It is sometimes alleged that Hitler's rise to power owed to the financing of the invincible Rothschild banking families. Fortunately the evidence does not support this fantasy.
Your Chronicler has in times past fallen for this false claim, but the evidence is very clear that Hitler's support, financial and political, came from the groundswell of German patriots.
The most obvious refutation of the Rothschild myth is Hitler's arrest of Baron Louis Rothschild in 1939. While Hitler released the criminal for the equivalent of 21 million USD, it was part of his policy of maintaining amicable relationships with the governments under Rothschild control such as the United Kingdom.
Concurrently the German government permitted release of a film documenting Rothschild treachery since the time of the Napoleonic wars. Clearly this was not a film which the Rothschilds would endorse, especially from someone whom they allegedly financed.
Finally, Hitler's closure of the Rothschild banks in France, Germany, and Austria is the absolute proof that this evil banking family did not finance Hitler, and is perhaps the most important reason that Jews hate Hitler so viciously to this day. And you thought that hate was not a family value.
Regarding the claim that London and New York banksters financed Hitler, again the evidence is lacking. Noble, author of Hitler Was NOT Controlled Opposition (Part 1), cites Henry Ashby Turner who documents clearly that big business contributed little to nothing to Hitler and his party. His financing came from small businesses fearing communist takeovers as in Russia, and from receipts from the sales of Mein Kampf. Additional corroboration for the refutation of Rothschild or big business financing of Hitler comes from James Pool .
If all of that is not enough, we have Rothschild agent Hjalmar Schacht admitting at the Nuremberg trials that most of Hitler's support came from the rank and file - not large corporate interests.
Our anonymous author also refutes the notion that the Bushes or Harrimans funded Hitler, a theme we had supported in the past. Citing Antony Sutton, Anonymous points out that Sutton, often referenced for the allegations, actually made contradictory statements regarding Harriman and Standard Oil, meaning that the latter did not fund Hitler.
Given his determination to stamp out the treachery and enslavement of his people by the Rothschild banksters, the world needs another Hitler. (The Holocaust was a total lie).
Reference
Noble, Hitler Was NOT Controlled Opposition (Part 1), renegadetribune.com, December 29, 2019, source(Hitler Was NOT Controlled Opposition (Part 1) (renegadetribune.com), accessed 5/22/2021)
Noble, Hitler Was NOT Controlled Opposition (Part 1), renegadetribune.com, December 29, 2019, source(Hitler Was NOT Controlled Opposition (Part 1) (renegadetribune.com), accessed 5/22/2021)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please provide constructive or informative comments.