Showing posts with label Henry Kissinger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Henry Kissinger. Show all posts

Monday, May 10, 2021

Will the Real Deep Throat Please Stand Up?

In a Chronicle of some age, we rejected - with considerable scorn - the story that former FBI executive Mark Felt was the notorious Deep Throat of Watergate fame. Even our nominee failed the truth test as we discovered after reading Michael Collins Piper's investigation into the matter which is explosive in substance and implication.

Mark Felt, doddering, crippled, and half-demented, was wheeled out before the nation in one of the most ghastly acts of disrespect of a senior citizen we have witnessed. Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein had the audacity and psychopathic temerity to reveal him as the secret source of their revelations about the Nixon administration as they pummeled it in their political assassination of the 37th president. Have these "people" no decency? Have they no shame?

Our candidate for Deep Throat was certainly better placed and more plausible, but it was wide of the mark as well. We thought that Alexander Haig, Nixon's autocratic, treacherous, and traitorous chief of staff, was well placed, and had enough access to the tapes that he could provide the damaging information which tore asunder his boss' government. Of course, none of this error precludes Haig's involvement in the destruction of the government and Nixon, or his involvement in Operation Deep Throat.

However, Piper introduced new material illuminating Deep Throat in his groundbreaking book, Final Judgment. Drawing on investigation by Debra Davis, author of a biography of Washington Post owner Katherine Graham, Piper provides the most persuasive analysis of Deep Throat we have read.

When Katherine the Great: Katherine Graham and her Washington Post Empire was first published in 1979, Graham flew into a rage, demanding that Harcourt Brace destroy the book. Graham had no libel case - merely a demand that the book be destroyed - because that is what you do when the truth is revealed - especially when it involves treason and sedition against the United States as was her case.

Davis reported that National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger installed his comrade James Angleton of CIA in the White House with Richard Ober, where Kissinger set up a spy network to do surveillance on Nixon. The spy operation Angleton ran was for the Israeli counter-intelligence desk at the White House - not at CIA, meaning that Kissinger and Angleton were conducting Israeli affairs of state out of the Nixon White House!

In other words, Kissinger and Angleton were committing treason by attempting to overturn the 1972 presidential election through espionage for their country Israel, an act in which Mossad was no doubt involved.

Ensconced at the White House, and with full access to the National Security Adviser, Angleton and Ober began monitoring the tapes and conversations in the Oval Office. Whether Ober was Deep Throat proper, or Charlie McCarthy to Angleton's Edgar Bergen, is a rather fine distinction with no difference - the man behind the curtain was Angleton who was deliberately sabotaging the American government for his nation - ie ISRAEL.

Nixon was the target of yet another political assassination by International Jewry and Mossad, the details of which we shall save for another Chronicle. Our main point for now is that James Angleton, working for Mossad, was Deep Throat.

[Postscipt 5/10/2021: It is our belief, though unproven, that Angleton spotted a damaging reference on one of the tapes, ordering Haig to remove it, thus creating the famous 18 minute gap. The popular theory is that Nixon secretary Rosemary Woods made the erasure, but that is surely another fantasy of the Washington Post. To think that Nixon had time to listen to the tapes for incriminating material is lunacy. The damage was to CIA and Mossad - not Nixon.]

Reference
Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th Edition, 2d printing, 2005, source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com), accessed 5/7/2021)


Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Why Nixon Did Not Destroy the Tapes

Nixon releasing tape transcripts (Photo: pimall.com)
One of the enduring mysteries of the Watergate scandal has been the reason why Nixon did not destroy the tapes containing incriminating conversations against him. Thanks to the astute analysis of Gary Allen, we know the answer – Nixon simply was not in a position to destroy them.

Even special prosecutor Leon Jaworski admitted that without the tapes, he had no case against Nixon. This statement comes from a man who fabricated evidence and suborned perjury to convict an innocent man of murder during World War 2. Jaworski’s case was so foul that years later a review board would castigate it as a gross miscarriage of justice .
The common argument at the time of Watergate was that had Nixon destroyed the tapes, he would have saved his presidency, even at the risk of a dark cloud hanging over his administration for the remainder of its term. Without evidence there is no case. The predicate of the argument is false. It assumes that Nixon had full control over the taping system which he did not.

The two key figures to understanding the taping fiasco, which started when Alexander Butterfield, White House liaison to the Secret Service and CIA informant or agent, casually but oh so deliberately mentioned the tapes to the Senate Watergate committee in July 1973, are Henry Kissinger and Alexander Haig.
Kissinger established the plumbers after agitating Nixon incessantly about leaks, a situation which was exacerbated by the staged Pentagon Papers leaks, a report drier than saw dust and about 5 years old by the time CIA operatives leaked it. But it’s the principle of the thing, as the old saying goes.

Kissinger’s paranoia was not restricted to hiring the CIA Plumbers. He installed extensive wiretaps on all of his staff and several journalists, a fact known at the time of Watergate but never once reported in the major press. Kissinger skated through Watergate without a singed hair – something which was not accidental.
Butterfield was in charge of the taping system which had been installed in the White House at the suggestion of Lyndon Johnson when Nixon assumed office. Our recollection is that it did not become operational until around 1971, with an improvised system in place in the mean time. In any event, the system in place at the time of Watergate was transparent in that it was voice activated and operated without Nixon’s involvement. Butterfield monitored Nixon’s movements and conversations from his White House office.

In addition to much of the foregoing analysis, Gary Allen presented two compelling explanations about Nixon’s inaction over the tapes, neither of which has anything to do with Nixon greed or vanity, both of which are common explanations. Allen suggests that Nixon did not have control of the tapes and that there were multiple copies of them, meaning that destruction of one tape would still leave others available. And not knowing their locations, the task becomes like trying to stomp out cockroaches.
This is where Alexander Haig, the man who butchered Nixon without the latter having a clue, comes in. Allen points out that the investigating staffs seemed to know exactly where in the many miles of tapes all of the incriminating evidence was. The only people with such access were Butterfield, Haig, and Robert H. Taylor, the secret service chief whom Bob Haldeman fired and who later went to work for Nelson Rockefeller as head of his security. But Haig and Butterfield were colleagues from previous assignments. Thus when Butterfield left the White House, Haig became the keeper of the tapes archives.

Apparently Haig, with advice from Butterfield, fed the precise location - down to the second - of the damning evidence to the Watergate Committee and Special Prosecutor. There is no way in the world anyone could have traversed those tapes and made sense of them in so short a period of time without knowledgeable help which Haig was only too happy to provide. Even today, we still do not have all of the tapes transcribed.
Nixon was a caged animal trapped by men who were supposed to be working for him, but who were in fact working for their true boss, Nelson Rockefeller. The implications of Nixon's downfall are staggering, but a topic we will continue to cover in future postings.

Reference
Gary Allen, Rockefeller File, 1976

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Saturday, March 16, 2013

Was Henry Kissinger a Soviet Spy?

Kissinger, Rockefeller, Ford (Photo: Wikimedia)
Pundits taking a walk down political memory lane may recall the rapturous attention which Henry Kissinger commanded as he scaled the ranks from Harvard professor to the second most powerful man in Washington, but few will recall the revelations from the 1970s disclosing Kissinger as a Communist agent going back to World War 2. We will help you reminisce.
 
It may seem fantastical that a man respected as much as Kissinger would turn out to be a Soviet spy, but if you understand the linkage between the Rockefellers, USSR, and the United States, it is not so bizarre. We have credible sources documenting Kissinger’s involvement with espionage with the USSR starting with his career in the US Army counter intelligence unit after the war.
Kissinger was drafted into the Army in 1943 where he was later assigned to the 970th Counter Intelligence Detachment where he ruled a German town after the cease fire in 1945, earning the princely salary of 10,000 USD per year. To put that income into perspective, the median male annual income in 1950, which had risen substantially due to rampant post-war inflation, was only 2570 USD. His reign ended in April 1946 when he was transferred as an instructor to the European Command Intelligence School.

Around that time, Kissinger was recruited by Soviet intelligence agents as a double agent through a spy ring known as ODRA whose purpose was to penetrate British and American military intelligence. Eventually one of the chiefs of the Polish GZI, corresponding to the KGB, Colonel Michael Goleniewski, defected to the USA with a large cache of documents, including a 1500 page report on the activities of the ODRA which contained a list of spies and their code names.
One of the names was that of American Ernst Bosenhard who was assigned to US Intelligence Headquarters in Oberammergau, Germany where he was arrested in 1951 and subsequently convicted of espionage and the conveyance of large quantities of official documents to the USSR. Bosenhard was an ODRA colleague of Kissinger’s.

Goleniewski defected in 1961 when Kissinger was a professor at Harvard and in the employ of the Council on Foreign Relations, commonly known as CFR. Goleniewski’s ODRA documents also included the name of Sgt Henry A Kissinger, code named Bor, whom they noted in 1954 had returned to the USA to work at Harvard and was collaborating with the CIA.
While foreign intelligence agencies, especially those of the British, used the information to identify and prosecute traitors, the United States did not do so. In any event, the United States Congress passed a law making Goleniewski a US citizen for his services.

Goleniewski suffered a bit of credibility loss when he declared himself Aleksei Nicholaevich Romanoff, the son of the Czar Nicholas II, who was thought to have been murdered with the royal household in the aftermath of the Russian Revolution. However, CIA Chief of Research and Analysis Herman E. Kimsey swore in an affidavit dated June 3, 1965, and based on numerous and varied authentication tests, that Goleniewski’s claim was truthful. Goleniewski’s credibility was also affirmed by John Norpel, Jr., who had served with FBI and State Department Security, before Senate hearings on the subject.
There is more to the story. Charlotte Iserbyt reports that she invited Dr Igor Glagolev, an advisor to the Politburo and Soviet arms negotiators prior to his defection, to debate Paul Warnke, chief SALT negotiator under Jimmy Carter, on the merits of SALT II. Dr Glagolev told Iserbyt that he had attended many meetings at the Kremlin where both Nelson Rockefeller and/or Henry Kissinger were present. That explosive disclosure will be developed in another blog posting.

Finally, to cement the case of Kissinger's espionage, all of which was endorsed by Nelson Rockefeller, we note that President Nixon personally intervened to waive Kissinger's background check which required of all persons entering White House service. The reason is simple - both Nixon and Kissinger knew of Goleniewski's damning revelations. Kissinger is the only appointee known to receive a special presidential waiver in this first term.

Thus to answer our essay’s title, the evidence is overwhelming and conclusive that Henry Kissinger was a Soviet spy and to this day spies for an even more powerful government, the House of Rockefeller.

References
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_income_in_the_United_States
Gary Allen, Kissinger The Secret Side Of The Secretary Of State ,  1976,  http://www.whale.to/b/allen_b2.html#THE_MAN_BEHIND_THE_MYTH__
Charlotte Iserbyt, 2002, Kissinger Out Of The Closet, http://rense.com/general32/kissde1.htm

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Friday, October 5, 2012

What Did Lynne Cheney Know, And When Did She Know It?

For those wanting more evidence that Dick Cheney is Satan incarnate, look no further than his wife’s coded description of Watergate in Executive Privilege. Although she wrote ostensibly a novel, she wrote more of a true confession in the truth is stranger than fiction category.
 
One of our good researchers passed along information which we found both shocking and illuminating – a cast of characters involved in both the Kennedy assassination and Watergate. Richard Nixon always maintained that the Bay of Pigs was connected to the Kennedy assassination and should have extended its reach to his presidency.
 
Indeed his White House, unbeknownst to him, was a breeding ground and way station for past and future murderers who would rule America with their chauvinistic, imperial lusts. Thanks to another superb book which decodes Cheney’s revelations, we know much more about the Kennedy murder than we knew before. The decoder book is Against Them by Tegan Mathis.
 
While we prepare for a fuller review, we wished to pass along this information in connection to the Kennedy conspiracy led by some of the most respected names in post war American politics. For those familiar with the schematic of Dealy Plaza, you may recognize Umbrella Man, the guy who was holding the umbrella on a sunny day at the foot of the grassy knoll from where Kennedy was lethally shot.
 
Umbrella man was a signaler for the assassins behind the fence. But it takes special skill to operate as point man for assassins, so the future General Alexander Haig was selected to operate the umbrella semaphore that fateful day. To keep the signal on time, a trusty sidekick to notify the Umbrella Man to signal the assassins is required too. So why not enlist a Harvard genius by the name of Henry Kissinger?
 
One of the other stunning surprises is the identity of the man in the 5th floor window of the Texas School Book Depository. (And yes we said 5th floor). The man who was the sharpshooter against the president was an Army officer fresh from Viet Nam and future Secretary of State. The name is none other than General Colin Powell.
 
What  is striking about all three men is their meteoric rises in power after murdering the president. Alexander Haig became in turn Kissinger’s aide in the Nixon White House, Nixon’s chief of staff, commander of NATO, and eventually Secretary of State during Reagan’s first term.
 
Kissinger had a very dazzling career as National Security Advisor and Secretary of State. We have already noted Powell’s tenure as Secretary of State under George Bush, Jr. If you wondered how both Powell and Haig jumped over many men their seniors in such a short period of time, wonder no more. It mattered little that they both sported average to mediocre records – especially when they excelled at murder.
 
However, being well connected to the Bush Crime Syndicate offers advantages not found elsewhere. Indeed, we have reported how Prescott Bush and George Bush, Sr. were important figures in the murder plot, where good behavior is richly rewarded - just as mafia crime family does.
 
Henry Kissinger’s career is well known, especially to Italians who identified him as the man behind the murder of Prime Minister Aldo Moro.
 
We know much of this new information thanks to the investigations and deciphering abilities of Mr Mathis who delivers much more information in explaining these two pivotal events in American history – only to be surpassed by 9/11 – another production of the cabal who practiced in Dealy Plaza.
 
Stay tuned for more illumination.

Copyright 2010-12 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

How Many People Has Henry Kissinger Murdered?

While researching the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, we uncovered evidence supporting additional allegations of murder against Henry Kissinger. Although the total Kissinger body count may never be known, we would like to pass along other cases where Kissinger was the author of murder.

We thank again Jim Marrs for his superb document of the 9/11 anomalies as found in The Terror Conspiracy Revisited.

We previously reported from a separate source several witnesses who identified Henry Kissinger as the mastermind of the murder in 1978 of Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro. Marrs indirectly confirms this discovery when he reports that two European countries have several warrants for Kissinger’s arrest on charges related to war crimes and complicity in murder.

While staying at the Ritz Hotel in Paris in May 2001, French police served the Bildeberger member with a court summons which prompted him to hastily exit the country, never to return. We believe that Kissinger's rushed escape was to avoid legal jeopardy.

Christopher Hitchens has stated with substantial evidence that Kissinger is responsible for many of the atrocities committed in Southeast Asia during the Viet Nam war, atrocities which may - in our opinion - include Operation Phoenix led by William Colby, later CIA Director. Operation Phoenix was directly responsible for the cold blooded murder of at least 20,000 civilians.

Perhaps Kissinger’s most famous plot was that against Rene Schneider in 1970, Chile’s army commander-in-chief for Salvador Allende whom we also believe to have died on the orders of Kissinger. Former US ambassador to Chile Edward Korry substantiated Kissinger’s direct involvement in these affairs.

The former Secretary of State is also implicated in the overthrows and assassinations related to uprisings in Nicosia, Cyprus and the genocide in East Timor.

Marrs cites Kissinger’s involvement with an assassination in Washington, D.C. without specifying any details. We would link that with the murder of Orlando LeTellier and Ronni Moffat. The former was foreign minister under assassinated Chilean President Salvador Allende. We reported on this matter in, Is James Buckley a Murderer?

We see a profound need to dig deeper into Kissinger’s macabre past with the expectation that more dead bodies will be found. We, for one, would like to see the former statesman extradited to Europe to stand trial for the charges pending against him.

Reference
The Terror Conspiracy Revisited, Jim Marrs

Copyright 2010-12 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Palace Intrigue in the Nixon White House


Richard Nixon is often portrayed as a schemer, a man whose official duties were sometimes a footnote to his political machinations. This simplification does not do justice to the overly wrought schemes he hatched to further his political aims as details surrounding the Moorer espionage against the White House indicate.

Len Colodny and Robert Gettlin, in their book Silent Coup, detail a spy ring in the White House operated from 1970 – 1971 by the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), notably chairman Admiral Thomas Moorer (1912 – 2004) and his direct reports Rear Admiral Rembrandt Robinson (1924 – 1972), Yeoman Charles Radford (b. 1944), and later Robinson’s replacement Rear Admiral Robert Welander (1924 - 2005).

 The authors set the context by describing how Nixon’s untrusting and recessive perceptions led him to establish a byzantine configuration of reporting relationships which in turn fostered paranoia among his senior staff in major governmental departments and agencies, most notably the CIA, defense and state departments.

Nixon sought to establish a back channel for he and Henry Kissinger (b. 1923) to communicate with government persons without the CIA eavesdropping. This communication network was established and maintained by the JCS, a network which allowed him to bypass CIA channels. Nixon had developed deep suspicions of the CIA, especially following his loss to Kennedy in 1960, which he blamed on the agency in releasing classified information to Kennedy which he used to his advantage in the debates which many analysts cite as a signal event in the vice president's loss at the polls that November.

Nixon also harbored deeper suspicion about the CIA in connection with the Bay of Pigs and Kennedy assassination which Nixon’s former chief of staff Bob Haldeman (1926 - 1993) said Nixon referenced with the imprecise phrase, “the bay of pigs thing” – not to be confused with George Bush’s “vision thing.” This curiosity, we believe, ultimately killed the cat.

Nixon had his reasons for this secrecy, not the least of which was to protect sensitive negotiations with the USSR and the Peoples’ Republic of China both of which countries were long standing protagonists in the artificial Cold War. But these Kremlinesque maneuvers backfired in a bad way by compelling Nixon's key cabinet and military leaders to pursue alternate means of obtaining information.

Kissinger, who was despised by the military brass as a meddling, officious, academic bureaucrat, abetted their fears by cultivating their communications directly with the president rather than with the Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird (b. 1922) who was frequently ignored entirely by Nixon in key decisions.

Likewise, Nixon bypassed  Secretary of State William Rogers (1913 - 2001) in his major policy initiatives with the USSR and Communist China. Thus with each of his major policy agenda including détente, SALT, Vietnamization, troop withdrawals, and the Vietnam peace accord, Nixon circumvented the leading cabinet officers who should have been focal points in these advances. In their places was Henry Kissinger, National Security Advisor, attempting to control foreign policy through the NSC.

The back channel communications were sent through the National Security Council (NSC) which had lain largely dormant during the Kennedy and Johnson years. Through the NSC, Nixon and Kissinger could control major actions which might ordinarily be conducted through cabinet members.

The incendiary event which exposed the Moorer spy operation was started by a leak to columnist Jack Anderson about Nixon’s “tilt” from India toward Pakistan in the Pakistani civil war which resulted in the creation of the state of Bangladesh. Heretofore, the administration had claimed neutrality.

The White House was furious with the leak but the JCS were equally furious that Nixon had sent on December 10, 1971 Naval Task Group 74 to the Indian Ocean in support of Pakistan against India, a deployment done without consultation with Laird, senior naval officials, NSC, or the Washington Special Action Group (WSAG). In their fury and frustration, it is quite likely that the JCS leaked the memos documenting the policy shift and troop movements, which in the minds of the JCS exposed the US quite unnecessarily to Soviet naval forces operating in the Indian Ocean.

The glue among Nixon, Kissinger, NSC and JCS was Alexander Haig (1924 – 2010), the man who would be instrumental in Nixon’s removal from power in the Watergate affair. Haig enjoyed a meteoric rise from the bottom quarter of his West Point class to Colonel, then Brigadier and Major General during Nixon’s presidency. He was brought to politics in 1963 by Joseph Califano, a man with CIA ties and former Secretary of the Army during the Johnson administration.

Yeoman Radford was a highly eager to please young man with a young family who readily engaged, on orders of his superiors, in theft of highly classified documents, including Eyes Only memos exchanged between Kissinger and Nixon. Radford rifled through Kissinger’s and Haig’s brief cases, burn bags, White House in and out boxes, personal contacts, and anywhere else he could find documents of relevance to the JCS. Very little was deemed irrelevant for pilfering purposes including office gossip for which daily briefings were held. Radner even managed to steal the ultra secret correspondence between Kissinger and Nixon about the opening to China and the peace negotiations between Kissinger and Le Duc Tho.

With Kissinger fuming over the breach in confidentiality, investigations and phone taps were installed against possible suspects including Radford. The investigation yielded a treasure trove of true confessions from Radford and Welander with less expressive admissions from Robinson and Moorer.

When John Ehrlichman (1925 – 1999), Nixon’s domestic affairs advisor, presented the findings to his boss, the President demurred about taking retributive action. In fact he took it rather stoically, figuring aloud how this affair could be either advantageous or detrimental to his larger goals. The president decided to bury the entire affair for at least one reason and probably two. Ehrlichman was strongly in favor of firing the admiral but obviously did not prevail with the president.

Nixon decided that a compromised admiral was of more use to him than a new unknown replacement, knowing that Moorer would henceforth owe everything to him when he reappointed him as chairman of the JCS rather than fire him or prosecute him in a court martial for spying.

The other reason Nixon buried the scandal – even possibly treason – was related to his vanity and insecurity. He feared that exposure of the spy ring would reflect poorly upon him as an administrator, leader, and manager – a man who inspires contempt and disloyalty from his subordinates. He also supposed that the spy ring could be used as fodder for his political opponents.

A more practical reason for covering for Moorer was Nixon’s need to maintain the secret back channel which the JCS had established under the sitting chairman. Thus, Moorer was a pawn in Nixon’s larger intrigues to play off and circumvent the various government bureaucracies.

The investigators did not find any culpability of Radford for leaking to Anderson despite a many months’ long wire tapping of his home ordered by Kissinger of the FBI. However, this did not stop journalism professor Mark Feldstein from reporting otherwise, which we believe was a blatant attempt to prevaricate on the subject in order to salvage the reputations of the admirals.

We believe that the refusal to discipline Moorer to avoid the recriminations which may have redounded negatively to the president was also the reasoning Nixon used to pursue a cover-up of the Watergate break in of which he was completely innocent – exposure of which created far more political casualties than a complete burial would engender.

Nixon’s direct command to the Naval Task Group may explain Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger’s (b. 1929) worldwide command to all military forces to refuse any orders from Nixon, an action of highly treasonous nature because the allegations of Nixon’s mental instability were without warrant and Schlesinger defied the oath he took to uphold the Consitution and execute the orders of the Commander-in-Chief.

Nixon’s isolation from his key staff and cabinet officers, stemming from his paranoia about them, engendered an equal and opposite reaction which resulted in this indefensible spying operation. Clearly the JCS were more concerned about bureaucratic politics than about the welfare or defense of the nation.

More dangerous to Nixon than Moorer was Alexander Haig who appeared in the background of all the critical points of the spying operation and its aftermath. Colodny and Gettlin surmise that Haig took Radford on a trip to Southeast Asia as his aide, and later assigned him as an aide to Kissinger, knowing full well that Radford would take documents from both of them in order to supply his comrades in the Pentagon with highly classified intelligence.

Admiral Moorer claimed at the time that he already knew of the China opening before illicitly receiving the Eyes Only communiqué from Kissinger to Nixon declaring a victory with Peking in 1971. If we take his word at face value – something which must be done with caution given his possible treason – we must then assume that Haig was the man supplying the information as he was the only other person besides Nixon and Kissinger privy to the negotiations stateside.

This betrayal of his boss, who was flawed in his own ways, clearly indicated on which side of the political divide Haig stood – it was with the military which, along with the CIA, had been planning Nixon’s ouster even before Watergate, proving again that military and civiilian government do not mix well for the sake of rule by law.

Reference
Family Secret, Russ Baker
Silent Coup, Len Colodny and Robert Gettlin
Nixon plot against newspaper columnist detailed [sic], msnbc.com

Copyright 2010-12 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Did Henry Kissinger Murder Aldo Moro?


As sensational as it sounds, there are credible accusations that Henry Kissinger, while Secretary of State, ordered the murder of Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro. Can such allegations about the urbane and world wise Kissinger be true?

Daniel Estulin, a reporter whose career is devoted to exposing the Bilderberg Group, related in his book The True Story of the Bilderberg Group, that John Coleman, a former intelligence operative, reported that the murder of Moro happened under orders of the Bilderberg Group, of which Henry Kissinger is a long standing member.

The justification for murder was that Moro opposed the Club of Rome’s prescriptions for population reduction and de-industrialization of Italy. Additionally, the Bildebergers needed an unstable Italy for their plans to destabilize the Middle East.The Club of Rome is a compatriot of the Bilderberg Group.

Moro and his bodyguards were kidnapped by the Red Brigade in Spring 1978 after which they were all brutally murdered.

During the trial in 1982, Gorrado Guerzoni, a friend of Moro’s, testified that Moro had been threatened by an RIIA (Royal Institute for International Affairs) official while he was still Secretary of State. Red Brigade members who were called to testify confirmed that senior US officials were involved in the plot to murder Moro. Moro’s widow also testified that her husband’s life had been threatened by a “high ranking United States political figure.”

The widow testified that the official told her husband, “Either you stop your political line or you will pay dearly for it.” Guerzoni identified that the identity of the thug was Henry Kissinger.

The astonishing testimony was broadcast all over Europe but, as in the case of the explosive civil suit brought by the King family against Lloyd Jowers, the domestic American press was silent as a mouse. But we have explained how the CIA controls the American press so the result was not unusual.

We know from other research that Henry Kissinger is a darker figure than is commonly thought. We believe that the allegations of three witnesses substantiate the allegation that Kissinger ordered or relayed the orders to murder Moro. However, unlike the Warren Commission, we would be interested in evidence challenging the allegation.

Reference
The True Story of the Bilderberg Group, Daniel Estulin
Copyright 2010-12 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.