America's Fifth Column and the Murder of JFK

Those who have thoroughly studied the murder of President John F Kennedy in Dealey Plaza in Dallas, TX on November 22, 1963 recognize the involvement of Allen Dulles as one of leading principals in the crime. What is less well known is his family's treasonous involvement in destroying the United States of America for well over half a century before murdering Kennedy.

 

Dulles' grandfather, John Watson Foster, was Secretary of State for Benjamin Harrison ( 1889 - 1893 ) when the United States staged a coup on January 17, 1893 against the Hawaiian government in support of the financial and military powers who wanted control of the islands. A month following the coup, Foster left his position to take up lobbying - perhaps one of the first professional lobbyists in the country.

 

Instead of returning to his native Indiana to practice law, he opened up offices in Washington to curry favor with plutocrats who wanted to influence US government policies in favor of imperial aggrandizements abroad in order to line their silk pockets with even more ill gotten gain.

 

After his tenure in public office, Foster trained his son-in-law Robert Lansing, a future Secretary of State, as well as his grandsons, John Foster Dulles, also a future Secretary of State, and Allen Dulles, a future murderer, to take the reigns of power in serving plutocrats and British interests.

 

When William Jennings Bryan, a strong opponent of entering World War 1, protested vigorously the false flag sinking of the Lusitania to Wilson, the president yawned, which left Bryan with no credible alternative other than resignation from office. Bryan had discovered the treason of Wilson and the Ziocons in sinking the ocean liner.

 

Wilson had collaborated with the British to load munitions on the Lusitania knowing full well that the Germans would sink it as a belligerent ship as they had publicly announced. Wilson also purposely boarded civilians on the ship hoping to incite outrage among Americans against the Germans when the great ship sank.

 

What is more interesting about Wilson than his murder and treason - at least for the present discussion - is that he was the instructor of John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles at Princeton. Thus a strong relationship existed between the Fosters, Dulles, and Wilson, with the latter playing the role of sock puppet. All of these men were heavily involved in coups against sovereign governments and in fomenting wars to benefit their wealthy benefactors, including the Zionist Jews.

 

Of additional interest concerning the Dulles family was the fact that John was a homosexual as was his sister Eleanor, the latter of whom, along with her brother Allen, had sexual relationships with Mary Bancroft, a CIA operative who worked at the Social Security Administration undercover for the CIA.

 

After graduating from Princeton Law School, John could not get a job with the plutocratic powerhouse law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell until John Foster intervened on his grandson's behalf with William Nelson Cromwell, in 1911 when Dulles was made law clerk of the firm.

 

In addition to staging the first US sponsored coup against a foreign government, Foster also started the first military intelligence unit at the State Department. Thus when Robert Lansing, his son-in-law, became Secretary of State in 1915 upon Bryan's departure, he inherited much of the machinery to operate covert and criminal operations against foreign governments, to say nothing of cooperating with British royals and the Ziocons in fomenting World War 1. Lansing brought Allen Dulles - at the ripe old age of 23 - with him to State where he learned the ropes of espionage, much as Victoria Nuland would practice it against Ukraine in the "Obama" administration.

 

Thus the Fosters, Lansings, and Dulles seized the machinery of the government to form a government within a government accountable to no one except Wall Street, British Royalty, and Zionist Jews.

 

When Allen was CIA director, he was well acquainted with the ways of Washington and the shadow government, knowing full well that his plot to murder Kennedy, at the request of the Rothschilds, would encounter no material opposition, especially since he was running the cover-up of the murder as the primary member of the Warren Commission.

 

Copyright 2015 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

How the CIA Started the Vietnam War

If you are the typical American, you may believe that the Vietnam War was a struggle of freedom over oppression, right vs. wrong, or maybe in some vague way about preserving the American way of life. Unfortunately, none of these reasons is correct, and were in fact part of the brain washing scheme to ensure American support for the bloody, vicious, unwinnable war. The truth is that the CIA concocted the war out of whole cloth, whose locus provided a safe haven for committing many acts of cold blooded murder in the name of fighting the war.

Fletcher Prouty is a deceased former USAF Colonel who worked in the Pentagon and closely with the CIA during 1940s-60s and who had a bird’s eye view of the development of policy during the Eisenhower administration and beyond. He relates a sordid tale of how the plutocrats had planned the Vietnam War during the last half of World War 2, and the various phases of that war resulting in a massive American invasion of the Indochinese peninsula.

Before describing the political and military aspects of the war, it is important to outline the demographic nature of the land known as Vietnam. All of Vietnam was a tribal community based loose confederation of villages whose central cohesion was ancestral worship and tribal identity. The villages were self sustaining with each family typically engaged in agriculture, farming land that had belonged to the family for centuries. This way of life had persisted unmolested for thousands of years prior to the French arrival in the late 18th century.

Under no normal circumstance would the Vietnamese abandon this ancient way of life – not even under French tutelage. The northern region was dominated by the Tonkinese ethnic group while the southern region was identified as Cochin China. The two groups were distinct and without natural affiliation but followed similar governing customs. The southern section was the more prosperous of the two, being the rice bowl of Asia. However, in no way were these regions countries in the modern sense of the term. Vietnam was an administrative district for the French but without meaning to the native Vietnamese. But that didn’t stop the CIA from pretending that a South Vietnam existed as a fully functioning state.

By the late 19th C. there were two primary influences in the region – the French and the Chinese. The French controlled banking, constabularies, justice, and their rapacious industrial enterprises such as Michelin. The Chinese provided commercial middleman services by supplying an outside market for the Vietnamese’s excess rice production, necessary goods for living, and silver for balances owed the farmer after the exchange of rice and goods.

During World War 2, the Japanese conquered the region and imposed a brutality even greater than that of the French. But the French managed to retake the region with a few armed forces, reimposing their colonial rule. At the end of World War 2, the USA sent huge quantities of arms from Okinawa to Vietnam, ostensibly to arm Ho Chi Minh and his Vietminh forces who were trying to establish a free Vietnam – the Democratic Republic of Vietnam - and to preserve their ancestral customs and governance under the aegis of modern statecraft. However, the CIA had orders to subvert this Indochinese-American relationship in pursuit of higher Cold War aims which had been planned before the end of the world war.

The Chinese and French provided a source of stability and continuity although the French were deeply despised for their brutal methods and administration. The utter defeat of the French at Dien Bien Phu in May 1954 marked an important inflection point for American involvement in Southeast Asia.

At the beginning of the year, the CIA sent in the Saigon Military Mission headed by Philippines covert operations veteran Edward Lansdale who nominally worked for the Air Force but whose real bosses were in the CIA. The purpose of the SMM was to destabilize the region and foment war, at which task they were spectacularly successful.

The SMM was the Dulles brothers’ way of circumventing President Eisenhower’s stern and adamant opposition to placing American ground troops in Vietnam, a position he declared at a National Security Council meeting on January 8, 1954 with the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff present.

The first task of the SMM was to install a pliable leader in South Vietnam. We must remember that South Vietnam did not exist as a country except on paper and in the minds of the plutocrats plotting the next 30 years of war. As we discussed above, the native government of the region was tribal and local – not national.

The CIA installed in 1954 as president of South Vietnam the Catholic Ngô Đình Diệm who had been at times in exile in the United States or Europe. His first assignment was to expel the French and Chinese which he dutifully did. This had the very perverse and intended effect of destabilizing the inchoate nation. Without the French, the legal and administrative infrastructure disappeared, and without the Chinese the economic and commercial infrastructure vanished, leaving the farmers without a market for their rice. During Diem's rule, Vietnam sunk from being a net exporter of rice to being a net importer.

To light the fuse, the CIA arranged to transport 1.1 million people in the north to the south – a figure which even John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State, confirmed – using its secret and proprietary Civil Air Transport airline company stationed in Taiwan. The expense and logistical requirements for an unprecedented migration of this magnitude were enormous but funded via the CIA. As Prouty states, this would be like transplanting 1.1 million New Yorkers overnight to Alabama with all of the social and economic upheaval such a move would inspire.

The CIA had used terroristic threats to cause the Tonkinese residents to move from their ancestral homelands to a strange one in the south. They had also offered financial assistance and inducements for these people to move. The goals were anything but humanitarian.

To the good people back home in America who were busy building bomb shelters and stockpiling food and provisions, the state controlled media reported that the peace loving northerners were fleeing the communist Vietminh. This too was a lie. Ho Chi Minh had the respect and support of his people as he fought first the Japanese, then the French, and now the Americans in order to form an independent nation of Vietnam.

When the waves of Tonkinese migrants arrived in the south, they found that there was no food, shelter, or financial assistance. In short, the CIA lied – a big surprise. In need of basic necessities of life, and out of desperation, the Northerners formed bandits to steal food. They were not motivated by ideology, doctrine, or belief – it was purely and simply a matter of survival.

So the south was now plagued with three huge problems – social unrest due to massive migrations, civil disorder due to the vacuum left by the departure of the French, and economic collapse due to the departure of the Chinese. The attacking bandits were described as guerillas and insurgents to the American people and were later transmogrified into the Viet Cong.

The CIA then organized the migrants into armies and administrators – so they in effect colonized the south and became their rulers and magistrates, creating another source of antagonism. Thus the once prosperous southerners were reduced to poverty and suffered the theft of their farms and other property by the northerners.

In order to complete the antagonism necessary for war, the CIA organized the two comingled groups into "us" and "them", which ignited a confusing and hopelessly tangled set of enemies, using a sophisticated tactic which the French had passed to the CIA from its experiences in Algeria.

Thus over a period of years beginning on September 2, 1945, the end of World War 2, US plutocrats had purposefully configured Vietnam to be the locus of an unwinnable and perpetual war – at least 30 years worth. To frame the conflict as a Communist vs Capitalist conflict is a gross fraud. At no time did the North Vietnamese ever pose a threat in any way shape or form to America’s security. We shall explore the reasons for the war in another posting.

Reference
JFK: The CIA, Vietnam and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy, Fletcher Prouty
Copyright 2010-12 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

How the Bush Family Financed Hitler and Nazism

[Editor' Note 5/15/2021: We have undertaken a complete overhaul of our view of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany of 1933-45. We have moved away from the childish caricature of Hitler as a lunatic, a view promoted by Hollywood and irresponsible, if not deceitful, historians. Please keep this in mind as you read this Chronicle.]

[Editor's Note 5/24/201: We are publishing a new Chronicle today which fundamentally debunks the idea that any large foreign or domestic interest financed Adolf Hitler, including the Bush Crime Syndicate.]

If one knew all of the evil machinations of the Bush Crime Syndicate, the revelation of Prescott Bush as a financier of Hitler’s war machine would strike no one as odd. If on the other hand, one accepts the state propaganda about a civic minded patriotic Bush family, you might be a bit surprised about their deep roots to totalitarian leaders.

Before proceeding, we must credit Webster Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin for much of the information provided here as found in their book, George Bush – The Unauthorized Biography. Although we have significant philosophical differences with Tarpley, we operate under the principle of the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

In October 1942, under the the Trading with the Enemy Act, the US government seized the New York City German Nazi asset of Union Banking Corporation (UBC) managed by Prescott Bush. Its stock holders were E. Roland Harriman, Cornelis Lievense, Harold D. Pennington, Ray Morris, H.J. Kouwenhoven, Johann G. Groeninger, and Prescott Bush.

The order states that “all of which shares are held for the benefit of … members of the Thyssen family, [and] is property of nationals … of a designated enemy country…. ”

On November 17, 1942, the US government seized only the Nazi interests of the Silesian-American Corporation under the same act, leaving the American interests untouched. As it is wont to do, the New York Times fluffed the story for its readers by obscuring it in a little noticed inside the cover article without contemplating the ramifications of the Bush-Walker ties to the Nazi government.

Even if Fritz Thyssen hadn’t already published his infamous I Paid Hitler, US diplomatic notes would have revealed the indispensability of Thyssen money for the rise of Hitler who, after all, had to support 300,000 – 400,000 privately armed brown and black shirt murdering thugs.

Averell Harriman and Fritz Thyssen began discussions in 1922 which eventually lead to the formation in 1924 of Union Banking Corporation, a joint combine of W. A. Harriman & Co. and the Thyssen owned Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart (BHS) located in the Netherlands. George Walker, Prescott’s father in law, was its first President.

UBC, according to US government investigations, was an interlocking concern of Stahlwerke (United Steel Works Corporation or German Steel Trust) another Thyssen owned conglomerate which, post war Congressional investigations discovered, provided the bulk of important industrial materials for armaments production for Hitler’s war machine.

Wall Street banker Clarence Dillon, with the assistance of Sam Bush, Prescott’s father, had established German Steel Trust in 1926 with Thyssen.

When Brown Brothers merged with W. A. Harriman & Co in 1931, the Bushes gained new business connections with Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England and a former Brown Brothers partner. Norman was perhaps the leading and most vocal supporter of Hitler in England.

Webster reports on the nearly Byzantine interlocking relationships between the Harrimans and Thyssens with the ever servile Bushes – Prescott, Sam, and Walkers – holding key management positions in addition to equity interests. Given the coziness of the groups, it is without question that the Bushes and Harrimans were engaged in collaboration with German industrialists to arm Hitler and to realize his war aims.

Harriman and Bert Walker gained control over the Hamburg-Amerika Line in 1920 in a collaboration with Wilhelm Cuno, its CEO, and M. M. Warburg, its banker. Cuno would subsequently give large sums of money to Hitler. The Hamburg-Amerika Line paid for extensive propaganda attacks on the German government when at long last it began to crack down on Hitler’s private army supported by the aforementioned financiers and industrialists, the latter of which also included the Schroeder banking family who also had close ties to the Harrimans and Bushs. Unfortunately for Germany and the world, the German government's crackdown was too little too late.

To put a fine point on the Nazi Bushs efforts for Hitler, Prescott installed Max Warburg, another Hitler supporter, as the German representative for his American Ship and Commerce Corp. Immediately following, Max’s son Erich sent a cable to his cousin Frederick, a director of Union Pacific Railroad, to use all of his influence to suppress anti-Nazi propaganda in the USA.

In 1933, Bush’s Hamburg Amerika Line merged with North German Lloyd Company under direct Nazi auspices. From that point forward, a supervisor of the Nazi Labor Front rode every ship.

Also in 1933, The Harriman International Co. was selected by Hitler’s government to lead a syndicate of 150 Nazi exporters to America. The agreement was negotiated by Hjalmar Schacht and John Foster Dulles who represented scores of German Nazi interests.

Dulles also arranged, under Nazi decree, a series of debt restructurings for German firms which enabled them to forgo bond repayments to creditors, especially smaller American ones. The reason for the restructurings was to free cash for rearming Nazi Germany's military. Of course, the Bush-Harriman banks were intermediaries to the restructurings.

Prior to Hitler’s expropriation of power, the Anglo-American banksters had milked Germany dry – something which helped propel Hitler to dictator. As soon as Hitler was safely in power, the same banksters immediately eased terms which they desired as aid to remilitarizing Germany.

There is much more to this story which Tarpley and Chaitkin have told, but we have only skimmed the highlights. In addition we have begun publishing summarized extracts from Antony Sutton’s works which independently document the Wall Street choreography of Hitler’s ascension.

It is without doubt that the Bushs were willing promoters of Hitler and Naziism and to this day are the champions of terror and totalitarianism - what we know as the New World Order and its 1000 points of light.

Reference

George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography, Webster Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin

Copyright 2010-12 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.