Most history students would probably protest that Charles I,
king of England (1625-49) etc., was murdered, but they probably do not know the details
of how the Jews used Cromwell to trump up charges against the sovereign, and
how Dutch Jews were the power behind Cromwell.
We know that in many Reformed circles, a certain amount of
reverence is accorded to Oliver Cromwell, the usurper to the English throne, if
for no other reason than he led the Puritans to political victory in the
kingdom. They do this despite the fact that Cromwell was a Rosicrucian Mason who
was well versed in the Jewish Kabala. Any notion that Cromwell was a Christian
is misplaced.
A fascinating article by Stephen Goodson traces the role of
Jews in English history, including that of the following synopsis, almost all of it
nefarious and corrosive to their host nation. So destructive were the Jews to
English comity and prosperity that Edward I finally banished them from the
kingdom in 1290, a fate they faced throughout Europe at various times and places.
During the 17th century they attempted a comeback
through the agency of Oliver Cromwell, a man who used brutal force to conquer England,
and whose military successes owed not to his military genius, but to his superb
intelligence network which always knew the movements of Charles’ armies. This
intelligence was supplied by English traitors and Jewish infiltrators.
One of the more prominent traitors was John Churchill, Duke
of Marlborough and ancestor of Winston Churchill, who abandoned service to the
king, in favor of a 6,000 pound annual stipend from the Jew Solomon Medina of
Holland.
Prior to open hostilities, the Jew Fernandez Carvajal
organized 10,000 operatives to exploit the country’s continuing religious
divisions, particularly with the Sabbatean controversy which concerned itself with
the question of observance of the Sabbath.
The Jews had alighted in the Netherlands during the 16th and 17th centuries, from where they
financed Cromwell on the condition that he allow them back into England upon
destroying the English monarch. Goodson quotes excerpts from correspondence between
Cromwell and the Jew Ebenezer Pratt who promised generous funding in exchange
for the aforementioned quid pro quo. The good Mason Cromwell explained that he
would need time and circumstances to pull off the murder, and that he would
need a way to distance himself from the actual deed – plausible deniability as
the CIA likes to state it.
The letters between the two conspirators is fascinating
because it shows without question that two parties were conspiring to destroy a
third, evidence of which is enough to demolish the imbecilities of those who
deny conspiracies, such as the Jew Cass Sunstein.
No Englishman would draw up charges against the king, so
Cromwell brought in the Dutch Jew Isaac Dorislaus to do so, after which a show
trial with its predetermined outcome eventuated in the King’s murder on trumped
up charges in 1649.
By 1656 Cromwell made good on his promise to Pratt, but
could only do so by smuggling in Jews to England as practically all of the merchant and
professional classes, to say nothing of his own government, were staunchly
opposed to such actions.
Following the resettlement of Jews in England, the German
William of Orange led another and final invasion of England, also financed by
Jews, which permanently established the Hanoverians on the British throne.
Parliament, on Williams’ watch, approved the Bank of
England, using the exact same tactics which the Jewish banksters would use over
200 years later when they established the Federal Reserve. Out of 512 members of Parliament, 42 formed a
“quorum” to pass the enabling legislation. Since that time England has been in
permanent debt, paying a continuous tribute to the City of London banksters,
significantly robbing and defrauding the country of its economic health, and
perpetually plunging it into colonial wars.
A history buff may wish to read the entire article as it covers more historical ground concerning Jewish influences on England, as well as that of the Bank of England.
Reference
Stephen Goodson, The Hidden Origins of the Bank of England, The Barnes Review, September/October 2012
Copyright 2014 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.
2 comments:
Thank you for trying to take history a little closer to reality than is presented in most history books. You mention the "German William of Orange". Was he not Dutch? Or did he have strong German connections that would justify calling him German?
Thanks, Peter
I think it is closer to the latter of your options. I seem to recall my college professor in English history (the Glorious Revolution) stating that he was from the Netherlands but that was only an immediate connection. my source gave him a German attribution probably based either on birth or native country. Given what I have subsequently learned about European ethnicities and the very Germanic bases of the English royalty - Especially the houses of hanover/windsor, I am inclined to accept the Teutonic label over the Dutch which I am sure was political rather than ethnic. in any event it is an interesting question.
Post a Comment