The 40 minutes between the murder of President John Kennedy
on November 22, 1963 in Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas at 12:30 PM and the arrival
of Temple Bowley at the murder scene of Dallas Police Department officer J D
Tippit is shrouded in myths and lies which sealed the Lie about Lee Oswald. We
will explain.
We always make the disclaimer that we consider the myth that
Lee Oswald murdered the president and the Tippit as the vilest of lies produced
in American history. There is not a scintilla of evidence, let alone proof,
that Oswald committed either act, and much to demonstrate that he did not. But
we have covered that elsewhere.
The Warren Commission presented the story that after
murdering the president, Oswald left the Texas School Book Depository by foot to catch a bus, and some say cab, to
return to his boarding house, change clothes, murder Tippit, and then hide out
in the Texas Theater on Jefferson Street in the Oak Cliff community of Dallas - all within 40 minutes.
This nonsense is poppycock.
Dallas Police Officer Roger Craig witnessed Oswald run down
the grassy knoll to enter a Nash Rambler station wagon, destination unknown to
Craig. However, we surmise that Oswald went directly to the Texas Theater, or
was perhaps dropped off at a point where he picked up a bus or cab to the
theater. In any event, he did NOT go to his boarding house.
Oswald’s predicament was that he did not participate in the
crime of the century according to plan, and needed a way to escape. He had
informed his mistress Judyth Vary Baker that he wanted to escape the country
because he knew that the CIA was zeroing in on him for elimination.
When he arrived at the theater at about 1:00 – 1:07 PM
according to theater witnesses, he sat down right next to several people in a rather
empty theater – very odd behavior to say the least. The reason for his odd
movements was that he was attempting to locate his contact which could have
either been another assassination handler, or his escape contact.
In the event it was the former, we must understand that
Oswald was in the assassination plot to thwart or undermine it. Indeed he attempted on at least
2 occasions to notify the FBI of an impending attack on the president.
Therefore, he would most likely be given his next assignment or movement at an obscure location.
In the second scenario, which we believe is more likely,
Oswald was looking for an angel to take him away from the CIA while the heat
subsided. One such possibility is David Ferrie, an odd fellow with whom Oswald
worked closely on the Oschner cancer project in New Orleans over the summer.
There is good evidence supporting that scenario as Ferrie is
known to have made a flight to Dallas the evening of the 22d but then quickly
turned around for home realizing that Oswald’s case was now hopeless.
But many will object vehemently to this scenario because the Warren Commission
said otherwise; to which we offer you some of our prime ocean front property in
Topeka. What the Warren Commission
Report and independent news sources reported is that Oswald was seen by
Earlene Roberts, the housekeeper at his boarding house, enter the house and
quickly leave without saying a word. But there is more to the story.
“Oswald” did not say a word as he entered or left because it was not Lee Harvey
Oswald – speaking would have undermined his ploy to impersonate Oswald. But
there is more to know about Roberts. She was a widow with limited vision, blind
in one eye, and faltering in the other. She testified before the Warren
Commission that a friend urged her to turn on the television a couple of
minutes before “Oswald” arrived. She also told the commission that she had been
a police informant, an activity in which we strongly believe she was still engaged
at the time.
She made some rather dramatic statements during her
testimony:
Mr. Ball. Did a police car pass the house there and
honked?
Mrs. Roberts. Yes.
Mr. Ball. When was that?
Mrs. Roberts. He came in the house.
Mr. Ball. When he came in the house?
Mrs. Roberts. When he came in the house and went to his room, you know how the sidewalk runs?
Mrs. Roberts. Yes.
Mr. Ball. When was that?
Mrs. Roberts. He came in the house.
Mr. Ball. When he came in the house?
Mrs. Roberts. When he came in the house and went to his room, you know how the sidewalk runs?
The astonishing statement is that Oswald came in the house
at the moment the Dallas Police dropped off Tippit, after which they honked to
alert Roberts to be in position to observe "Oswald" enter the house. She
testified that this was a communication method they had used before, so she was
quite comfortable with it.
So Earlene so happens to be at the television set fiddling
with the antenna to get a better picture reception, because the DPD called to
alert her a few minutes prior to get into that position, when the police drop
off “Oswald”, toot twice on their horn to give the final warning, and drive
off.
It should also be noted that Earlene’s sister was an apartment
owner in Dallas who was quite familiar with Jack Ruby, and in fact seeking to
do business with him. Thus Mrs Roberts' connections with the criminal elements
involved in the murder are well established.
In any event, Roberts can now testify that she saw “Oswald”
come into the house, change clothes, and walk out with a light colored jacket.
Her last spotting of him was waiting for a bus near the house. As with plausible deniability, the murderers now have a plausible witness to place Oswald wherever they want him.
‘Now, who was this “Oswald”?’ you may ask. There are two
candidates both of whom we believe are correct. The first candidate is Billy
Lovelady who, though older, bore a striking resemblance to Oswald and was
indeed seen at the Texas School Book Depository at the time of the
assassination. His height was close enough to Oswald’s to make a good
impression on the half blind Roberts.
We believe that he entered the house to get the coat, and
then was then taken back to the Dallas Police Department. Indeed Jim Fetzer has a still image of Lovelady at the Dallas Police Department at 2 PM.
The other candidate was Roscoe White about whom we discussed
his impersonation of Oswald in the famous back yard photo with him holding a
gun. However, he was 2-3 inches too tall, a difference which even Roberts may
have noticed.
Thus our opinion is that Lovelady gave the coat to White who
then took it with him to the murder site of Tippit who, we believe, was lured
onto 10th Street to make a special rendezvous after being ordered
into the Oak Cliff community by the DPD – an area which was not even close to
his normal assignment.
The lure, in our estimation, was his former mistress Johnnie
Maxie Witherspoon who lived very close to the murder spot. Although she claimed
that she and Tippit had broken off their affair in the summer, she is either
lying, or she put out for a last tango on 10th Street.
On the way to a tryst or meeting with his former paramour,
he stumbled across someone he mistook for Oswald – an incident which assumes
prior acquaintance, a relationship about which we are unprepared to offer a
dogmatic assertion.
In any event, one man accosted Tippit who emerged from his
car with his weapon drawn, shot him 3 times, and then was shot in the head by
another assailant who was described as shorter and in shorts. Thus we have
Roscoe White murdering Tippit, along with an accomplice who then drove White to
the Texas Theater where he made a grand entrance.
One very curious fact which many do not know is that an
important witness observed the murder of Tippit from a bird’s eye view from her
2d floor bedroom. Doris Holan saw a police car parked in the drive way in front
of which Tippit had parked to talk to White. She saw Tippit murdered, then the
police car rolled very slowly forward while another man walked down to confirm
that Tippit was dead. The police car then reversed and left out the alley.
Tippit was murdered about 1:06 PM but Officer Temple Bowley
just happened to drive up by 1:10 PM which is 12 minutes earlier than “official”
reports show the arrival of an officer. Was Bowley the driver of the vehicle in
the drive way?
White would have arrived at the theater about 5-10 minutes
later, but when he did do so, he was quite boisterous about it,
catching the attention of the ticket agent who called police when he failed to
pay for his ticket. Now why a freeloader would command the attention of 4-5
police officers is unknown, but 4-5 officers showed up in short order.
The importance of getting Oswald’s coat cannot be overstated
for it shows that a carefully crafted plan had been set in motion to murder
Oswald as well as Tippit. Only someone a few lights short of a Christmas tree could consider the
wallet and coat found at the Tippit crime scene evidence of anything but a
juvenile frame-up.
Part of the reason for the murder of Tippit was to lock up
Oswald and then murder him – if indeed the original plan was not to murder him
sooner. The other reason was to brand Oswald a murderer – a man who never hurt
anyone – except his wife, but that is a matter for another story.
The purpose of leaving the bullet casings, the wallet, and
coat at the crime scene was to implicate Oswald, and was evidence that both men
were targeted for murder. But when one claims that Oswald was a “lone nut”,
then details about the planted evidence at the crime scene can be brushed off
with limited comment.
Whatever happened to Roger and Earlene? When Roger refused
to change his testimony about the 6th floor crime scene and Nash
Rambler, the police department turned on Craig with a vengeance. Several assassination
attempts were made on his life. In desperation he finally committed suicide in
1975, or so they say.
Roberts’ indiscretions did not go unpunished either. She we
harassed constantly by the police, day and night, who saw to it that she was
quickly fired from any place she was hired for work. She was found in her
apartment suffering from a heart attack and taken to Parkland Memorial Hospital
where she died in 1966. We believe that she was murdered.
Oswald was a patsy who had nothing to do with the plot to
murder the president or Tippit. The truth continues to develop, even 50 years
after the crime.
Copyright 2013 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.
No doubt Mrs. Holan had a birds eye view compared to the cab driver, Mrs. Markham and Domingo Benavides. Elevated up two floors took shrubbery and cars out of play. Curious to your thoughts on Domingo Benavides? Mechanic, Navy trained yet did not know how to operate a 2-way radio. No honorable discharge. Of all the males in Dallas a Latin is first at the scene and totally destroyed the integrity of the murder scene while Oswald will soon be smashed for his latin connections. 1963 pre-civil rights southern city and he goes un-touched after crawling all up inside a police cruiser belonging to a dead officer? Not much of a stretch to determine the origin of the wallet, spent casings, clothing article, etc. and his statements does not corroborate Mrs. Holans. I'd bet my money on her statement not his. Its as though he's there on that afternoon as the planter.
ReplyDeleteyou raise an interesting point about benavides especially since Cubans were heavily involved in bush's op40 and alpha 66. the reason I have ruled him out as an accomplice is that there was an attempt on his life within 2-3 years of the accident, but the assassins confused his twin or look alike brother for him. also, I think that the Oswald imposter and his accomplice, probably ruby, handled the faked crime scene "evidence" given that they went to his rooming house for his coat.
ReplyDeleteon the other hand, nothing I have said precludes your suggestion. the murderers were always murdering witnesses and benavides if guilty would have been a huge liability.
I will think through this possibility a bit more as I hadn't given benavides as much thought as I should have.
thank you for that insight.
after conferring with one of my best sources on benevides, we both draw the same conclusion that he was not involved with op40 or the tippit murder.
ReplyDeletebenevides provided testimony that the fake Oswald was distinguishable from the real one, which put a pucker in bush's asshole. so they (via dpd) murdered his brother as reported above, but also attempted to murder benevides' father WHILE a dpd officer was present with the father. when the father attempted to mount an investigation into his son's death, the dpd warned him to drop it. dpd investigated nothing in the murder of the son because they did it or were protecting the perpetrators.
bottom line is that we reject the hypothesis that benevides was involved in the tippit murder.