The Eccentric Joseph A Milteer and the Assassination of President Kennedy

Joseph Milteer crops up from time to time in the Kennedy saga as someone who had foreknowledge of the plan to murder the president in Dallas, Texas, November 22, 1963. Although there is plausible data to confirm such an opinion, it is based on flimsy evidence or careless interpretations of  it.

Most of the information we have about Milteer comes from William Somersett who was an informant for the FBI from 1949-1961 at which time the agency severed the relationship. Somersett also informed for the Miami police department, the city in which he resided and worked as an organizer for the National Federation of Labor.

Milteer's FBI file is approximately 167 pages long, though other holdings by the agency concerning him may exist. Documents in his FBI file also reference Secret Service memos. Most of the FBI's material on Milteer comes from Somersett, a redacted female informant, and an interview of the subject conducted by 2 redacted FBI special agents on November 27, 1963. Many of the pages are highly repetitive, heavily redacted especially with reference to people with whom Milteer associated, and appear to begin as early as May 18, 1962. Thus Milteer was no stranger to the FBI on November 22, 1963. He also appears to be of little substantive interest to the agency.

Joseph Adams Milteer was born in Quitman, Georgia on February 26, 1902. His father was apparently prosperous, leaving his son an estate estimated at 200,000 USD when he died in 1961. Several accounts claim that Milteer was a powerful, well connected millionaire who was a player influential in the assassination of Kennedy. This view is nonsense.

Milteer graduated from Quitman High School in 1921, there concluding his formal education. His FBI file has no further information on him until 1955 when he was arrested for suspicion of burglary by the Valdosta, Georgia police, finger printed, then released.

He is generally described as unemployed, though he filled in for an acquaintance for a couple of months in 1962 transporting US Post Office mail from the Valdosta airport to the Valdosta post office. His file also contains reports that he operated some concessions around US military "reservations" for a while near Washington, DC, though it is speculative information. There is additional speculation that he was employed in Washington for about 3 1/2 years with unspecified purpose, possibly with the Supreme Court, a matter about which we will form a conclusion momentarily.

The information about his work in Washington comes from the tape recording Somersett made of a conversation between him and Milteer in Miami on November 9, 1963. The following excerpt is

MILTEER: I have a man who is the head of his underground of his own up there in Delaware, and since I worked on the Supreme Court, he wanted me to give him the lay-out there so they could go over there and do some things there, you know. But he called it off, I don't know why, I didn't even ask him why. That was his affair, but he called it off. But I was ready to go with him. I gave him the damn information he wanted.

SOMERSETT: You worked on the Supreme Court.

MILTEER: Yeah, three and a half years.

There is no follow up or details provided anywhere in his file concerning this employment, his FBI file stating that very little is known about his background. It is my view that the Supreme Court comment is a distortion of his concession operations; or, perhaps the concessions were actually his father's business in which he helped.

Regarding his physical appearance at the time of the FBI visit, Milteer is described as 5' 4", 160 lbs, White, unshaven, and a shabby dresser in old-fashioned clothes. He wore glasses, was graying, and would have been 61 at the time.

Although wealthy by 1963 standards, he never used credit, owned a 1962 Volvo and Volkswagen station wagon. He is described as frugal, living in a run down house. The files ultimately indicated that he had residences in Quitman and Valdosta.

Milteer was an only child with no known relatives living in the area. He was single, never married as far as the files are concerned, and had no known friends though he was well known around Quitman. He was regarded as an eccentric, opinionated, and largely a gadfly who published a pamphlet in Quitman deploring the conduct of the city commission - over minor defects according to the informant - for which he tried repeatedly to earn a seat.

There is discrepancy between the FBI files and Find A Grave which reports that Joseph married Helen Margaret Strouse in 1927. By the time his file is developed, he is reported as single. Find A Grave lists Margaret's life span as 1910 - 1980.

Another discrepancy between the FBI file and Find A Grave is Milteer's middle name. FBI gives it as Adams whereas his tomb stone has Abraham.

He was involved in civic organizations such as Ku Klux Klan, White Citizens Council in Atlanta, Constitution Party of America, and travelled frequently on related business throughout the south and even west coast.

The impressions I formed based upon the various reports are that Milteer was a self-important loud mouth who was all talk and no action. At one point he is reported by an informant offering to kill a black man named Cole protected by the government at a cost of 10,000 USD per month, and visited by Martin King and Gus Hall. Milteer boasted that he could "kill [him] by Tuesday" but did not relish the thought and would have to meet the target first to make sure that he did not shoot the wrong man. Further investigation found that there was no such man.

So finally we come to the "smoking gun" tape where Milteer boasts foreknowledge of a plot to kill Kennedy. Of special interest is his knowledge that Kennedy as 15 doppelgangers because he knows that he is a marked man according to Milteer. The same detail has been reported in other places that a taped phone conversation between mob members also speaks of body doubles for Kennedy. So my suspicion is that Milteer was in some way apprised of mob discussions though it does not seem likely that he had any direct connections with them. There is certainly no indication of that in the FBI files.

The context of the Somersett tape is Milteer's visit to Miami on November 9. On the 10th and 11th the former reported his information to the FBI Washington office that Kennedy would be killed at some future date possibly in Washington or Miami - nothing definite. Milteer for his part tries to impress Somersett that he has inside knowledge and that it would not be difficult to knock off Kennedy. Thirteen days later Kennedy would be dead with Milteer's jubilation.

Here is the relevant excerpt from the Somersett tape discussing Kennedy's visit to Miami:

            SOMERSETT: I don't know, I think Kennedy is coming here on the 18th, or something like that to             make some kind of speech, I don't know what it is, but I imagine it will be on the TV, and you can             be on the look for that, I think it is the 18th that he is suppose to be here. I don't know what it is             suppose to be about.

MILTEER: You can bet your bottom dollar he is going to have a lot to say about the Cubans, there are so many of them here.

SOMERSETT: Yeah, well he will have a thousand bodyguards, don't worry about that.

MILTEER: The more bodyguards he has, the easier it is to get him.

SOMERSETT: What?

MILTEER: The more bodyguards he has the more easier it is to get him.

SOMERSETT: Well how in the hell do you figure would be the best way to get him?

MILTEER: From an office building with a high-powered rifle, how many people [room noise--tape not legible] does he have going around who look just like him? Do you know about that?

SOMERSETT: No, I never heard that he had anybody.

MILTEER: He has got them.

SOMERSETT: He has?

MILTEER: He has about fifteen. Whenever he goes any place they [not legible] he knows he is a marked man.

SOMERSETT: You think he knows he is a marked man?

MILTEER: Sure he does.

SOMERSETT: They are really going to try to kill him?

MILTEER: Oh, yeah, it is in the working, Brown himself, Brown is just as likely to get him as anybody. He hasn't said so, but he tried to get Martin Luther King.

The FBI thought nothing of this windbag conversation as it did nothing to follow-up. Milteer thinks that a small one man operator Jack Brown of Chattanooga, Tennessee is the man who will do the deed. Brown died October 4, 1965.

As a fascinating aside, the FBI as early as 1962 consistently described any party interested in upholding the US Constitution as a "Hate" group such as it did with the American Constitutional Party. In fact, that is the only reason the FBI sought to locate Milteer. It was not interested in his comments about Kennedy's pending assassination - only that he was involved with ACP - a "Hate" group. Today, the FBI labels people who support the Constitution as Constitutional terrorists.

In point of fact though, during the November 27 interview, it did ask about Milteer's information, and if he had threatened the president.

The important discoveries in Milteer's FBI file are many. The FBI maintains an extensive network of spies who conduct surveillance on American citizens. It labels patriotic groups who support the Constitution's historic interpretation as "Hate" groups. It was for this reason that the FBI spied on Joseph Milteer. The agency had no interest in Milteer for his foreknowledge of Kennedy's assassination (thought its agents did ask related questions), even though it was informed of it on November 10, 1963. Contrary to other reports, Milteer was not a millionaire, and had no notable connections beyond Klan-type groups, the American Constitution Party, and other marginal political organizations. Milteer wasn't even influential enough to win a seat on the Quitman City Council which town had a population of 5000 in 1960.

Anyone poking around in Milteer's back yard, so to speak, will find nothing but rust buckets and other litter.

Reference
-, Transcript of Milteer-Somersett Tape, Mary Ferrell Foundation (website), nd, (located: Transcript of Milteer-Somersett Tape (maryferrell.org), accessed 3/21/2021)

-, Milteer, Impious Digest, September 9, 2014, (attached Milteer FBI file), location( Milteer | The Impious Digest, accessed 3/21/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Mary Meyer, Judith Campbell Exner, and Mea Culpa

Some years ago, these Chronicles gave considerable endorsement to a biography of Mary Meyer by Peter Janney, and were about to do so with the Judith Campbell Exner story due to some comments made by John Newman that there may be substance to it. Fortunately we pulled back before making the same mistake twice. It turns out that both stories are bunk from the same people who are part of the Second Assassination of John Kennedy.

We were swindled into the Meyer story because it seemed to fit well with James Douglass' thesis in JFK and the Unspeakable that Kennedy was maturing in his foreign policy outlook - outgrowing the knee jerk cold warrior persona into a more nuanced and peace oriented statesman who avoided the extremisms of his predecessor and the security state.

In Janney's telling, it was socialite Mary Meyer and LSD which brought Kennedy his new insights and peace orientation such as the nuclear test ban treaty. In Douglass' telling, it was facing the specters of multiple Hiroshimas and Nagasakis many times over in the event of nuclear war with the USSR. Each story, at least to us at the time, complemented or reinforced the other.

We were also fooled by the credentials of Janney, someone with sterling academic achievements and close connections to the families allegedly involved in or affected by the murder - starting with his own father Wistar, the family friends the Meyers, and the Bradlees of Washington Post fame. Surely we thought that someone with the academics and connections of Janney would tell a story properly sourced and documented. As we recently found out, such was not the case.

Much more recently, we encountered some comments made by Professor John Newman that the Judith Campbell Exner story of her affairs with John Kennedy should not be dismissed out of hand just because they came from Seymour Hersch. But because we had dismissed that one as sensationalist gossip, we never placed any credence in it. So we poked around to see if credible substantiation could be found.

In search for this elusive confirmation, we came across a couple of articles by James DiEugenio and Lisa Pease which demolished the Janney and Exner stories, resulting in our belated retraction of endorsement of Mary's Mosaic.

Though the authors level considerable criticism over literary deficiencies in Mary's Mosaic, the more serious critiques center on Janney's use of dubious and discredited sources such as Gregory Douglas, Leo Damore, and James Truitt, the latter two who were authors or journalists. DiEugenio documents the mental illnesses of Damore and Truitt, and their difficulties with publishers and employers such that it makes sense that neither one told anything truthful in regards to Meyer or Exner.

In the case of Damore, Random House took him to court to recover advance money for Senatorial Privilege. In the case of Truitt, Ben Bradlee fired him from Newsweek for problems stemming from alcoholism.

Janney also relied upon documentation which he failed to reproduce for other researchers, such as transcripts of interviews. So we are supposed to accept the honor system as the standard for scholarly attestation. This standard does not work for topics as serious as these.

The two most substantive remarks made by these reviewers concern the guilt of Ray Crump, and Kennedy's foreign policy ideas developed while senator.

We had accepted Janney's rehabilitation of Crump as a patsy because we knew that CIA did that kind of thing regularly and well. And it made such a great story to have a victimized black man as the underdog who was rescued by the heroic Dovey Roundtree in a triumph of racial justice. The problem with this story is that Roundtree got a violent man out of jail who would later be arrested at least 22 times, many times on violent charges. He indeed he murdered Mary Meyer.

But with Crump vindicated by the courts, then who killed Meyer? For us, we are very open to the idea that the CIA murdered Meyer because of her alleged power to cause the security state problems with its coverup of Kennedy's murder. After all, the agency has murdered hundreds of witnesses - why not Mary Meyer?

As it turned out, DiEugenio shows that Meyer was not all that powerful - in fact not at all - and her relationship with Kennedy was quite conventional with both Jackie and Jack. There was nothing political or sexual about it.

DiEugenio also makes the cogent case that Kennedy's foreign policy ideas were developed well before the alleged 1962/3 encounters with Meyer. For example, he briefly describes Kennedy's visit to Saigon in 1951 in order to understand the problems in Viet Nam which were all about repulsing French colonialism rather than becoming another domino in its theory.

The lynch pin to the murder is the alleged diary that Mary kept which held regime secrets which the CIA could ill-afford to see the light of day. Janney spends many pages developing a Keystone Cops kind of circus with Wistar Janney, Ben and Toni Bradlee, James and Anne Truitt, James and Cicely Angleton all fumbling around like inspectors Clousseau looking for the radioactive diary which provided the motive for murdering Mary.

The truth of the matter was that there was no diary. So many different stories have been told about it that it can only be one of those chimeras which only existed as a fictional device to further a story and an agenda.

Before realizing all of these problems, we had come across a comment by John Newman, author of many books about the Kennedy administration and assassination, in which he gave some credence or plausibility to the assertions of Judith Campbell Exner who claimed to have been a go-between for Kennedy and Sam Giancana because Kennedy needed help in winning the West Virginia primary, and then later in murdering Fidel Castro.

The only evidence for this story is that White House logs show that Campbell called the White House a few times, but nothing ever came of it other than Kennedy telling his staff to ignore them - not because he was covering up anything, but that she was a flake or pest. Telephone calls do not prove sexual liaisons or bagman services for Kennedy and the mob. Given Robert Kennedy's war against organized crime, this should have been obvious.

And that is all there is to the story beyond Exner's late-in-life confessions - after Kennedy and Giancana were both dead. She took no secrets to her grave.

Both stories were fun up to a point, but upon critical examination turned out to be tabloid trash. Good riddance to both.

Reference

Lisa Pease, Peter Janney, Mary's Mosaic, Part 1, Kennedys and King (website), June 21, 2012, located( Kennedys And King - Peter Janney, Mary's Mosaic (Part 1) accessed 3/14/2021)

James DiEugenio, Peter Janney, Mary's Mosaic, Part 2, Kennedys and King (website), July 12, 2012, located(Kennedys And King - Peter Janney, Mary's Mosaic (Part 2), accessed 3/14/2021)

James DiEugenio, The Posthumous Assassination of JFK, Probe, September-October 1997, vol 4, no 6, located(Probe V4N6: The Posthumous Assassination of JFK (the-puzzle-palace.com), accessed 3/14/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Chronicle Postscript: The Bombing of the USS Liberty

In 2014, we chronicled some of the political intrigue surrounding the sinking of the USS Liberty. It is among the darkest moments in US history, filled with murderous treason by the master murderer himself Lyndon Johnson. Joan Mellen subsequently wrote a history vindicating our position, and containing new details which we share following.

I briefly met Joan Mellen in 2013 during the conclusion of a JFK conference where we both stayed at the Adolphus Hotel in Dallas. I had known of her as a scholar of integrity and for her books on the Kennedy assassination, starting with her treatment of Jim Garrison, the legendary New Orleans district attorney who unsuccessfully prosecuted co-conspirator Clay Shaw in the murder of President Kennedy. Based upon the transcript of a speech given in 2018, I see that she continues the tradition she started with Garrison.

One interesting fact which she details is the involvement of Assistant Secretary of Defense Cyrus Vance who later became Rockefeller sock puppet Jimmy Carter's Secretary of State. Vance, who had long relationships with Johnson going back to the 1930s, ordered USS Liberty to its position just outside of Egyptian territorial waters prior to the outbreak of the Six Day War. To do so, he had to bypass Chief of Naval Operations Admiral David Lamar McDonald who subsequently expressed anger over being circumnavigated in this operation.

Vance, with Eugene Rostow, was a member of the 303 Committee which provided cover to the president for the CIA's illegal maneuvers, especially those in international matters. Thus it was important that Vance handle all of the naval operational aspects of the false flag.

We had previously reported that the perfidy was engineered to provide a pretext for bombing Cairo, whereas Mellen provides more details about the conspiracy to murder Egyptian president Gamal Nassar.

She recounts orders sent to Tel Aviv Chief of Station John Hadden by Desmond Fitzgerald to order Mossad to bomb Cairo as a pretext for US intervention in the war. We had known that Johnson desired to use hydrogen bombs on the city, and that US military forces were put on alert for a bombing raid, but we were not aware of the previous attempts and mechanisms to make it happen.

Hadden, thankfully, placed the cable he received in the burn bag, refusing to act upon its psychopathic intent. Previously he had met with Mossad chief Meir Amit to persuade him to delay the start of the June war. But with Johnson as president, that goal was doomed to failure.

Mellen also covers the Israel subterfuge against the United States and its theft of American nuclear secrets to advance its own nuclear program which Kennedy attempted to thwart. Though Mellen does not go there, this aspect of Jewish treachery against the United States is part of the main reason Israel and the British monarch ordered the murder of Kennedy - he was subverting Jewish-Rothschild interests. Jewish leaders warned Kennedy that he would be murdered if he did not comply with their nuclear demands.

The thread tying the Jewish state to American power was the arch-traitor James Angleton whom the Jews honored with a statue in Jerusalem. Angleton worked all along for the Rothschilds and Israel. His endless whack-a-mole project was a cover for his treason.

Ms Mellen's book is definitely one to add to your reading list. Any true American will be horror stricken by the murders of Johnson and CIA. The men of the USS Liberty should all receive Congressional Medals of Honor for suffering at the hands of Lyndon Johnson and Levi Eshkol.

Reference

Joan Mellen, A Talk in Colebrook, New Hampshire, 12/1/18: “Blood in the Water: How the United States and Israel Conspired to Ambush the USS Liberty”, joanmellen.com, December 6, 2018, accessed( A Talk in Colebrook, New Hampshire, 12/1/18: “Blood in the Water: How the United States and Israel Conspired to Ambush the USS Liberty” | JOAN MELLEN, 3/14/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Victoria Adams on the Stairs: Brouhaha Edition

Another rift among Kennedy assassination researchers has erupted within the past month over the integrity of Victoria Adams' testimony given to the criminal Warren Commission. While it could remain a matter of relative inconsequence, these matters rarely stay that way. Our view is that Adams' original published testimony is the canonical and best version.

The background to the argument between researchers John Armstrong and Barry Ernest starts with the latter's important book published in 2011, The Girl on the Stairs. Its author explains that its protagonist's descent down the stairs of the Texas School Book Depository from the 4th floor excludes the possibility that anyone else could have used that route to flee from the 6th floor. Only in the fertile imagination of the criminal Warren Commission could Oswald have been the president's assassin and then flee down the stairs at precisely the time he allegedly did so. There would have been a traffic jam as that stairway was the only path out. Recall that the criminal Warren Commission had Oswald racing at warp speed to get his Coke in the 2d floor lunch room so that he could casually and calmly encounter Dallas police officer Marion Baker and TSBD building manager Roy Truly.

As far as I can discern, there seems to be no disagreement over this general play of events, namely that it would be impossible for both parties to use the stairway without running into each other.

An additional, but important, detail attaches to the story regarding whom Ms Adams saw once she descended with co-workers Sylvia Styles and Dorothy Gardner, the latter the office manager of the Scott Foresman company office occupying part of the 4th floor.

In her testimony to the Warren Commission, Adams stated that she saw two men near the rear elevator on the first floor, which was the only elevator access to the 6th floor. Her testimony stated that she arrived there within seconds - 1 minute tops - of hearing the sniper bullets. These two men are significant in a number of ways, and submerging them under the sediment of history is an important objective of the continuing cover-up of the murder of the president.

Ernest upsets 40 years of silence on this matter by averring that he interviewed Victoria Adams in 2002 who then stated that she saw no men at the bottom of the stairwell. When Armstrong took issue with this development in 2021, Ernest issued a rebuttal on Kennedys and King, a website edited by fellow researcher Jim DiEugenio.

Ernest contends that Adams told him that she did not see two men near the elevator, thus leaving us the options of 1. recantation by Adams 2. Obstruction of Justice by altering her testimony. Ernest enlists the support of Sylvia Styles, still living, to rebut the testimony, and his Boy Scouts' honor that Adams made these confessions. He also suggests that Adams' missing testimony from the criminal Warren Commission archive is a sign of foul play and might vindicate his assertions about Ms Adams who died in 2007.

For his part, Armstrong cites Adams' Warren Commission testimony, Marion Baker's testimony, Billy Lovelady's testimony, and Bill Shelly's testimony to support the general idea that two men were standing near the elevator at the time Adams and her entourage reached the first floor. One would think that this marshalling of testimony was sufficient, but things are never this simple.

The irony of ironies is that Kennedys and King even published Ernest's rebuttal. Given DiEugenio's many castigations of other authors' flimsy and even fake evidence, why did he submit this to the court, so to speak?

To put a point on it, during a moment of insomnia, your Chronicler read one of DiEugenio's  slams, written in 2008, of the likes of James Fetzer, Peter Janney, and Gregory Douglas for using questionable, unverifiable, and 3d hand hearsay as evidence, precisely the methods used by Ernest in his rebuttal.

In 2002, when electronic recording equipment was plentiful and abundant, and when notary publics abounded, Barry Ernest did not bother to document the testimony of a critical witness very troublesome to the criminal Warren Commission. This lapse is unacceptable. We are not left with any substantive evidence that Ms Adams recanted her testimony, made any allegations of discrepancies, or was the victim of obstruction of justice.

Armstrong reports that Adams was given a copy of her testimony to approve and/or make corrections. She made a few grammatical corrections, signed it, and that was the end of it. Ernest reported his attempt to find the original commission transcripts in order settle the matter once and for all, but came up empty handed. So that leaves us with only the 1964 published interview of Adams as found in the criminal Warren Commission's fable known as the Warren Commission Report.

However, Baker's report that he saw "two white men" near the elevator corresponds very nicely with Adams' testimony in which she placed two men near the elevator, using a diagram supplied by the criminal Warren Commission.

Bill Shelley was a CIA agent or operative, and we wouldn't give his testimony any time other than to analyze how he twisted it to conform to the criminal Warren Commission's lies.

The reason that it is so important to bury the "two white men", and Ernest confirms it, is that it provides substantiation for Armstrong's thesis that the 6th floor snipers escaped down the elevator which was stationed just below the 6th floor where it was boarded for escape, aided by Bill Shelley and Billy Lovelady. It was Shelly's job to turn off the electricity to keep the elevator out of service until needed.

So why does Ernest wish to make the "two white men" disappear? That is a rabbit hole I prefer to avoid, but he pretty much shows his hand when he somewhat dismissively refers to Armstrong's escape thesis.

We suspect that more will be said about this disagreement, but for now, that's our story and we're sticking to it until some substantive verifiable evidence dissuades us.

Reference

John Armstrong, Oswald DID NOT Run Down the Stairs, Harvey and Lee (website), nd, accessed(Oswald DID NOT Run Down the Stairs (harveyandlee.net), accessed 3/13/20201)

Barry Ernest, Barry Ernest Replies to John Armstrong, Re: Victoria Adams, Kennedys and King (website), February 27, 2021, accessed( Kennedys And King - Barry Ernest Replies to John Armstrong, RE: Victoria Adams, accessed 3/13/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

Kennedy's Cuban Quicksand

President John Kennedy was doomed before he set foot in the oval office as president. The trap for his death was laid in Cuba long before he ever considered a campaign trip to Dallas. If nothing else defined his presidency, it was most assuredly Cuba, a well laid plan of quicksand which would kill the Irish American at the predetermined time.

Kennedy was the Cold War president par excellence. He was open to détente, but he also presaged Ronald Reagan's advice to trust but verify. He was not tangled about the axel with "either/or" policies or strategies. He flexed with the context, in ways which his mindless Strangelovian generals could never do.

There are three aspects to Cuba, which we shall examine ever so briefly, which guaranteed Kennedy's failure in this epic battle between his beleaguered White House and his sworn enemies. They were enemies before Kennedy assumed the presidency, though he was too naïve to know it. No, Cuba was not the cause of his death - it was the pretext, the excuse, the stratagem to make it inevitable. He was given no option but failure.

After considering the Cuban trap, we will explore how it was the device a much broader and more powerful entity used to put him in his coffin. They hide behind a plethora of actors and skein of deceit.

The first Cuban crisis plaguing Kennedy was the Bay of Pigs circus drummed up by the Eisenhower administration under Richard Nixon and the CIA. It never had a chance of success in Kennedy's hands, but with enough Bubbas filling the CIA and Pentagon, it had legs and would easily have enough mass behind it to make it a fait accompli - Kennedy could not stop it. It mattered little whether Nixon or Kennedy was president, it was all systems go.

Kennedy was not enthusiastic about the initiative, but as a new president, he attempted to play along and moderate some of its excesses, assuming that there was some strategic brilliance hiding in it. After he authorized the use of air power, his treacherous aide McGeorge Bundy canceled it, thus guaranteeing its failure. Bay of Pigs was a Maxwell Smart schtick - a hapless plan with nothing more than to embarrass Kennedy and to galvanize most of his Cuban American enemies. Thus one major element of the assassination was primed.

The other major element armed was the senior leadership of the CIA, not the least of which was Allen Dulles, DCI. Kennedy weakly dismissed them under delayed reaction, but clearly their departures were desired by the president. His failure to fire them publicly and promptly helped undo him later.

The second major aspect of the Cuba pox was the Cuban Missile crisis, which we believe was another staged event provoked and orchestrated by both CIA and Pentagon. We lack the smoking gun proof, but are convinced that the USSR was prodded and/or maneuvered to plant ICBMs in Cuba as a provocation to the president. Either he would give in to a nuclear war which Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff Lyman Lemnitzer desperately wanted, or he would fold like a cheap suit, making way for the installation of Johnson and his party. Either outcome would ruin Kennedy.

Fortunately, Kennedy and his Attorney General brother found a third way which involved the Soviets' removal of the missiles in exchange for the US removing its missiles from Turkey and Italy. This move had the effect of infuriating the Pentagon generals even more as it smacked of treason, and the relinquishment of strategic superiority which Kissinger a decade later would belittle with the line, What is strategic superiority, and what does one do with it?

So the elite were not against détente and compromise - but only if Kennedy did it. But in the scheme of things it was necessary to incite the hatred of the generals toward Kennedy. October 1962 galvanized their wills for regime change.

The third and final trap - and noose - into which Kennedy stepped was Operation Mongoose. Although the US placed Castro in power, Kennedy decided to reverse course perhaps to appease his spooks, and perhaps as a low cost way to rid himself of the Cuba problem. He supported Operation Mongoose as a way to remove Castro with any means short of war. But if Kennedy was justified in removing Castro, were not his own administration justified in removing him?

This operation involved in part the use of Alpha 66, a covert Army unit led by Anthony Veciana which undertook covert operations against shipping vessels in Cuban waters, the objective always to force Kennedy's hand into declaring war and invasions. Kennedy came to regret this decision, but it armed another group of enemies when the president ordered the destruction of all Alpha 66 bases and operations, even going so far as to order the CIA to neutralize them, unaware that it was a US Army operation - not one any longer under CIA umbrella.

This Alpha 66 group, and its targeting for termination, armed another group of enemies who would play prominently in the assassination of the president.

Kennedy later made public pronouncements which showed a conciliatory attitude towards Cuba, prompting Castro to express loss of hope when he heard of Kennedy's murder. Castro realized that Kennedy was has last best hope for civil relations with his northern neighbor.

So who so deftly orchestrated the Cuba card to ensure a maximum of correlation of forces against Kennedy? It was International Jewry (IJ). This thesis relies on a lot of ground work laid by Michael Collins Piper and Lyndon LaRouche's organization which demonstrated the hands of the Anglo-Semite powers in the assassination of Kennedy. Yet the hand of IJ was against Kennedy even before his presidency.

Some think that Kennedy's murder was predicated upon policy differences between the young president and the Deep State, and at some level that is true. But these differences were simply the fuel for propelling the lower food chain creatures into action. The higher powers were manipulating them into position - ie the Pentagon, CIA, FBI, Cubans, and Kennedy's own staff. The justification, of course, was softness on communism, treason, and other acts which a decade later would be hailed as visionary when conducted by Nixon.

But the reason that we know that the plot to destroy Kennedy was anterior and prior to any policy concerns is because IJ murdered Joseph Kennedy Jr. There was no Kennedy Curse - they suffered slow destruction under the regulation of the very steady hand of quiet conspiracy. The boob is a coincidence theorist - dismissing common, repeated events as happenstance when, as FDR put it, nothing happens by chance.

When we consider the deaths of Joe, Jack, Bobby, and almost Teddy, there is no doubt that they were targets of assassination by a single top group. Even Joe Kennedy, Sr., in our strong opinion, was drugged to have a stroke.

But returning to Roosevelt, a Jewish family hiding behind bland Episcopalism, we have a mass murderer, and a member of the England First crowd as was Clay Shaw whose allegiances were to the British Crown.

FDR murdered thousands at Pearl Harbor, an attack made by Americans against Americans, a practice near and dear to the clandestine cabals haunting America. False flags were tried and true with the USS Maine, Gulf of Tonkin, the World Trade Centers, Pentagon, King David Hotel, and so many other places where IJ operates.

FDR also personally approved or ordered the murder of General Patton. So murder was a companion and friend of Roosevelt. It was thus nothing but a thing for his son Elliot to murder Joe Kennedy, Jr during Operation Athena, a motive for which we will supply shortly.

When the Jewish Lyndon Johnson forced his way onto the Kennedy ticket, the deal for murder was sealed, and it mattered little whether or not Kennedy led troops into combat in Viet Nam. He could have given David Ben-Gurion all of the nuclear warheads and plants he demanded, but Kennedy would still be doomed.

International Jewry has interfered repeatedly in American politics - whether in the form of central banking, murdering presidents such as Lincoln or McKinley, or completely controlling the State Department and Department of Homeland Security - a Soviet name if ever there were one - that it is no stretch of the imagination to see its hand in the murder of yet another president.

So what motivated IJ to murder Kennedy if it were not for contemporary policy differences? Joe Sr committed the unpardonable sin of speaking frankly of Jews and thwarting the start of World War 2 - a massive blood bath necessary for the establishment of the State of Israel, a Rothschild colony for furthering its internationalist ambitions and murders. Israel was the reason Johnson ordered the USS Liberty to the bottom of the Mediterranean.

IJ needed a cause so outrageous that the world would fold as it stole land belonging to Palestinians.

Although my thesis lacks smoking guns - my intellect, intuition, and imagination are too great for such limiting strictures. Nor do legal systems require such stringent proofs. We only need the means and motive to find a murderer. However, I have pointed to those who found the paper trail, and I have assembled the pieces together in the most sensible fashion with the known facts. I know of no exculpatory material for International Jewry in the murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.

How Face Masks Cause Cancer

We have inveighed against the use of face masks as useless, stupid, and criminal, but new calamities caused by masks have crossed our desk, which deserves to be passed to the couple dozens of people who understand our warnings. Everyone else can plaster his face with window caulking to keep the "germs" out.

To recap, we have noted that masks are ineffective and dangerous. Every major health official in 2020 conceded the point, but the World Health Organization still demanded that masks be mandatory because it gave people a sense that they were doing something to help. Of course the only thing that they are helping is their own enslavement. And now you know why Jews consider non-Jews cattle - goy - guys.

We are not trying to use the appeal-to-authority argument, but simply short circuiting the reference to innumerable studies - long before "COVID-2019" - showing that masks have no effectiveness in stopping particles as small as the alleged novel corona virus. We of course have expatiated at length that germ and viral theories upon which corona-scam rests are discredited 19th century hogwash.

As to the harms of masks, we noted that they were well studied by OSHA and other researchers in decades past as being toxic and lethal. Yes, I said lethal. The harms come from asphyxia, hypoxia, and hypercapnia, which cause serious oxygen deficits which lead to blood clots, heart attacks, respiratory disease, asthma, and, yes, death.

We can now add cancer to the diseases caused by masks. Guy Crittenden, former editor of the award winning journal HazMat Management, reported that most masks, especially the ubiquitous blue masks, are treated with Teflon, Ethylene Oxide, or PTFE which are carcinogenic substances.

Crittenden also repeated the point we have made previously that OSHA has adamantly insisted that masks were "never!" designed to be worn for extended periods of times. He also noted that masks also cause wearers to recycle toxins and wastes back into the body, echoing Dr Blaylock's reporting from studies showing that these reentrant toxins can enter the brain, causing even more damage than the initial somatic versions.

For those who contend that physicians wear them all day, Crittenden avers quite the opposite. He states that they are worn for limited time, and that operating rooms are pumped with extra oxygen because, as we have noted above, masks induce oxygenic deficits which are injurious to health. Teachers have been reporting accelerating cases of sickness and injuries due to constant mask wearing.

The evil parents who force their children to wear face masks are contributing to their children's brain and lung damage, to which they are susceptible at such delicate periods in their developments.

Masks were never about health, public or private. Masks are face muzzles for the goy, the cattle, who are so stupid that they deserve the harms of face masks. That is for what stupid people are made.

Reference

Guy Crittenden, Is That Mask Giving You Lung Cancer?, Human News Network, October 21, 2020, accessed( Is Your Mask Giving You Lung Cancer? – Human News Network (neverb4.net), 3/7/2021)

Copyright 2021 Tony Bonn. All rights reserved.