Caravan to Dallas

The many moving parts in the murder of President Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas' Dealey Plaza may have looked like a Rube Goldberg contraption, but it was quite effective. One of those movements was that of the two car caravan which arrived in Dallas carrying scoped rifles to be used in the murder the following day.

Although we have Chronicled this story before, like all good stories, it bears repeating, with some additional detail added.

Most JFK assassination researchers are aware of Marita Lorenz' testimony in the court case instigated by E Howard Hunt's lawsuit against the newspaper The Spotlight. Hunt claimed that an article by Victor Marchetti, a former high ranking CIA official, which the newspaper published, libelously placed him in Dallas on November 22, 1963, the implication being that he was involved in the assassination.

Rather than respond to the article, as offered by the editors, Hunt chose to sue. While he won his initial trial, he lost the appeal when Mark Lane took the case. The details revealed in court testimony were explosive, and were most undoubtedly the reasons why Hunt and his CIA supplied lawyers chose to terminate legal proceedings.

The bombshell of the case is that it legally proved that CIA was involved in the murder of President Kennedy in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963.

The testimony revealed that a former mistress of Fidel Castro accompanied a party leaving for Dallas from a CIA safehouse in Miami. The persons in the caravan were Lorenz, her handler Frank Sturgis, 

Guillermo Novo, and Ignacio Novo. The cargo was telescoped rifles. Other conspirators may have accompanied them.

Lorenz testified that she was supposed to act as decoy, but was unclear in what capacity. Growing nervous about the operation, she left Dallas 11/22, but not without first meeting with Jack Ruby (born Rubenstein) and E Howard Hunt. Hunt was the paymaster who handed Sturgis a bag of money.

Michael Collins Piper raises the possibility that Hunt may not have known the reason for the payment, that he was being framed or made frameable, but it is clear that he was in Dallas on November 21, and there are no reasons beyond Hunt's convoluted and contradictory lies to believe that he was not in Dallas on November 22. However, that point is largely immaterial.

What is more interesting to us is that Frank Sturgis and the Novo brothers met with Jack Ruby that evening. This incendiary revelation proves that Ruby had advanced knowledge of the assassination or at the very least was working with two of the president's snipers. There are revisionists working for Mossad who claim that Ruby was "childlike" and would never be trusted with any assassination plans. This court testimony by Lorenz totally debunks those putrid lies exonerating Ruby.

Furthermore, as Piper documents, Sturgis and Ruby both worked for Jewish intelligence through Jew Meyer Lansky who was the international crime lord of American, Jewish, and other criminal organizations. Lansky worked hand-in-hand with Mossad. Ruby was a trusted Lansky partner, the former of whom admired Jew Mickey Cohen who also was Lansky's lieutenant in Los Angeles.

As we have Chronicled elsewhere - and so does Piper - the Novo brothers also murdered Chilean diplomat Orlando Letelier in 1976, working out of the office of Senator James Buckley.

Another earthquake emanating from the court room was Lorenz' testimony that her handler, Frank Sturgis, admitted to murdering the president. Although it is hearsay information, in no way is it less astounding, and begs why Sturgis was not arrested and questioned.

"We killed the president that day . . . Everything was

covered in advance. No arrests, no real newspaper investigation. It was all

covered, very professional."

Returning to the allegations of Lorenz providing hearsay evidence, Piper relates that Cuban intelligence General Fabian Escalante confirmed her testimony, stating that Sturgis was in charge of communications, particularly on the movements of the motorcade through Dallas.

Thanks to E Howard Hunt and his CIA lawyers, we can confidently conclude that the agency was a major participant in the murder of the president of the United States. However, it leaves open one rather fascinating question, Why did CIA allow the case to go to trial, risking disclosure of damning information? And why did it ask Lorenz who was in the caravan?

Reference

Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment, America First Books, 6th Edition, 2d printing, 2005, source(Microsoft Word - Final_Judgment_x_Build_20 (wikispooks.com), accessed 5/25/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.