on the left side of Black Tie Man’s jacket. If someone would move that element back to Oswald, we would see part of Oswald’s missing arm. We are also doubtful that Black Tie Man is real, but that is not critical to the main story.

 

Other observers, including a dentist comparing jaw structure, noticed difficulties with the conspirators’ hoax. The man in the doorway had to be Oswald. Dr Jim Fetzer published these findings in a 5 part series of articles in 2012 highlighting the work of Cinque and other collaborators who deconstructed the Altgens photo fraud perpetrated by the CIA.

 

One other interesting observation the authors made was the fact that 2 Secret Service agents were looking back at Oswald as was Jack Ruby. Why would attention be on an obscure no-name warehouse worker? The answer that we provide is that Oswald was not at his assigned post on the 6^th floor. The patsy decided that he did not want to be the patsy.

 

The findings of the researchers are historic and ground breaking as they obliterate the last of the Warren Commission Lies to be exposed. For those wanting a fuller explanation of Cinque’s analysis, please follow the links in the Reference section with parts 2 and 5 being the most valuable.

Reference

Jim Fetzer, et. al., JFK Special 2: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!, Veterans Today, April 13, 2012, http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/04/13/jfk-special-2-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

First Impressions: Me & Lee

 

Me and Lee Cover (meandlee.com)

If anyone is looking for the neutron bomb for the Kennedy Lone Nut theory and a torrid love story all rolled into one, then run – don’t walk – to buy Me & Lee, a book which shines a battery of Krieg lights into dark corners and crevices of the crime of the century. This masterpiece is a canonical book in the JFK Assassination Bible.

 

The author, Judyth Vary Baker, has produced a blazing barn burner of a story which a stable of Hollywood writers on hallucinogenic drugs could not produce, proving once again that truth is stranger than fiction. The book overturns established classics in the field dealing with Lee Oswald, and has caused us to reconsider important elements of our understanding of this conspiracy to end all conspiracies.

 

Me & Lee mixes many genres of narrative including autobiographical and historical viewpoints, as well as an unmatched love story William Shakespeare could not touch. Baker is a firsthand witness to history who has done as much as any other to give us extraordinary insight into a cast of characters involved in the most sinister operation against the people of the United States by its treasonous fifth column elites.

 

The story begins with an autobiographical introduction to Judyth Vary Baker and a traumatic life threatening illness which kept her in a hospital for 18 months at age 5. As a bed ridden child who was not expected to survive, she was nursed back to health by caring Catholic nuns who saw to her education, and helped to sharpen a keen mind with hours of reading.

 

After leaving the hospital, Vary continued to feed her voracious reading appetite, artistic talents, and athletic abilities, all of which led her to a precocious interest in cancer research, especially after her grandmother died of the disease.

 

Her pursuit was facilitated by important mentors she met in and out of school, who would provide exceptional support as she developed sophisticated, leading edge experiments which would win local, state, and national awards and recognition, even from the nation’s foremost cancer authorities such as Dr Alton Ochsner, past president of the American Cancer Society, and a man with powerful connections in the highest places.

 

As a very idealistic high school graduate zealous to find a cure for cancer, she was a favorite among many prestigious schools’ science departments, struggling to select from a bevy of scholarship offers. Her path was guided by fateful outcomes to her many conflicts with her increasingly mentally ill father, which took her from the University of Florida to Tulane University through the agency of Dr Ochsner who had arranged for her to study under the world renowned oncologist Dr Mary Sherman.

 

While at the University of Florida, Judyth met (and later married) Robert Baker III whose emotional capacity did not exceed that of a hamster, owing in large measure to limited, venal parents who transmitted to their son a well developed love of money and self. His selfish, miserly, controlling personality opened the way to a reluctant affair with Lee Oswald through a happenstance starting at the post office where she anxiously awaited a letter from Robert.

 

Oswald was Judyth's entre into the murky underworld of intelligence where crime and government coalesced to form a perfect union of conspirators, double crossers, and murderers. Recognizing her possible utility to their own conspiracy, Oswald introduced Vary – not yet Baker – to David Ferrie, Dr Mary Sherman, Jack Ruby, Clay Shaw, Carlos Marcello, Guy Banister, and other characters closely associated with the New Orleans intelligence world. These people to varying degrees, especially Ferrie, Sherman, Ochsner, and Oswald, were racing against time to develop an injectible cancer virus which would rapidly induce death.

 

The main target of their bioweapon was Fidel Castro, the pariah of American plutocrats who resented the loss of Cuba as the vice capital of the Carribean – to say nothing of the sugar and fruit plantations. The rationale for killing Castro was that his assassination would divert attention from President Kennedy who was equally loathed by the plutocrats running the CIA. Such a diversion might give him more time to live or possibly escape the assassins’ death altogether.

 

This usage of medicine was not at all for what Vary had signed up. She wanted to find a cure for the dreaded disease – not find out how to propagate it – and certainly not for the purpose of murder. Although she had gotten so deep into the plot that there was no safe way out, her conscience eventually caught up with her when she crossed Ochsner by reminding him in writing that injecting the virus into healthy people was unethical. This act of truthiness damned her promising career as an oncologist, and put her in the cross hairs of powerful vengeful men.

 

Ferrie, Shaw, and Oswald headed to Jackson, LA to inject the cancer into victims at the East Louisiana State Mental Hospital as final testing for its ultimate target. Baker accompanied Oswald on a follow up trip a few weeks later to get blood samples from the victims in order to assess the efficacy of the bioweapon. The successful results required Oswald to take a trip to Mexico City in order to pass the cancer weapon to an agent in Mexico who would smuggle it into Cuba to administer to Castro.

 

When Oswald goes to Mexico City but fails to make his connection, his previously developed fears about being framed for a murder were confirmed. He grows increasingly anxious about his safety as well as that of his family. Knowing that he is trapped, he makes the best of his situation by looking for ways he might counter the Kennedy assassins. In the end he is overwhelmed by his handlers who rub him out in order to guarantee his silence.

 

We have only related the barest skeleton of the plot which is moved along by the many interpersonal relationships among the characters, not the least of which is that of Oswald and Baker. They each discover the other’s virtues and flaws, falling into an unbreakable love between soul mates based upon numerous compatibilities and mutual respect.

 

Along the way we learn much about the central players, facts often unknown to veteran assassination researchers. Oswald’s marriage of convenience to Marina was a rocky tumultuous one which he only remained in because of his children whom he deeply loved. By the fall of 1963 Oswald and Baker had planned to escape to Mexico to start their lives anew.

 

Of the major characters presented in the story, the only ones to survive the Kennedy assassination were Marcello and Ochsner. The others were quietly and not so quietly murdered as part of a cleanup operation to hide the crime. Baker survived only due to her relative obscurity and youth, but she may well have inadvertently sealed the fate of Oswald at the hands of the imperious CIA asset Alton Ochsner.

 

Baker brings Oswald into living color, warts and all, to render him a richly textured hero who made the best of his dark underworld CIA swamp. A warm, sentient, noble woman, Baker paints an exhilarating picture of a lustful love affair of which many dream but few experience.

 

Regarding the physical composition of the hardback copy which we reviewed, we can only say that it is a first class production. The 500+ page book is sturdily bound whose fluent prose reflects the literary talents of its Masters of Arts English graduate, with only two noted proofreading errors. The story elements are richly documented with numerous footnotes, many of which are more revealing than the main narrative.

 

The book is profusely illustrated showing many of the locations and artifacts of the story, which helps immensely in understanding the geography and connections described in the text. The book also contains a good index and appendices, further substantiating important elements of the story.

 

When we say that we have only presented a snow flake on the tip of an iceberg, we exaggerate only slightly. This volume packs an enormous amount of information which any seeker of the truth about the assassination must read – especially those wanting to understand Oswald.

 

The decision to write her story was a difficult one for Baker especially given the threats to her life and family – to say nothing of lost relationships; but following the trail of her lost lover, she has accepted the risks of witnessing to the truth. For this we salute Judyth and send our love.

Reference
Me & Lee: How I came to Know, Love, and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald, Judyth Vary Baker, Trine Day LLC, Waterville, OR, 2010

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Bombshells in Dallas: Miscellaneous News from November in Dallas

Just when we thought we had uncovered the most important clues in the murder of President John Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dealey Plaza by the Rockefeller Crime Syndicate, new ones keep popping up like weeds. A case in point is the role of the Texas School Book Depository as a decoy.

To be more explicit, there were no shooters in the TSBD. This revelation hit us like two tons of lead bricks when we first heard it from our correspondent who viewed a lecture by Barry Ernest, the author of The Girl on the Stairs, at the recent November in Dallas conference sponsored by JFK Lancer Publications which presents new discoveries in the JFK murder case to the public at its annual gathering.

Ernest found a critical witness to the Kennedy murder after years of on again off again searching. Although she appears in the Warren Commission Report, her testimony was falsified by the committee and FBI. When Victoria Adams told the FBI what she saw in the immediate aftermath of the shooting in front of where she worked, they severely intimidated her to change her story to match the fabrications they were weaving about Oswald.

When she refused to do so, the commission falsified her story. She has remained deathly quiet since then, not wanting to find an early grave as have so many other who knew too much or dared to utter the truth.

Adams worked in the accounting department of the TSBD along with 3 others on the fateful day in November. When Adams’ coworkers heard the shots, they ran down the stairs to see what the commotion was, while Adams’ was certain that the president had been mortally wounded.

Two of the co-workers went down the stairs while Adams and a colleague remained on the fourth floor where they worked. From this vantage they could see anyone who ascended or descended the stairs. The only two people they saw were police officer Baker and building manager Roy Truly.

This observation is extraordinarily important. It is important because the stairs in the TSBD did not run straight up from the first floor to the sixth. In order to get to another floor, a climber had to  stop on the fourth floor to transfer to another flight of stairs to go up or down. The fourth floor housing the accounting department was wide open with an unobstructed view of the stair wells.

The girls who went down did not see anyone go down or up – to say nothing of Oswald. The girls who remained on the 4^th floor in the open area did not see anyone go up or down save for the two men just mentioned. The story completely contradicts the lies the Warren commission uttered about Oswald.

It also completely undoes our own understanding that CIA's assassins were manning the 5^th floor to shoot at the president. The truth is that the TSBD was NOT an assassin’s lair as long believed by the public and told ceaselessly by the state controlled news media.

The CIA staged an elaborate hoax  on the 6^th floor in order to frame Oswald. His handlers had maneuvered him into that job to create an association between Oswald and the TSBD. The 6^th floor sniper’s nest was yet another delusion with which the CIA blinded the public.

And to think that there is a museum there to keep the public stupid is a farce which would give Joseph Goebells sheer delight.

But that’s not all. Lyndon Johnson was rolled under the bus earlier this year in yet another solution to the crime. This time LBJ was painted as the master mind who had the will, motive, and power to murder a president. As usual, the truth is more complicated than that.

Johnson was easily the most foul president until George Bush, Jr. He was a mass murderer who sent men to Vietnam for no reason other than to line the pockets of his plutocrat bosses. He ordered the sinking of the USS Liberty when it was attacked by Israeli forces. And he participated in the murder of his nominal boss.

Johnson was a small cog in the Rockefeller / Wall Street plan to stage a coup. He was greedy enough to want to be president and wicked enough to obtain it by murder. His scandals were on the verge of sending him to prison. So it was no small gift to be invited to help in the American coup of 1963.

Johnson worked closely with his protégé John Connally to plan Kennedy's trip to Dallas which would allow the plutocrats to murder the president. When Kennedy was assaulted, Connally yelled out, “They are going to kill both of us!” Jackie Kennedy told William Manchester this quote when he was preparing his history of the Kennedy years. However, the publishers would not allow the quote to be published. So they altered it to, “They are going to kill us all!”

This statement meant that Connally felt that he was being double crossed after all of the work he did to funnel Kennedy onto Elm Street at the right moment.

Not to be outdone, Johnson called the Dallas Police Department to inform it that it should stop its investigation of the Kennedy murder because it already had the guilty party – Lee Oswald.

One of the interesting casualties of the discovery about the TSBD is in connection with the Tegan Mathis book claiming to deconstruct Executive Prvilege by Lynne Cheney. In particular, the claim that Colin Powell was the sniper in the TSBD becomes more farcical than it already was. We believe that Mathis is due for an even steeper discount than we had given previously.

The Kennedy killing and its cover-up by the CIA operating on orders from the Rockefeller murderers is one of history’s most fascinating and darkest crimes. Satan is laughing with delight the day the music died.

Reference
Personal correspondence with attendee to November in Dallas

Copyright 2012 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.