One Minute Chronicle: Why November 22, 1963?

Why did Permindex-Mossad-CIA choose November 22, 1963 to murder President Kennedy? Why not some other date? We offer a possible explanation.

At one point, I was attracted to the idea that November 22 was chosen because the psychopaths who planned the murder had a fascination with occultic numbers. So 11/22 contains the number of days multiplied twice by the number of the month. From there, the year 1963 somehow contained some hocus pocus number which combined with 11/22 produced the holy cosmic Jedi of the Universe number of Satan which would give the perpetrators all of the powers of this universe and all parallel universes to succeed at their murder, easily trumping 666 as most evil number in history. Fortunately I abandoned this idea.

The date 11/22 was chosen because it is the birthday of French president Charles de Gaulle who was born on that date in 1890. De Gaulle had been the target of more than one assassination attempt planned by the French OAS (Organisation Armée Secrète), which was a rival organization of the French intelligence agency SDECE (Service de Documentation Extérieure et de Contre-Espionnage), and Permindex whose Jewish leadership hated de Gaulle for granting independence to Algeria in 1962.

De Gaulle urged Switzerland and Italy to expel Permindex from their countries because of that organization's assassination operations with which the 2 countries complied. OAS had a close relationship with Mossad, working together to murder Algerian leaders, and disrupting the liberation process.

OAS, as Michael Collins Piper documents in his seminal Final Judgment, was also brought into the assassination of Kennedy, Israel hating the American president for his refusal to support Jewish development of nuclear weapons. Mossad asset James Angleton provided CIA support of the assassination in Dallas.

According to Piper, OAS supplied one or two of the assassins in Dealey Plaza.

There were also other assassination attempts on Kennedy in Tampa and Chicago, and quite possibly elsewhere. These locations were not serious sites for the murder. They were created not only to confuse people, but to make it very clear that Permindex-Mossad-CIA had options, and that it was not taking them. The only site which the combine would select was Dallas because Kennedy would be there on De Gaulle's birthday. The murderers wanted to make it very clear that they were angry with the French president, and the American president.

The idea for the date was probably that of Mossad asset James Angleton. Choosing 11/22 was a veiled threat to de Gaulle that he was next and that he would never have another birthday without remembering the death of his American friend. Another attempt was made on De Gaulle's life subsequent to the death of Kennedy.

This date proves - to me at least - that OAS was involved in the murder of Kennedy, vindicating Piper's research.

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

JFK and the Federal Reserve

Conspiracy researchers have often pointed to President Kennedy's antagonisms toward the privately owned Federal Reserve as a cause of his murder on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza. While there is a kernel of truth to that observation, it is usually muddled with reference to his famous Executive Order 11110 and silver certificates which are notoriously misunderstood. We have learned that there is much more to the story.

We covered the Executive Order in a previous Chronicle based upon G Edward Griffin's analysis on this widely misunderstood decree. To sum up briefly, the major intent of the order was to delegate the authority for the issuance of silver certificates and silver sales to the Secretary of the Treasury. Prior to this, the president was often imposed upon to provide a pro forma signature for their issuance or silver transactions. These notes were issued by the Treasury rather than the privately owned Federal Reserve.

The main point was that there were no silver certificates actually issued on authority of the president, and thus it was not a salvo fired on the Fed. 

Subsequently, partisans would show examples of Treasury issued notes as proof that Kennedy was indeed interested in wresting control of the money away from the Federal Reserve.

However, such notes were issued well into Johnson's elected term for, as Michael Collins Piper explains, federal law demanded that a certain level of United States Notes be maintained in circulation. Federal law from 1878 required that the Treasury circulate 322,539,016 USD at all times. 

So the United States Notes were simply compliance with a somewhat archaic law. Unfortunately the law was honored in the breach because, although they were printed, they were kept in the Treasury vault to collect dust.

However, there is more to the story than thusly told. Piper relates that DeWest Hooker stated that the Kennedys planned to move against the Federal Reserve in his second term. In a meeting which the Hollywood agent had with John's father Joseph, the latter called the Federal Reserve

'"the Rothschild-dominated Federal Reserve."'

Clearly Joe had no fond regard for the privately owned Federal Reserve, instead wanting to return the money to the people, issued without interest.

If the International Jews were aware of this intent, they probably would have walked into the Oval Office and shot him on the spot. Had Kennedy succeeded in achieving the destruction, or perhaps Treasury control, of the Federal Reserve, we would have hailed him as a god.

Reference

Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th Edition, 2d printing, 2005, source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com), accessed 5/7/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Identifying the JFK Assassination Senior Partner

When asked if CIA or Mossad was the initiator in the murder of President Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza, Michael Collins Piper equivocated a bit by claiming a degree of agnosticism but affirming that the heavy hand of Mossad was inescapable and plainly obvious. We would like to correct the record by stating that International Jewry, acting through Mossad, was the instigator in the murder, deftly orchestrating a village to remove the American president.

The only idiots in the village are the coincidence theorists who couldn't connect two dots lying on top of each other.

To answer the question, one has to step back from the minutia of the assassination to consider larger forces than the many trigger men encircling Dealey Plaza, or obsessing with the identity of Umbrella Man. This Piper does admirably in his book, Final Judgment. However, in stepping away from the trees, we finally see the forest of Israeli intelligence operating internationally through many spheres and layers.

But before getting into that aspect, we would do well to step back to 1917 when Lord Balfour, one of the instigators of World War 1, issued his famous declaration to Lord Walter Rothschild on November 2, 1917 stealing Palestinian lands from the crumbling Ottoman empire in order to give them to another empire - that of the Rothschilds.

It is thus unambiguous in the historical record that the land, contrary to mindless verbiage about "Jewish people", was given to the Rothschilds for their enrichment, providing them a political entity through which they could launch their ravagings of the earth through means of statecraft. Israel is first and foremost a Rothschild colony serving the purposes of Citizens of the World, the true meaning of International Jewry.

The wealth of the Rothschilds is legendary, making the fabled wealth of Solomon looking like that of a used car dealer. To rub the point in the faces of the goyim, their Hollywood collaborators even produced a movie in 1934 proclaiming, while laughing at the viewers, their blinding riches and power.

One financial analyst estimated a few years ago that the wealth of the Rothschilds numbered around 900 trillion dollars, far surpassing that of the Jewish Rockefellers at 300 trillion. With the passage of time, raids on the US Treasury, growth and inflation, we would easily estimate their current wealth over 1 quadrillion dollars, a number incomprehensible for most goyim.

This exceptional wealth should easily answer the question posed to Piper, who was the senior partner in the murder of the president? Yet there is even more to the matter than the sheer wealth of these Gargantua and Pantagruel.

The murder of the president was planned before he entered office. Joseph Kennedy earned the implacable raging anger of the Rothschilds when he interfered with their plans to initiate World War 2 by praising Hitler, and taking a pacifist stance toward the trumped up situations in Europe which Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin were staging for their pretext for aggression.

When one of Roosevelt's sons collaborated in the murder of Joe Kennedy, Jr, one of 4 Kennedy assassinations was in the completed column. The Jews were not content, for the Old Testament commands them to "wipe out every last man, woman, and child of the heathen whom I will give into your hands."

Evidence of this broad ranging movement to wipe out the Kennedys comes from a very interesting vignette from the life of Lee HARVEY Oswald - the Oswald who was the patsy designated to take the fall, and who was the son of Hungarian Jews living in New York City who spent all of their waking hours on communist activities.

John Armstrong documents the event in 1953 when HARVEY and his fake mother stayed in Stanley, North Dakota during July and August of that year. Mrs Alma Cole had a son who played with HARVEY, and knew another boy who was even closer to him. She wrote assassin Lyndon Johnson in 1963 recalling her interactions with Oswald, foolishly thinking that the government was trying to solve the murder of Kennedy.

She noted that Oswald was reading Communist literature, and recalled his boast that he had "a calling to kill a president." When the Secret Service read the letter, it interviewed the son, William Henry Timmer, who confirmed the information.

It is thus very clear that a plan to murder a president was in the works, and it wasn't just any president to our way of thinking. The president to be killed was John Fitzgerald Kennedy who needed to pay for the sins of the father.

With Jewish rage impelling an urgent destruction of the Kennedys which preceded John's inauguration, it becomes clear that the Bay of Pigs was simply a stratagem to enlist the help of CIA in the murder. John Foster Dulles and Richard Bissell were both fired for the planned failure, but it gave them the motive to participate in the revenge murder even after their alleged departures from the agency in 1961.

The straw which broke the camel's back was the highly contentious conflict between Jewish president David Ben-Gurion and President Kennedy over Jewish development and possession of nuclear weapons, something which the president resolutely opposed, and for good reason. Ben-Gurion's angry resignation in 1963 was the gauntlet authorizing execution of the president.

Kennedy was quite aware that Jewish terrorism in the Middle East was destabilizing to say the least, with Mossad, Irgun, Haganah, and Shin Beit being uncontrollable murder squads which would be even more destructive with nuclear technologies.

From here, Piper pulls together the data showing the Jewish manipulations and collaborations of PERMINDEX, CIA, French OAS, French SDECE, Meyer Lansky's mob, Mossad, anti-Castro Cubans, and many assorted and sundry villagers in the coalition to murder a president.

It is inconceivable that the murder of the president and its cover-up could succeed without the vast international resources of the Jews in government, intelligence, media, and industry. One quadrillion dollars buys a lot of murder and cover-up.

Michael Collins Piper's answer to the question of seniority in the assassination may have been somewhat unsatisfactory from my point of view, but our answer would be entirely impossible without his seminal contributions in solving the Kennedy murder case.

Reference

Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th edition, second printing ebook, 2005, illustrated, 771pp source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com) accessed 4/30/2021)

John Williams, Harvey in North Dakota, Hary and Lee (website), nd, source(Harvey in North Dakota (harveyandlee.net), accessed 5/1/2021

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Adele Edisen Story and the Murder of John Kennedy

Adele Edisen is not a name commonly found in Kennedy assassination histories, but her story is fascinating nonetheless, she being a proleptic witness to the murder of John Kennedy in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963.

Like Rose Cheramie, Edisen received pre-assassination warnings when she had an encounter with an enigmatic figure named Jose Albert Rivera who made cryptic predictions about Kennedy's murder, and all too accurate predictions about Lee HARVEY Oswald and Edward Grant Stockdale.

Before plunging into the story, we should address some of the objections or apprehensions many have registered about her tale, the common one being that she does not have smoking gun evidence of her encounters with Rivera. Defenders note that her mind was sharp and lucid during interviews, and that files have since surfaced corroborating parts of her story. 

Our view is that she is telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. No one has found evidence to rebut or falsify her story - merely potential objections without substance. William Perry, one of her chroniclers, satisfied himself through independent corroboration that her account is trustworthy, based in part on other researchers' independent verifications of the story's details.

The following summary of her experience is condensed from William Perry's article which we reference below, and to which we add our own commentary. In many ways Adele's revelations are explosive.

Edisen held a post-doctoral fellowship at the  National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness in 1963 in New Orleans, the very place where Kennedy murder conspirator Alton Ochsner worked at Tulane University, and the very city where CIA contract employee Lee HARVERY Oswald was stationed in 1963.

Rivera had ties to New Orleans as well, having been a faculty member of the Loyola University biochemistry department. He subsequently lived in Washington, DC. But his career included much more than academics, for he joined the US Army in 1948, retiring in 1965. His obituary claims that he joined in 1942, but we favor the former date for reasons to develop elsewhere.

His birth date is a bit of a mystery, with different dates provided depending upon the government file consulted. However, one researcher, Tom Scully, found his birth certificate which records his birth in 1898 in Lima, Peru. But why all of the birth dates which typically have him born anywhere from 1905-11? And why the discrepancies on his military service?

Edisen and Rivera met at a professional convention in Atlantic City in April 1963 from which a social relationship of brief duration ensued. During one visit, the subject of Dallas came up at which point Rivera encouraged her to visit the Carousel Club managed by soon-to-be famous Jack Ruby. Rivera also asked if she knew Lee Oswald whom he encouraged her to meet. He knew all about his wife, child, and move to New Orleans even if Oswald himself did not know about it. Later, when urging Edisen to call Oswald, he told her to tell him to "kill the chief."

During the visit, Edisen also found out that Rivera was a colonel in the army doing work for the State Department. While driving around Washington on a site seeing tour, Rivera asked what Jackie would do when Jack dies, a question which startled Edisen. He also knew about her pregnancy although Edisen did not, indicating that neither did the general public know. Rivera also asked his guest if she had seen Caroline on her pony. In general, Rivera expressed negative or hostile attitudes towards Kennedy.

During another dinner, Rivera asked Edisen if she knew John Abt, chief counsel for the Communist Party USA. Abt would be the lawyer whom Oswald would attempt to reach when jailed falsely for the murders of President Kennedy and JD Tippit. Abt himself is almost a footnote in the JFK drama, but Rivera was plugged into him and his future role at an early date, telling Edisen that Oswald would call him for defense.

Following his preview of John Abt, Rivera proceeded to inform his dinner companion that Grant Stockdale, the one-time ambassador to Ireland, and some-time fundraiser for Kennedy, would kill himself due to inconsolable grief. Rivera showed extraordinary powers of clairvoyance to say the very least.

When Adele returned to New Orleans, she called Oswald thinking that he was a research colleague of Rivera's. The first time she called, the man answering the phone said that she must have the wrong number. A week later, the same man said to wait a moment - he was just arriving. In Oswald's absence, she spoke with his wife Marina whom she described as having a Slavic-Russian accent, and who understood the conversation, then told her she was welcome to call back later when her husband was present. The most interesting fact of this conversation is that Marina could speak and understand English, a point we have made before which contradicts many of the popular and CIA based stories lying about Oswald's wife's inability to speak English.

Even more interesting than confirmation that Marina was rather fluent in English is the fact that Rivera had given Edisen Oswald's phone number before he had moved to New Orleans or had even found a place to live. We will return to this item in our conclusion.

One interesting item we learn from Perry's recounting is that Oswald used Sgt Robert Hidell as a reference on his application to CIA front company William B Reilly. This last name would show up again in connection with his post office box, and with identification found in his planted wallet at the Tippit scene with the name Alek Hidell.

Edisen saw Rivera one more time when he was on business at Louisiana State University. The encounter was by chance - at least from Edisen's point of view. There was nothing but a clumsy passing interaction between the two near an elevator. Rivera allegedly retired from the military in 1965, and allegedly died August 15, 1989 at Bethesda Naval Hospital.

One month prior to encountering Rivera at LSU, Adele received an unmarked envelope containing a drawing similar to one Rivera drew for her while they dined together in Washington. Rivera was in a near frenetic state at the time but made the point that there will be men on the 5th floor of the building he drew on the napkin, and that Oswald is not what he seems, and other incoherent thoughts. The 5th floor is actually where the shots from the Texas School Book Depository were fired, or where significant command and control operations occurred.

To conclude the recitation of events, we will note that Edisen contacted the Secret Service about these strange events and encounters - twice before the assassination, and once after. In no case did the Secret Service take any actions to follow-up on her reports, or to protect the president. Indeed, the Secret Service was involved in the assassination.

Edisen's story is extraordinary in several ways. One of the more curious aspects is that Rivera bothered to share specific details with Edisen. They were dangerous to reveal if for no other reason than exposing the plan to assassinate the president could have brought a lot of unpleasant publicity for the conspirators. Unfortunately, at the time, Rivera's babblings sounded senseless. And why would one of the conspirators reveal the plans to a stranger?

The only explanation which makes sense to me is that CIA was conducting a systems check to make sure that there were no leaks in the formal bureaucracies which might compromise their plans. In other words, they had to be sure that there were no inter-agency cooperations in following up assassination tips and that all information was dutifully scrubbed from the records so that the murder cover-up would succeed.

The common belief, expressed in his CIA-Wikipedia article, is that Grant Stockdale committed suicide. This vignette with Rivera tells us clearly that he was murdered when the assassins pushed him out of the window of his hotel room. Rivera's foreknowledge of this event and its public explanation is the smoking gun that he was murdered.

We also learn that Oswald was indeed the patsy. His movements were so controlled that Rivera could state where he would be before Oswald could. We also see the co-conspiracy of the vile Ruth Hyde Paine who was an important handler of Oswald.

The fact that Oswald's telephone number was being answered by the apartment owner shows the collusion between him and the conspirators.

Perhaps the most enlightening disclosure in this affair is the complete, total, and minute control CIA had over the entire operation, including the creepy observations by Rivera of Jackie's baby and Caroline's pony. 

Anyone who has managed large organizations or projects knows that goals and work do not happen by accident. The amount of managerial  and logistical support required to murder a president of the United States was epically enormous. It involved a massive apparatus from several countries, the most important of which were the United Kingdom, Israel and International Jewry, and the United States. 

One final point regarding Oswald - he may have been mind controlled. Edisen raises the suggestion that Rivera may have tried to poison her with LSD, and this would be entirely unsurprising given CIA's deep investment in MK Ultra.

While Adele Edisen's story is generally a detail in the vast knowledge we now have about the murder of Kennedy, it is our opinion that it may rise to the top as one of the most important because it reveals the scope and breadth of the planning which attended the assassination long before its execution. The only question now is, how long before April 1963 was the assassination planned?

Reference

William Perry, A New Oswald Witness Goes Public, JFKCountercoup, December 30, 2009, source( JFKcountercoup: A New Oswald Witness Goes Public, accessed 4/11/2021)

Tom Scully, Adele Edisen in the Searchers, Deep Politics Forum (website forum), January 22, 2017, source( Adele Edison in The Searchers (deeppoliticsforum.com), accessed 4/11/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Victoria Adams on the Stairs: Brouhaha Edition

Another rift among Kennedy assassination researchers has erupted within the past month over the integrity of Victoria Adams' testimony given to the criminal Warren Commission. While it could remain a matter of relative inconsequence, these matters rarely stay that way. Our view is that Adams' original published testimony is the canonical and best version.

The background to the argument between researchers John Armstrong and Barry Ernest starts with the latter's important book published in 2011, The Girl on the Stairs. Its author explains that its protagonist's descent down the stairs of the Texas School Book Depository from the 4th floor excludes the possibility that anyone else could have used that route to flee from the 6th floor. Only in the fertile imagination of the criminal Warren Commission could Oswald have been the president's assassin and then flee down the stairs at precisely the time he allegedly did so. There would have been a traffic jam as that stairway was the only path out. Recall that the criminal Warren Commission had Oswald racing at warp speed to get his Coke in the 2d floor lunch room so that he could casually and calmly encounter Dallas police officer Marion Baker and TSBD building manager Roy Truly.

As far as I can discern, there seems to be no disagreement over this general play of events, namely that it would be impossible for both parties to use the stairway without running into each other.

An additional, but important, detail attaches to the story regarding whom Ms Adams saw once she descended with co-workers Sylvia Styles and Dorothy Gardner, the latter the office manager of the Scott Foresman company office occupying part of the 4th floor.

In her testimony to the Warren Commission, Adams stated that she saw two men near the rear elevator on the first floor, which was the only elevator access to the 6th floor. Her testimony stated that she arrived there within seconds - 1 minute tops - of hearing the sniper bullets. These two men are significant in a number of ways, and submerging them under the sediment of history is an important objective of the continuing cover-up of the murder of the president.

Ernest upsets 40 years of silence on this matter by averring that he interviewed Victoria Adams in 2002 who then stated that she saw no men at the bottom of the stairwell. When Armstrong took issue with this development in 2021, Ernest issued a rebuttal on Kennedys and King, a website edited by fellow researcher Jim DiEugenio.

Ernest contends that Adams told him that she did not see two men near the elevator, thus leaving us the options of 1. recantation by Adams 2. Obstruction of Justice by altering her testimony. Ernest enlists the support of Sylvia Styles, still living, to rebut the testimony, and his Boy Scouts' honor that Adams made these confessions. He also suggests that Adams' missing testimony from the criminal Warren Commission archive is a sign of foul play and might vindicate his assertions about Ms Adams who died in 2007.

For his part, Armstrong cites Adams' Warren Commission testimony, Marion Baker's testimony, Billy Lovelady's testimony, and Bill Shelly's testimony to support the general idea that two men were standing near the elevator at the time Adams and her entourage reached the first floor. One would think that this marshalling of testimony was sufficient, but things are never this simple.

The irony of ironies is that Kennedys and King even published Ernest's rebuttal. Given DiEugenio's many castigations of other authors' flimsy and even fake evidence, why did he submit this to the court, so to speak?

To put a point on it, during a moment of insomnia, your Chronicler read one of DiEugenio's  slams, written in 2008, of the likes of James Fetzer, Peter Janney, and Gregory Douglas for using questionable, unverifiable, and 3d hand hearsay as evidence, precisely the methods used by Ernest in his rebuttal.

In 2002, when electronic recording equipment was plentiful and abundant, and when notary publics abounded, Barry Ernest did not bother to document the testimony of a critical witness very troublesome to the criminal Warren Commission. This lapse is unacceptable. We are not left with any substantive evidence that Ms Adams recanted her testimony, made any allegations of discrepancies, or was the victim of obstruction of justice.

Armstrong reports that Adams was given a copy of her testimony to approve and/or make corrections. She made a few grammatical corrections, signed it, and that was the end of it. Ernest reported his attempt to find the original commission transcripts in order settle the matter once and for all, but came up empty handed. So that leaves us with only the 1964 published interview of Adams as found in the criminal Warren Commission's fable known as the Warren Commission Report.

However, Baker's report that he saw "two white men" near the elevator corresponds very nicely with Adams' testimony in which she placed two men near the elevator, using a diagram supplied by the criminal Warren Commission.

Bill Shelley was a CIA agent or operative, and we wouldn't give his testimony any time other than to analyze how he twisted it to conform to the criminal Warren Commission's lies.

The reason that it is so important to bury the "two white men", and Ernest confirms it, is that it provides substantiation for Armstrong's thesis that the 6th floor snipers escaped down the elevator which was stationed just below the 6th floor where it was boarded for escape, aided by Bill Shelley and Billy Lovelady. It was Shelly's job to turn off the electricity to keep the elevator out of service until needed.

So why does Ernest wish to make the "two white men" disappear? That is a rabbit hole I prefer to avoid, but he pretty much shows his hand when he somewhat dismissively refers to Armstrong's escape thesis.

We suspect that more will be said about this disagreement, but for now, that's our story and we're sticking to it until some substantive verifiable evidence dissuades us.

Reference

John Armstrong, Oswald DID NOT Run Down the Stairs, Harvey and Lee (website), nd, accessed(Oswald DID NOT Run Down the Stairs (harveyandlee.net), accessed 3/13/20201)

Barry Ernest, Barry Ernest Replies to John Armstrong, Re: Victoria Adams, Kennedys and King (website), February 27, 2021, accessed( Kennedys And King - Barry Ernest Replies to John Armstrong, RE: Victoria Adams, accessed 3/13/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Chronicle Review: The Inheritance

Never before in American history has a man with the moral splendors of Christopher Fulton trod its lands. Our hero endured a barbaric star court inquisition managed from the Oval Office, and an even more brutal torture in the American gulag - all for seeing the smoking gun evidence establishing the fact that a vast right wing conspiracy up-ended the government of the United States when it murdered President Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza.

The American Junta which murdered the president, also attempted to snuff out the life of the last witness to the forensic evidence which Bobby Kennedy salvaged after the murder, proving that the military industrial complex of which Eisenhower warned was a breathing, living, hateful machine with unlimited powers.

The most important element in the book is Fulton's innocent involvement in acquiring the Cartier watch which Kennedy wore on the day he was murdered in Dallas. Its impeccable chain of custody starts before Bobby Kennedy but it is the president's brother who safe-guarded it with the president's faithful secretary Evelyn Lincoln.

The watch is important not only because it contains the residue from Kennedy's body but because it has the military grade cyanide which laced the bullets to guarantee that its victim would die. Contrary to nonsensical myths spouted by the Junta's press machine, Kennedy died instantly in his limousine when one of the bullets hit his head at 12:30 PM on that Friday exactly 56 years ago today.

Because the form of cyanide found on the bullet could be traced only to the military, it is very evident that it participated in the coup to end the American republic.

Through various manipulations, the Junta was able to force Fulton to offer the watch for sale at an auction with which Donald Trump was closely related, assuring the billionaire a berth in the Oval Office. Though the watch did not sell at auction, it still found a new owner.

The buyer of the watch was John F Kennedy, Jr, but that purchase guaranteed his own death by the Junta. The role of Caroline Kennedy in demanding the watch and stealing property of Fulton was reprehensible, showing that she had absolutely no interest in exposing the crimes against her father, uncle, and brother. One could argue that she attempted to save her own hide, but nothing Fulton wrote put her in a good light.

The other important element of Fulton's book is his detailing of how the president takes an active interest in any significant development about the case, especially any revelations which would discredit the skein of lies the Junta has woven to claim that a lone nut killed Kennedy.

Most revealing were Fulton's accounts of Bill Clinton's very active hands in the management of his arrest, prosecution, and imprisonment, much of it carried out by the vile bitch Janet Reno. What is clear to us is that every single president since Lyndon Johnson, who was a major player in the assassination, has been faithfully committed to the Junta and its myriad deceptions concerning the case. They not only support the lies, but most of them know that they are lies.

One curious possible exception is Richard Nixon. It is inconceivable to us, as a Rockefeller puppet, that Nixon was not aware of the coup. On the other hand, his White House tapes suggest that he was not well plugged in, sending one of his aides to CIA Director Richard Helms demanding documents on the Kennedy assassination. That was a mistake which cost Nixon his job when the CIA orchestrated the Watergate crisis to push Nixon from office.

Finally, one other major clarification was concerning Bobby's rise to the presidency. Bobby made it clear to Johnson that he had the physical evidence to put him away for life, if not in the electric chair. In exchange for his silence, Johnson, and the powers that be, agreed to let Bobby take the presidency in 1968. But there was no way that the murderers would redeem their promises. Bobby did not realize with whom he was dealing, and was summarily murdered by the same Junta which murdered his brother.

One unfinished bit of business concerns the location of the Cartier watch. John Kennedy Jr purchased it through the services of an auction house. He was the watch's last known owner. No one knows what happened to it, or they are not saying. It is possible that Kennedy, Jr was wearing it when the Junta murdered him, and the watch was taken from Kennedy's corpse. However, we are merely conjecturing.

We have only skimmed and cherry picked some of the disclosures found in Fulton's treasure. We cannot express enough gratitude and reverence for Mr Fulton, and for what he endured from the Junta, to tell his story.

The case is finally closed: there is no doubt of any kind that America's plutocrats, Citizens of the World, and military psychopaths murdered President Kennedy. The absurd Warren Commission Report is nothing but a pile of ashes ready to be swept away with the next gust of disgust. In its place we are owners of The Inheritance.

Reference
Christopher Fulton, The Inheritance, Trine Day Press


Copyright 2019 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The 55th Hoaxiversary of the Kennedy Assassination

[Author's Note: This Chronicle proves that we are not above being conned by specious but seductive reasoning. The theory that Kennedy was not shot is provably imbecilic as subsequent Chronicles will demonstrate. Miles Mathis is either an excellent con artist or as gullible as we were in considering the theory that Kennedy was not murdered.

Author's Note: Since publishing this Chronicle, I have come to reject the validity of its thesis though the questions it raises are quite profound - namely what happened to Kennedy's body?
]

The 55th anniversary of the assassination of John Kennedy gives an opportune time to reflect on the progress made since 2013 in unraveling the munificent mysteries of this epic event in American history. Many of our previous conclusions must be discarded or modified.

In our earlier attempt to bring clarity to the Big Event, we concluded that Kennedy was shot from the front by a cabal of conspirators, and that Lee Oswald was entirely innocent of either murdering Kennedy or Tippit. Finally we concluded that the Warren Commission was a complete farce. All of the foregoing is true except the one about Kennedy being shot.

So much has been learned in the past 5 years. Through the work of Ralph Cinque, we know that Oswald was indeed in the doorway of the Texas School Book Depository at 12:30p just as he told Dallas police Captain Will Fritz, thus making it impossible for him to be the assassin. The myriad Oswald inconsistencies are easily resolved by the recognition that multiple Oswalds were played over the years going back to the births of LEE and HARVEY Oswald as John Armstrong has documented. In short, Oswald was an intelligence project.

Other astonishing work by Ralph Cinque has proven that Jack Ruby did not shoot Lee HARVEY Oswald in the Dallas Police Department basement. In fact, the incident was a made for TV movie to terrorize the American people, and to eliminate the possibility of either case going to trial where it would collapse in a pile of smoke and rubble. Cinque has shown many marks of film production artifacts in the DPD basement - such as film set microphones, movie director filming angles, and stage marks - proving that the so-called casual transfer of Oswald between detention centers was pure theater - including his murder. The character of Jack Ruby was played by FBI agent James Bookhout.

At the other end of the drama, Miles Mathis has made a cogent case that Kennedy was not shot. While Mathis goes out on a limb to suggest that Kennedy assumed the throne of an underground kingdom, the more plausible story is that his health necessitated his evacuation from public life - but that is only part of the story.

The case against Kennedy's murder is that there is no body. Even Bobby complained at the casket viewing that "he didn't even look like Jack." This clue speaks volumes. The autopsy was a charade of  Keystone Cops playing a shell game of caskets where different caskets were literally being chased around Bethesda before the autopsy. Is that the way an autopsy of a president is conducted? Kennedy's brain is missing because it was never available in the first place. The X-rays are inconsistent because they are forged and faked because there was no Kennedy body. The photographic evidence is a mess because it was a movie production gone bad - or one which didn't need serious production quality because the news media would perpetually peddle a pile of lies to explain away the idiocies of the whole plot.

The Zapruder film has been shown time and time again to be a fraud, with Jim Fetzer's analysis of it being a good starting point for novices.

One of the central proofs of the fraud is the Single Bullet Theory which posited that the brilliant sharpshooter psychopath Oswald could fire 3 shots from an Italian weapon at which even the Italians laugh hysterically when presented as an assassin's weapon. The imbecility of suggesting that a bullet could zigzag through Kennedy's body and then hit Connally is damning evidence that the oligarchs were yanking our chain.

Since Oswald and Kennedy were not shot, it is very doubtful that Tippit was killed despite all of the conflicting and confusing testimony from the crisis actors playing witness to the event. We know for a fact from Armstrong's research that Dallas Captain William R Westbrook was at the crime scene with Sgt Kenneth Croy and that he walked down the driveway to where Tippit's body lay to confirm that he was "dead." Is even a CIA creep like Westbrook going to risk being spotted by dozens of witnesses as an accomplice to a murder?

More importantly, the crime scene is so clean. A point blank shooting is going to leave blood spatter, but we see none on the car or on LEE Oswald, the version who is known to have been Tippit's assailant. We also know that Tippit was involved in intelligence work because he was staying in the neighborhood - rather than his own home - where he was shot and was close friends with CIA asset Carl Mathers of CIA's Collins Radio.

Finally, there is the vaunted and much maligned Warren Commission which was a total joke. Critical witnesses such as Laura Kittrell were studiously ignored. Banal and inane documentation was included in the Warren Commission Report such as dental records of distant relatives of irrelevant witnesses. It was a creation of the Executive Branch which had absolutely zero competence to solve a murder - much less try one.

The major players in the assassination production were the masters of entertainment, legends of Hollywood, the Wizards of all Oz, and owners of all media - powerful Jews. Both Jack and Jackie were Jews, contrary to all of the misrepresentation about their Irish roots, a fact which Mathis establishes with considerably finality.

As we noted, one reason for the drama was Jack's health. But couldn't he have just resigned from office, or hung on for another year before relinquishing the reigns to Johnson? Oh no mon frere. Never let a good crisis go to waste. In the first place a good deal of controversial legislation needed passing such as the Civil Rights Act. And as we all know there is nothing like the pity card to get one's way.

More importantly, the American people needed constant fear to surrender civil liberties and to pay ever more taxes for Jewish wars of imperial aggression. The oligarchs needed a way to get the drugs flowing from the Golden Triangle - et voila - Vietnam.

So yes, the American people have been played like the gullible sheep which they are. If it's on TV - and especially if told by Walter Cronkite - it must be true. The facts state otherwise - you have been hoaxed.

Copyright 2018 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Update on Larry Craford

New information about Larry Craford has emerged providing new insights into his role in the alleged assassination of John F Kennedy, as well as compelling a revision to our previous belief about his role in the murder of Dallas Police Department Officer JD Tippit.

Larry Rivera has unearthed new details about the Texas Employment Commission (TEC) incident revealing that Larry Craford (aka Crafard) was the man impersonating Lee HARVEY Oswald.

For those new to the case, a young man said to be Oswald applied to the TEC for employment prior to "finding" a job at the Texas School Book Depository in October 1963. He was interviewed by Laura Kittrell who left a lengthy manuscript detailing her interviews of Oswald.

She described a man who was prone to outbursts, bragged of speaking Russian and being in Russia, and displayed other idiosyncratic behaviors which suggested that he was a "Lone Nut." When Kittrell later saw pictures of Craford from the Warren Commission, she recognized the man as her noisy Oswald.

But that wasn't the only Oswald Kittrell interviewed. The other version was indeed Lee HARVEY Oswald who was much more polished and composed. Kittrell noticed this difference, realizing that she was being played, but not sure of its meaning.

Thus it is very clear that CIA was running multiple Oswalds, as John Armstrong has abundantly demonstrated, to create a profile of a man who was unhinged and liable to do anything, including murdering a president.

Kittrell noticed that her boisterous and careless Oswald was not the news media Oswald, and was thus studiously avoided by the Warren Commission. Her records at TEC had been confiscated by FBI while she at the Trade Mart expecting to hear the president speak.

Not only had Kittrell seen Crafard, but she also saw the real HARVEY Oswald. She knew that 2 people were playing the same Oswald character.

Previously, we had opined - with conviction - that Larry Craford had murdered Tippit, but we may raise caution after these revelations. On the other hand, it cannot be ruled out all together. We are also not convinced that Tippit was murdered.

In other words, it appears that Crafard's assignment was to make Oswald look like a nut case. But we also know that he was involved with organized crime because he mentioned to Kittrell his ties to Nixon aide and real estate investor Murray Chotiner. We also reported previously Crafard's career as a gun for hire. Thus we have a credible basis for assuming that Craford applied his trade in the execution of JD Tippit.

Further research by Armstrong shows that LEE Harvey Oswald murdered Tippit, but there may be more to the story. Some witnesses reported seeing 2 men leave the alleged Tippit murder scene, each going in opposite directions.

If the Tippit murder was faked, as we suspect, then we have to question whether or not any of the witnesses were authentic. They may have been crisis actors as the government uses them so frequently in faked "tragedies."

But accepting that 2 men were at the scene of the "murder", it is entirely possible that one of them was Crafard while the other was LEE. But because the accounts of 2 assailants is somewhat murky, we leave as conjecture our hypothesis that Crafard was the murderer - if in fact there were a murder.

Reasons for doubting that a murder was committed include the cleanliness of the crime scene, and the cleanliness of LEE Oswald - there was no blood spatter or flying body fragments expected in a close range gun attack.

On the other hand, if Crafard was the gunman, then that might explain why the white-shirted LEE Oswald was untainted with physical evidence of the crime.

At this point, we can firmly believe and know that Larry Crafard was the man impersonating Lee HARVEY Oswald at the Texas Employment Commission.

References
Larry Rivera, Laura Kittrell, Larry Crafard, and Lee Oswald, The New JFK Show Blog, September 27, 2018, accessed 11/4/2018

John Armstrong, The Murder of J. D. Tippit, Harvey and Lee (website), September 9, 2018, harveyandlee.net, accessed 11/4/2018



Copyright 2018 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Did The Cubans Kill Kennedy?

CIA hacks propagate many theories about the power behind the murder of President John F Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza, the latest of which we address is the Cuban theory. Although it has a grain of truth, like all CIA murmurings, it is ultimately a fraud to fix primary culpability on the anti-Castro Cubans who were indeed a vital part of the matrix.

Recently an anonymous poster posited that Cubans betrayed in the Bay of Pigs fiasco formed the nucleus of the conspiracy to kill Kennedy. The interesting aspect of the theory is that it was a concession that there was a conspiracy at all. But like the mob theory of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, it falls far short of the mark and only serves to obfuscate the real murderers.

The important point about the Cuban involvement in the murder of Kennedy is that they were only one of numerous elements who had an axe to grind with the President. They simply lacked the means, on their own, to murder a president of the United States.

McGeorge Bundy, Richard Bissell of the CIA, and Secretary of State Dean Rusk colluded to ground the air support of the CIA operation after Kennedy had reluctantly authorized it earlier in the day on Sunday of the week of the Bay of Pigs invasion.

Thus the foolish Cubans were led to believe that Kennedy grounded the planes when it was actually traitors in his administration who did so. Without air support, Operation Zapata, ie Bay of Pigs, had no chance of success. This subterfuge was intentional for recruiting anti-Castro Cubans for the murder of the president. It also created yet one more rabbit hole down which researchers would fall, never to return, in attempting to trace the real blame for the murder of Kennedy.

As we have stated many times before, not even the CIA was the ultimate power which killed Kennedy. It answered to the Jewish Permindex which had targeted Kennedy for assassination before he entered office.

Murders of presidents typically take a village, which in this case included a bevy of heavy and lightweight assassins of which the Cubans are only one piece of the puzzle.

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Vile Ruth Hyde Paine and Her Vile Lies

The vile Ruth Hyde Paine pretended to be a friend of the Oswalds, but the truth of the matter is that she was assigned by the CIA to help manipulate Lee HARVEY Oswald and frame him for the CIA's murder of President John F Kennedy in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963.

Paine committed at least 3 signal acts to help frame Oswald for the murder. She got him a job at the CIA's Texas School Book Depository which, rather than being a school book supplier, was one of the CIA's nerve centers in managing the ambush on the president. The purpose for placing HARVEY in the TSBD was to provide the story about him being the lone 6th floor assassin.

The second act of participation in the murder of Oswald was that of Paine ordering the rifle with which Oswald allegedly shot the president. We have spent considerable space deriding the idiocy of using such a weapon for an assassination, but suffice it to say that when a large group of Italian military professionals was informed that the Mannlicher-Carcano was the murder weapon, the entire auditorium broke out in laughter.

Paine was the supplier of the rifle. Whether or not she ordered it from Kleins in Chicago, or was provided it locally, she was the one who wrapped the Carcano in a blanket in her garage. John Armstrong has proven that the alleged money order used to purchase the weapon was a fraud, so we know that Oswald did not acquire the rifle.

We do know that Paine, a CIA operative, did the dirty deed. She annotated her calendar on October 23 as saying Oswald ordered the rifle. Why would Paine record such a detail? Marina claimed she knew nothing about it. If Oswald were this dangerous lone nut, shouldn't she have alerted authorities that a mad man just ordered a rifle - all the more so with the false allegations that Oswald tried to assassinate General Walker. It was all a hoax, with Paine planting evidence on her occasional house guest.

Another act of treachery by the so-called Quaker Ruth Paine was forging a farewell note attributed to HARVEY. Having read it, we realized that only someone with an intellect of a pre-adolescent would accept it at face value. The note was supposedly written in Russian, translated into English, and then translated back into Russian. Such a bizarre stunt could have come only from the psychopathic imagination of the CIA of which Ruth Paine was a part.

Some of the nonsense in the letter was that Oswald had paid the last month's water and gas bill and house payment even though he was allegedly living in a rooming house and his wife was living with Paine. Paine knew Russian very well and was the author of the note which miraculously showed up some time after the assassination of the president.

We know conclusively from photographic evidence that HARVEY did not shoot the president because he was in the doorway of the TSBD precisely at the moment CIA ambushed the president. Therefore there was no need for him to concoct such a brain-dead note.

Finally, when HARVEY tried to reach Paine to get legal assistance on Saturday, she refused. What kind of friend was Paine? She was not a friend at all, but a vicious piranha seeking innocent blood.

It is unfortunate that the vile Ruth Paine is still alive, but soon enough the world will be rid of her. In the meantime we must all endure her insufferable lies and continuation of the murder operation of President Kennedy and Lee HARVEY Oswald.

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Did Marina Oswald Speak English?

The news media and Warren Commission fostered the unquestioned presumption that Marina Oswald did not speak English at the time of her interrogations immediately following the murder of John Kennedy by the CIA in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963. The evidence points to her mastery of English, a fact she hid to play the helpless damsel in distress.

John Armstrong has made a convincing case that Marina Oswald, the wife of Lee HARVEY Oswald, spoke English very well. He draws upon photographs annotated in her hand, and her handling of contract negotiations in English. We would like to present a few more pieces of evidence that she spoke and wrote English well.

The government-news media story was that Marina barely knew any English, in part because the brute Lee HARVEY Oswald wanted to keep his wife barefoot, dumb, and pregnant.

In the early days of the fake investigation conducted by the FBI of Kennedy's murder, a translator was always brought to the interviews of Marina. By February the investigation notes explicitly state the interviews were conducted in English, begging us to conclude that within 2 months of the murder, Marina suddenly developed enough competency in English to forgo the translators. The reality is that she knew English long before suddenly speaking in English tongues in February.

One of the evidences for Marina's proficiency is a letter by Robert Oswald, HARVEY's alleged brother, in which he described a number of interactions between Marina and other people who did not speak Russian. For example he documents an affair between her and John Martin, the assistant manger of the Inn of Six Flags, which would not have been possible without the 2 people being able to speak English. Armstrong in fact reports Martin as stating that Marina spoke English very well.

At the end of the affair in February, Robert walked into his house, where Marina was staying, at the tail end of a telephone conversation between her, John, and his wife in which Marina, under Robert's direction, ended the affair. According to Robert, the affair occurred from November 1963 to February 1964. It is inconceivable that the telephone conversation could occur without all parties being able to speak English, a fact Martin has already confirmed.

Another interview session of Marina by the FBI covered the allegations that HARVEY was in Mexico City, something which Marina said she knew about from watching television, another indicator that her English was quite good.

A final bit of evidence we offer is her association with Robert Webster, a Rand Corporation plastics specialist who fake-defected to the Soviet Union 2 weeks before Oswald, and who re-entered the US 2 weeks before Oswald. Webster stated that he knew Marina although the latter denied it. Unfortunately she made a Freudian slip of sorts when she told a Russian friend that her husband was in the USSR for a trade show, precisely the circumstances under which Webster was in the USSR. It is well known that HARVEY was not on a trade show mission, and therefore that Marina knew Webster.

Since Webster did not speak Russian, and evidence exists that Marina met with Webster in the USSR in Leningrad and in Moscow, it was necessary for Marina to have good English skills to communicate with Webster in what A J Weberman called an espionage ring operated by the CIA.

Many other small details of the story fabricated by the US insurgents who took over the government in 1963 give convincing proofs that Marina Oswald knew and spoke English, and quite well at that.

The significance of this revelation - though by no means new - is that Marina and the government were deceiving us when they pretended that she knew no English. It also confirms the probability that Marina was a spy, but for whose side was she working? We will address that subject soon enough.

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

How the Jews Murdered John F Kennedy

Although it took a village to murder President Kennedy in Dealey Plaza in Dallas, TX on November 22, 1963, one group stood head and shoulders above the others, and indeed acted as the prime contractor in murdering the president. If you think Israel, Zionists, and Jews, you are on the right track.

Our synopsis of the work of Michael Collins Piper in documenting the Jewish conspiracy to murder the president is found on our new website at the following link:

http://www.americanchronicle.info/Home/TabId/514/ArticleId/69/how-the-jews-murdered-john-f-kennedy.aspx

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Chronicle Redux: The Tippit Case Solved

We revisit our analysis of the Tippit case to include newly acquired information which helps us better reconstruct the events surrounding the murder of the Dallas Police Department officer on November 22, 1963. We consider this our most important article to date on the subject.

The article may be found at our new website http://www.americanchronicle.info/Home/TabId/514/ArticleId/68/chronicle-redux-the-tippit-case-solved.aspx

Copyright 2017 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

The Patsification of Jack Ruby, Part 2

[Editor 8/23/2021: Although Ruby did not kill Lee HARVEY Oswald, he was knee deep in the assassination of the president. He was by no means an innocent man as some contend, a topic we addressed in later Chronicles.]

New evidence has come to light over the past year which completely revamps our understanding of Jack Ruby, the man who allegedly murdered Lee Oswald on November 24, 1963 at the Dallas Police Department in downtown Dallas. We present a second installment of truth we had never encountered before concerning Ruby's whereabouts on November 22.

We published a summary of Ralph Cinque's ground-breaking study of the man shown on network television shooting Oswald which concludes that FBI agent James Bookhout (1914-2009) was the assailant. Jack Ruby had been apprehended at about 10:20 that morning - and was indisposed to carrying out a planned assassination.

Another cache of evidence has come forth definitively establishing the whereabouts of Jack Ruby from early Friday morning until after the murder of John Kennedy by the CIA and Secret Service. The witness is James Coley who was an advertising agent for the Dallas Morning News, one of whose clients was Jack Ruby.

Before we review Coley's account, it is worthwhile noting some of the theories and ideas about Ruby's movements on that day. One of the more striking is the testimony of Julie Ann Mercer who said that she saw Ruby in a light green pickup truck near Dealey Plaza carrying rifles up to the fence area.

Another story states that he was in Dealey Plaza keeping tabs on Lee Oswald at the Texas School Book Depository. Others have stated that he was at Parkland Memorial Hospital planting the magic bullet more formally known as CE-399. Some accounts place him at the Dallas Morning News. In short, Jack was a very busy man according to these various stories, having the same problem as Lee Oswald being in three places nearly simultaneously.

Coley's story is eminently more sensible. He says that the underworld braggadocio was in the coffee shop of the DMN downtown office where he habitually met Coley on Fridays to buy his weekend advertising for his strip clubs. Coley met with Ruby for about an hour before making his regular sales calls that morning. When he returned after 11a, Coley found Ruby still in the office, and it was the ad man's distinct impression that Ruby had been there the whole time.

He went out to Main and Houston with a colleague, Charley Mulkia (sp), to watch the motorcade. After hearing the noises from the assassination, he returned to the office no earlier than 12:45p where he found Ruby still sitting at Jack Newnam's (sp) desk, the man who handled Ruby's downtown club account. When Ruby heard the news, he ran to promotions director Dick Jefferies' secretary's office to make a phone call.

Coley states that Ruby was no fan of Kennedy's, but we can clearly see that he was not involved in the murder activities that day, and perhaps hung out at the Morning News to provide an alibi for himself. We now know conclusively that Ruby was at the Dallas Morning News offices all morning at least until around 1p.

One other speculation about Ruby concerns the man in the fedora in the Altgens 6 photograph which was mercilessly altered to remove Lee Oswald's presence on the stairs of the TSBD at precisely the same moment that the CIA snipers were murdering the president. That fedora hat man has often been identified as Ruby, but it is absolutely impossible for Ruby to be the man since he was camped out at the Dallas Morning News ad offices. The man in the hat was most likely James Bookhout who shot Oswald on national television.

It is not entirely clear to us why Ruby was wasted, but certainly knowing too much was part of the hedging, and probably because he knew Lee Oswald too well.

Reference

Jerry Coley, Additional pools of blood were found in Dealey Plaza., MrChrillemannen, November 27, 2016, accessed 12/30/2016 on YoutTube, [interview with Len Osanic, nd]

Tony Bonn, The Patsification of Jack Ruby, The American Chronicle, December 30, 2016, http://www.americanchronicle.info/Home/TabId/514/ArticleId/66/the-patsification-of-jack-ruby.aspx

Copyright 2016 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Ruby Did NOT Shoot Oswald

Contrary to the baroque lies of the Warren Commissioners and the establishment press and US government, Jack Ruby did not murder Lee Oswald.

The details to this fascinating story are found on our new website by following this link: http://www.americanchronicle.info/Home/TabId/514/ArticleId/66/the-patsification-of-jack-ruby.aspx

One Minute Chronicle: Proof that the Zapruder Film Was Altered

Much controversy has raged over the integrity of the Zapruder film which captured for the CIA by Abraham Zapruder the murder of President John F Kennedy in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963. The following frame proves with smoking gun evidence that the Zapruder film was altered, and consequently required the involvement of the US government to murder its chief executive.

 

The frame we present is 343, with credit to Larry Rivera, an expert Kennedy assassination researcher. This one frame alone proves without qualification, codicil, or caveat that the Zapruder film was altered.

 

Zapruder Film: frame 343

To understand this frame, please note that Jackie Kennedy's right arm is leaning against the back of the limousine seat where she and her husband were riding. Notice its length.

 

Notice that her left arm is behind the dead president's top of head as he lays in her lap. The trick which the CIA and the technicians at Kodak who altered the film attempted to play on the public was that the white blob on the president's head was the gloved hand of Jackie. It is utterly impossible, given Jackie's physique, for her arm to be positioned behind and underneath her husband's head and on top of it at the same time.

 

Since we have proven that the film was altered, a conspiracy in its own right which involved CIA, Secret Service, and Kodak, we have also proven a conspiracy to assassinate the president, by no less than the 3 aforementioned conspirators.

 

The white blob trick covered the back of the president's blown out skull which means that the lethal shots came from the front and side from both behind the fence on the grassy knoll and the pergola of the Plaza.

 

While it is inconceivable that intelligent people in the 21st century could possibly believe that President John F Kennedy was not murdered by a high powered conspiracy within and without the United States government, such is still the case. These people will still deny it after we have presented the incontrovertible proof that the Zapruder film was altered, which in turn makes them accessories after the fact to murder.

Kennedy's brain is still missing, and I bet that George Bush Sr knows where it is.

Reference
Larry Rivera, Frame 343 of the Zapruder Film

Copyright 2016 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Update on the Murder of Dorothy Kilgallen

Investigative reporter and celebrity Dorothy Kilgallen was murdered on November 8, 1965 in order to prevent her from publishing exclusive information she had obtained about Jack Ruby's testimony to the Warren Commission, as well as the results of her interview with the Kennedy assassin who murdered Lee Oswald.

 

We have discovered many details since we first published on this subject several years ago, including how Jayne Mansfield was murdered in connection with Kilgallen.

 

To read more, follow the link below to our new website.

 

http://www.americanchronicle.info/Home/TabId/514/ArticleId/61/update-on-the-murder-of-dorothy-kilgallen.aspx

Copyright 2016 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Statistical Proof That Conspirators Murdered John Kennedy

One of our favorite evidences proving that a cabal of conspirators murdered President Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas’ Dealey Plaza is the statistical evidence showing the mathematical impossibility of so many witnesses to the Kennedy murder dying of unnatural causes.

 

To see 4 astonishing graphs proving a conspiracy to murder the president, see our latest article on our new website at the following address:

http://www.americanchronicle.info/home/statistical-proof-that-conspirators-murdered-john-kennedy.aspx?ArticleID=28&tabid=514

Copyright 2015 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

From Dealey Plaza to the Texas Theater

There is much misinformation about the movements of Lee Oswald after the CIA ambushed President Kennedy in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963, but we offer an antidote to the lies of the Warren Commission. We also discuss the controversial Rambler station wagon, the Beckley rooming house, and the testimony of Roger Craig.

 

This article is one of our more important ones dealing with the details of the crime during this critical time period, an article you can read on our new website at the following address.

http://www.americanchronicle.info/home/from-dealey-plaza-to-the-texas-theater.aspx?ArticleID=26&tabid=514

Copyright 2015 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

A New Geometry for Understanding the Murder of President Kennedy

While so many researchers of the investigation of John Kennedy in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963 focus on easy to hate groups such as organized crime and the CIA, very few realize that the masterminds of the assassination were the British monarchy and its super secret Special Operations Executive operating through the Permindex corporation.

 

To read more about this breakthrough in the Kennedy assassination, navigate to our article on our new website:

http://www.americanchronicle.info/home/a-new-geometry-for-understanding-the-murder-of-president-kennedy.aspx?ArticleID=23&tabid=514

Copyright 2015 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.