Understanding Climate Change

The Global Warming Nazis beat the drum of anthropogenic global warming, citing as their "evidence" a 1.6 degrees centigrade increase in global temperature as the smoking gun. As it turns out, the earth’s climate patterns are far more complex than such a simple citation of transient data.

 

The last time we ventured into these waters, the climate Nazis came out from behind their swastikas to warn us of imminent global regimentation – the New World Order – in order to rescue us from the impending disaster. But all of the bullying in the world will not alter the science of climatology, as much as prominent newsfakers such as BBC might propagandize.

 

The Corbett Report produced a fascinating presentation on earth’s climate vagaries by interviewing Dr Tim Ball, retired professor of climatology, and Dr Piers Corbyn, also a climatologist and astrophysicist. They showed with scientific evidence that the primary actor influencing temperatures on this planet is the sun.

 

Ball explained that the earth’s tilt – its axis of rotation – is not constant as many have believed until even the 1990s, which varies between a few degrees over time. This variation is not to be confused with wobbling, which is another factor related to earth’s relationship with the sun.

 

The major influences on the angle of tilt are the gravitational pulls of both the sun and the moon whose resulting obliquity of the ecliptic operates on weather patterns over short and long cycles.

The angle of rotation ranges from 21.8 to 24.4 degrees. The significance of this fluctuation is that the sun’s angle of incidence also changes, which strongly correlates with temperature as heat energy is consequently concentrated or diffused. Because the sun's angle of incidence is constantly changing – however minute - so does the temperature of the earth.

 

In considering another climatic influence, It should be reasonably apparent to most people that distance from a heat source will influence the local ambient temperature.
 

Until very recently, scientists, and certainly the public, assumed that the earth’s orbit around the sun was constant. Perhaps this was a result of Newton’s laws of motion which tend to describe static systems well, but fail in some important natural phenomena.

 

The term associated with orbital variation is orbital eccentricity which scientists have observed as a feature of the solar orbit, and has a cycle of about 90-95,000 years. This orbital characteristic explains the ice ages through which the earth has entered and exited. Each year the orbit of the earth around the sun varies ever so slightly, but over long periods of time accumulates to produce significant weather states such as ice ages.

 

Orbital eccentricity is largely influenced by Jupiter whose gravitational pull makes marginal changes on the orbit of the earth meaning that its distance from the sun fluctuates in a way which causes changes in temperatures. At certain periods, these effects can be quite pronounced.

 

But there are short term influences on temperatures, perhaps the most important being what its discoverer Piers Corbyn calls Solar Lunar Amplification Magnetic process (SLAM). This process describes the electromagnetic interaction between the sun, moon, and earth. The sun’s solar wind storms emit magnetic particles which interact with the earth’s magnetic fields, while the moon’s orbit modulates the effects.

 

The significance of these magnetic field interactions is that they strongly influence weather and temperature. Corbyn has produced a long range forecasting success rate of about 85% corroborated by 3d party auditors. In contrast, the UK’s Meteorological Office between 2007-11 had a dismal 0% success rate. Corbyn believes that the earth is facing a 100 year cooling cycle, a prediction which brings us right back to the 1970s.

 

The SLAM process covers a period of generally 60 years with sub cycles related to the sun’s 22 year magnetic cycle. This 60 year cycle correlates very nicely with the Pacific decay oscillation of 60 years which describes the cooling and heating of the Pacific Ocean.

 

As for the role of carbon dioxide in geo-temperatures, we will only state that it is a consequence, not a cause, of warming, due in large measure to the compound’s release from the ocean. However, we shall save that discussion for another day.

 

So why are the corporate-state news media so shrill about global warming? The reason was given in part by Rahm Emanuel, one time director of North American MOSSAD operations, who advised politicians to “Never let a crisis go to waste.”

 

If the Nazis can convince people that global warming is an anthropological phenomenon, then they can bamboozle them with draconian laws to regiment society. As a half way measure to totalitarianism, they can at least implement Cap and Trade laws which suck vast sums of money into their already bloated pockets – just as they did with the Federal Reserve System.

 

The main lesson of these 2 scientists is that the earth's temperature is in constant flux, because its primary determinants are in flux. Thus to expect constant temperatures over time is a somewhat foolish expectation - at least if you understand the science behind climatology. For now, the most important weather concern is a coming cooling age – not global warming.

 

Reference

James Corbett, It's the Sun, Stupid, The Corbett Report, 2/27/2011, Episode 177
Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Weighing In On Climate Change

Global climate change has been a contentious topic going back to at least the 1970s when pop scientists and their journalistic hangers-on warned of an impending ice age. The latest hysteria involving global warming – just a scant decade or two later suffers from even worse politico-scientific terrorism.

 

There are two aspects to the war which must be recognized to discern the motives of the global warmers. The first is the science. Is there global warming, and how does one know if one has it? How significant is it, and what are its impacts? Even more interesting is, what is causing it? The transitional question leads to the second aspect of equally grave consequence, to wit, if the world is undergoing global warming, what does one do about it?

 

It is this last question which puts us most at odds with the globalist Nazis who, as North American MOSSAD Director Rahm Emmanuel once said, “Never waste a good crisis.” The Nazi elite are forever manufacturing security scares in order to justify ever more totalitarian government. When a mayor declares that merchants may no longer sell beverages of a certain size, as Mayor Bloomberg recently did, you know you are governed by Nazis. And we, by the way, believe that the Mayor was absolutely correct about the toxicity of the poison which Coca Cola, Pepsi, and other sweetened drink vendors hawk.

 

We take the position that even if long term global warming is in progress, government is not the solution. There are some problems even too big for big government. As American history has shown over the past 100 years, big government is the Agent Orange to civil and productive life.

 

Before delving into the scientific data, we observe that climate change is usually not sudden, and that if it is there is precious little one could do about it. Sudden intense volcanic activity in the Mediterranean during the early Middle Ages had a significant effect on weather and health, but the best response would have been evacuation of the area if the eruption could have been predicted. So how do you plug a volcano?

 

Our other observation regards causality, scientific method, and time. With weather and climate change occurring continuously over ages and eons, it is impossible for a (quack) scientist to make any causal inferences about cause and effect with a few years' worth of data - to say nothing about direction of the trend. A few years is noise on the planetary timeline. The attempt to isolate causality requires control of significant variables which is at best unlikely and at worst a fool’s errand. We endorse the scientific inquiry into climate change provided that it respects the Scientific Method, and does not substitute coincidence for causality.

 

We would also add that destruction of the planet’s eco system to enrich the bank accounts of Wall Street banksters is a vile act of rape which should be regulated or controlled. In particular, all deforestation of the Amazon rain forest should stop immediately pending a better understanding of its role in the planetary ecosystem. And that could take decades or more.

 

Finally, we note the supreme hypocrisy of many global warming terrorists, with Al Gore the leading example. Mr Gore has been observed riding around in large Sport Utility Vehicles and purchasing large homes consuming large amounts of energy. This fact alone demolishes the urgency or significance of the global warmers.

 

So what does the evidence show about global warming? In ‘Game changer’ – Antarctic melt due to warm water, not air temperature, Antony Watts reports that in a comprehensive study by University of California (Irvine) funded by NASA, the Antarctic ice mass which did melt is largely attributable to water temperatures rather than to atmospheric temperature change. Now that information hardly demolishes the global warming thesis inasmuch as the debate shifts from the atmosphere to the waters. But the difference is more than nuance and completely different than with what we are brainwashed.

 

More fascinating is that the Antarctic ice mass grew between 1980-2010 according to the University of Colorado National Snow and Ice Data Center. In an article entitled Antarctic Sea Ice for March 2010 Significantly Greater Than 1980, Admin of Global Warming Hoax reports that both the mass and concentration of ice grew roughly 14% and 30% respectively. The warmers have claimed that the Antarctic is disappearing. The evidence seems to refute the thesis.

 

Now having said all of this, our evidence does not prove that there is no global warming – only that no evidence for it has been produced in the area of the Antarctic, one of the favorite places the warmers point to. If there is global warming, we need stronger evidence, and we will follow the facts, not the politics or agenda of control.

 

Climatology is too broad a topic to be considered in short blog posting, so we will continue to post our findings. We caution all to follow the scientific method, discern between coincidence and causality, and avoid bombastic rhetoric – even though some might consider our labels of the warmers hypocrisy. Perhaps so, but we are impatient with knee jerk responses to complex problems – especially in areas where time is measured in eons and ages, rather than months and years.

Reference

http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.php?extend.133
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/13/game-changer-antarctic-melt-due-to-warm-water-not-air-temperature/

Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.